Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 65
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2009
Print publication year:
2003
Online ISBN:
9780511493690
Subjects:
Socio-Legal Studies, Law, Sociology of Science and Medicine, Sociology, Jurisprudence

Book description

This interdisciplinary study explores the relationship between conceptions of nature and (largely American) legal thought and practice. It focuses on the politics and pragmatics of nature talk as expressed in both extra-legal disputes and their transformation and translation into forms of legal discourse (tort, property, contract, administrative law, criminal law and constitutional law). Delaney begins by considering the pragmatics of nature in connection with the very idea of law and the practice of American legal theorization. He then traces a set of specific political-legal disputes and arguments. The set consists of a series of contexts and cases organized around a conventional distinction between 'external' and 'internal nature': forces of nature, endangered species, animal experiments, bestiality, reproductive technologies, genetic screening, biological defenses in criminal cases, and involuntary medication of inmates. He demonstrates throughout that nearly any construal of 'nature' entails an interpretation of what it is to be (distinctively) human.

Reviews

'This is an outstanding book, no doubt the product of a research project of great scope and sustained intellectual inquiry and creativity. With this book, David Delaney makes a significant contribution to the literature on the relationship between law and nature, indeed may even have carved out this area as his own. … eminently readable, he writes beautifully, with a clear purpose (rather than agenda), a light hand and confidence, without cliché, or even predictability.'

Source: Journal of Environmental Law

'This is a big book - it has big aims and a big subject matter. … the book's interdisciplinary orientation means that it will appeal strongly to those working in a myriad of disciplines beyond law …'.

Source: Journal of Environmental Law

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
References
Abbott, Jack Henry, 1982. In the Belly of the Beast. New York
Abramson, Paul, and Steven Pinkerton, 1995. With Pleasure: Thoughts on the Nature of Human Sexuality. Oxford
Adams, Carol, 1995. “Bestiality: The Unmentioned Abuse,” Animal Agenda 15: 29–31
Ajami, Fouad, 1996. “Why Bosnia Needs a Nuremberg,” US News and World Report, 19 February
Alford, C. Fred, 1997. What Evil Means to Us. Ithaca, NY
Allen, Anita, 1990. “Surrogacy, Slavery, and the Ownership of Life,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13 139–149
Andrews, Lori, 1990. “Surrogate Motherhood: The Challenge for Feminists,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 167–182
Andriette, Bill, 1999. “Laying with Beasts,” The Guide, January (www. guidemag.com), 1
Angier, Natalie, 1995. The Beauty of the Beastly: New Views on the Nature of Life. New York
Animal Sexual Abuse Information and Resources (www.asairs.com/zoo summary.htm)
Annas, George, 1990. “Fairy Tales Surrogate Mothers Tell,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 43–58
Aplet, Gregory, 1999. “On the Nature of Wildness: Exploring What Wilderness Protects,” Denver University Law Review 76: 347–367
Appy, Christian, 1993. Working Class War: American Combat Soldiers in Vietnam. Chapel Hill, NC
Arluke, Arnold and Clinton Sanders, 1996. Regarding Animals. Philadelphia
Aronowitz, Stanley, 1988. Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Science. Minneapolis, MN
Baker, C. Edwin, 1986. “Property and its Relation to Constitutionally Protected Liberty,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 134: 741–816
Baker, Lynne Rudder, 1987. Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton, NJ
Baker, Nicola, 1996. “Let's Talk about our Relationships,” New Statesman, 20 September, 12
Barnard, Neal, and Steven, Kaufman, 1997. “Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading,” Scientific American 2: 80–82
Barrett, Robert, 1998. “The ‘Schizophrenic’ and the Liminal Persona in Modern Society,” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 22: 465–494
Barrow, John, 1991. Theories of Everything. Oxford
Bazelon, David, 1969. “Implementing the Right to Treatment,” University of Chicago Law Review 36: 742–754
Becker, Ernst, 1973. The Denial of Death. New York
Berg, Barbara, 1995. “Listening to the Voices of the Infertile,” in Joan Callahan (ed.), Reproduction, Ethics and the Law: Feminist Perspectives. Bloomington IN: 80–108
Berlin, Isaiah, 1965/1999. The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton, NJ
Bierne, Piers, 1997. “Rethinking Bestiality: Towards a Concept of Interspecies Sexual Assault,” Theoretical Criminology 1: 317–340
Binder, Denis, 1996. “Act of God? or Act of Man: A Reappraisal of the Act of God Defense in Tort,” Review of Litigation 15: 1–79
Birch, Thomas, 1990. “The Incarceration of Wildness: Wilderness Areas as Prisons,” Environmental Ethics 12: 3–26
Bitz, D. Michael, and Jean, Bitz, 1999. “Incompetence and the Brain Injured Individual,” St. Thomas Law Review 12: 205–276
Blecker, Robert, 1990. “Haven or Hell: Inside Lorton Central Prison,” Stanford Law Review 42: 1149–1249
Blum, Deborah, 1994. The Monkey Wars. Oxford
Bogert, Laurence, 1994. “That's My Story and I'm Stickin' to it: Is ‘the Best Available’ Science Any Available Science under the Endangered Species Act?Idaho Law Review 31: 85–150
Bookchin, Murray, 1986. The Modern Crisis. Philadelphia
Borges, Ellen, 1995. “A Social Critique of Biological Psychiatry,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 211–240
Boswell, John, 1980. Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality. Chicago
Botting, Jack, and Adrian, Morrison, 1997. “Animal Research is Vital to Medicine,” Scientific American 2: 83–85
Boyle, James, 1991. “Is Subjectivity Possible? The Post-Modern Subject in Legal Theory,” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 489–524
Bransford, Helen, 1995. “Surrogacy: A Mother's Story,” Vogue, July, 134
Brown, Bill, 2001. “Thing Theory,” Critical Inquiry 28: 1–22
Burton, Steven, 1992. Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge
Button, Lori, 1989. “Postpartum Psychosis: The Birth of a New Defense,” Cooley Law Review 6: 323–344
Cahoone, Lawrence, 1988. The Dilemma of Modernity: Philosophy, Culture and Anti-Culture.Albany, NY
Callicott, J. Baird, 1998. “That Good Old-Time Wilderness Religion,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 387–394
Callicott, J. Baird, and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA
Cardozo, Benjamin, 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven
Carhart, Arthur, 1961. Planning for America's Wildlands. Harrisburg, PA
Carney, Robert, and Williams, Brian, 1983. “Note – Criminal Law: Premenstrual Syndrome – a Criminal Defense,” Notre Dame Law Review 59: 253–269
Castree, Noel, and Bruce Braun, 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Malden, MA
Charo, R. Alta, 1994. “And Baby Makes Three – or Four, or Five, or Six: Defining Family after the Genetic Revolution,” in M. Frankel and A. Teich (eds.), The Genetic Frontier: Ethics, Law and Policy. Washington: 25–44
Charo, R. Alta, and Karen Rothenberg, 1994. “‘The Good Mother’: The Limits of Reproductive Accountability and Genetic Choice,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 105–130
Charvet, John, 1999. “Rousseau, the Problem of Sovereignty and the Limits of Political Obligation,” in Christopher Morris (ed.), Social Contract Theorists. Lanham, MD: 205–218
Cheah, Pheng, and Elizabeth Grosz, 1996. “The Body of the Law: Notes toward a Theory of Corporeal Justice,” in David Fraser and Judith Grbich (eds.), Thinking through the Body of the Law. New York: 3–25
Chesler, Phyllis, 1988. The Sacred Bond. New York
Cichon, Dennis, 1992. “The Right to ‘Just Say No’: A History and Analysis of the Right to Refuse Antipsychotic Drugs,” Louisiana Law Review 53: 283–426
Clayton, Ellen, 1994. “What the Law Says about Reproductive Genetic Testing and What it Doesn't,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 131–161
Coffey, Maureen, 1993. “The Genetic Defense: Excuse or Explanation?William and Mary Law Review 35: 353–399
Cohen, Felix, 1935. “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–849
Coke, Edward, 1628/1979. First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. New York
Collingwood, R. G., 1945. The Idea of Nature. Oxford
Colson, Charles, 1993. “Society Must Cultivate Man's Innate Moral Sense,” Insight on the News, 17 November
Cook-Deegan, Robert, 1994. The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. New York
Cooper, David E., 1990. Existentialism. Oxford
Corea, Gena, 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York
Cover, Robert, 1986. “Violence and the Word,” Yale Law Journal 95: 1601–1630
Cronon, William, 1995. “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature,” in Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York: 69–90
Csordas, Thomas, 1994. “Introduction: The Body as Representation and Being-in-the-World,” in Thomas Csordas (ed.), Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: 1–27
Dallmayr, Fred, 1981. Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post-Individualist Theory of Politics. Amherst, MA
Dan-Cohen, Meir, 1992. “Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self,” Harvard Law Review 105: 959–1004
Daston, Lorraine, 1998. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” in Mario Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader. New York: 110–123
Davies, Margaret, 1994. Asking the Law Question. London
Davies, Margaret, 1996. Delimiting the Law: “Postmodernism” and the Politics of Law. London
Davies, Paul, 1998. “What are the Laws of Nature?” in John Brockman (ed.), Doing Science: The Reality Club. New York: 45–72
Dekkers, Midas, 1994. Dearest Pet: On Bestiality. London
Dennett, Daniel, 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Having. Cambridge, MA
Dolgin, Janet, 1993. “Just a Gene: Judicial Assumptions about Parenthood,” UCLA Law Review 40: 637–694
Donovan, Josephine, 1996. “Animal Rights and Feminist Theory,” in Josephine Donovan and Carol Adams (eds.), Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals. New York: 34–59
Douglas, William O., 1965. A Wilderness Bill of Rights. Boston
Doyle, Richard, 1997. On Beyond Living: Rhetorical Transformations of the Life Sciences. Stanford, CA
Dresser, Rebecca, 1991. “Making up our Minds: Can Law Survive Cognitive Science?Criminal Justice Ethics 6: 27–40
Dressler, Joshua, 1998. “Reflections on Excusing Wrongdoers,” Rutgers Law Journal 19: 671–709
Dressler, Joshua, 1994. Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. St. Paul, MN
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, and Nelkin, Dorothy, 1992. “The Jurisprudence of Genetics,” Vanderbilt Law Review 45: 313–348
Duxbury, Neil, 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford
Dyn, Barry, and Michael Glenn, 1993. “Forecast for Couples,” Psychology Today, July
Edmundson, William, 1993. “Transparency and Indeterminacy in the Critique of Critical Legal Studies,” Seton Hall Law Review 24: 557–602
Ehrlich, Paul, 1986. The Machinery of Nature. New York
Elias, Norbert, 1939/1982. The Civilizing Process. Oxford
Elliot, Robert, 1982. “Faking Nature,” Inquiry 25: 81–94
EquAdept, “The Essence of Zoophilia” (http://home.worldonline.dk/horsies)
Eskridge, William, 1999. Gaylaw. Cambridge, MA
Faulstich, Paul, 1994. “The Cultured Wild and the Limits of Wilderness,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild. Washington: 161–174
Feldman, Stephen, 2000. American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism. New York
Fingarette, Herbert, 1972. The Meaning of Criminal Insanity. Berkeley
Flanagan, Dennis, 1988. Flanagan's Version. New York
Floyd, Jami, 1990. “The Administration of Psychotropic Drugs to Prisoners: State of the Law and Beyond,” California Law Review 78: 1243–1285
Foreman, Dave, 1994. “Where Man is a Visitor,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild. Washington: 225–235
Foucault, Michel, 1965. Madness and Civilization. New York
Foucault, Michel, 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York
Francione, Gary, 1995. Animals, Property and the Law. Philadelphia
Foucault, Michel, 1996. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia
Frank, Jerome, 1949. Courts on Trial. Princeton
Franklin, Sarah, 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London
Fraser, Caroline, 1993. “The Raid at Silver Spring,” New Yorker, 19 April, 66
Freud, Sigmund, 1930/1962. Civilization and its Discontents. New York
Freyfogle, Eric, 1994. “The Ethical Strands of Environmental Law,” University of Illinois Law Review 1994: 819–846
Fuller, Steven, 1996. “Does Science Put an End to History, or History to Science? Or, Why Being Pro-Science is Harder than you Think,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 29–60
Fuss, Diana, 1989. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. New York
Garber, Marjorie, 1996. Dog Love. New York
Gelman, Sheldon, 1995. “The Biological Alteration Cases,” William and Mary Law Review 36: 1203–1301
Gelman, Sheldon, 1999. Medicating Schizophrenia. New Brunswick, NJ
George, Robert, 1992. “Natural Law and Human Nature,” in Robert George (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford: 31–41
Gerety, Tom, 1997. “Redefining Privacy,” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 12: 233–296
Gilbert, Walter, 1992. “A Vision of the Grail,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 83–97
Gilman, Owen, 1992. Vietnam and the Southern Imagination. Jackson, MS
Gladwell, Malcolm, 1997. “Damaged,” New Yorker, 24 February, 132
Goldstein, Abraham, 1967. The Insanity Defense. New Haven
Graves-Brown, Paul, 2000. “Introduction,” in Paul Graves-Brown (ed.), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture. London: 1–9
Greenawalt, Kent, 1992. Law and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA
Griffin, David Ray, 1988. “Introduction,” in David Griffin (ed.), The Reenchantment of Science. Albany: 1–46
Gross, Paul, 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. New York
Grosz, Elizabeth, 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, IN
Gruchow, Paul, 1997. The Boundary Waters: The Grace of the Wild. Minneapolis, MN
Guthiel, Thomas, 1980. “In Search of True Freedom: Drug Refusal, Involuntary Medication, and ‘Rotting with your Rights on’,” American Journal of Psychiatry 137: 327–328
Guthiel, T., and Appelbaum, P., 1983. “‘Mind Control’, ‘Synthetic Sanity’, ‘Artificial Competence’ and General Confusion: Legally Relevant Effects of Antipsychotic Medication,” Hofstra Law Review 12: 77–120
Hacking, Ian, 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA
Halewood, Peter, 1996. “Law's Bodies: Disembodiment and the Structure of Liberal Property Rights,” Iowa Law Review 81: 1331–1393
Ham, Jennifer, and Mathew Senior (eds.), 1997. Animal Acts: Configuring the Human in Western History. London
Hanson, F. Allan, 1996. “Suits for Wrongful Life, Counterfactuals and the Nonexistence Problem,” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 5: 1–24
Haraway, Donna, 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York
Harding, Sandra, 1996. “Science is ‘Good to Think with’,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 16–28
Hart, H. L. A., 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Cambridge, MA
Hayles, N. Katherine, 1996. “Consolidating the Canon,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 226–237
Healy, David, 2002. The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge, MA
Hearne, Vicki, 1986. Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York
Hegert, James, 1990. American Jurisprudence 1870–1970. Houston
Heller, Agnes, 1988. General Ethics. Oxford
Henifin, Mary Sue, Ruth Hubbard, and Judy Norsigian, 1989. “Prenatal Screening,” in Sherrill Cohen and Nadine Taub (eds.), Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Clifton, NJ: 155–183
Hill, John Lawrence, 1997. “Law and the Concept of the Core Self: Toward a Reconciliation of Naturalism and Humanism,” Marquette Law Review 80: 289–390
Hobbes, Thomas, 1650/1994. The Elements of Law. Oxford
Hill, John Lawrence, 1651/1994. Leviathan. Indianapolis
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 1881. The Common Law. Boston
Horan, Susan, 1992. “The XYY Supermale and the Criminal Justice System: A Square Peg in a Round Hole,” Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 25: 1343–1376
Horgan, John, 1999. The Undiscovered Mind: How the Human Brain Defies Replication, Medication and Explanation. New York
Hosp, Christina, 1991. “Has the PMS Defense Gained a Legitimate Foothold in Virginia Criminal Law?George Mason Law Review 14: 427–446
Houck, Oliver, 1995. “Reflections on the Endangered Species Act,” Environmental Law 25: 689–702
Hubbard, Ruth, and Elijah Wald, 1993. Exploding the Gene Myth. Boston
Hyde, Alan, 1997. Bodies of Law. Princeton
Jeffery, C. Ray, 1992. “The Brain, the Law and the Medicalization of Crime,” in Roger Masters and Michael McGuire (eds.), The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law.Carbondale, IL: 161–178
Johnston, David, 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton
Jordan, Mark, 1997. The Invention of Sodomy in Christian Theology. Chicago
Julien, Robert, 1996. A Primer of Drug Action: A Concise, Nontechnical Guide to the Actions, Uses and Side Effects of Pyschoactive Drugs, 8th ed. New York
Kadish, Sanford, 1987. “Excusing Crime,” California Law Review 75: 257–290
Kay, Lily, 2000. “The Book of Life? How a Genetic Code Became a Language,” in Phillip Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies. Notre Dame, IN: 99–124
Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1992. “Nature, Nurture and the Human Genome Project,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 281–299
Keller, Evelyn Fox, 1995. Refiguring Life. New York
Kelley, Donald, 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA
Kelsen, Hans, 1945. General Theory of Law and the State. Cambridge, MA
Kennedy, J. S., 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge
Kennedy, Walter, 1941. “My Philosophy of Law,” in My Philosophy of Law: Credos of 16 American Legal Scholars. Boston: 147–160
Kevles, Daniel, 1992. “Out of Eugenics: The Historical Politics of the Human Genome,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 3–36
Kevles, Daniel, and Leroy Hood (eds.), 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA
Kilbourne, James, 1991. “The Endangered Species Act under the Microscope: A Closeup Look from a Litigator's Perspective,” Environmental Law 21: 499–585
King, Martin Luther Jr., 1963. Letter from the Birmingham City Jail. Philadelphia
Kirmayer, Laurence, 1992. “The Body's Insistence on Meaning: Metaphor as Presentation and Representation in Illness Experience,” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 6: 323–346
Kirwin, Barbara, 1997. The Mad, The Bad and the Innocent: The Criminal Mind on Trial. Boston
Kitcher, Philip, 2000. “Utopian Genetics and Social Inequality,” in Phillip Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies. Notre Dame, IN: 229–264
Klaver, Irene, 1995. “Silent Wolves: The Howl of the Implicit,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 117–132
Klein, Richard, 1995. “The Power of Pets,” New Republic, 10 July, 18–23
Klinenberg, Eric, 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago
Krafft-Ebing, Richard von, 1924. Psychopathia Sexualis. New York
Kuhn, Thomas, 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago
Lakoff, George, 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind.Chicago
Langdell, Christopher, 1879. Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2nd ed. Boston
Latour, Bruno, 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar, 1986. Laboratory Life. Princeton
Law, John, 1994. Organizing Modernity. Oxford
Law, John, and Mol, Annemarie, 1995. “Notes on Materiality and Sociality,” Sociological Review 43: 274–294
Laycock, Steven, 1999. “The Animal as Animal: A Plea for Open Conceptuality,” in H. Peter Steeves (ed.), Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology and Animal Life. Albany: 271–284
Leder, Drew, 1990. The Absent Body. Chicago
Leiss, William, 1972. The Domination of Nature. New York
Lelling, Andrew, 1993. “Eliminative Materialism, Neuroscience and the Criminal Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141: 1471–1564
Lessnoff, Michael, 1986. Social Contract. Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, 1985. The View from Afar. New York
Lewis, Dorothy, 1998. Guilty by Reason of Insanity. New York
Libby, Ronald, 1998. Eco-Wars: Political Campaigns and Social Movements. New York
Lieberman, Jethro, 1999. A Practical Companion to the Constitution. Berkeley
Light, Andrew, 1995. “Urban Wilderness,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 195–212
Lightman, Alan, 1996. Dance for Two. New York
Liliequist, Jonas, 1992. “Peasants Against Nature: Crossing the Boundaries between Man and Animals in 17th and 18th Century Sweden,” in John Fout (ed.), Forbidden History. Chicago: 57–88
Lindberg, David, 1992. The Beginnings of Western Science. Oxford
Linzey, Andrew, 2000. “On Zoophilia,” Animal Agenda 20: 29
Lippman, Abby, 1991. “Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequalities,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 17: 15–49
Lippman, Abby, 1994. “The Genetic Construction of Prenatal Testing: Choice, Consent or Conformity for Women,” in Karen Rothenberg and E. Thomson (eds.), Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Technology. Columbus, OH: 9–34
Llewellyn, Karl, 1931. “Some Realism about Realism – Responding to Dean Pound,” Harvard Law Review 44: 1222–1256
Llewellyn, Karl, 1960. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston
Lock, Margaret, 1993. “Cultivating the Body: Anthropology and Epistemologies of Bodily Practice and Knowledge,” Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 133–155
Locke, John, 1690/1980. Second Treatise on Government. Indianapolis
McKibben, Bill, 1989. The End of Nature. New York
Macklin, Ruth, 1990. “Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An Ethical Analysis,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 136–150
McPhee, John, 1989. The Control of Nature. New York
Mahoney, Joan, 1990. “An Essay on Surrogacy and Feminist Thought,” in Larry Gostin (ed.), Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy. Bloomington, IN: 181–197
Mann, Charles, and Mark Plummer, 1995. Noah's Choice: The Future of Endangered Species. New York
Mann, Joe, 1999. “Making Sense of the Endangered Species Act: A Human Centered Justification,” New York University Environmental Law Journal 7: 246–304
Mannix, Brian, 1992. “The Endangered Species Act and the Descent of Man (with apologies to Mr. Darwin),” The American Enterprise, 12 November, 56–63
Marcuse, Herbert, 1966. Eros and Civilization. Boston
Marks, Jonathan, 2002. What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee. Berkeley
Martin, Emily, 1987. The Women in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston
Masson, Jeffery Moussaieff, 1995. When Elephants Weep: The Emotional Lives of Animals. New York
Masson, Jeffery Moussaieff, 1997. Dogs Never Lie about Love: Reflections on the Emotional World of Dogs. New York
Mathews, Mark, 1994. The Horseman: Obsessions of a Zoophile. Amherst, NY
Mead, Margaret, 1983. Foreword, in Thomas Rhys Williams, Socialization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: v–viii
Mele, Alfred, 1995. Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy. New York
Merchant, Caroline, 1989. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco
Meyer, Linda Ross, 1998. “Is Practical Reason Mindless?Georgetown Law Journal 86: 647–675
Meyer, Michel, 2000. Philosophy and the Passions: Toward a History of Human Nature. University Park, PA
Midgley, Mary, 1978. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. Ithaca, NY
Midgley, Mary, 1984. Animals and Why They Matter. Athens, GA
Mill, John Stuart, 1874/1923. Nature, the Utility of Religion and Theism. London
Miller, William, 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, MA
Modrow, John, 1992. How to Become a Schizophrenic: The Case against Biological Psychiatry. Everett, WA
Money, John, 1986. Lovemaps. Buffalo
Moore, Michael, 1985. “Causation and the Excuses,” California Law Review 73: 1091–1148
Moran, Leslie, 1996. The Homosexual(ity) of Law. London
Morriss, Peter, 1997. “Blurred Boundaries,” Inquiry 40: 259–290
Morse, Stephen, 1994. “Culpability and Control,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142: 1587–1660
Morse, Stephen, 1996. “Brain and Blame,” Georgetown Law Review 84: 527–549
Morse, Stephen, 1999. “Crazy Reasons,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 10: 189–226
Murphy, Lawrence, 1990. “Defining the Crime against Nature: Sodomy in the United States Appeals Courts, 1810–1940,” Journal of Homosexuality 19: 49–66
Nash, Roderick, 1982. Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven
Nash, Roderick, 1989. The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. Madison, WI
Nedelsky, Jennifer, 1990. “Law, Boundaries and the Bounded Self,” Representations 30: 162–189
Nelkin, Dorothy, 1992. “The Social Power of Genetic Information,” in Daniel Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds.), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA: 177–190
Nelkin, Dorothy, 1996. “The Science Wars: Responses to a Failed Marriage,” in Andrew Ross (ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: 114–122
Nelkin, Dorothy, and M. Susan Lindee, 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York
Nelkin, Dorothy, and Laurence Tancredi, 1989. Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information. New York
Nelson, Michael P., 1998. “An Amalgamation of Wilderness Preservation Arguments,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 154–198
Neu, Jerome, 2000. A Tear is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotions. New York
Noske, Barbara, 1997. Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Montreal
Nussbaum, Martha, 1999. “‘Secret Sewers of Vice’: Disgust, Bodies and the Law,” in Susan Bandes (ed.), The Passions of Law. New York: 19–62
Oelschlaeger, Max, 1991. The Idea of Wilderness from Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven
Nussbaum, Martha, 1992. “Wilderness, Civilization and Language,” in Max Oelschlaeger (ed.), The Wilderness Condition: Essays in Environment and Civilization. San Francisco: 271–308
O'Neill, John, 1985. Five Bodies: The Human Shape of Modern Society. Ithaca, NY
Opton, Gary, 1974. “Psychiatric Violence against Prisoners: When Therapy is Punishment,” Mississippi Law Review 45: 605–644
Overall, Christine, 1987. Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Boston
Pam, Alvin, 1995. “Introduction,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 1–6
Paul, Diane, 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Peller, Gary, 1985. “The Metaphysics of American Law,” California Law Review 73: 1151–1290
Perlin, Michael, 1994. The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense. Durham, NC
Perrine, Daniel, 1996. The Chemistry of Mind-Altering Drugs. Washington
Pfeffer, Naomi, 1987. “Artificial Insemination, In-Vitro Fertilization and the Stigma of Infertility,” in Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis: 81–97
Posner, Richard, and K. Silbaugh, 1994. A Guide to America's Sex Laws. Chicago
Pound, Roscoe, 1908. “Mechanical Jurisprudence,” Columbia Law Review 8: 605–623
Pound, Roscoe, 1931. “A Call for a Realist Jurisprudence,” Harvard Law Review 44: 697–711
Powell, John, 1997. “The Multiple Self: Exploring between and beyond Modernity and Postmodernity,” Minnesota Law Review 81: 1481–1520
Price-Huish, Cecilee, 1997. “‘Born to Kill?’ Aggression Genes and their Potential Impact on Sentencing and the Criminal Justice System,” Southern Methodist University Law Review 50: 603–626
Rapp, Rayna, 1988. “The Power of ‘Positive’ Diagnosis: Medical and Maternal Discourses on Amniocentesis,” in Karen Michaelson (ed.), Childbirth in America. South Hadley, MA: 103–116
Redding, Richard, 1999. “Reconstructing Science through Law,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 23: 585–610
Regan, Pamela, and Ellen Berscheid, 1999. Lust: What We Know about Human Desire. Thousand Oaks, CA
Reider, Laura, 1998. “Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience into Moral and Legal Theories,” UCLA Law Review 46: 289–340
Ricklefs, Robert, 1973. Ecology. Newton, MA
Robinson, Daniel, 1996. Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge, MA
Rojek, Chris, 1993. Ways of Escape: Modern Transformations in Leisure and Travel. London
Rosen, Jeffery, 1994. “Hugo Black: A Biography,” New Republic, 5 December, 110
Rosenfeld, Michel, 1992. “Deconstruction and Legal Interpretation: Conflict, Indeterminacy and the Temptations of the New Legal Formalism,” in Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: 152–210
Ross, Andrew (ed.), 1996. Science Wars. Durham, NC
Ross, Colin, 1995. “Errors in Logic in Biological Psychiatry,” in Colin Ross and Alvin Pam (eds.), Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York: 85–128
Ross, Colin, and Alvin Pam (eds.), 1995. Pseudoscience in Biological Psychiatry: Blaming the Body. New York
Roth, Martha, 1998. Arousal: Bodies and Pleasures. Minneapolis
Rothenberg, David, 1995a. “Introduction: Wildness Untamed: The Evolution of an Ideal,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: xiii–xxvii
Rothenberg, David, 1995b. “Epilogue: Paradox Wild,” in David Rothenberg (ed.), Wild Ideas. Minneapolis: 213–218
Rouse, Joseph, 1996. Engaging Science: How to Understand its Practices Philosophically. Ithaca, NY
Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 1755/1983. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Indianapolis
Rousseau, Jean Jacques, 1762/1963. Emile. London
Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and Clark McCauly, 2000. “Disgust,” in Michael Lewis and Jeanette Haviland-Jones (eds.), The Handbook of Emotions. New York: 637–653
Sandelowski, Margarete, andLinda, Corson Jones, 1996. “‘Healing Fictions’: Stories of Choosing in the Aftermath of the Detection of Fetal Anomalies,” Social Science and Medicine 42: 353–361
Santoni, Ronald, 1993. “On the Existential Meaning of Violence,” Dialogue and Humanism 4: 139–151
Sarat, Austin, 1990. “‘ … The Law is All Over’: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2: 343–379
Sarat, Austin, (ed.), 2001. Pain, Death and the Law. Ann Arbor
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas Kearns (eds.), Law's Violence. Ann Arbor
Scarry, Elaine, 1992. “The Declaration of War: Constitutional and Unconstitutional Violence,” in Austin Sarat and Thomas Kearns (eds.), Law's Violence. Ann Arbor: 23–76
Schlag, Pierre, 1991. “The Problem of the Subject,” Texas Law Review 69: 1627–1743
Schott, Robin May, 1993. “Resurrecting Embodiment,” in Louise Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder: 171–185
Schultz, Marjorie, 1990. “Reproductive Technology and Intention-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality,” Wisconsin Law Review 1990: 297–398
Schwenger, Peter, 2001. “Words and the Murder of the Thing,” Critical Inquiry 28: 99–113
Scruton, Roger, 1986. Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic. New York
Scull, Andrew, 1981. “Moral Treatment Reconsidered: Some Sociological Comments on an Episode in the History of British Psychiatry,” in Andrew Scull (ed.), Madhouses, Mad-Doctors and Madmen. Philadelphia
Shacochis, Bob, 1996. “Missing Children,” Harpers, October, 55–61
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, 1993. “Surrogate Mothers and Women's Freedom: A Critique of Contracts for Human Reproduction,” Signs 18: 618–639
Shapiro, Michael, 1992. “Law, Culpability and the Neural Sciences,” in Roger Masters and Michael McGuire (eds.), The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior and the Law. Carbondale, IL: 179–202
Shorter, Edward, 1997. A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac. New York
Simpson, Lorenzo, 1995. Technology, Time and the Conversations of Modernity. London
Skinner, B. F., 1974. About Behaviorism. New York
Sokal, Alan, and Jean Bricmont, 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York
Solomon, Lee, 1995. “Premenstrual Syndrome: The Debate Surrounding Criminal Defense,” Maryland Law Review 54: 571–600
Solomon, Robert, 1993. The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis
Soper, Kate, 1995. What is Nature? Oxford
Soule, Michael, and Gary Lease (eds.), Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. Washington
Stanworth, Michelle, 1987. “Reproductive Technologies and the Destruction of Motherhood,” in Michelle Stanworth (ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis: 1–9
Steeves, H. Peter, 1999. “They Say Animals Can Smell Fear,” in H. Peter Steeves (ed.), Animal Others: On Ethics, Ontology and Animal Life. Albany: 133–178
Stich, Stephen, 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief. Cambridge, MA
Strathern, Marilyn, 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. London
Stumpf, Andrea, 1986. “Redefining Motherhood: A Legal Matrix for New Reproductive Technologies,” Yale Law Journal 96: 187–208
Suggs, Ike, 1993. “Caught in the Act: Evaluating the Endangered Species Act, its Effect on Man and the Prospects for Reform,” Cumberland Law Review 24: 1–78
Sullum, Jacob, 2000. “Curing the Therapeutic State: Thomas Szasz on the Medicalization of American Life” (www.reason.com)
Szasz, Thomas, 1990. The Untamed Tongue: A Dissenting Dictionary. La Salle, IL
Talbot, Carl, 1998. “The Wilderness Narrative and the Cultural Logic of Capitalism,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 325–333
Terborgh, John, 1999. Requiem for Nature. Washington
Thomas, Keith, 1983. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800. London
Torrey, E. Fuller, 1992. A Freudian Freud. New York
Tribe, Lawrence, 1988. American Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. Mineola, NY
Turiel, Elliot, 1983. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge
Turner, Bryan, 1984. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford
Turner, Jack, 1994. “The Quality of Wildness: Preservation, Control and Freedom,” in David Burks (ed.), The Place of the Wild. Washington: 175–189
Turner, Jack, 1996. The Abstract Wild. Tucson
Tushnet, Mark, 1996. “Defending the Indeterminacy Thesis,” Quinnipiac Law Review 16: 339–356
Ulrich, Roger, 1993. “Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural Landscapes,” in Stephen Kellert and E. O. Wilson (eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: 73–137
Unger, Roberto, 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA
Walker, Mark Thomas, 1996. “The Voluntariness of Judgment,” Inquiry 39: 97–119
Waller, Donald, 1998. “Getting Back to the Right Nature: A Reply to Cronon's ‘The Trouble with Wilderness’,” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 540–567
Weinreb, Lloyd, 1987. Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge, MA
Wicke, Jennifer, 1991. “Postmodern Identity and the Legal Subject,” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 455–473
Wigmore, John Henry, 1914. “The Terminology of Legal Science with a Plea for the Science of Nomothetics,” Harvard Law Review 28: 1–9
Wigmore, John Henry, 1917. “The Problems of Law's Evolution,” Virginia Law Review 4: 247–272
Wigmore, John Henry, 1919. “Problems of Law's Evolution,” Virginia Law Review 4: 1–9
Williams, Karen, 1998. “The Gift that Made me a Mother,” Good Housekeeping, April, 89
Wilson, Edward, O., 1975. Sociobiology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA
Wilson, Edward, O., 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA
Winick, Bruce, 1997. The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment. Washington
Winston, Mark, 1997. Nature Wars. Cambridge, MA
Wolch, Jennifer, and Jody Emel, 1998. “Witnessing the Animal Moment,” in Jennifer Wolch and Jody Emel (eds.), Animal Geographies: Place, Politics and Identity in the Nature–Culture Borderlands. London: 1–25
Wolfe, Alan, 1992. “Algorithmic Justice,” in Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfeld, and David Gray (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: 361–386
Wolin, Sheldon, 1960. Politics and Vision. Boston
Wolpert, Lewis, and Alison Richard, 1997. The Passionate Mind: The Inner World of Scientists. Oxford
Woods, Mark, 1998. “Federal Wilderness Preservation in the United States: The Preservation of Wilderness?” in J. Baird Callicott and Michael Nelson (eds.), The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: 131–153
Yagerman, Katherine, 1990. “Protecting Critical Habitat under the Federal Endangered Species Act,” Environmental Law 20: 811–856
Yanagisako, Sylvia, and Carol Delaney, 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. London
Young, Iris, 1990. “Pregnant Embodiment: Subjectivity and Alienation,” in Iris Young, Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington, IN: 160–177
Zachary, G. Pascal, 1999. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge, MA
Zapf, Christian, and Moglen, Eben, 1996. “Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of Law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein,” Georgetown Law Review 84: 485–520

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.