Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:05:00.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The Spread of Pama-Nyungan in Australia

from Part IV - New Guinea and Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2020

By
Patrick McConvell
Edited by
Tom Güldemann ,
Patrick McConvell  and
Richard A. Rhodes
Tom Güldemann
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Patrick McConvell
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Richard A. Rhodes
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

In contrast to all the other continents discussed in this volume, Australia’s hunter-gatherers did not share, or contend for, the land with indigenous cultivators or pastoralists. The foraging economy reigned exclusively throughout the history of human habitation until the catastrophic events of conquest and settlement by the British caused its collapse within the last 200 years. Certainly there were differences between the way the indigenous people of Australia gained a living from the land in different regions, from more to less mobile, which will enter the picture as we focus our discussion here.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Language of Hunter-Gatherers , pp. 422 - 462
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpher, Barry. (1982). Dalabon dual-subject prefixes, kinship categories and generation skewing. In Heath, J., Merlan, F. and Rumsey, A. (eds.), Languages of kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Sydney: Oceania Linguistic Monographs 24, 19–30.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry. (1990). Some Proto-Pama-Nyungan paradigms: A verb in the hand is worth two in the phylum. In O’Grady, G. N. and Tryon, D. (eds.), Studies in comparative Pama-Nyungan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-111, 155–171.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry. (2004). Pama-Nyungan: Phonological reconstruction and status as a phylogenetic group. In Bowern, C. and Koch, H. (eds.), Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry and Nash, David (1999). Lexical replacement and cognate equilibrium in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics (AJL) 19(1): 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpher, Barry, O’Grady, Geoffrey and Bowern, Claire. (2008). Western Torres Strait language classification and development. In Bowern, Claire, Evans, Bethwyn and Miceli, Luisa (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch.Amsterdam; John Benjamins, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. (1990). Classification of Lake Eyre languages. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 171–201.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter. (1992). A Dictionary of Yinggarda. Bundoora: La Trobe University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Australia and Pacific Science Foundation. (2012). The distribution, abundance and diversity of the Lapita Cultural Complex along the Great Barrier Reef coastline in the third millennium BP. www.apscience.org.au/projects/APSF_09_9/apsf_09_9.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. (2013). First migrants: Ancient migration in global perspective. Chichester: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter and Renfrew, Colin. (2002). Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75(1): 214–242.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, B. J. (1988). Redefining Pama-Nyungan: Towards the prehistory of Australian languages. In Evans, N. and Johnson, S. (eds.), Aboriginal linguistics. Armidale: Department of Linguistics, University of New England, 1–90.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. (1990). Language and culture history. Asian Perspectives 27(2): 205–227.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. (2001). Karnic classification revisited. In Simpson, Jane, Nash, David, Laughren, Mary, Austin, Peter and Alpher, Barry (eds.), Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 245–261.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. (2007). On eels, dolphins, and echidnas: Nyulnyulan prehistory through the reconstruction of flora and fauna. In Nussbaum, Alan (ed.), Verba Docenti: Studies in historical and Indo-European linguistics, presented to Jay H. Jasanoff by students, colleagues, and friends. Ann Arbor, MI: Beech Stave Press, 39–53.Google Scholar
Breen, Gavan. (1993). East is south and west is north. Australian Aboriginal Studies no. 2: 20–33.Google Scholar
Bulith, Heather C. (2003). The archaeology and socioeconomy of the Gunditjmara: A landscape analysis from southwest Victoria, Australia. Australian Archaeology 56: 57.Google Scholar
Clendon, Mark. (2006). Reassessing Australia’s linguistic prehistory. Current Anthropology 47(1): 39–61.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry and Dixon, R. M. W.. (1981). Tasmanian. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barr (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press,392–421.Google Scholar
Denham, Tim, Donohue, Mark and Booth, Sara. (2009). Horticultural experimentation in Northern Australia reconsidered. Antiquity 83(321): 634–648.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. (1997). The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. (2002). Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dousset, Laurent. (2012). “Horizontal” and “vertical” skewing: Similar objectives, two solutions? In Trautmann, Thomas R. and Whiteley, Peter M. (eds.), Crow-Omaha: New light on a classic problem of kinship analysis. Tucson: Arizona University Press, 261–277.Google Scholar
Dyen, Isidore and Aberle, David. (1974). Lexical reconstruction: The case of the proto-Athapaskan kinship system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, A. P. (1964). The Australian Aborigines: How to understand them. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Elkin, A. P. (1970). The Aborigines of Australia: ‘One in thought, word and deed’. In Wurm, S. and Laycock, D. (eds.), Pacific linguistic studies in honour of Arthur Capell. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-13, 697–716.Google Scholar
Evans, N., ed. (2003). The Non-Pama-Nyungan languages of Northern Australia: Comparative studies of the continent’s most linguistically complex region. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and McConvell, Patrick. (1998). The enigma of Pama–Nyungan expansion in Australia. In Blench, Roger and Spriggs, Matthew (eds.), Archaeology and language, Vol. 2. London: Routledge, 174–191.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Wilkins, David. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546–592.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Wilkins, David. (2001). The complete person: Networking the physical and the social. In Simpson, Jane, Nash, David, Laughren, Mary, et al. (eds.), Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 512, 493–521.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1971). The Indo-Pacific hypothesis. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 8: Linguistics in Oceania. The Hague: Mouton, 808–71. (Reprinted in Greenberg, Genetic Linguistics, 2005, 193–275.)Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark. (2009). The genetic status of Garrwan. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29(2): 195–244.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. (1957). The semantics of Icelandic orientation. Word 13(3): 447–459.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. (1978). Linguistic diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: AIAS.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. (1981). A case of intensive lexical diffusion: Arnhem Land, Australia. Language 57: 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, Peter. (2002). Pattern and context in the Holocene proliferation of backed artifacts in Australia. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 12(1): 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, John W. (1998). Developmental processes in the pre-contact history of Athapaskan, Algonquian, and Numic Kin systems. In Godelier, Maurice, Trautmann, Thomas R. and Fat, Franklin Tjon Sie (eds.), Transformations of Kinship, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 94–139.Google Scholar
Jones, Rhys. (1969). Fire-stick farming. Australian Natural History 16: 224.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (1996). Backtracking to Babel: The chronology of Pama-Nyungan expansion in Australia. Archaeology in Oceania 31: 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (1997a). The semantic shift between “fish” and “meat” and the prehistory of Pama-Nyungan. In Walsh, M. and Tryon, D. (eds.), Boundary rider: Essays in honour of G. N. O’Grady. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 303–325.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (1997b). Long lost relations: Pama-Nyungan and Northern kinship. In McConvell, Patrick and Evans, Nicholas (eds.), Archaeology and linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in global perspective. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 207–236.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2008). Grandaddy morphs: The importance of suffixes in reconstructing Pama-Nyungan kinship. In Evans, B. and Bowern, C. (eds.), Morphology and language history: In honour of Harold Koch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2009). Loanwords in Gurindji, a Pama-Nyungan language of Australia. Chapter and database in Haspelmath, M. and Tadmor, U. (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 790–822.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2010). The archaeolinguistics of migration. In Lucassen, L., Lucassen, J. and Manning, P. (eds.), Migration history in world history: Multidisciplinary approaches. Leiden: Brill, 155–190.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2012). Omaha skewing in Australia: Overlays, dynamism and change. In Trautmann, T. and Whiteley, P. (eds.), Crow-Omaha: New light on a classic problem of kinship analysis. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 243–260.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2013a). Introduction: Kinship change in anthropology and linguistics. In McConvell, P., Keen, I. and Hendery, R. (eds.), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2013b). Proto-Pama-Nyungan kinship and the AustKin Project: Reconstructing proto-terms for “mother’s father” and their transformations. In McConvell, P., Keen, I. and Hendery, R. (eds.), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 190–214.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2013c). Granny got cross: Semantic change of kami in Pama-Nyungan from ‘mother’s mother’ to ‘father’s mother’. In Mailhammer, R. (ed.), Beyond word histories: Lexical and structural etymology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 147–184.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. (2015). Long-distance diffusion of affinal kinship terms as evidence of late Holocene change in marriage systems in Aboriginal Australia. In Toner, P. (ed.), Strings of connectedness. Canberra: ANU Press, 287–316.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Alpher, Barry. (2002). The Omaha Trail in Australia: Tracking skewing from east to west. In McConvell, P., Dousset, L. and Powell, F. (eds.), special number of Anthropological Forum (2002) on ‘Kinship Change’. 12(2): 159–176.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Bowern, Claire. (2011). The prehistory and internal relationships of Australian languages. Languages and Linguistics Compass 5(1): 19–32.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Evans, Nicholas (eds.). (1997). Archaeology and linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in global perspective. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Keen, Ian. (2011). The transition from Kariera to an asymmetrical system: Cape York Peninsula to North-east Arnhem Land. In Jones, Doug and Milicic, Bojka (eds.), Kinship, language and prehistory: Per Hage and the Renaissance in kinship studies. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 99–132.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Laughren, Mary. (2004). Ngumpin-Yapa languages. In Koch, H. and Bowern, C. (eds.), Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 151–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Smith, Mike. (2003). Millers and mullers: The archaeolinguistic stratigraphy of seed-grinding in Central Australia. In Andersen, H. (ed.), Language contacts in prehistory: Studies in stratigraphy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–200.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick and Spronck, Stef. (2011). Meaning change in the flora, fauna, artefact and social domains in the prehistory of the Kimberley region, Western Australia. Paper presented to Australian Linguistic Society conference, Canberra.Google Scholar
Mooney, S. D., Harrison, S. P., Bartlein, P., et al. (2011). Late Quaternary fire regimes of Australasia. Quaternary Science Reviews 30: 28–46.Google Scholar
Murdock, George P. (1970). Kin term patterns and their distribution. Ethnology 9(2): 165–207.Google Scholar
O’Grady, G. N. and Fitzgerald, S.. (1995). Triconsonantla sequences in proto-Pama-Nyungan. Oceanic Linguistics 34: 454–471.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (2009). Greenberg’s Indo-Pacific hypothesis: An assessment. In Evans, Bethwyn (ed.), Discovering history through language: Papers in honour of Malcolm Ross. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 153–180.Google Scholar
Plomley, N. J. B. (1976). A word-list of the Tasmanian Aboriginal languages. Launceston, Tas: N. J. B. Plomley in association with the Government of Tasmania.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1931). The social organisation of Australian tribes. Sydney: Oceania Monograph 1.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Harold. (1978). Australian kin classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Warren. (1977). Structure, variation and change in “Balamumu” social classification. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Tindale, Norman. (1974). Aboriginal tribes of Australia: Their terrain, environmental controls, distribution, limits, and proper names. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Dasher, Richard. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Neville. (1997). Genes, languages and landscapes Australia. In McConvell, Patrick and Evans, Nicholas (eds.), (1997). Archaeology and linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in global perspective. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 45–82.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren. (2015). Neolithic linguistics. In Barjamovic, Gojko, Elmerot, Irene, Hyllested, Adam, Nielsen, Benedicte and Skaarup, Bjørn Okholm (eds.), Language and prehistory of the Indo-European peoples: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. (1996). Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In Durie, Mark, and Ross, Malcolm (eds.), The comparative method reviewed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 264–304.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×