Aarsleff, Hans. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Adair, James M. 1775. The history of the American Indians. London: Edward and Charles Dilley.Google Scholar

Adams, Frederick, and Aizawa, Kenneth. 2008. The bounds of cognition. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Adams, Frederick, and Aizawa, Kenneth. 2009. ‘Why the mind is still in the head’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, 78–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2003. ‘The social life of cultural value’, Language and Communication 23/3–4: 231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Stephen G. 1999. Darwinism and the linguistic image: Language, race, and natural theology in the nineteenth century. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Stephen G. 2005. William Dwight Whitney and the science of language. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Amir, Yehoshua. 1983. Die hellenistische Gestalt des Judentums bei Philon von Alexandrien. Neukirchen: Vluyn.Google Scholar

Amsler, Mark. 1989. Etymology and grammatical discourse in late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsler, Mark. 2011. Affective literacies: Writing and multilingualism in the Late Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. 2nd edn. London and New York: Verso. (1st edn, 1983.)Google Scholar

Angell, James Rowland. 1907. ‘The province of functional psychology’, Psychological Review 14: 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anonymous. 1871, Rev. of Rudolf Westphal, Methodische Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, North American Review 112/231 (April): 441–55.Google Scholar

Aquinas, St Thomas. 1889. ‘Pars prima Summae Theologiae, a quaestione L ad quaestionem CXIX’, in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis doctoris angelici opera omnia, iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P.M. edita, Vol. V. Rome: Ex typographia polyglotta, S. C. de Propaganda Fide.Google Scholar

Aquinas, St Thomas. 1953. Super epistolas S. Pauli lectura, ed. Cai, P. Raphaelis, OP. 2 vols. Turin and Rome: Marietti.Google Scholar

Arens, Hans. 1980. ‘“Verbum cordis”: zur Sprachphilosophie des Mittelalters’, Historiographia Linguistica 7: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arens, Hans. 1984. Aristotle's theory of language and its tradition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustine, St, Bishop of Hippo. 1863. ‘Sermo CCLXXXVIII (alias 23 inter Sirmondianos) in Natali Joannis Baptistae’, in Migne, J.-P. (ed.), Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera omnia, Vol. V, 1302–8. (Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. 38.) Paris: J.-P. Migne.Google Scholar

Augustine, StBishop of Hippo. 1877. Principia dialecticae, in Migne, J.-P. (ed.), Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera omnia, Vol. I, 1409–20. (Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. 32.) Paris: Garnier fratres.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. 2010. Augustine and the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Roger. 1940. Summa grammatica magistri Rogeri Bacon necnon Sumule dialectices magistri Rogeri Bacon, ed. by Steele, Robert. Oxford: Clarendon Press; London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar

Baeck, Leo. 1905. Das Wesen des Judentums. Berlin: Nathansen und Lamm. English trans., The Essence of Judaism, New York, 1936.Google Scholar

Bailey, Cyril (ed. and trans.). 1926. Epicurus: The extant remains. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bain, Alexander. 1855. The senses and the intellect. London: John W. Parker and Son.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, Alexander. 1859. The emotions and the will. London: John W. Parker and Son.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, Alexander. 1875. Mind and body: The theories of their relation. New York: D. C. Appleton and Co. (Orig. publ. 1872.)Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon, and Morris, Katherine J.. 1996. Descartes’ dualism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robertson, Dan and Sorace, Antonella. 1996. ‘Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability’, Language 72/1: 32–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1971/2. ‘Aristotle's concept of mind’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society N.S. 72: 101–14.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1982. The Presocratic philosophers, rev. edn., 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Barron, Robert. 2004. Bridging the great divide: Musings of a post-liberal, post-conservative evangelical Catholic. Lanham, Md. and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Beardslee, John Walter, Jr. 1918. The use of ΦΥΣΙΣ in fifth-century Greek literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Benton, Arthur L. 1965. ‘Johann A. P. Gesner on aphasia’, Medical History 1: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, Arthur L., and Joynt, Robert J.. 1960. ‘Early descriptions of aphasia’, Archives of Neurology 3: 205–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bergounioux, Gabriel. 2010. ‘Les trois sources de la théorie de l'endophasie: Phonologie, psychologie et clinique’, Histoire – Épistémologie – Langage 32/2: 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkeley, George. 1709. An essay towards a new theory of vision. Dublin: printed for Aaron Rhames.Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. 2006. ‘Political studies as narrative and science, 1880–2000’, Political Studies 54: 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1923. Rev. of Saussure ([1916] 1922), Modern Language Journal 8: 317–19.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1927. ‘On recent work in general linguistics’, Modern Philology 25: 211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar

Bonacina-Pugh, Florence. 2012. ‘Researching “practiced language policies”: Insights from Conversation Analysis’, Language Policy 11/3: 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D. and Scorolli, C.. 2011. ‘Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract words acquisition’, Frontiers in Psychology 2: 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Botha, Rudolf. 1989. Challenging Chomsky: The generative garden game. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, Véronique. 2007. Galien. Vol. I. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Bouhours, Dominique, SJ. 1671. Entretiens d'Ariste et d'Eugène. Paris: chez Sébastien Mabre-Cramoisy.Google Scholar

Bouillaud, J.-B. 1825. ‘Recherches cliniques propres à démontrer que la perte de la parole correspond à la lésion des lobules antérieurs du cerveau, et à confirmer l'opinion de M. Gall, sur le siège de l'organe du langage articulé’, Archives Générales de Médecine 3: 24–45.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit. (English trans., The logic of practice, by Richard Nice, Cambridge: Polity, in association with London: Blackwell, 1990.)Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power: The economy of linguistic exchanges, ed. Thompson, John B., trans. Raymond, Gino and Adamson, Matthew. Cambridge: Polity, in association with Basil Blackwell. (Compiled from various publications by Bourdieu, 1980–5.)Google Scholar

Braine, David. 2014. Language and human understanding: The roots of creativity in speech and thought. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bréal, Michel. 1897. Essai de sémantique: Science des significations. Paris: Hachette. (English trans., Semantics: Studies in the science of meaning, by Mrs Henry Cust, London: W. Heinemann, 1900.)Google Scholar

Brickner, Richard M. 1939. ‘Bilateral frontal lobotomy: Follow-up report of a case’, Archives of Neurology and Psychology 41: 580–5.Google Scholar

Broadie, Alexander. 2000. ‘Reid, Campbell and universals of language’, in Wood, Paul B. (ed.), The Scottish Enlightenment: Essays in reassessment, 351–71. Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press.Google Scholar

Broadie, Alexander. 2001. The Scottish Enlightenment: The historical age of the historical nation. Edinburgh: Birlinn.Google Scholar

Broca, Paul. 1861. ‘Perte de la parole, ramollissement chronique de destruction partielle du lobe antérieur gauche du cerveau’, Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 235–8.Google Scholar

Broca, Paul. 1863. ‘Localisation des fonctions cérébrales: Siège du langage articulé’, Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 200–4.Google Scholar

Broca, Paul. 1865. ‘Sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé’, Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 377–93.Google Scholar

Brown, John Russell (ed.). 1955. William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome, with the assistance of Rita Watson. 1983. Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Buckley, Kerry W. 1989. Mechanical man: John Broadus Watson and the beginnings of behaviorism. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Norman. 1939. ‘Deterioration and regression in schizophrenic thinking’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 34: 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canguilhem, Georges. 1955. La formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Amber D. 2008. ‘Embodying intelligence: Animals and us in Plato's Timaeus’, in Zovko, Marie-Elise (ed.), Platonism and forms of intelligence, 39–56. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Amber D. 2010. ‘Embodied (intelligent?) souls: Plants in Plato's Timaeus’, Phronesis 55: 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casas, Ghislain. 2015. ‘Language without voice: locutio angelica as a political issue’, in Kleiman, Irit Ruth (ed.), Voice and voicelessness in Medieval Europe, 13–28. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassin, Barbara, Apter, Emily, Lezra, Jacques and Wood, Michael. 2014. Dictionary of untranslatables: A philosophical lexicon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Orig. publ. as Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles, Paris: Le Seuil and Le Robert, 2004.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. 1923–9. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. 3 vols. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar

Cestaro, Gary P. 1991. ‘“…quanquam Sarnum biberimus ante dentes…”: The primal scene of suckling in Dante's De vulgari eloquentia’, Dante Studies, no. 109, 119–47.Google Scholar

Cestaro, Gary P. 1997. ‘Dante, Boncampagno da Signa, Eberhard the German, and the rhetoric of the maternal body’, in Schildgen, Brenda Deen (ed.), The rhetoric canon, 175–97. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1959. Review of Skinner (1957), Language 35/1: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York and London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, Ct.: Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2006. Language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st edn, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1968.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2007. ‘Of minds and language’, Biolinguistics 1: 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Christoff, K., Keramatian, K., Gordon, A. M., Smith, R. and Mädler, B.. 2009. ‘Prefrontal organization of cognitive control according to levels of abstraction’, Brain Research 1286: 94–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, Andy. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 1998. ‘Magic words: How language augments human computation’, in Carruthers, P. and Boucher, J. (eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes, 162–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 2010. ‘Memento's revenge: The extended mind extended’, in Menary, Richard (ed.), The extended mind, 43–66. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David J.. 1998. ‘The extended mind’, Analysis 58/1: 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Desmond M. 2006. Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Edwin. 1963. ‘Apoplexy in the Hippocratic writings’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 37 (July–Aug.): 301–14.Google ScholarPubMed

Clarke, Edwin, and O'Malley, C. D.. 1968. The human brain and spinal cord. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia. 2006. Studies in scholasticism. Aldershot, England and Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate Variorum.Google Scholar

Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. 1746. Essai sur l'origine des connoissances humaines: Ouvrage où l'on réduit à un seul principe tout ce qui concerne l'entendement humain. Amsterdam: P. Mortier. (English trans., Essay on the origin of human knowledge, by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.)Google Scholar

Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de. 1947. Œuvres philosophiques, ed. Le Roy, Georges. 3 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1912. From religion to philosophy: A study in the origins of Western speculation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Cowan, J. Milton. 1987. ‘The whimsical Bloomfield’, Historiographia Linguistica 14/1–2: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowley, Stephen J. 2015. ‘Verbal patterns: Taming cognitive biology’, in Velmezova, Ekaterina, Kull, Kalevi and Cowley, Stephen J. (eds.), Biosemiotic perspectives on language and linguistics, 123–48. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Cowley, Stephen J., and Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric (eds.). 2013. Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice. London and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cram, David. 2007. ‘Shelf life and time horizons in the historiography of linguistics’, Historiographia Linguistica 34/2–3: 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crichton, Alexander. 1798. An inquiry into the nature and origin of mental derangement, comprehending a concise system of the physiology and pathology of the human mind and a history of passions and their effects. London: Cadell and Davies.Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante. 1996. De vulgari eloquentia, ed. and trans. Botterill, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, Alan. 2003. The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Davies, Alan. 2013. Native speakers and native users: Loss and gain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian, OP. 2002. Aquinas. London and New York: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Paul Sheldon. 2011. ‘Ancestral voices in the mammalian mind: Philosophical implications of Jaak Panksepp's affective neuroscience’, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35/9: 2036–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Debru, Armelle. 2008. ‘Physiology’, in Hankinson, R. J. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Galen, 263–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeCasper, A. J., and Spence, M. J.. 1986. ‘Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds’, Infant Behavior and Development 9: 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Defoe, Daniel. 1697. An essay upon projects. London: Printed by R[obert] R[oberts] for Tho. Cockerill, at the Three Legs in the Poultrey.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof, and Åkesson, Katarina Lundin. 2005. Håller språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska, svenska och norska. Copenhagen: Nordiska Ministerrådet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, Daniel. 1995. Darwin's dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L. and Seidenberg, M. S.. 2010. ‘Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension’, Cerebral Cortex 20: 468–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Descartes, René. 1984–5. The philosophical writings of Descartes, Vol. I (1985) and Vol. II (1984), trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Desmet, Piet. 1996. La linguistique naturaliste en France (1867–1922): Nature, origine et évolution du langage. Leuven and Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Dessalles, Jean-Louis. 2000. Aux origines du langage: Une histoire naturelle de la parole. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar

Dove, Guy. 2011. ‘On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition’, Frontiers in Psychology 1: 242. doi: 10.3389//fpsyg.2010.00242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunbar, Robin. 1996. Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London and Boston: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Edie, James M. 1981. ‘The meaning and development of Merleau-Ponty's concept of structure’, in Sallis, John (ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Perception, structure, language, a collection of essays, 39–57. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Egger, Victor. 1881. La parole intérieure: Essai de psychologie descriptive. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar

Elder, Catherine, McNamara, Tim, Kim, Hyejeong, Pill, John and Sato, Takanori. 2017. ‘Interrogating the construct of communicative competence in language assessment contexts: What the non-language specialist can tell us’, Language and Communication. doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eling, Paul. 1984. ‘Broca on the relation between handedness and cerebral speech dominance’, Brain and Language 22: 158–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eling, Paul, and Whitaker, Harry. 2010. ‘History of aphasia: From brain to language’, in Finger, S., Boller, F. and Tyler, K. L. (eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology, vol. 95 (3rd series), History of neurology, 571–82. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius. 1535. Ecclesiastes, sive de ratione concionandi libri quatuor. Basel: Froben.Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 2005. ‘Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language’, Current Anthropology 46: 621–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 2009. ‘Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms’, Language 85: 405–42.Google Scholar

Faes de Mottoni, Barbara. 1986. ‘Enuntiatores divini silentii: Tommaso d'Aquino e il linguaggio degli angeli’, Medioevo: Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale 12: 197–228.Google Scholar

Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2011. Rhetorical style: The uses of language in persuasion. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feigl, Herbert. 1967. The ‘mental’ and the ‘physical’: The essay and a postscript. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Essay orig. publ. 1958.)Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. ‘Diglossia’, Word 15: 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernández, Mauro. 1995. ‘Los orígenes del término diglosia: Historia de una historia mal contada’, Historiographia Linguistica 22: 163–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernel, Jean. 1567. Universa medicina, tribus et viginti libris absoluta. Paris: Andreas Wechel.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. 1808. Reden an die deutsche Nation. Berlin: Realschulbuchhandlung. Repr. in I. Fichte, H. (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichtes sämmtliche Werke, Vol. VII, 259–500. Berlin: Veit & Comp., 1845–6.Google Scholar

Figueroa, Esther. 1994. Sociolinguistic metatheory. Oxford: Pergamon; New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Finger, Stanley. 2000. Minds behind the brain: A history of the pioneers and their discoveries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finger, Stanley, and Buckingham, Hugh. 1994. ‘Alexander Crichton (1763–1856): Disorders of fluent speech and associationist theory’, Archives of Neurology 51: 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Hauser, Marc D. and Chomsky, Noam. 2005. ‘The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications’, Cognition 97/2: 179–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Formigari, Lia. 1988. Language and experience in 17th-century British philosophy. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrester, John. 2002. ‘The marvellous network and the history of enquiry into its function’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 57/2: 198–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fowler, Thomas. 1887. The elements of deductive logic, designed mainly for the use of junior students in the universities. 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Frampton, Michael. 2008. Embodiments of will: Anatomical and physiological theories of voluntary animal motion from Greek antiquity to the Latin Middle Ages, 400 B.C.–A.D. 1300. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr Müller.Google Scholar

Frawley, William J., and Lantolf, James P.. 1985. ‘Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective’, Applied Linguistics 6: 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furness, Hannah. 2015. ‘Wind and salt, the secret ingredients that honed Poldark's Cornish accents: Eleanor Tomlinson, who plays Demelza, reveals how she spoke with a tightly clenched jaw to mimic how people living by the sea communicated’, The Telegraph, 14 March, www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/11472543/Wind-and-salt-the-secret-ingredidents-that-honed-Poldarks-Cornish-accents.htmlGoogle Scholar

Galen of Pergamon. 1963. Galen on the passions and errors of the soul, trans. Harkins, Paul W., with an intro. and interpretation by Riese, Walther. [Columbus:] Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Gall, Franz Joseph. 1822–5. Sur les fonctions du cerveau et sur celles de chacune de ses parties. 6 vols. Paris: J. B. Baillière.Google Scholar

Galvani, Luigi. 1791. ‘De viribus electricitatis in motu musculari commentarius’, De Bononiensi Scientiarum et Artium Instituto atque Academia Commentarii 7: 363–418.Google Scholar

Gambarota, Paola. 2011. Irresistible signs: The genius of language and Italian nationalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 1992. The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2004. Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gesner, Johann. 1770. Samlung von Beobachtungen aus der Arzneygelahrtheit, Vol. II, rev. edn. Nordlingen: Beck.Google Scholar

Gibson, Edmund, The Right Rev., Lord Bishop of London. 1760. Admonition against profane and common swearing: in a letter from a minister to his parishoners; to be put privately into the hands of persons who are addicted to swearing. 20th edn. London: printed by E. Owen in Warwick-Lane, and sold by W. Johnston in Ludgate-Street.Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gobineau, Artur de. 1853–5. Essai sur l'inégalité des races humaines. 4 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot frères. (English trans., The inequality of human races, by Adrian Collins, London: William Heinemann, 1915.)Google Scholar

Goldstein, Kurt. 1944. ‘Methodological approach to the study of schizophrenic thought disorder’, in Kasanin, (ed.), pp. 17–40.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Kurt. 1949. ‘Frontal lobotomy and impairment of abstract attitude’, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 110/2: 93–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golinski, Jan. 2010. British weather and the climate of enlightenment. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Grandgent, C. H. 1891. ‘School documents no. 14, Boston High School (1890)’. Repr. in Modern Language Notes 6/2 (Feb.), p. 59.Google Scholar

Grave, S. A. 1960. The Scottish philosophy of common sense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gregory the Great, St. 1862. ‘Moralium Libri, sive Expositio in Librum B. Job’, in Migne, J.-P. (ed.), Sancti Gregorii Papae I, Cognomento Magni, Opera omnia, Vol. I, pp. 509–1162. (Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. 75.) Paris: J.-P. Migne.Google Scholar

Gregory the Great, St. 1878. ‘Moralium Libri, sive Expositio in Job, Librum B.’, in Migne, J.-P. (ed.), Sancti Gregorii Papae I, Cognomento Magni, Opera omnia, Vol. II, pp. 10–782. (Patrologiae cursus completus, Series latina, vol. 76.) Paris: Garnier Fratres.Google Scholar

Gregory, Richard (ed.). 1987. The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hackert, Stephanie. 2012. The emergence of the English native speaker: A chapter in nineteenth-century linguistic thought. Boston and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Sir William. 1829. ‘Philosophy of the unconditioned’, Edinburgh Review 50: 194–221.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Sir William. 1859–60. Lectures on metaphysics and logic, ed. Mansel, Henry Longueville and Veitch, John. 4 vols. Edinburgh and London: Blackwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnad, Stevan. 2007. ‘Grounding the arbitrary in the non-arbitrary’, http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/skywritings/index.php?/archives/59-Grounding-the-Arbitrary-in-the-Non-Arbitrary.htmlGoogle Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2004. ‘Integrationism, language, mind and world’, Language Sciences 26/6: 727–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartley, David. 1747. An enquiry into the origin of the human appetites and affections. Lincoln: Printed by Wood, W., and sold by Dodsley, R., at Tully's Head, in Pall-Mall. Repr. in Metaphysical tracts by English philosophers of the eighteenth century, ed. Samuel Parr, London: Edward Lumley, 1837.Google Scholar

Hartley, DavidWood, W., and sold by Dodsley, R.. 1749. Observations on man, his frame, his duty, and his expectations. In two parts. London: Printed by S. Richardson, for James Leake and Wm. Frederick, Bath; and sold by Charles Hitch and Stephen Austen, London.Google Scholar

Harvey, E. Ruth. 1975. The inward wits: Psychological theory in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. London: Warburg Institute, University of London.Google Scholar

Harvey, William. 1628. Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus. Frankfurt: Guilielmus Fitzerus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’, Science 298: 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Havelock, Eric A. 1963. Preface to Plato. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haym, Max I. 1979. ‘William Dwight Whitney and Ernest Renan: The role of Orientalism in Franco-American relations’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 99: 225–34.Google Scholar

Hebb, Donald O. 1949. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1782. Vom Geist des ebräischen Poesie. Erster Teil. Dessau: auf Kosten der Verlags-Kasse. (English trans., The spirit of Hebrew poetry, by James Marsh, 2 vols., Burlington, Vt.: Edward Smith, 1833.)Google Scholar

Hicks, R. D. (ed. and trans.). 1925. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of eminent philosophers. 2 vols. London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar

Hippocrates, . 1839–61. Œuvres complètes d'Hippocrate, ed. and trans. Littré, Émile. 10 vols. Paris: J.-B. Baillière.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan, or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. London: printed for Andrew Crooke.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J. 1990. Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programmes, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hogg, James. 1813. The Queen's wake, a legendary poem. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: printed by Andrew Balfour for George Goldie, and Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, London.Google Scholar

Householder, Fred W. 1952. Review of Zellig Harris' ‘Methods in structural linguistics’, International Journal of American Linguistics 18: 260–8.Google Scholar

Humboldt, G. de [Wilhelm von, ]. 1827. Lettre à Monsieur Abel-Rémusat, sur la nature des formes grammaticales en général, et sur le génie de la langue chinoise en particulier. Paris: à la Librairie Orientale de Dondey-Dupré père et fils.Google Scholar

Humboldt, G. de [Wilhelm von, . 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Königlich Academie der Wissenschaften. (English trans., On Language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species, by Peter Heath, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.)Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1931. Méditations cartésiennes: Introduction à la phénoménologie, trans. Peiffer, Gabrielle and Levinas, Emmanuel. Paris: Colin. (English trans., Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology, by Dorion Cairns, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.)Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell H. 1972. ‘On communicative competence’, in Pride, J. B. and Holmes, Janet (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Werner. 1933–47. Paideia: Die Formung des griechischen Menschen. 3 vols. Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1932. ‘Zur Struktur des russischen Verbum’, in Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario a discipulis et Circuli Linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblata, 74–84. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells. (English trans., Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals, by A. Keiler, The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 1968.)Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1949. ‘Les lois phoniques du langage enfantin et leur place dans la phonologie générale’ [written 1939], appendix to N. S. Trubetzkoy, Principes de phonologie, trans. Cantineau, J., 315–36, Paris: Klincksieck. (English trans., ‘The sound laws of child language and their place in general phonology’, in Jakobson, Studies on child language and aphasia, 7–20, The Hague: Mouton, 1971.)Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1976. Six leçons sur le son et le sens. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

James, William. 1890. The principles of psychology. 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Richard. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: G. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Johnson, Galen A. 1999. ‘At the limits of phenomenology: Merleau-Ponty’, in Glendinning, Simon (ed.), Edinburgh Encyclopaedia of Continental Philosophy, 307–22. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. London: Frances Pinter; New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. 1998. ‘Why isn't translation impossible?’, in Hunston, Susan (ed.), Language at work: Selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Birmingham, September 1997, 86–97. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2000. Limiting the arbitrary: Linguistic naturalism and its opposites in Plato's Cratylus and modern theories of language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2002. From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the history of American linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2004. Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2006. Language and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2011a. ‘Small universes and big individuals: Locating Humboldt in evolving conceptions of language and Individualität’, in Tintemann, Ute and Trabant, Jürgen (eds.), Wilhelm von Humboldt: Universalität und Individualität, 95–111. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2011b. ‘Harris's Saussure – Harris as Saussure: The translations of the Cours and the third course’, Language Sciences 33: 524–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2012. Saussure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2013. ‘Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries’, Journal of Politeness Research 9/1: 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2014. ‘The wolf in itself: The uses of enchantment in the development of modern linguistics’, in Bod, Rens, Maat, Jaap and Weststeijn, Thijs (eds.), The making of the humanities, Vol. III: The modern humanities, 81–95. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2015a. ‘Iconicity in Saussure's linguistic work, and why it does not contradict the arbitrariness of the sign’, Historiographia Linguistica 42/1: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2015b. ‘Corpse puppetry: Anachronisms of consistency, continuity and progress in the history of linguistics’, History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences, http://hiphilangsci.net/2015/06/03/salon-anachronism-in-linguistic-historiography/#johnjosephGoogle Scholar

Joseph, John E. 2017. ‘The reception of Wilhelm von Humboldt's linguistic writings in the Anglosphere, 1820 to the present’, Forum for Modern Language Studies 53/1: 7–20.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E., Love, Nigel and Taylor, Talbot J.. 2001. Landmarks in linguistic thought II: The Western tradition in the twentieth century. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E., and Newmeyer, Frederick J.. 2012. ‘“All languages are equally complex”: The rise and fall of a consensus’, Historiographia Linguistica 39/2–3: 341–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamesar, Adam. 2004. ‘The logos endiathetos and the logos prophorikos in allegorical interpretation: Philo and the D-Scholia to the Iliad’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 44: 163–81.Google Scholar

Karasawa, J., Touho, H., Ohnishi, H. and Kawaguchi, M.. 1997. ‘Rete mirabile in humans: Case report’, Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica 37/2: 188–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Karmiloff, Kyra, and Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 2002. Pathways to language: From fetus to adolescent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasanin, Jacob S. (ed.). 1944. Language and thought in schizophrenia: Collected papers, presented at the meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, May 12, 1939, Chicago, Illinois, and brought up to date. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kasanin, Jacob S., and Hanfmann, Eugenia. 1938. ‘An experimental study of concept formation in schizophrenia, i: Quantitative analysis of the results’, American Journal of Psychiatry 95: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasanin, Jacob S., and Hanfmann, Eugenia. 1942. Conceptual thinking in schizophrenia. New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publ. Co.Google Scholar

Kelly, L. G. 2002. The mirror of grammar: Theology, philosophy and the Modistae. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, Geoffrey Stephen, Raven, John Earle and Schofield, Malcolm. 1983. The Presocratic philosophers: A critical history with a selection of texts. 2nd edn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisker, G. W. 1944. ‘Abstract and categorical behavior following therapeutic brain surgery’, Psychosomatic Medicine 6: 144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. 1967. ‘History of semantics’, in Edwards, Paul (ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy, Vol. VII, 358–406. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1982. ‘Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English Trial in Ann Arbor’, Language in Society 11: 165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1988. ‘Cognitive semantics’, in Eco, Umberto, Santambrogio, Marco and Violi, Patrizia (eds.), Meaning and mental representations, 119–54. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lam, Daniel M. K. 2015. ‘Contriving authentic interaction: Task implementation and engagement in school-based speaking assessment in Hong Kong’, in Yu, Guoxing and Jin, Yan (eds.), Assessing Chinese learners of English: Language constructs, consequences and conundrums, 38–60. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lantolf, James P. 2010. ‘Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative’, in Kaplan, Robert (ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, 2nd edn, 163–77. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1991. Nous n'avons jamais été modernes: Essai d'anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte. (English trans., We have never been modern, by Catherine Porter, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.)Google Scholar

Lauzon, Matthew. 2010. Signs of light: French and British theories of linguistic communication, 1648–1789. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Law, Vivien. 2003. The history of linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawn, Brian (ed.). 1979. The prose Salernitan questions, edited from a Bodleian manuscript (Auct. F. 3. 10), an anonymous collection dealing with science and medicine written by an Englishman c. 1200, with an appendix of ten related collections. London: published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1765. ‘Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain’, in Raspe, Rudolf Erich (ed.), Œuvres philosophiques latines et françoises de feu Mr de Leibnitz, 1–496. Amsterdam and Leipzig: Jean Schreuder. [Written 1703–4.]Google Scholar

Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennon, Thomas M. 1993. The battle of the gods and giants: The legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesky, Erna. 1979. Franz Joseph Gall: Naturforscher und Anthropologe. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1945. ‘L'analyse structurale en linguistique et en anthropologie’, Word 1: 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Rhodri. 2012. Language, mind and nature: Artificial languages in England from Bacon to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1987. The revolutions of wisdom: Studies in the claims and practice of ancient Greek science. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1991. Methods and problems in Greek science: Selected papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John. 1700. An essay concerning humane understanding. 4th edn. London: printed for Tho. Basset, and sold by Edw. Mory. Ed. by Nidditch, Peter, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. (1st edn, 1690.)Google Scholar

Logan, Robert K. 1986. The alphabet effect: The impact of the phonetic alphabet on the development of western civilization. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Logan, Robert K. 1997. ‘The extended mind: Understanding language and thought in terms of complexity and chaos theory’, presented at the 7th Annual Conference of The Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences at Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisc., 1 Aug. 1997.Google Scholar

Logan, Robert K. 2007. The extended mind: The origin of language and culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A., and Sedley, David N.. 1987. The Hellenistic philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lord, Albert B. 1960. The singer of tales. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Luzzatti, Claudio. 2002. ‘Johann August Philipp Gesner (1738–1801): A review of his essay “The language amnesia” in the bicentennial anniversary of his death’, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 11: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luzzatti, Claudio, and Whitaker, Harry 1995/6. ‘Johannes Schenck and Johannes Jakob Wepfer: Clinical and anatomical observations on the prehistory of neurolinguistics and neuropsychology’, Journal of Neurolinguistics 9: 157–64.Google Scholar

Luzzatti, Claudio, and Whitaker, Harry. 2001. ‘Jean-Baptiste Bouillaud, Claude-François Lallemand and the role of the frontal lobe: location and mislocation of language in the early 19th century’, Archives of Neurology 58: 1157–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Madison, Gary Brent. 1981. The phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty: A search for the limits of consciousness. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. (Trans. by Madison from his La phénoménologie de Merleau-Ponty: Une recherche des limites de la conscience, Paris: Klincksieck, 1973.)Google Scholar

Magoun, H. W. 1957. ‘Early development of ideas relating the mind with the brain’, in Wolstenholme, G. E. W. and O'Connor, C. M. (eds.), The neurological basis of behaviour, 4–27. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa. 2010. ‘Words for parts of the body’, in Malt, Barbara and Wolff, Phillip (eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience, 58–71. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, C. B. 2008. The mind in nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Massa, Niccolò. 1536. Liber introductorius anatomiae. Venice: Francesco Bindoni and Maffeo Pasini.Google Scholar

Maturana, Humberto R., and Varela, Francisco J.. 1987. The tree of knowledge. Boston: Shambhala. (2nd edn, 1993.)Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1909. ‘Sur la disparition des formes simples du préterit’, Germani-sche-Romanische Monatsschrift 1: 521–6. Repr., with added coda, in Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Vol. I, 149–58. Paris: Champion, 1921.Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1923. ‘Le caractère concret du mot’, Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 20: 246–58. Repr. in Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Vol. II, 9–13. Paris: Champion, 1936.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1942. La structure du comportement. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (English trans., The structure of behavior, by Alden L. Fisher, Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.)Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard. (English trans., Phenomenology of perception, by Colin Smith, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.)Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1948. Sens et non-sens. Paris: Nagel. (English trans., Sense and non-sense, by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Patricia Allen Dreyfus, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1964.)Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1960. Signes. Paris: Gallimard. (English trans., Signs, by McCleary, Richard, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1964.)Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. Le visible et l'invisible, suivi de notes de travail, ed. by Lefort, Claude. Paris: Gallimard. (English trans., The visible and the invisible, by Alphonso Lingis, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1968.)Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. Résumés de cours, Collège de France 1952–1960. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1969. La prose du monde. Paris: Gallimard. [Written 1951–3.] (English trans., The prose of the world, by O'Neill, John, Evanston: Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973.)Google Scholar

Mikami, Takeshi, Takahashi, Akira and Houkin, Kiyohiro. 2005. ‘Cartoid rete mirabile associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage’, Neurologia medico-chirurgica 45: 201–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1867. An examination of Sir William Hamilton's philosophy, and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings. 3rd edn. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer. (1st edn, 1865.)Google Scholar

Minsky, Marvin. 1986. The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Monboddo, James Burnett, Lord. 1773–92. Of the origin and progress of language. 6 vols. Vol. I. Edinburgh: printed for A. Kincaid; London: printed for T. Cadell, 1773. (2nd edn, Edinburgh: printed for T. Balfour; London: printed for T. Cadell, 1774.)Google Scholar

Monro, Alexander secundus. 1783. On the structure and functions of the nervous system. Edinburgh: William Creech and Joseph Johnson.Google Scholar

Montagu, Ashley. 1967. The anatomy of swearing. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Moss, Gregory S. 2015. Ernst Cassirer and the autonomy of language. Lanham, Md., and London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Mulholland, James. 2013. Sounding imperial: Poetic voice and the politics of empire, 1730–1820. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munson, Rosaria Vignolo. 2005. Black doves speak: Herodotus and the languages of barbarians. Washington DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, distributed by Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar

Naert, Pierre. 1940–41. ‘Réflexions sur le caractère concret du mot dans les langues anciennes et dans les langues modernes’, Acta Linguistica 2: 185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narayanan, Srini. 1997. KARMA: Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect. University of California at Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar

Naville, Adrien. 1901. Nouvelle classification des sciences: Étude philosophique. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Nef, Frédéric. 1986. ‘La sémantique de Saint Augustin est-elle vraiment mentaliste?’, in Joli, Henri (ed.), Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l'antiquité, 377–400. Bruxelles: Ousia.Google Scholar

Noppeney, U., and Price, C. J.. 2004. ‘Retrieval of abstract semantics’, NeuroImage 22/1: 164–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norton, Bonny. 2013. Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. 2nd edn. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 1978. Aristotle's De motu animalium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nutton, Vivian. 2004. Ancient medicine. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutton, Vivian. 2010. Essay review on Frampton (2008), Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53/2: 271–88.Google Scholar

[Offraye de la Mettrie, Julien.] 1747. L'homme machine. Leiden: Elie Luzac. [Published anonymously.]Google Scholar

Olender, Maurice. 1989. Les langues du Paradis: Aryens et Sémites – un couple providentiel. (2nd edn, Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil, 1994; English trans. of 2nd edn, Languages of Paradise: Aryans and Semites, a match made in heaven, by Arthur Goldhammer, New York: The Other Press, 2002.)Google Scholar

Olender, Maurice. 2009. Race sans histoire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

O'Neill, Ynez Violé. 1980. Speech and speech disorders in Western thought before 1600. Westport, Conn. and London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Oppert, Jules. 1866. ‘Discours de M. Jules Oppert fait à la Bibliothèque Impériale, le 28 Décembre 1865, pour l'ouverture de son cours de sanscrit,’ Annales de philosophie chrétienne, January, 50–68.Google Scholar

Orman, Jon. 2016. ‘Distributing mind, cognition, and language: Exploring the (un)common ground with integrational linguistics’, Language and Cognition 8/1: 142–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orwell, George. 1946. ‘Politics and the English language’, Horizon 13/76 (April): 252–65. Repr. in Davison, Peter (ed.), The complete works of George Orwell, Vol. XVII: I belong to the left: 1945, 421–32, London: Secker & Warburg, 1998.Google Scholar

Osthoff, Hermann, and Brugmann, Karl. 1878. Preface to Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 1.iii–xx. (English trans. by Lehmann, Winfred P., in A reader in nineteenth-century historical indo-european linguistics, 197–209, Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1967.)Google Scholar

Panksepp, Jaak. 2012. ‘A synopsis of affective neuroscience – naturalizing the mammalian mind’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 19/3–4: 6–18.Google Scholar

Panofsky, Ervin. 1967. Architecture gothique et pensée scolastique. Trans. with preface and postface by Bourdieu, Pierre. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Parry, Milman. 1971. The making of Homeric verse: The collected papers of Milman Parry, ed. Parry, Adam. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Pecher, D., Boot, I. and Van Dantzig, S.. 2011. ‘Abstract concepts: Sensorymotor grounding, metaphors, and beyond’, in Ross, B. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 54, 217–48. Burlington, Mass.: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Penfield, Wilder, and Roberts, Lamar. 1959. Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair. 2001. Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perelman, Chaïm, and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean. 1923. Le langage et la pensée chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel and Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé. (English trans., Language and thought of the child, by Marjorie Gabain, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., 1926.)Google Scholar

Pictet, Adolphe. 1859–63. Les origines indo-européennes, ou les Aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique. 2 vols. Paris and Geneva: J. Cherbuliez.Google Scholar

Pranghofer, Sebastian. 2009. ‘“It could be seen more clearly in unreasonable animals than in humans”: The representation of the rete mirabile in early modern anatomy’, Medical History 53/4: 561–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Priestley, Joseph. 1775. Hartley's theory of the human mind, on the principle of the association of ideas. London: printed for J. Johnson.Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert N., and Schiebinger, Londa (eds.). 2008. Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Radick, Gregory. 2016. ‘The unmaking of a modern synthesis: Noam Chomsky, Charles Hockett, and the politics of behaviorism, 1955–1965’, Isis 107/1: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rée, Jonathan. 1999. I see a voice: A philosophical history of language, deafness and the senses. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. 1764. An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. Edinburgh: printed for A. Millar, London, and A. Kincaid and J. Bell, Edinburgh. (Critical edn by Brookes, Derek R., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, Thomas. 1785. Essays on the intellectual powers of man. Edinburgh: printed for John Bell, and G. G. J. & J. Robinson, London.Google Scholar

Reid, Thomas. 1788. Essays on the active powers of man. Edinburgh: printed for John Bell, and G. G. J. and J. Robinson, London.Google Scholar

Renan, Ernest. 1858. De l'origine du langage. 2nd edn. Paris: Michel Lévy, Frères. (1st edn, 1848.)Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Gennari, S. P., Davies, R. and Cuetos, F.. 2011. ‘Neural correlates of abstract verb processing’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 106–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Romero Lauro, L. J., Pisoni, A., Zerboni, H. and Papagno, C.. 2007. ‘The neural correlates of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from an rTMS study’, Brain and Language 103/1–2: 146–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rommel, Peter. 1685. ‘De aphonia rara’, Miscellanea Curiosa Medico-Physica Academiae Naturae Curiosum 2 (ser. 2): 222–7. Leipzig: Jacobus Trescherus.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Steven. 1987. ‘Memory: Biological basis’, in Gregory, (ed.), pp. 456–60.Google Scholar

Rousseau, George S. 2004. Nervous acts: Essays on literature, culture and sensibility. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1755. Discours sur l'origine et les fondemens de l'inégalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam: Marc Marcel Rey.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1782. ‘Essai sur l'origine des langues, où il est parlé de la mélodie et de l'imitation musicale’, in Collection complète des œuvres de J. J. Rousseau, citoyen de Genève, Vol. VIII, 355–434. Geneva: s.n. [Written 1755–61.]Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. and the PDP Research Group. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. I: Foundations; Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M. and Binder, J. R.. 2005. ‘Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability’, Neuroimage 27: 188–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sahin, Hilal, Çinar, Celal and Oran, Ismail. 2010. ‘Carotid and vertebrobasilar rete mirabile: A case report’, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 32/2: 95–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saint Aubert, Emmanuel de. 2004. Du lien des êtres aux éléments de l’être: Merleau-Ponty au tournant des années 1945–1951. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar

Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M. M., Heim, S., Borghi, A. M., and Binkofski, F.. 2013. ‘Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7/125. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1933. ‘Language’, in Encyclopedia of the social sciences, Vol. IX, 155–69. Repr. in Mandelbaum, David G. (ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality, 7–32. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: imprimé par B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert, with the collaboration of Riedlinger, Albert. Lausanne and Paris: Payot. (2nd edn, 1922; further edns essentially unchanged. English trans., Course in general linguistics, by Wade Baskin, New York: Philosophical Library, 1959.)Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1995. Phonétique: il manoscritto di Harvard Houghton Library bMS Fr 266 (8), ed. Marchese, Maria Pia. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de, and Constantin, Émile. 2005. Saussure, ‘Notes préparatoires pour le cours de linguistique générale 1910–1911’, Constantin, ‘Linguistique générale, cours de M. le professeur de Saussure 1910–1911’, ed. Gambarara, Daniele and Quijano, Claudia Mejía, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 58: 71–290.Google Scholar

Saussy, Haun. 2016. The ethnography of rhythm: Orality and its technologies. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Schacherer, Frank G. D. 2001. ‘Writing’, www.schacherer.de/frank/tech/write/write.html www.schacherer.de/frank/tech/write/write.html; now replaced with a shorter version on http://bioinfoxy.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/writing.htmlGoogle Scholar

Schiappa, Edward. 1991. Protagoras and Logos: A study in Greek philosophy and rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Schiefsky, Mark. 2012. ‘Galen and the tripartite soul’, in Barney, Rachel, Brennan, Tad and Brittain, Charles (eds.), Plato and the divided self, 331–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schiller, Francis. 1992. Paul Broca, founder of French anthropology, explorer of the brain. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Johann. 1676. ‘De oblivione lectionis ex apoplexia salva scriptione’, Miscellanea Curiosa Medico-Physica Academiae Naturae Curiosum 4: 195–7. Leipzig: Jacobus Trescherus.Google Scholar

Scorolli, C., Jacquet, P. O., Binkofski, F., Nicoletti, R., Tessari, A. and Borghi, A. M.. 2012. ‘Abstract and concrete phrases processing differentially modulates cortico-spinal excitability’, Brain Research 1488: 60–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Screech, M. A. 1997. Laughter at the foot of the cross. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Sebastiani, Silvia. 2013. The Scottish Enlightenment: Race, gender, and the limits of progress. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sériot, Patrick. 2004. ‘Oxymore ou malentendu? Le relativisme universaliste de la métalangue sémantique naturelle universelle d'Anna Wierzbicka’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 57: 23–43.Google Scholar

Sériot, Patrick. 2014. ‘Language and nation: Two models’, in Vihman, and Praakli, (eds.), pp. 255–74.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. ‘Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life’, Language and Communication 23/3–4: 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1938. The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; London and New York: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1969. ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory 8/1: 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Robin. 2017. ‘Aristotle's logic’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 edn), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/aristotle-logic/Google Scholar

Spencer, Herbert. 1855. The principles of psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, Clara, and Wilhelm, Stern. 1928. Die Kindersprache: Eine psychologische und Sprachtheoretische Untersuchung. 4th edn. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar

Storch, Alfred. 1922. Das archaisch-primitive Erleben und Denken der Schizophrenen: Entwicklungspsychologisch-klinische Untersuchungen zum Schizophrenieproblem. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Taine, Hippolyte. 1870. De l'intelligence. 2 vols. Paris: Hachette. (English trans., On intelligence, by T. D. Haye, London: L. Reeve and Co., 1871.)Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 2016. The language animal: the full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Talbot J. 1992. Mutual misunderstanding: Scepticism and the theorizing of language and interpretation. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press; London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Taylor, Talbot J. 2012. ‘Understanding others and understanding language: How do children do it?’, Language Sciences 34: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Temkin, Owsei. 1950. ‘On Galen's pneumatology’, Gesnerus 8: 180–9.Google Scholar

Thibault, Paul J. 2011. ‘First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view’, Ecological Psychology 23: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, John B. 1991. Editor's intro. to Bourdieu (1991).Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. 1905. The elements of psychology. New York: A. G. Seiler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. 1898. ‘The postulates of a structural psychology’, Philosophical Review 7: 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trousseau, Armand. 1864. ‘De l'aphasie, maladie décrite récemment sous le nom impropre d'aphémie’, Gazette des hopitaux civils et militaires de l'Empire ottoman 37: 13–14, 25–6, 37–9, 48–50.Google Scholar

Tuczek, Karl. 1921. ‘Analyse einer Katatonikersprache’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 72: 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, James. 2014. Philology: The forgotten origins of the modern humanities. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan and Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ventris, Michael, and Chadwick, John. 1953. ‘Evidence for Greek dialect in the Mycenaean archives’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 73: 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verbeke, G. 1945. L’évolution de la doctrine du pneuma du stoïcisime à S. Augustin: Étude philosophique. Paris: Desclée De Brouwer; Louvain: Éditions de l'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar

Vesalius, Andreas. 1543. De humani corporis fabrica libri septem. Basel: s. n. [Johannes Oporinus].Google Scholar

Vihman, Virve-Anneli, and Praakli, Kristiina (eds.). 2014. Negotiating linguistic identity: Language and belonging in Europe, 255–74. Oxford and Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1934a. Мышление и речь. Психологические исследования. Moscow and Leningrad: Государственное социально-экономическое издательство. (English trans. of final chapter, ‘Thought and speech’, by Eugenia Hanfmann, Jacob S. Kasanin and Helen Kogan, Psychiatry 2 (1939): 29–54. English trans. of book (abridged), Thought and language, by Eugenia Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1962. Revised edn (unabridged), by Alex Kozulin, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.)Google Scholar

Vigotsky [sic], Lev S. 1934b. ‘Thought in schizophrenia’, trans. Kasanin, Jacob S., Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 31: 1062–77. Repr. in Vygotsky 1994, pp. 313–26.Google Scholar

Vigotsky [sic], Lev S. 1994. The Vygotsky reader, ed. van der Veer, René and Valsiner, Jaan. Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wakslak, Cheryl J., Smith, Pamela K. and Han, Albert. 2014. ‘Using abstract language signals power’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107/1: 41–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Watson, John B. 1914. Behavior: An introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max. 1919. Wissenschaft als Beruf. Munich and Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar

Wepfer, Johannes Jakob. 1727. Observationes medico-practicae de affectibus capitis internis and externis, ed. Wepfer, Bernhardin and Wepfer, Georg Michael. Schaffhausen: Johann Adam Ziegler.Google Scholar

Wernicke, Carl. 1874. Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex: Eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis. Breslau: Max Cohn & Weigert.Google Scholar

Whatmough, C., Verret, L., Fung, D. and Cherktow, H.. 2004. ‘Common and contrasting areas of activation for abstract and concrete concepts: An H2 15O PET study’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1211–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whitaker, Harry. 2007. ‘Was medieval cell doctrine more modern than we thought?’, in Cohen, Henri and Stemmer, Brigitte (eds.), Consciousness and cognition: Fragments of mind and brain, 45–51. London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. Carroll, John B.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Whytt, Robert. 1765. Observations on the nature, causes, and cure of those disorders which have been commonly called nervous hypochondriac, or hysteric: to which are prefixed some remarks on the sympathy of the nerves. Edinburgh: printed for T. Becket, and P. Du Hondt, London, and J. Balfour, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic primitives. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 2008. ‘Имеет ли смысл говорить о «русской языковой картине мира»? (Патрик Серио утверждает, что нет)’ [Does it make sense to talk about the ‘Russian linguistic picture of the world’? (Patrick Sériot says no)], in Динамические модели: Слово, предложение, текст. Сборник статей в честь Е. В. Падучевой [Dynamic models: words, sentences, text. Festschrift for E. V. Paducheva], 177–89. Moscow: Языки Славянских Культур [Languages of Slavic cultures].Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, John. 1668. An essay towards a real character, and a philosophical language. London: printed for Sa: Gellibrand, and for John Martin, printer to the Royal Society.Google Scholar

Willis, Thomas. 1664. Cerebri anatome, cui accessit nervorum descriptio. London: Jo. Martyn and Ja. Allestry.Google Scholar

Wilson, Andrew D., and Golonka, Sabrina. 2013. ‘Embodied cognition is not what you think it is’, Frontiers in Psychology 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K.. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner. (Orig. publ. in German in Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 1921.)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations, trans. by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wollock, Jeffrey. 1997. The noblest animate motion: Speech, physiology, and medicine in pre-Cartesian linguistic thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolbert, Charles Henry. 1920. The fundamentals of speech: A behavioristic study of the underlying principles of speaking and reading: A text book of delivery. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Young, J. Z. 1987. ‘Memory’, in Gregory, (ed.), pp. 455–6.Google Scholar