Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:49:38.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Sociolinguistic Awareness in Business Professionals

Breaking Stereotypes and Language Myths

from Part III - Language Awareness in Education and Training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

Erika Darics
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

The chapter focuses on an innovative set of methods and approaches designed to change the manner in which business professionals view language and communication practices in their global workplaces. Despite the advances made within linguistics, particularly within the fields of sociolinguistics and discourse analysis, where large banks of empirical evidence of real-life workplace research have been systematically analysed, very little of this robust linguistic evidence finds its way into practical applications in workplace training. Too often, business training materials are based on outdated and inaccurate stereotypes about language at work, or flawed frameworks, such as ‘neurolinguistic programming’, which at best is based on pseudo-scientific knowledge and devoid of any real foundation of how any language system works. Other training methods include role-plays of how people think they communicate. In order to get the sociolinguistics of the workplace research firmly embedded as a form of applied linguistics in action, the chapter reports on the practical methods and approaches taken as part of an initiative at the University of Nottingham, Linguistic Profiling for Professionals.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000) Doing Critical Management Research. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annis, B. and Gray, J. (2014) Work with Me: The 8 Blind Spots between Men and Women in Business. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2010) Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1982) Reframing: Neuro-Linguistic Programming and the Transformation of Meaning. Real People Press.Google Scholar
Bandler and McKenna (2010) Get the Life You Want: Secrets to Quick and Lasting Life Change. Harper Books.Google Scholar
Bandler, R. and Le Valle, J. (2013) The Ultimate Introduction to NLP: How to Build a Successful Life. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. (2012) The Language of Female Leadership. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bohnet, I. (2016) Gender Equality by Design: What Works. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brookes, G., Harvey, K. and Mullany, L. (2016) ‘Off to the best start’? A multimodal critique of breast and formula feeding health promotional discourse. Gender & Language 10(3), 340363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2010) Locating identity in language. In Llamas, C. and Watt, D. (eds.) Language and Identities. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Second Ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2003) Gender and language ideologies. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, pp. 447467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (2007) The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B. and Richardson, K. (1992) Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, L. (2018) Corpus Linguistics for Online Communication. Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 3572.Google Scholar
Darics, E. (2020) The relevance of applied linguistic and discourse research: On the margins of communication consultancy. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Darics, E. and Koller, V. (2018) Language in Business, Language at Work. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2002) Mars and Venus in the Workplace: A Practical Guide to Improving Communication and Getting Results at Work. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2003) How to Get What You Want in the Workplace: How to Maximise Your Professional Potential. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1990) Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese, Journal of Pragmatics 1–2, 237257.Google Scholar
Handford, M. (2010) The Language of Business Meetings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Handford, M., van Maele, J., Matous, P. and Maemura, Y. (2019) ‘Which culture? A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 108, 161177.Google Scholar
Handford, M. (2020) Training ‘international engineers’ in Japan: Discourse and stereotypes. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Hardaker, C. (2020) In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Sage.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. Pearson.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2006) Gendered Talk at Work. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2020) Epilogue: Future directions in professional communication research. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., Marra, M. and Vine, B. (2013) Leadership, Discourse and Ethnicity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003a) Power and Politeness in the Workplace. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003b) “Feminine” workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, pp. 573599.Google Scholar
Hunt, V., Layton, D. and Prince, S. (2015) Why Diversity Matters. McKinsey Co.Google Scholar
Koller, V. and Ereaut, G. (2020) Culture change and rebranding in the charity sector: A linguistic consultancy approach. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave, pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) The social stratification of r in New York department stores. In Labov, W. (ed.) Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (2003) Language, gender and politics: Putting ‘women’ and ‘power’ in the same sentence. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, pp. 161178.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2016) Discourse and Management: Critical Perspectives through the Language Lens. Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. and Price, H. (eds.) (2018) Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2004) Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings. Multilingua 23(1/2), 1337.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2006a) Narrative constructions of gendered and professional identities. In White, G. and Omoniyi, T. (eds.) The Sociolinguistics of Identity. Continuum, pp. 157172.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2006b) ‘Girls on tour’: Politeness, small talk and gender identity in managerial business meetings. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 2(1), 5577.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2007a) Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullany, L. (2007b) Negotiating methodologies: Making language and gender relevant in the professional workplace. In Harrison, K., Litosseliti, L., Sauntson, H. and Sunderland, J. (eds.) Gender and Language: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Palgrave, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2008) “Stop hassling me!” Impoliteness in the workplace. In Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. (eds.) Impoliteness in Language. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231–254.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2010) Gendered identities in the professional workplace: Negotiating the glass ceiling. Language and identities, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2012) Corpus analysis of language in the workplace. In Chapelle, C. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0248.Google Scholar
Mullany, L. (2020) Rethinking language in the professions: New departures for global workplace research. In Mullany, L. (ed.) Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullany, L., Harvey, K., Smith, C. and Adolphs, S. (2015) ‘Am I anorexic?’ Weight, eating and discourses of the body in online adolescent communication. Communication & Medicine 12(2–3), 211223.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (1999) The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings.Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 157.Google Scholar
Schnurr, S. (2009) Leadership Discourse at Work. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Schnurr, S. and Zayts, O. (2017) Language and Culture at Work. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sharpley, C. (1987) Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Non-supportive data or an untestable theory? Journal of Counselling Psychology 34(1), 103107.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. (2004) Gendered Discourses. Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, C. (1990) Not just ‘doctor’s orders’: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society 1(1), 85112.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×