Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Expected online publication date:
December 2024
Print publication year:
2025
Online ISBN:
9781009472043

Book description

The idea that imagination is everywhere in our lives, and that reality is an illusion, may sound absurd to the concrete mind. This book will try to convince you that imagination manifests in different 'phases,' encompassing even the most fundamental ideas about what is real (ontology) and what is true (epistemology). It is present in the contents (e.g., images) and the acts (e.g., fantasy) of our minds. Imagination helps us remove barriers through conscious planning and finds ways to fulfill unconscious desires. The many words related to imagination in the English language are part of a unified web and share a “family resemblance.” The first section of this book deals with imagination in everyday life, the second focuses on aesthetic imagination, and the third discusses scholarly approaches that incorporate both imagination types. The fourth section proposes a unified model integrating the diverse ways that imagination is manifested in our culture.

References

Abraham, A. (Ed.). (2020). The Cambridge handbook of the imagination. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Arnheim, R. (1954, 1971). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Arnheim, R. (1985). The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. In Koch, S. & Leary, D. E. (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 856865). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ash, M. G. (1998). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1995)
Baldwin, J. M. (1905). Sketch of the history of psychology. Psychological Review, 12(2–3), 144165.
Baldwin, J. M. (1908). Knowledge and imagination. Psychological Review, 15(3), 181196.
Baldwin, J. M. (1930). James Mark Baldwin. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography, Vol. 1 (pp. 130). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Ball, L. J. (2020). Hypothetical thinking. In Abraham, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 447465). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1929)
Boulis, M., Lang, J., Stamatopoulou, D., & Cupchik, G. (2023). Attachment and imagination in Coptic Christians’ religious and aesthetic experiences. Sæculum, 56, 109132.
Braun, I. & Cupchik, G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85109. DOI:10.2190/W6TJ- 4KKB-856F-03VU.
Bullough, E. (1912). “Psychical distance” as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle. British Journal of Psychology, 1904–1920, 5(2), 87118.
Bundy, M. W. (1927). The theory of imagination in classical and mediaeval thought. Champaign, IL: University of Ilinois press.
Burwick, F. (1991). Illusion and the drama: Critical theory of the enlightenment and romantic. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
Burwick, F. & Pape, W. (Eds.). (1990). Aesthetic illusion: Theoretical and historical approaches. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Byrne, R. M. J. (2020). The counterfactual imagination: The impact of alternatives to reality on morality. In Abraham, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 447465). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carraro, A., Ignacio, A., Cupchik, E. L., & Cupchik, G. C. (2022). The aesthetics of culture. In Wehrs, D. R., Nalbantian, S., & Tucker (Eds.), D. M., Cultural memory (pp. 121136). New York: Routledge.
Cassirer, E. (1950). The problem of knowledge: Philosophy, science, and history since Hegel. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cicero, M. T. (1993). De Inventione; De Optimo Genere Oratorum; Topica (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.; Reprint). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1949)
Cocking, J. M. (1991). Imagination: A study in the history of ideas (Murray, P., Ed.). London: Routledge.
Coomaraswamy, A. K. (1974). The transformation of nature in art. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Cupchik, G. C. (1995). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177188. DOI:10.1016/0304-422X(94)00014-W.
Cupchik, G. C. (1999). The thinking-I and the being-I in psychology of the arts. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 165173. DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj1203_1.
Cupchik, G. C. (2011). The digitized self in the internet age. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 5(4), 318328. DOI:10.1037/a0024820.
Cupchik, G. C. (2016). The aesthetics of emotion: Up the down staircase of the mind-body. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cupchik, G. C. & Berlyne, D. E. (1979). The perception of collative properties in visual stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20(1), 93104.
Cupchik, G., Damasco, V. G., Kiosses, E., et al. (2024). Profiles in pandemic response: Situational helplessness versus coherent resilience. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. (Feb 8, 2024).
Cupchik, G. C. & Gignac, A. (2007). Layering in art and in aesthetic experience. Visual Arts Research, 33(1), 5671.
Cupchik, G. C. & Laszlo, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 297312. DOI: 10.1080/02699939408408943.
Cupchik, G. C. & Shereck, L. (1998). Generating and receiving contextualized interpretations of sculptures. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(2), 179191.DOI: 10.2190/DR21-Q20D-XNED-VXP8.
Cupchik, G. C., Stamatopoulou, D., & Duan, S. (2021). Finding elusive resonances across cultures and time. In Vorderer, P. & Klimmt, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 139156). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., & Mikulis, D. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 8491.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Danziger, K. (2000). Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history, 1920–1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36(4), 329347.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Oxford: Minton, Balch.
Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art: A study in the psychology of artistic imagination. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.
Fried, M. (1980). Absorption and theatricality: Painting and beholder in the age of Diderot. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Handelman, S. A. (1982). The slayers of Moses: The emergence of rabbinic interpretation in modern literary theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hinton, D. (2012). Hunger mountain: A field guide to mind and landscape. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
Hinton, D. (2013). The four Chinese classics: Tao Te Ching, Chuang Tzu, Analects, Mencius. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
Hsieh, L. (2015). The literary mind and the carving of dragons (V. Y. Shih, Ed.; Revised). The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press/NYRB, New York Review Books.
Hutcheson, F. (2004). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue: In two treatises (Leidhold, W., Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. (Original work published 1725).
Ignacio, A. & Cupchik, G. (2020). Understanding fantasy and adult doll play through regression in service of the self. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 40(3), 290324.
Irish, M. (2020). On the interaction between episodic and semantic representations – Constructing a unified account of imagination. In Abraham, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 447465). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Iser, W. (1993). The fictive and the imaginary: Charting literary anthropology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Vol II. New York Dover. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000.
Karnes, M. (2011). Imagination, meditation, & cognition in the Middle Ages. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kreitler, H. & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. Oxford, UK: International Universities Press.
Law, S. S. (2011). Being in traditional Chinese landscape painting. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 32(4), 369382.
Lindner, R. W. & Cupchik, G. C. (2024). Phenoesthetics: Clinical aesthetics and the just noticeable difference. Tampa, FL: Phenoesthetics.
Lipps, T. (1962). Empathy, inner imitation and sense-feelings. In Rader, M. M. (Ed.), A modern book of esthetics: An anthology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (Original work published 1903)
Lyell, C. (1990). Principles of geology (Rudwick, M. J. S., Ed.; 1st ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1830–1833)
Magon, R. & Cupchik, G. (2023). Examining the role of aesthetic experiences in self-realization and self-transcendence: A thematic analysis. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 10(1–2), 6894.
Mallgrave, H. F. & Ikonomou, E. (Eds.). (1994). Empathy, form, and space: Problems in German aesthetics, 1873–1893. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220232.
Mureika, J. R., Dyer, C. C., & Cupchik, G. C. (2005). Multifractal structure in nonrepresentational art. Physical Review E, 72(4), 046101.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Pfeiffer, K. L. (1990). Fiction: On the fate of a concept between philosophy and literary theory. In Burwick, F. & Pape, W. (Eds.), Aesthetic illusion: Theoretical and historical approaches (pp. 92104). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Pompa, L. (1967). Family resemblance. The Philosophical Quarterly, 17(66), 6369.
Poulet, G. (1956). Studies in human time (Coleman, E., Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1950)
Rothenberg, A. (1976). Homospatial thinking in creativity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(1), 17.
Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rothenberg, A. (1980). Visual Art: Homospatial thinking in the creative process. Leonardo, 13(1), 1727.
Rothenberg, A. (1986). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combined-composite visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 370381.
Rothenberg, A. (1988). The creative process of psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity and madness: New findings and old stereotypes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 128.
Sander, F. (1930). Structure, totality of experience, and Gestalt. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 188204). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Schiller, F. (1965). On the aesthetic education of man: In a series of letters (R. Snell, Trans.). New York: Frederick Ugar. (Original work published 1794)
Schneider, H. J. (1995). The staging of the gaze: Aesthetic illusion and the scene of nature in the eighteenth century. In Pape, W. & Burwick, F. (Eds.), Reflecting senses (pp. 7795). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Shanks, M. (2012). The archaeological Imagination. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Sirén, O. (2005). The Chinese on the art of painting: Texts by the painter-critics, from the 4th through the 19th centuries. Mineola, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1936)
Stamatopoulou, D. & Cupchik, G. C. (2017). The feeling of the form: Style as dynamic “textured” expression. Art and Perception, 5(3), 262298.
Tateo, L. (2017). Use your imagination: The history of a higher mental function. In Wagoner, B., de Luna, I. B., & Awad, S. H. (Eds.), The psychology of imagination: History, theory, and new research horizon (pp. 4766). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Vartanian, O. (2020). Imagination in aesthetic experience. In Abraham, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 447465). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vartanian, O., Cant, J. S., Sama, M. A., et al. (2024, April). Exploring the neural bases of instrumental vs. expressive imagination: A dynamic functional network connectivity analysis. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience of Creativity, Toronto, ON.
Werner, H. (1978). On physiognomic modes of perception and their experimental investigation. In Barten, S. S. & Franklin, M. B. (Eds.), Developmental processes: Heinz Werner’s selected writings, Vol. 1 (pp. 149152). New York: International Universities Press.
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. Oxford: Wiley.
Wilkinson, E. M. (1945). Johann Elias Schlegel: A German pioneer in aesthetics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. Oxford: International Universities Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. Oxford: Penguin.
Wölfflin, H. (1950). Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art (M. D. M. Hottinger, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1915).
Wulf, C. (2022). Human beings and their images: Imagination, mimesis, performativity (Hamilton, E. & Winter, D., Trans.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Zittoun, T., Glaveanu, V., & Hawlina, H. (2020). A sociocultural perspective on imagination. In Abraham, A., (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 143161). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.