Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:02:39.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Constitutional Public Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Ronald C. Den Otter
Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University
Get access

Summary

In the previous chapter, I reviewed the three basic principles of public reason – laissez-faire, exclusion, and inclusion – and described their strengths and weaknesses. In this chapter, I defend an exclusive principle of public reason as the best interpretation of an ideal of public justification. Such a principle, where the set of public reasons is narrow, is more likely to lead to publicly justified laws and judicial decisions under conditions of moral pluralism. This defense is partially based on the claim that an exclusive principle of public reason better squares with the requirements of judging. An exclusive principle would require “exceedingly persuasive justification” for the law in question, which would be more difficult for the state to satisfy than the alternative principles of public reason in fundamental rights and equal protection cases. When legislation involves constitutional essentials, the state must produce reasons that an ideal reasonable dissenter could not reject, or else the law in question is unconstitutional. The constitutional requirement that the most important laws be unquestionably publicly justified would foster the same basic equal legal rights for all of the members of the political community.

The use of an exclusive principle also would help those who read judicial opinions to know when the Court has decided a case incorrectly. That is more important than it may seem. A morally pluralistic society like our own always has been, and always will be, trying to temper the moral disagreement that causes political conflict.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rawls, John, “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 134Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 5Google Scholar
Barber, Sotirios A. and Fleming, James E., Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), xiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., “Public Legal Reason,” 92 Virginia Law Review (2006), 1453Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), 3Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977), 128–9Google Scholar
Gerstmann, Evan, Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 18Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A., “Relativizing Rawls,” 69 Chicago-Kent Law Review (1994), 719Google Scholar
Doan, Alesha E. and Williams, Jean Calterone, The Politics of Virginity: Abstinence in Sex Education (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Only Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 16Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A., “Francis Biddle's Sister: Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987), 163–97Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 254Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 2003), 347–50Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F., “Liberal Neutrality: A Compelling and Radical Principle,” in Perfection and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory, ed. Wall, Steven and Klosko, George (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 147Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen, The New Right v. the Constitution (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1987), 54Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., “Rawls on Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 404Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F., Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 279Google Scholar
Reiman, Jeffrey, Justice and Modern Moral Philosophy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990), 1Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 153–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 1996), 14Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M., Liberalism and American Constitutional Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), esp. 1–17Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “The Right and the Good Contrasted,” in Liberalism and Its Critics, ed. Sandel, Michael J. (New York: New York University Press, 1984), 49–51Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, The Anatomy of Antiliberalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), esp. 232–46Google Scholar
Sher, George, “Liberal Neutrality and the Value of Autonomy,” 12 Social Philosophy and Policy (1995), 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1986), 371–4Google Scholar
Tomasi, John, Liberalism beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the Boundaries of Political Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 25Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, The Liberal Theory of Justice (Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1973), 121Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto, Knowledge and Politics (New York: Free Press, 1975), 76Google Scholar
Wall, Steven, Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Leslie, “Good Catholics Should Be Rawlsian Liberals?5 Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal (1997), 297–373Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles, “Political Liberalism,” 18 Political Theory (1990), 347–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, Carlos Santiago, The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996), 117–19Google Scholar
McPherson, James M., Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), esp. 6–169Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, “Liberal Dialogue versus a Critical Theory of Discursive Legitimation,” in Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy L. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), 143–56Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent, “On Public Reason,” 64 Chicago-Kent Law Review (1994), 671Google Scholar
Estlund, David, “The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth,” 108 Ethics (1998), 263–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment,” 29 Philosophy and Public Affairs (2000), 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B., “Faith and Justice,” 39 DePaul Law Review (1990), 1102Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J., “Neutrality and Utility,” 20 Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1990), 215–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J., “Liberal Neutrality on the Good: An Autopsy,” in Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory, ed. Wall, Steven and Klosko, George (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003), 208Google Scholar
Callahan, David, The Cheating Culture: Why More Americans Are Doing Wrong to Get Ahead (Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 2004)Google Scholar
Wenar, Leif, “Political Liberalism: An Internal Critique,” 106 Ethics (1995), 44–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P., “Public Reason and Political Conflict: Abortion and Homosexuality,” 106 Yale Law Journal (1997), 2484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, Robert P. and Wolfe, Christopher, “Natural Law and Liberal Public Reason,” 42 American Journal of Jurisprudence (1997), 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, Micah, “The Completeness of Public Reason,” 3 Politics, Philosophy and Economics (2004), 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, ed. Audi, Robert (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 607–11
Larmore, Charles, “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism,” 116 Journal of Philosophy (1999), 600Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles, Patterns of Moral Complexity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Constitutional Public Reason
  • Ronald C. Den Otter, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism
  • Online publication: 17 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809507.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Constitutional Public Reason
  • Ronald C. Den Otter, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism
  • Online publication: 17 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809507.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Constitutional Public Reason
  • Ronald C. Den Otter, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism
  • Online publication: 17 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809507.006
Available formats
×