Skip to main content Accessibility help
John Searle's Philosophy of Language
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This is a volume of original essays on key aspects of John Searle's philosophy of language. It examines Searle's work in relation to current issues of central significance, including internalism versus externalism about mental and linguistic content, truth-conditional versus non-truth-conditional conceptions of content, the relative priorities of thought and language in the explanation of intentionality, the status of the distinction between force and sense in the theory of meaning, the issue of meaning scepticism in relation to rule-following, and the proper characterization of 'what is said' in relation to the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Written by a distinguished team of contemporary philosophers, and prefaced by an illuminating essay by Searle, the volume aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of Searle's work in philosophy of language, and to suggest innovative approaches to fundamental questions in that area.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.


Abel, G. (ed.) (2006). Kreativität. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Adams, E. (2001). Threat displays in animal communication: handicaps, reputations, and commitments. In Nesse, R. (ed.), Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment, pp. 99–119. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Alston, W. P. (1997). Searle on perception. Read at the mini-conference on the philosophy of John Searle held at the University of Notre Dame in April 1997.
Alston, W. P.(2000). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1991). Intentionality, perception and causality: reflections on John Searle's Intentionality. In Lepore, E. and Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and his Critics, pp. 149–58. Oxford: Blackwell.
Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Asher, N. and Bonevac, D. (2005). Free choice permission is strong permission. Synthese, 145, 303–23.
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Asher, N. and McCready, E. (2007). “Might”, “would” and a compositional account of counterfactuals. Journal of Semantics, 24, 93–129.
Asher, N. and Reese, B. (2005). Negative bias in polar questions. In Maier, E., Bary, C., and Huitink, J. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, pp. 30–43. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.
Asher, N. and Wang, L. (2003). Ambiguity and anaphora with plurals in discourse. In Young, R. B. and Zhou, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.
Austin, J. L. (1961). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. (1978). A representational theory of action. Philosophical Studies, 34, 361–79.
Bach, K.(1981). What's in a name. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59, 371–86.
Bach, K.(1982). De re belief and methodological solipsism. In Woodfield, A. (ed.), Thought and Object, pp. 121–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K.(1994a). Thought and Reference, pbk edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K.(1994b). Semantic slack: what is said and more. In Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 267–91. London: Routledge.
Barker, S. J. (2004). Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Belnap, N., Horty, J., and Xu, M. (1995). The deliberative Stit: a study of action, omission, ability and obligation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24, 583–644.
Blackburn, S. (1990). Wittgenstein's irrealism. In Brandl, L. and Haller, R. (eds.), Wittgenstein: Eine Neubewertung, pp. 13–26. Vienna: Hoelder-Pickler Tempsky.
Bloom, P. (2002). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brandom, R. B. (1983). Asserting. Noûs, 17, 637–50.
Brandom, R. B.(1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brentano, F. ([1874] 1973). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, trans. A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and L. L. McAlister, ed. McAlister, L. L.. New York: Humanities Press.
Burge, T. (1977). De re belief. Journal of Philosophy, 74, 338–62.
Burge, T.(1991). Vision and intentional content. In Lepore, E. and Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and his Critics, pp. 195–213. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–6.
Cocchiarella, N. B. (1984). Philosophical perspectives on quantification in tense and modal logic. In Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. ii, pp. 309–53. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Darwin, C. ([1872] 1998). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, ed. Ekman, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1975). Thought and talk. In Guttenplan, S. (ed.), Mind and Language, pp. 7–23. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D.(1984). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davis, W. A. (2003). Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, W. A.(2005). Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devitt, M. (1974). Singular terms. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 183–205.
Devitt, M.(1981). Designation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Devitt, M.(1990). Meanings just ain't in the head. In Boolos, G. (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honour of Hilary Putnam, pp. 79–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Devitt, M. and Sterelny, K. (1987). Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Donnellan, K. (1972). Proper names and identifying descriptions. In Harman, G. and Davidson, D. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 356–79. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dummett, M. (1963). Realism. Read at Oxford University Philosophical Society in March 1963. First published in Dummett, M., Truth and Other Enigmas, London: Duckworth, 1978, pp. 145–65.
Dummett, M.(1976). What is a theory of meaning? (ii). In Evans, G. and McDowell, J. (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, pp. 67–137. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Evans, G. (1973). The causal theory of names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 47, 187–208.
Evans, G.(1982). The Varieties of Reference, ed. McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fernandez, J. (2006). The intentionality of memory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84, 39–57.
Fitch, W. T. (2005). The evolution of language: a comparative review. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 193–230.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Fodor, J. A.(1981). Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A.(1994). The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and its Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Forguson, L. W. (1973). Locutionary and illocutionary acts. In Berlin, al., Essays on J. L. Austin, pp. 160–85. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Frege, G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: L. Nebert.
Frege, G.(1918). Der Gedanke, eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1, 58–77.
Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gauker, C. (1990). How to learn a language like a chimpanzee. Philosophical Psychology, 3, 31–53.
Gauker, C.(1991). If children thought like adults. Philosophical Psychology, 4, 139–46.
Gauker, C.(1994a). Review of C. R. Gallistel (ed.), Animal Cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 7, 515–19.
Gauker, C.(1994b). Thinking Out Loud: An Essay on the Relation between Thought and Language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gauker, C.(2003). Words without Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gauker, C.(2005a). On the evidence for prelinguistic concepts. Theoria (Spain), 54, 287–97.
Gauker, C.(2005b). Conditionals in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geach, P. T. (1965). Assertion. Philosophical Review, 74, 449–65.
Geach, P. T.(1976). Saying and showing in Frege and Wittgenstein. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 28, 54–70.
Geach, P. T.(1980). Some problems about the sense and reference of proper names. Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplement, 6, 83–96.
Gillies, A. (2004). Epistemic conditionals and conditional epistemics. Noûs, 38, 585–616.
Ginzburg, J. (1995). Resolving questions, i. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 459–527.
Goldman, A. I. (1970). A Theory of Human Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goodale, M. and Milner, D. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodale, M. and Milner, D.(2004). Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, M. (1999a). Moore's many paradoxes. Philosophical Papers, 28, 97–109.
Green, M.(1999b). Illocutions, implicata, and what a conversation requires. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7, 65–92.
Green, M.(2000a). The status of supposition. Noûs, 34, 376–99.
Green, M.(2000b). Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 435–73.
Green, M.(2003). Grice's frown: on meaning and expression. In Meggle, G. and Plunze, C. (eds.), Saying, Meaning, Implicating, pp. 200–19. Leipzig: University of Leipzig Press.
Green, M.(2007). Moorean absurdity and showing what's within. In Green, M. and Williams, J. (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality and the First Person, pp. 189–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, M.(forthcoming a). Self-Expression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, M.(forthcoming b). Speech acts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–88.
Grice, H. P.(1968). Utterer's meaning, sentence-meaning and word-meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 225–42.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Groenendijk, J. (1999). The logic of interrogation: classical version. In Matthews, T. and Strolovitch, D. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, pp. 109–26. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 39–100.
Hamblin, C. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, 10, 41–53.
Hamblin, C.(1987). Imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell.
Han, C. (2000). The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. New York: Garland.
Harel, D. (1984). Dynamic logic. In Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. ii, pp. 497–604. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Heal, J. (1977). Insincerity and commands. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 77, 183–202.
Higginbotham, J. (1995). Tensed thoughts. Mind and Language, 10, 226–49.
Higginbotham, J.(1996). The semantics of questions. In Lappin, S. (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp. 361–84. Oxford: Blackwell.
Higginbotham, J.(2003). Remembering, imagining, and the first person. In Barber, A. (ed.), Epistemology of Language, pp. 496–533. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoerl, C. (2001). The phenomenology of episodic recall. In Hoerl, C. and McCormack, T. (eds.), Time and Memory, pp. 315–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horwich, P. (1998). Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology, vol. i. London: Macmillan.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1991). What is communication? In Mellor, D. H. (ed.), Ways of Communicating, pp. 1–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, D. (1978). Dthat. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, pp. 221–53. New York: Academic Press.
Kaplan, D.(1989). Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Almog, J., Perry, J., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kölbel, M. (ms). Literal force: a defense of conventional assertion. University of Birmingham.
Korta, K. and Perry, J. (2006). Three demonstrations and a funeral. Mind and Language, 21, 166–86.
Krifka, M. (2001). Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 1–40.
Krifka, M.(2002). Embedded speech acts. Paper read at In the Mood, a conference on mood and modality, Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt.
Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and necessity. In Harman, G. and Davidson, D. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 253–355, 763–9. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Kripke, S.(1977). Speaker reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, 255–78.
Kripke, S.(1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kusch, M. (2006). A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke's Wittgenstein. Chesham: Acumen.
Levinson, S. C. (1997). From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In Nuyts, J. and Pederson, E. (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, pp. 13–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1972). General semantics. In Harman, G. and Davidson, D. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 169–218. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lewis, D.(1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339–59.
Lewis, D.(1980). Index, context, and content. In Kanger, S. and Öhman, S. (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, pp. 79–100. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Loar, B. (1985). Review of S. Kripke, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Noûs, 19, 273–80.
Malcolm, N. (1942). Moore and ordinary language. In Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, pp. 345–68. Evanston and Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts and cognitive science. In Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings, pp. 3–81. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Martin, M. (2001). Out of the past: episodic recall as retained acquaintance. In Hoerl, C. and McCormack, T. (eds.), Time and Memory, pp. 257–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mastop, R. (2005). What Can You Do? PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Smith, Maynard J. and Harper, D. (2004). Animal Signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDowell, J. (1984a). De re senses. In Wright, C. (ed.), Frege: Tradition and Influence, pp. 98–109. Oxford: Blackwell.
McDowell, J.(1984b). Wittgenstein on following a rule. Synthese, 58, 325–63.
McDowell, J.(1991). Intentionality de re. In Lepore, E. and Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and His Critics, pp. 215–25. Oxford: Blackwell.
McDowell, J.(1994). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J.(1995). The content of perceptual experience. Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 190–205.
Merin, A. (1992). Permission sentences stand in the way of Boolean and other lattice-theoretic semantices. Journal of Semantics, 9, 95–162.
Mill, J. S. (1879). A System of Logic (10th edn). London: Longman, Green, and Co.
Moore, G. E. (1925). A defence of common sense. Reprinted in G. E. Moore, Selected Writings, ed. Baldwin, T., London: Routledge, 1993, pp. 106–33.
Moore, G. E.(1939). Proof of an external world. Reprinted in G. E. Moore, Selected Writings, ed. Baldwin, T., London: Routledge, 1993, pp. 147–70.
Murphy, G. L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pagin, P. (2004). Is assertion social?Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 833–59.
Perry, J. (1977). Frege on demonstratives. Philosophical Review, 89, 474–97.
Perry, J.(1979). The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs, 13, 3–21.
Perry, J.(2001). Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Perry, J., Israel, D., and Tutiya, S. (1993). Executions, motivations and accomplishments. Philosophical Review, 102, 515–40.
Petrie, M., Halliday, T. R., and Sanders, C. (1991). Peahens prefer males with elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour, 41, 323–31.
Pettit, P. (1990). The reality of rule-following. Mind, 99, 1–21.
Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York: W. Morrow and Co.
Plantinga, A. (1978). The Boethian compromise. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15, 129–38.
Poole, J. H. (1989). Announcing intent: the aggressive state of musth in African elephants. Animal Behaviour, 37, 140–52.
Portner, P. (2004). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Young, R. B. (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.
Prior, A. N. (1963). Thank goodness that's over. Philosophy, 34, 12–17. Reprinted in A. Prior, Papers in Logic and Ethics, London: Duckworth, 1976, pp. 78–84.
Prior, A. N.(1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, A. N.(1968). Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Prior, A. N.(1977), with K. Fine. Worlds, Times and Selves. London: Duckworth.
Putnam, H. (1962). It ain't necessarily so. Journal of Philosophy, 59, 658–71.
Putnam, H.(1973). Meaning and reference. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 699–711.
Putnam, H.(1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. In Scholl, B. (ed.), Objects and Attention, pp. 127–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z.(2003). Seeing and Visualizing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. and Storm, R. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–97.
Recanati, F. (1981). Les énoncés performatifs. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Recanati, F.(1987). Meaning and Force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recanati, F.(1996). Domains of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 445–75.
Recanati, F.(1997). The dynamics of situations. European Review of Philosophy, 2, 41–75.
Recanati, F.(1999). Situations and the structure of content. In Murasugi, K. and Stainton, R. (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics, pp. 113–65. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Recanati, F.(2000). Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Recanati, F.(forthcoming). Perspectival Thought : A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reese, B. (2006). Negative polar interrogatives and bias. In Washio, T., Sakurai, A., Nakajima, K., Takeda, H., Tojo, S., and Yokoo, M. (eds.), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: Joint JSAI 2005 Workshop Post-Proceedings, pp. 85–92. Berlin: Springer.
Reichert, S. (1984). Games spiders play III: cues underlying context-associated changes in agonistic behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 32, 1–15.
Russell, B. ([1918] 1985). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, ed. Pears, D.. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Searle, J. R. (1958). Proper names. Mind, 67, 166–73.
Searle, J. R.(1967). Proper names and descriptions. In Edwards, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. vi, pp. 487–91. New York: Macmillan.
Searle, J. R.(1968). Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. Philosophical Review, 77, 405–24.
Searle, J. R.(1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R.(1975a). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, pp. 344–69. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Searle, J. R.(1975b). Indirect speech acts. In Morgan, J. L. and Cole, P. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.
Searle, J. R.(1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R.(1980a). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–24.
Searle, J. R.(1980b). The background of meaning. In Searle, J., Kiefer, F., and Bierwisch, M. (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, pp. 221–32. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Searle, J. R.(1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R.(1989). How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 535–58.
Searle, J. R.(1991a). Perception and the satisfactions of intentionality. In Lepore, E. and Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and his Critics, pp. 181–92. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R.(1991b). Reference and intentionality. In Lepore, E. and Gulick, R. (eds.), John Searle and his Critics, pp. 227–41. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R.(1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R.(1994). Intentionality (1). In Guttenplan, S. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, pp. 394–86. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R.(1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
Searle, J. R.(1998). Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.
Searle, J. R.(2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R.(2002). Consciousness and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R.(2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soames, S. (2002). Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soteriou, M. (2000). The particularity of visual perception. European Journal of Philosophy, 8, 173–89.
Sperber, D. (1982). Comments on Clark and Carlson's paper. In Smith, N. (ed.), Mutual Knowledge, pp. 46–51. London: Academic Press.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stalnaker, R. (1972). Pragmatics. In Harman, G. and Davidson, D. (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 380–97. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Stalnaker, R.(1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–57.
Stalnaker, R.(1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In Munitz, M. and Unger, P. (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 197–13. New York: New York University Press.
Stalnaker, R.(1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stalnaker, R.(1999). Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R.(2006). Saying and meaning, cheap talk and credibility. In Benz, A., Jager, C., and Rooij, R. (eds.), Game Theory and Pragmatics, pp. 83–100. London: Palgrave.
Stampe, D. (1975). Show and tell. In Freed, B., Marras, A., and Maynard, P. (eds.), Forms of Representation, pp. 221–45. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59, 320–44.
Strawson, P. F.(1959). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
Strawson, P. F.(1973). Austin and “locutionary meaning.” In Berlin, al., Essays on J. L. Austin, pp. 46–68. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Thomason, R. (1990). Accommodation, meaning and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J., and Pollock, M. E. (eds.), Intentions in Communication, pp. 325–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Txurruka, I. (2003). The natural language conjunction “and.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 255–85.
Valberg, J. J. (1992). The Puzzle of Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van den Berg, M. (1996). Some Aspects of the Internal Structure of Discourse: The Dynamics of Nominal Anaphora. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and Speech Acts, vol. i. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vauclair, J. (1996). Animal Cognition: An Introduction to Modern Comparative Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Veltman, F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25, 221–61.
Wiggins, D. (1980). Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Blackwell.
>Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Williams, M. (1999). Skepticism. In Greco, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, pp. 35–69. Oxford: Blackwell.
Williamson, T. (1996). Knowing and asserting. Philosophical Review, 105, 489–523.
Williamson, T.(2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, G. M. (1994). Kripke on Wittgenstein and normativity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 19, 366–90.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L.(1953). Philosophical Investigations, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wright, C. (1984). Kripke's account of the argument against private language. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 759–78.
Wright, C.(1992). Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zahavi, Am. and Zahavi, Av. (1997). The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zimmerman, E. (2000). Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics, 8, 255–90.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.