Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: May 2018

6 - Regional human rights treaty systems



Initial concerns that regional human rights systems may undermine the universality of rights have largely given way to a more positive appreciation of their role. Regional human rights systems provide a crucial layer of protection. They are closely connected with regional political developments and integration which potentially gives them more traction than the United Nations (UN) system. Moreover, increasing references to their jurisprudence and practice evince how they contribute to, and enrich, international human rights law.

An examination of regional human rights systems suggests the following typical process. States agree on the need for closer regional cooperation if not integration. Human rights are accepted as one element of, and a yardstick for, the regional political order. A foundational human rights instrument is adopted. Further, a human rights body with a mandate to promote human rights and monitor states parties’ compliance with their treaty obligations is (eventually) set up. Over time, responding to demands and with a view to strengthening the effectiveness and credibility of the system, substantive rights are broadened and the role of victims (and others, particularly non-governmental organisations (NGOs)) in raising the issue of, or complaining about, human rights violations is enhanced. As the system matures this momentum eventually results in the establishment of a judicial body. Parallel efforts to foster regional political integration reinforce the importance of human rights at all levels as a marker of the system's ability to provide a stable order based on the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights.

The European, Inter-American and African human rights systems share a number of these idealised features, which indicates that there is a pull to develop a stronger normative framework and monitoring mechanisms. However, a look at their development demonstrates that these goals are not always shared across a region (see, for example, the ambiguous role of the United States of America (USA) in the Inter-American system). Regional political support for human rights systems can vary considerably, which may in turn affect the latter's effectiveness.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Cerna, C. M. (ed.), Regional Human Rights Systems (Ashgate, 2014).
Shelton, D., and Wright-Carroza, P., Regional Protection of Human Rights, (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Bates, E., The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Christofferson, J., and Madsen, M. R. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Grabenwarter, C., European Convention on Human Rights: Commentary (Beck, 2014).
Greer, S., The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Harris, D. J., O'Boyle, M., Bates, E. and Buckley, C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, (Oxford University Press, 2014).
Hodson, L., NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe (Hart, 2011).
Leach, P., Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Mowbray, A., Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights, (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kemmer, J. and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart, 2014).
Rainey, B., Wicks, E. and Ovey, C., Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights, (Oxford University Press, 2014).
Seatzu, F., and Ubeda de Torres, A., The Law and Practice of the European Social Committee (Routledge, 2015).
Burgorgue-Larsen, L., and Ubeda de Torres, A., The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Harris, D., and Livingstone, S. (eds.), The Inter-American System of Human Rights (Clarendon Press, 1998).
Medina Quiroga, C., The American Convention on Human Rights: Crucial Rights and their Theory and Practice (Intersentia, 2014).
Pasqualucci, J. M., The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Serrano, M., and Popovski, V. (eds.), Human Rights Regimes in the Americas (United Nations University Press, 2010).
Evans, M., and Murray, R. (eds.), The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The System in Practice 1986–2006, (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Kufuor, K. O., The African Human Rights System: Origin and Evolution (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
Okafor, O. C., The African Human Rights System, Activist Forces and International Institutions (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Ssenyonjo, M. (ed.), The African Regional Human Rights System: 30 years after the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Martinus Nijhoff, 2012).
Viljoen, V., International Human Rights Law in Africa, (Oxford University Press, 2012).
African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child:
See on the jurisprudence of all three of the above also African Human Rights Case Law Analyser:
Community Court of Justice – ECOWAS:
East African Court of Justice:
SADC Tribunal:
Nasu, H., and Saul, B. (eds.), Human Rights in the Asia-Pacific Region: Towards Institution Building (Routledge, 2011).
Saul, B., and Renshaw, C., Human Rights in Asia and the Pacific: Critical Concepts in Asian Studies Volumes I – IV (Routledge, 2014).
Tan, H.-L., The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: Institutionalising Human Rights in South East Asia (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: