Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:20:45.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

10 - Group rights: self-determination, minorities and indigenous peoples

Ilias Bantekas
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Lutz Oette
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Rights pertaining to groups, as opposed to individual members thereof, are also known as collective rights or solidarity rights. However, not every conceivable group possesses such rights by the mere fact that it is organised as a collectivity (e.g. political parties, activists, disabled groups and others are not endowed with collective rights). Rather, collective rights are limited to particular groupings and are typically conferred by treaty, soft law or customary international law. They are premised on the rationale that certain entitlements are meaningless outside the group and that their justiciable character is dependent on the group’s continued existence and coherence. Thus, the notion of statehood is redundant without a stable population that wishes to form a nation and it is exactly in this populace, through its duly appointed representatives, that the state finds expression. As a result, the powers of the state are vested in its people and it is natural that they be endowed with entitlements that cannot be conferred on discrete individuals. By way of illustration, although the right to elect and be elected is meaningful in its personal dimension, the choice to form, secede or unite with another state cannot be exercised individually. Instead, such decisions are best taken by the affected collectivity acting as a single corpus in accordance with predefined rules. General international law informs a large part of the discussion on group rights, albeit, as will become evident, human rights considerations have increasingly been viewed as central to the rights of peoples.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anaya, S. J., Indigenous Peoples in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Castellino, J., ‘Territoriality and Identity in International Law: the Struggle for Self-determination in the Western Sahara’, Millennium Journal of International Studies 28 (1999), 547.Google Scholar
Castellino, J. and Dominguez-Redondo, E., Minority Rights in Asia: A Comparative Legal Analysis (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Crawford, J. (ed.), The Rights of Peoples (Oxford University Press, 1992).
Genugten, W. van, ‘Protection of Indigenous Peoples on the African Continent: Concepts, Position Seeking and the Interaction of Legal Systems’, AJIL 104 (2010), 29.Google Scholar
Keane, D., Caste-Based Discrimination in International Human Rights Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).
Lerner, N., Group Rights and Discrimination in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).
McHugh, P., The Maori Magna Carta: New Zealand Law and the Treaty of Waitangi (Oxford University Press, 1991).
Ndahinda, F. M., Indigenousness in Africa: A Contested Legal Framework for Empowerment of Marginalised Communities (The Hague: TMC Asser, 2011).
Pentassuglia, G., Minorities in International Law: An Introductory Study (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2002).
Ratner, S., ‘Drawing a Better Line: Uti possidetis and the Borders of New States’, AJIL 90 (1996), 590.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M., ‘Protecting Indigenous Rights in International Adjudication’, AJIL 89 (1995), 352.Google Scholar
Spiliopoulou-Akermark, A., Justifications of Minority Protection in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).
Thornberry, P., International Law and the Rights of Minorities (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).
Xanthaki, A., Indigenous Rights and United Nations Standards: Self-Determination, Culture and Lands (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Cassese, A., Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 19–23
International Status of South-West Africa, Advisory opinion, 1950
UNGA resolution 2625(XXV) (24 October 1970), Declaration on principles of international law concerning friendly relations and co-operation among states in accordance with the Charter of the UN (Friendly Relations Declaration), principles 1 and 3; HRCtee, General Comment 12 (13 March 1984), para. 6.
Pellet, A., ‘The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee: a Second Breath for the Self-determination of Peoples’, EJIL 3 (1992), 178 Google Scholar
Shaw, M., ‘The Heritage of States: the Principle of uti possidetis Today’, BYIL 67 (1996), 75 Google Scholar
Poore, B., ‘Somaliland: Shackled to a Failed State’, Stanford Journal of International Law (Stan. J. Int’l L.) 45 (2009), 117 Google Scholar
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in Katangese Peoples’ Congress v. Zaire, 75/92 (1995)
Franck, T. M., ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’, AJIL 86 (1992), 46 Google Scholar
Wampler, B., Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation and Accountability (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press, 2007)
Shah, A., Participatory Budgeting: Public Sector Governance and Accountability (Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 2007)
Thornberry, P., Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights (Manchester University Press, 2002), 154
Steiner, H., ‘Ideals and Counter-ideals in the Struggle over Autonomy Regimes for Minorities’, Notre Dame Law Review (Notre Dame L. Rev.) 66 (1991), 1539 Google Scholar
O’Keefe, R., ‘The Right to Take Part in Cultural Life under Article 15 of the ICESCR’, ICLQ 47 (1998), 904 Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. P., ‘The United Nations Sub-commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities’, AJIL 62 (1968), 870 Google Scholar
Bantekas, I, ‘The Authority of States to Use Names in International Law and the Macedonian Affair: Unilateral Entitlements, Historic Title and Trademark Analogies’, LJIL 22 (2009), 563 Google Scholar
Henrard, K., ‘Language Rights and Minorities in South Africa’, International Journal on Multicultural Societies 3 (2001), 78 Google Scholar
children, Romani, see D. H. and Others v. Czech Republic (2008) 47
Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium (1987)
Sejdic ´ and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, ECtHR judgment (22 December 2009)
Coster v. UK (2001) 33
Kingsbury, B., ‘Indigenous Peoples in International Law: A Constructivist Approach to the Asian Controversy’, AJIL 92 (1998), 414 Google Scholar
ACHPR, Advisory opinion on the UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)
Case of the Saramaka People v. Suriname, IACtHR judgment (28 November 2007)
the Australian High Court in Kruger v. The Commonwealth (1997)
Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua, IACtHR, Ser. C, no. 79 (31 August 2001)
Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, Merits, reparations and costs, Judgment, IACtHR Ser. C, no. 125 (17 June 2005)
the Malaysian High Court in Adong bin Kuwau and 51 Others v. The Government of Jahore [1997]
Shapovalov, A., ‘Straightening out the Backward Legal Regulation of Backward Peoples’ Claim to Land in the Russian North: the Concept of Indigenous Neomodernism’, Georgia International Environmental Law Review (Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev.) 17 (2005), 435 Google Scholar
Becker, H. A. and Vanclay, F, The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006)
Barrow, C. J., Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (London: Hodder Arnold, 1997), 234
Ashley, C. and Hussein, K., Developing Methodologies for Livelihood Impact Assessment: Experience of the African Wildlife Foundation in East Africa (Washington DC: Overseas Development Institute Working Paper 129, 2000), 14
Mawoung, G. Ngima, The Relationship between the Bakola and the Bantu Peoples of the Coastal Regions of Cameroon and their Perception of Commercial Forest Exploitation, African Study Monographs 26 (2001), 209 Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×