Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:15:03.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Elections: The Power of Elections in Multiparty Africa

from Part III - Elections, Parties and Political Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Carolien Van Ham
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Staffan I. Lindberg
Affiliation:
V-Dem Institute at University of Gothenburg
Nic Cheeseman
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Multiparty elections are not only the sine qua non of modern representative democracy, they also constitute perhaps the most notable set of formal institutions on the continent today. At the same time, electoral institutions in Africa are often accompanied by the kind of competitive informal institutions described in Chapter 15. This has led to a fierce debate about the quality and impact of elections in Africa.

Elections in sub-Saharan Africa (hereafter referred to as Africa) are more common than ever in the continent's history: multiparty elections have spread to almost every country. This is all the more remarkable given Africa's relatively brief experience with elections. While multiparty elections were held on the continent before 1989, the real upsurge came only after the end of the Cold War.

Under colonialism, colonial subjects in the French territories voted in elections both to assemblies in France and to local government councils, and elections were also held for councils with limited legislative power in some of the English colonies. In conjunction with decolonisation, many countries also held multiparty elections, bringing leaders such as Kwame Nkrumah, Kenneth Kaunda, Leopold Senghor and Jomo Kenyatta to power.

Yet, after independence, about half of all African countries reverted to military regimes, starting with the 1960 coup in the then Zaire, today Democratic Republic of Congo. More than twenty other countries fashioned one-party regimes (often with a nominal socialist ideology) holding non-competitive elections. The justification for doing so was that legal processes had been followed – such as constitutional review commissions and referenda – and that these changes were necessary to forge national unity in the interest of rapid economic development. Consequently, by the mid-1980s, forty-two out of forty-seven countries in Africa could be categorised as either military or single-party regimes. Only Botswana, Gambia and Mauritius continued with multiparty elections from independence.

The end of the Cold War marked the start of a rapid transformation. In just a few years, almost all the previously autocratic regimes started holding multiparty elections (Bratton and van de Walle 1997; Lindberg 2006). The proportion of countries holding multiparty polls jumped from just 25 per cent in 1988 to 84 per cent in 1994 (van Ham and Lindberg 2015). At present, forty-six of forty-nine countries on the continent (94 per cent) hold multiparty elections for national offices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Institutions and Democracy in Africa
How the Rules of the Game Shape Political Developments
, pp. 213 - 237
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, Robert H. 1989. Beyond the miracle and the market: The political economy of agrarian development in Kenya, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2011. Electoral malpractice, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2013. ‘Exchange: Reexamining African elections’, Journal of Democracy 24, 4: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Van de Walle, Nicholas. 1997. Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in a comparative perspective, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliffe, Lionel. 1967. One party democracy in Tanzania, Nairobi: East African Publishing House.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth B. 1982. Regimes in tropical Africa: Changing forms of supremacy 1945–1975, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steve. 1997. ‘Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research’, World Politics 49, 3: 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Altman, David, Michael Bernhard, M. Fish, Steven, Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, McMann, Kelly, Pemstein, Daniel, Reif, Megan, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, and Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2015a. ‘Varieties of Democracy: Dataset v4’, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Altman, David, Michael Bernhard, M. Fish, Steven, Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, McMann, Kelly, Pemstein, Daniel, Reif, Megan, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, and Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2015b. ‘Varieties of Democracy: Codebook v4.’ Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, Altman, David, Michael Bernhard, M. Fish, Steven, Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, McMann, Kelly, Pemstein, Daniel, Reif, Megan, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, and Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2015c. ‘Varieties of Democracy: Methodology v4’. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
Edgell, , Mechkova, , Altman, , Bernhard, , and Lindberg, . Forthcoming 2017. “When and where do elections matter? A global test of the democratization by elections hypothesis, 1900-2010”, Democratization 24.
Elklit, Joergen, and Reynolds, Andrew. 2005. ‘A framework for the systematic study of election quality’, Democratisation 12, 2: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elklit, Joergen, and Svensson, Palle. 1997. ‘What makes elections free and fair?Journal of Democracy 8, 3: 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. ‘Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats’, Comparative Political Studies 40, 11: 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. ‘Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset’, Journal of Peace Research 39, 5: 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groemping, Max, and Martinez i Coma, Ferran. 2015. Electoral integrity in Africa, Munich: Electoral Integrity Project/Hanns Seidel Foundation.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Axel. 1992. Democracy and development, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Fred (ed.). 1987. Elections in independent Africa, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc M., and Roessler, Philip G.. 2006. ‘Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes’, American Journal of Political Science 50, 2: 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, Goran, and Leys, Colin. 1972. ‘Elections and politics in single-party systems: The case of Kenya and Tanzania’, British Journal of Political Science 2, 4: 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, Ruchan, and Bernhard, Michael. 2013. ‘Are elections mechanisms of authoritarian stability or democratisation? Evidence from postcommunist Eurasia’, Perspectives on Politics 11, 3: 734–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice. 2003. ‘Electoral fraud: Causes, types, and consequences’, Annual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steve, and Way, Lucas. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the Cold War, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2006. Democracy and elections in Africa, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2009. ‘The power of elections revisited’ in Lindberg, Staffan I. (ed.), Democratisation by elections: A new mode of transitions, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press: 25–46.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2013. ‘Confusing categories, shifting targets’, Journal of Democracy 24, 4: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I., Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, and Teorell, Jan. 2014. ‘V-Dem: A new way to measure democracy’, Journal of Democracy 25, 3: 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. ‘legislative elections in hegemonic authoritarian regimes: Competitive clientelism and resistance to democracy’ in Lindberg, Staffan I. (ed.), Democratisation by Elections: A New Mode of Transitions, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press: 226–245.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, William. J. M., and Robinson, Kenneth. 1960. Five elections in Africa, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatrice. 2008. ‘Credible power-sharing and longevity of authoritarian rule’, Comparative Political Studies 41, 4–5: 715–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer and Hartlyn, Jonathan. 2009. ‘The relative powerlessness of elections in Latin America’ in Lindberg, Staffan I. (ed.), Democratisation by elections: A new mode of transitions, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press: 47–76.Google Scholar
Moe, Ronald C. 1990. ‘Traditional organisational principles and the managerial presidency: From phoenix to ashes’, Public Administration Review 50, 2: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Ruth S. 1964. Political parties in French-speaking West Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2014. Why electoral integrity matters, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and development, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Ellinor, Scroeder, Larry, and Wynne, Susanne. 1993. Institutional incentives and sustainable development: Infrastructure policies in perspective, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Tzelgov, Eitan, and Wang, Yi-Ting. 2015. ‘Evaluating and improving item response theory models for cross-national expert surveys’, University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper Series No. 1.CrossRef
Pettersson, Therése, and Wallensteen, Peter. 2015. ‘Armed conflict, 1946-2014’, Journal of Peace Research 52, 4: 536–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Joseph. H. 1967. Political institutions of West Africa. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. ‘Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model’, Comparative Politics 2: 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. ‘The menu of manipulation’, Journal of Democracy 13, 2: 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas (ed.). 2006. Electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2013. The politics of uncertainty. Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2010. Determinants of democratisation. Explaining regime change in the world, 1972–2006, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan, Dahlberg, Stefan, Holmberg, Sören, Rothstein, Bo, Hartmann, Felix, and Svensson, Richard. 1 January 2015. ‘The quality of government standard dataset’, University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
Teorell, Jan, and Hadenius, Axel. 2009. ‘Post-Cold War political regimes: when do elections matter?’ in Lindberg, Staffan I. (ed.), Democratisation by elections: A new mode of transitions, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press: 77–100.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua. 2007. ‘Enough! Electoral fraud, collective action problems, and post-communist colored revolutions’, Perspectives on Politics 5, 3: 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ham, Carolien. 2012. ‘Beyond electoralism? Electoral fraud in third wave regimes 1974-2009’. PhD dissertation. Florence: European University Institute.
Van Ham, Carolien. 2014. ‘Getting elections right? Measuring electoral integrity’, Democratisation 22, 4: 714–737.Google Scholar
Van Ham, Carolien, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2015. ‘From sticks to carrots: Electoral manipulation in Africa, 1986–2012’, Government and Opposition 50, 3: 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×