Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:52:05.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Regimes and Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2019

Agustina Giraudy
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Eduardo Moncada
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University
Richard Snyder
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Inside Countries
Subnational Research in Comparative Politics
, pp. 113 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Benton, Allyson Lucinda. (2012). Bottom-up challenges to national democracy: Mexico’s (legal) subnational authoritarian enclaves. Comparative Politics 44(3), 253271.Google Scholar
Bivand, Roger. (2014). spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.5–77.Google Scholar
Blasi, Joseph R., Kroumova, Maya, & Kruse, Douglas. (1997). Kremlin capitalism: The privatization of the Russian economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, & Stokes, Susan C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics 55(4), 517549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, & Collier, David. (2002). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Linda. (2007). Negotiating welfare in postcommunist states. Comparative Politics 40(1), 4162.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert Alan. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Elkink, Johan A. (2011). The international diffusion of democracy. Comparative Political Studies 44(12), 16511674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. (1993). Bargaining over the presidency. East European Constitutional Review 2(4), 9598.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. (1996). The role of institutional interest in East European constitution-making. East European Constitutional Review 5(1), 6365.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, & Preuss, Ulrich K. (1998). Institutional design in post-communist societies: Rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. (2005). Democracy derailed in Russia: The failure of open politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. (2006). Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies. Journal of Democracy 17(1), 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Timothy. (1997). A politics of institutional choice: Post-communist presidencies. Comparative Political Studies 30(5), 523552.Google Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos. (2010). A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the argentine provinces. World Politics 62(2), 302340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. (2005). Boundary control: Subnational authoritarianism in democratic countriesWorld Politics 58(1), 101132.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. (2013). Boundary control: Subnational authoritarianism in federal democracies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. (2015). Democrats and autocrats: Pathways of subnational undemocratic regime continuity within democratic countries. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golosov, Grigorii. (2004). Political parties in the regions of Russia: Democracy unclaimed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Gorenburg, Dmitry P. (2003). Minority ethnic mobilization in the Russian Federation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. (2003). Explaining machine politics in Russia’s regions: Economy, ethnicity, and legacy. Post-Soviet Affairs 19(3), 228263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Henry E. (2006). Why not parties in Russia? Democracy, federalism, and the state. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J. (2013). Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(2), 155184.Google Scholar
King, James D. (2000). Changes in professionalism in U.S. state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(2), 327343.Google Scholar
Kousser, Thad. (2005). Term limits and the dismantling of state legislative professionalism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konitzer, Andrew. (2005). Voting for Russia’s governors: Regional elections and accountability under Yeltsin and Putin. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kopstein, Jeffrey S., & Reilly, David A. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics 53(1), 137.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, & Taagepera, Rein. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1), 327.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena V. (2006). How Russia really works: The informal practices that shaped post-Soviet politics and business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, & Way, Lucan. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13(2), 5165.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review 99(03), 435452.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. (1991). Constitutional choices for new democracies. Journal of Democracy 2(1), 7284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. (1992). Democratization and constitutional choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland 1989–91. Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(2), 207223.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. (1990a). The perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1(1), 5169.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. (1990b). The virtues of parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy 1(2), 8491.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., & Valenzuela, Arturo (Eds.). (1994). The failure of presidential democracy: Comparative perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53(1), 69105.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, & Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. (2007). Why regions of the world are important: Regional specificities and region-wide diffusion of democracy. In Munck, Gerardo L. (Ed.), Regimes and democracy in Latin America: Theories and methods, pp. 199229. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil. (2006). Government growth and professionalism in U.S. state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(4), 563584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael. (2001a). Explaining party formation and nonformation in Russia: Actors, institutions, and chance. Comparative Political Studies 34(10), 11591187.Google Scholar
McFaul, Michael. (2001b). Russia’s unfinished revolution: Political change from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McMann, Kelly M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy: Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moraski, Bryan. (2006). Elections by design: Parties and patronage in Russia’s regions. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
O’loughlin, John, Ward, Michael D., Lofdahl, Corey L., Cohen, Jordin S., Brown, David S., Reilly, David, Gleditsch, Kristian S., & Shin, Michael. (1998). The diffusion of democracy, 1946–1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88(4), 545574.Google Scholar
Powell, Bingham G. (1982). Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability, and violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Remington, Thomas F. (2001). The Russian parliament: Institutional evolution in a transitional regime, 1989–1999. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remington, Thomas F. (2011). The politics of inequality in Russia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Cameron. (2002). Federalism and democratization in Russia. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics 2(3), 337363.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas (Ed.). (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. (2006). When do elites compete? The determinants of political competition in Russian regions. Comparative Politics 38(3), 273293.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (2006). Comparative executive-legislative relations. In Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah, & Rockman, Bert, The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, pp. 344365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1), 93110.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. (1992). Legislative professionalization and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(1), 6979.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. (1998). Membership turnover and the efficient processing of legislation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(1), 2332.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. (2005). The Evolution of American Colonial Assemblies as Legislative Organizations. Congress & the Presidency 32(2), 109131.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. (2007). Measuring state legislative professionalism: The Squire index revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2), 211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner-Weiss, Katherine. (2002). Local heroes: The political economy of Russian regional governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Altamirano, Claudia. (2016, January 25). El Congreso de Veracruz aprueba una reforma antiabortista del Gobernador. El País. Available at: https://elpais.com/internacional/2016/01/25/mexico/1453688213_930974.html?rel=mas (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., & Jones, Bryan D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. American politics and political economy series. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beauregard, Luis Pablo. (2017, February 16). La millionaria asociación provida que mueve los hilos de la ultraderecha en México. El País. Available at: https://elpais.com/internacional/2017/02/16/mexico/1487209541_075721.html (last accessed: December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline. (2016). La Iglesia Católica y la igualdad de género en los estados Mexicanos. In Mendéz, Irma & Loza, Nicolás (Eds.), Poderes y democracias: La política subnacional en Mexico, pp. 283302. Mexico City, Mexico: FLACSCO-Mexico and Instituto Electoral del Distrito Federal.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline. (2017a). Left parties and violence against women legislation in Mexico. Social Politics 24(4), 511537.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline. (2017b). Making abortion laws in Mexico: Salience and autonomy in the policymaking process. Comparative Politics 50(1), 4159.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline, & Cruz-Aceves, Victor. (2018). Extending rights to marginalized minorities: Same-sex relationship recognition in Mexico and the United States. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 18(1), 326.Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, & Berry, William D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review 84(2), 395415.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike. (2006). The politics of moral sin: Abortion and divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. (2010). Policy diffusion dynamics in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H., Longhofer, Wesley, & Minzee, Kim. (2015). Abortion liberalization in world society, 1960–2009. American Journal of Sociology 121(3), 882913.Google Scholar
Cabrales Lucio, Josés Miguel. (2016). Análisis jurídico (en perspectiva de derechos humanos) de la Ley para prevenir, atender, sancionar, y erradicar la violencia contra las mujeres para la entidad federativa de Tamaulipas y algunas propuestas para su operatividad. In De Jesús Guzmán Acuña, Teresa & Guzmán Acuña, Josefina (Eds.), Género, universidad, y sociedad, pp. 1326. Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Miguel Ángel Porrúa.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, & Krook, Mona Lena. (2008). Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies 56(3), 725736.Google Scholar
Diego Rodríguez, Martín. (2006, December 10). Despiden a equipo de defensa de los derechos de la mujer en Guanajuato. La Jornada. Available at: www.jornada.unam.mx/2006/12/10/index.php?section=estados&article=034n1est (last accessed: December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Diego Rodríguez, Martín. (2007, July 9). Guanajuato: Piden ONG ley contra violencia a mujeres. La Jornada. Available at: www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/07/09/index.php?section=estados&article=040n1est (last accessed: December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Díez, Jordi. (2015). The politics of gay marriage in Latin America: Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dulitzky, Ariel. (2006). Federalismo y derechos humanos: El caso de la convención Americana sobre derechos humanos y la República Argentina. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional VI, 199249.Google Scholar
El Universal. (2010, March 5). Piden en Guanajuato ley vs violencia a mujeres. El Universal. Available at: http://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/663618.html (last accessed July 16, 2014).Google Scholar
Excelsior. (2014, May 6). Aguirre presenta iniciativa para despenalizar el aborto en Guerrero. Excelsior. Available at: www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2014/05/06/957754 (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
García, Carlos, & Chávez, Mariana. (2009, September 18). Guanajuato desecha ley contra violencia de género y Querétaro aprueba normas contra el aborto. La Jornada. Available at: www.jornada.unam.mx/2009/09/18/index.php?section=estados&article=032n2est (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos, Loza, Nicolás, & Mendéz, Irma. (2016). Introducción. In Loza, Nicolás & Mendéz, Irma (Eds.), Poderes y democracias: La política subnacional en Mexico, pp. 1542. Mexico City: FLACSO Mexico.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review 67(4), 11741185.Google Scholar
Guardiola, Andrés. (2015, April 5). Política polémica va por alcaldía en León. Excelsior. Available at: www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2015/04/05/1017186 (last accessed: December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. (2001). Policy diffusion as a geographic expansion of the scope of political conflict: Same-sex marriage bans in the 1990s. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1(5), 526.Google Scholar
Haussman, Melissa. (2005). Abortion politics in North America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Rodríguez, Rogelio. (2003). The renovation of old institutions: State governors and the political transition in Mexico. Latin American Politics & Society 45(4), 97127.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. (2003). Sex and the state: Abortion, divorce, and the family under Latin American dictatorships and democracies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, & Weldon, S. Laurel. (2010). When do governments promote women’s rights? A framework for the comparative analysis of sex equality policy. Perspectives on Politics 8(01), 207216.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., Krook, Mona Lena, & Paxton, Pamela. (2015). Transnational women’s activism and the global diffusion of gender quotas. International Studies Quarterly 59(2), 357372.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, & Norris, Pippa. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew. (2007). Democratic laboratories: Policy diffusion among the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., & Sikkink, Kathryn. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal 51(159), 89101.Google Scholar
Lamas, Marta. (2009). La despenalización del aborto en México. Nueva Sociedad 220 (March/April), 154172.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, & Way, Lucan A. (2006). Linkage versus leverage. Comparative Politics 38(4), 379400.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. (2013). La restauración de la Iglesia católica en la transición Mexicana. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Lopreite, Debora. (2014). Explaining policy outcomes in federal contexts: The politics of reproductive rights in Argentina and Mexico. Bulletin of Latin American Research 33(4), 389404.Google Scholar
Loza, Nicolás, & Méndez, Irma. (2014). Encuesta a expertos en política estatal en México 2001–2012. Edited by PNUD FLACSO, y CONACYT. Available at: http://podesualflacso.wordpress.com (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Laura, & Mills, Lisa. (2010). Gender, democracy and federalism in Mexico: Implications for reproductive rights and social policy. In Haussman, Melissa, Sawer, Marian, & Vickers, Jill (Eds.), Federalism, feminism, and multilevel governance, pp. 187198. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Madrazo, Alejandro, & Vela, Estefanía. (2011). The Mexican supreme court’s (sexual) revolution? Texas Law Review 89(7), 18631893.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy. (2002). Theorizing feminist policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Cheryl M. (2013). Beyond the national: Transnational influences on (subnational) state responsiveness to an international norms on violence against women. (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Pérez Courtade, Luis. (2014, April 24). Propondrá Mancera despenalización del aborto en el resto del país. Excelsior. Available at: www.excelsior.com.mx/comunidad/2014/04/24/955612 (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Pou Jiménez, Francisca. (2009). El aborto en México: El debate en la Suprema Corte sobre la normativa del Distrito Federal. Anuario de Derechos Humanos 5, 137152.Google Scholar
Proceso. (2010, November 25). Aprueban en Guanajuato ley de acceso a vida libre de violencia. Proceso. Available at: www.proceso.com.mx/98666/aprueban-en-guanajuato-ley-de-acceso-a-vida-libre-de-violencia (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Reina, Elena. (2016, July 29). Veracruz abre la vía para que el aborto sea considerado como un homocidio. El País. Available at: https://elpais.com/internacional/2016/07/29/mexico/1469810266_277274.html (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. (2010). Political power and women’s representation in Latin America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Semple, Kirk. (2017, April 17). Javier Duarte, Mexican ex-governor accused of diverting money, is captured. The New York Times. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2017/04/16/world/americas/mexico-javier-duarte-captured.html?_r=0 (last accessed December 16, 2018).Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. (2015). Legal inequality and federalism: Domestic violence laws in the Argentine provinces. Latin American Politics & Society 57(3), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. (2017, June 20–23). The transnational and sub-national study of abortion lawfare. Paper presented at the International Meeting on Law and Society, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. (2008). Theories of policy diffusion: Social sector reform in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 41(2), 193216.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. (2012). Bottom-up policy diffusion: National emulation of a conditional cash transfer program in Brazil. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42(1), 2551.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63(3), 880899.Google Scholar
Washington Valdez, Diana. (2006). The killing fields: Harvest of women – The truth about Mexico’s bloody border legacy. Los Angeles, CA: Peace at the Border.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. (1997). Political sources of presidencialismo in Mexico. In Mainwaring, Scott & Soberg Shugart, Matthew (Eds.), Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America, pp. 225–258. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. (2002). Protest, policy, and the problem of violence against women: A cross-national comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×