Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:46:32.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The Three Great Issues Confronting Europe – Economic, Environmental and Political

from Part IV - Innovation Management and its Links with Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2018

Jorge Niosi
Affiliation:
Université du Québec, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Europe today is confronted by fundamental changes in its external environment as well as internally, giving rise to several daunting policy challenges. First, there is the economic challenge manifest in slow growth or even stagnation in many countries, which, although also present in other parts of the world, is particularly severe in Europe. Second, there is the challenge posed by the climate crisis, the solution of which requires nothing less than a fundamental transformation from carbon-based growth to a new, sustainable economy. Without this, future generations will be in dire straits. The third challenge concerns the governance and policy crisis now facing Europe and the difficulties this poses for policy making and implementation. It might be argued that the recent rapid growth of immigration to Europe represents a fourth challenge.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, M. 1994. Catch-up and convergence in the post-war growth boom and after, in Baumol, W. J., Nelson, R. R. and Wolf, E. N. (eds.), Convergence of Productivity – Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 86125.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., Feichtinger, J., and Steurer, R.. 2012. The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: Challenges and approaches. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14: 279304.Google Scholar
Begg, I. 2015. EU policy and governance: Part of the problem or part of the solution? in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 204228.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. 2007. Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17: 326337.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. and Gupta, A.. 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics 70: 18561864.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. and Pattberg, P. 2008. Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 33: 277294.Google Scholar
BP. 2016a. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2016 (downloaded from www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
BP. 2016b. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2016, Carbon Dioxide Emissions (downloaded from www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Cingano, F. 2014. Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, Paris: OECD Publishing (downloaded from www.oecd.org/els/soc/trends-in-income-inequality-and-its-impact-on-economic-growth-SEM-WP163.pdf on 10 October2016).Google Scholar
ECF. 2013. From Roadmaps to Reality – A Framework for Power Sector Decarbonisation in Europe. Brussels: European Climate Foundation.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. An investment plan for Europe, Brussels: European Commission (downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/jobs-growth-investment/plan/index_en.htm on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
European Council. 2014. Conclusions from the European Council 23 and 24 October 2014, EUCO 169/14, Brussels: European Council. (downloaded from http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%20169%202014%20INIT on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R.. 2015. The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R. (eds.). 2016. The triple challenge for Europe: The economy, climate change, and governance. Challenge 59: 178204.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B.. 2015. One Europe or several? Causes and consequences of the European stagnation, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., B. R. 3359.Google Scholar
Figenbaum, E., and Kolbenstvedt, M.. 2013. Electromobility in Norway – experiences and opportunities with Electric Vehicles, Report 1281/2013, The Institute of Transport Economics (downloaded from www.toi.no/publikasjoner/elektromobilitet-i-norge-erfaringer-og-muligheter-med-elkjoretoy-article32103-8.html on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. 2015. The arduous transition to low-carbon energy: A multi-level analysis of renewable electricity niches and resilient regimes, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., B. R. 91118.Google Scholar
Global Utmaning. 2015. Nordic Transport Ways (a report from the independent Swedish think tank Global Utmaning) (downloaded from www.globalutmaning.se/rapporter/ on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
GMDAC. 2016. IOM Global Migration Data Analysis Centre (downloaded from http://iomgmdac.org on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Gordon, R. 2012. Is US Economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds, NBER Working Paper 18315. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth – the U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. et al. 2016a. Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: Evidence from paleoclimatic data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2°C global warming could be dangerous. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16: 37613812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. et al. 2016b. Young people’s burden: Requirement of negative CO2 emissions (discussion paper publ. 161004 by Earth System Dynamics, an open access journal of the European Geosciences Union, (downloaded from www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/esd-2016–42/ on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
IEA. 2014. Energy Technology Perspectives – Harnessing Electricity’s Potential. Paris: OECD, International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IEA. 2015b. Energy and Climate Change – World Energy Outlook Special Report. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
IEA. 2016. Key CO2 Emissions Trends, Excerpt from: CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2013a. Climate Change 2013 – Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2013b. Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014 – Mitigation of Climate Change (WGIII contribution to AR5) (downloaded from www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_frontmatter.pdf on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Laestadius, S. 2015. Transition paths: Assessing conditions and alternatives, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 143169.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. A. 2015. The new North-South divide in Europe – Can the European convergence model be resuscitated? in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 6087.Google Scholar
Lauber, V. and Jacobsson, S.. 2015. Lessons from Germany’s Energiewende, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 173203.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. 2014. Greening of Capitalism: How Asia Is Driving the Next Great Transformation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. and Perez, C.. 2015. Innovation as growth policy: The challenge for Europe, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S. and Martin, B. R., 229264.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. R. and Engelke, P.. 2016. The Great Acceleration – An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moriarty, P. and Honnery, D.. 2016. Can renewable energy power the future? Energy Policy 93: 37.Google Scholar
Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R. R. and Martin, B. R.. 2010. Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work), Research Policy, 39: 10111023.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. 2013. The Climate Casino – Risk, Uncertainty and Economics for a Warming World. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rogelj, J. et al. 2016. Paris agreement climate proposals need a boss to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature 534: 631639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, H. and Lema, R.. 2015. The global green economy: Competition or cooperation between Europe and China? in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 119142.Google Scholar
Reilly, J. et al. 2015. Energy and Climate Outlook – Perspectives from 2015, MT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Sandén, B. 2008. Solar solution: the next industrial revolution. Materials Today 11(2): 2224.Google Scholar
Smil, V. 2010. Energy Transitions – History, Requirements Prospects. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223): paper 1259855.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Turn Down the Heat – Why a 4°C Warmer World Must be Avoided. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013. Turn Down the Heat – Climate Extremes, Regional Impact, and the Case for Resilience. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×