Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: February 2010

16 - Which World Should Be Represented in Representative Design?

Summary

University of California, Berkeley campus, early 1940s. A man and a young woman are strolling across the university campus. Suddenly the man stops and says, “Now.” The woman also stops, raises her arm, points to the building in front of her, and says, “The window on the second floor.” After contemplating the scene for a moment, she says “Three-and-a-half feet.” The man records this and other numbers. They begin walking again. A few moments later, the man stops once again and the same interaction repeats itself.

University of Constance, vision laboratory, mid-1980s. A young man enters a dark room. The experimenter welcomes him and then asks him to sit down in front of a large cubicle, to put his chin on a rest (thus making it impossible to move his head), and to look into the cubicle through two small holes. Its interior is completely dark. Suddenly a white square appears, only to disappear a few seconds later. Then, a tone is heard, which is followed by another white square to the right of the previous one. The young man says, “The left one.” This episode frequently repeats itself over the course of the next half hour.

Although both scenes represent the same genre, namely, psychological studies on the perception of object size, they share few common features. As we shall see shortly, their differences can be traced back to the fact that the Berkeley study was conceived by Egon Brunswik (1944; for a replication, see Dukes, 1951), whereas a contemporary experimental psychologist conducted the Constance study.

References
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 123–156
Anderson, J. R., & Lebierre, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396–408
Baker, T. L. (1988). Doing social research. New York: McGraw-Hill
Begg, I. M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446–458
Braspenning, J., & Sergeant, J. (1994). General practitioners' decision making for mental health problems: Outcomes and ecological validity. Journal Clinical Epidemiology, 47, 1365–1372
Brehmer, B. (1979). Preliminaries to a psychology of inference. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 193–210
Brunswik, E. (1940). Thing constancy as measured by correlation coefficients. Psychological Review, 47, 69–78
Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272
Brunswik, E. (1944). Distal focussing of perception: Size constancy in a representative sample of situations. Psychological Monographs, 56, 1–49
Brunswik, E. (1945). Social perception of traits from photographs. Psychological Bulletin, 42, 535
Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. In International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (Vol. 1, No. 10, pp. iv–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press
Brunswik, E., & Reiter, L. (1937). Eindrucks-Charaktere schematisierter Gesichter. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 142, 67–134
Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego: Academic Press
Czikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1992). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. In Vries, M. W. (Ed.), The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings (pp. 43–57). New York: Cambridge University Press
Dhami, M., Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2004). The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 959–988
Dukes, W. F. (1951). Ecological representativeness in studying perceptual size-constancy in childhood. American Journal of Psychology, 64, 87–93
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Ebbesen, E. B., & Konecni, V. J. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts: The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805–821
Ebbesen, E. B., & Konecni, V. J. (1980). On the external validity of decision-making research: What do we know about decisions in the real world? In Wallsten, T. S. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 21–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ebbesen, E. B., Parker, S., & Konecni, V. J. (1977). Laboratory and field analyses of decisions involving risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 576–589
Feigl, H. (1955). Functionalism, psychological theory, and the uniting sciences: Some discussion remarks. Psychological Review, 62, 232–235
Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Plessner, H. (2002). Judgment biases in a simulated classroom – A cognitive-environmental approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 527–561
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670
Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow:” How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts?Risk Analysis, 25, 623–629
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506–528
Gigerenzer, G., Switjink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Gillis, J., & Schneider, C. (1966). The historical preconditions of representative design. In Hammond, K. R. (Ed.), The psychology of Egon Brunswik (pp. 204–236). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75–90
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence, Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411–435
Hammond, K. R. (1966). Probabilistic functionalism: Egon Brunswik's integration of the history, theory, and method of psychology. In Hammond, K. R. (Ed.), The psychology of Egon Brunswik (pp. 15–80). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Hammond, K. R. (1996). Upon reflection. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 239–248
Hammond, K. R. (1998). Representative design. http://www.brunswik.org/notes/essay3.html
Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (1974). The interaction between design and discovery in the study of human judgment. Report No. 152. University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science
Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (Eds.) (2001). The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372–1388
Hastie, R., & Hammond, K. R. (1991). Rational analysis and the lens model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 498
Hilgard, E. R. (1955). Discussion of probabilistic functionalism. Psychological Review, 62, 226–228
Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14, 53–72
Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2004). The cognitive illusion controversy: A methodological debate in disguise that matters to economists. In Zwick, R. & Rapoport, A. (Eds.), Experimental business research (pp. 361–378). Boston: Kluwer
Hoffrage, U. (1995). Zur Angemessenheit subjektiver Sicherheits-Urteile. Eine Exploration der Theorie der probabilistischen mentalen Modelle [The adequacy of subjective confidence judgments: Studies concerning the theory of probabilistic mental models]. Doctoral thesis, University of Salzburg
Hoffrage, U. (2004). Overconfidence. In Pohl, R. F. (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A Handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 235–254). Hove, UK: Psychology Press
Hoffrage, U., & Pohl, R. F. (Eds.) (2003). Hindsight Bias (Special Issue). Memory, 11, 329–504
Hogarth, R. (2006). Is confidence in decisions related to feedback? Evidence from random samples of real-world behavior. This volume
Hull, C. L. (1943). The problem of intervening variables in molar behavior theory. Psychological Review, 50, 273–291
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326–338
Juslin, P. (1993). An explanation of the “hard-easy effect” in studies of realism of confidence in one's general knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 55–71
Juslin, P. (1994). The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 226–246
Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (1997). Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: A sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Psychological Review, 104, 344–366
Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Björkman, M. (1997). Brunswikian and Thurstonian origins of bias in probability assessment: On the interpretation of stochastic components of judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 189–209
Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Winman, A. (1998). The calibration issue: Theoretical comments on Suantak, Bolger, and Ferrell (1996). Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 73, 3–26
Juslin, P., Winman, A., & Olsson, H. (2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychological Review, 107, 384–396
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 493–508). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582–591
Krech, D. (1955). Discussion: Theory and reductionism. Psychological Review, 62, 229–231
Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 313–327
Kurz, E. M., & Hertwig, R. (2001). To know an experimenter. In Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications (pp. 180–186). New York: Oxford University Press
Kurz, E. M., & Tweney, R. D. (1997). The heretical psychology of Egon Brunswik. In Bringmann, W. G., Lueck, H. E., Miller, R., & Early, C. E. (Eds.), A pictorial history of psychology (pp. 221–232). Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence
Moore, W. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1990). Conjoint analysis on objects with environmentally correlated attributes: The questionable importance of representative design. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 490–497
Olson, G. A., Dell'omo, G. G., & Jarley, P. (1992). A comparison of interest arbitrator decision-making in experimental and field settings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 711–723
Oppewal, H., & Timmermans, H. (1999). Modeling consumer perception of public space in shopping centers. Environment and Behavior, 31, 45–65
Phelps, R. H., & Shanteau, J. (1978). Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 209–219
Postman, L. (1955). The probability approach and nomothetic theory. Psychological Review, 62, 218–225
Schooler, L., & Hertwig, R. (2005). How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review, 112, 610–628
Soll, J. B. (1996). Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration: The roles of random error and ecological structure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 117–137
Stewart, T. (1988). Judgment analysis: Procedures. In Brehmer, B. & Joyce, C. R. B. (Eds.), Human judgment: The SJT view (pp. 41–74). North-Holland: Elsevier
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131
Mises, R. (1957). Probability, statistics, and truth. New York: Dover
Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125
Winman, A. (1997). The importance of item selection in “knew-it-all-long” studies of general knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 63–72
Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2006). “I'm m/n confident that I'm correct”: Confidence in foresight and hindsight as a sampling probability. This volume
Woodworth, R. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt