Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:51:51.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Infection and the Diversity of Regulatory DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Lindsay G. Cowell
Affiliation:
Department of Immunology, Campus Box 3010, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701
N. Avrion Mitchison
Affiliation:
Department of Immunology, Windeyer Institute of Medical Science, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4JF, UK
Brigitte Muller
Affiliation:
Deutsches Rheuma Zentrum Berlin, Shumannstrasse 21/22, 10117 Berlin-Mitte, Germany
Krishna R. Dronamraju
Affiliation:
Foundation for Genetic Research, Houston, Texas
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The importance of regulatory DNA in long-term evolution is well recognized. Major evolutionary advances such as the origin of the bacteria, vertebrates, and mammals can be interpreted largely in terms of regulation of gene expression (1,2). Short-term evolution also is mediated substantially by changes in gene expression, and polymorphism in regulatory DNA provides a major component of genetic variation in natural populations (3–5). Such variation has been particularly well studied in respect to disease susceptibility in human populations, including susceptibility to infection. The immune system is a rich source of regulatory genetic variation, notable in the following four areas:

  1. Inflammation, where variation in the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is conspicuous.

  2. Th1/Th2/Treg balance, where differentiation into distinct T-cell subsets is regulated by the timing and level of gene expression, as can be modeled by Hopff bifurcation (6).

  3. In the constitutive immune system, where multiple copies of, e.g., interferon genes occur.

  4. In the generation of diverse antigen receptor repertoires, where variability among signal sequences mediating V(D)J recombination may regulate ordered assembly and allelic exclusion of the H, β, and δ loci and may bias the preselection repertoire.

In short, the immune system does not know what it will need to cope with next and uses regulatory DNA to provide some of the flexibility needed to function effectively. The same means are also used elsewhere to provide balance and flexibility, e.g., in the cardiovascular system (7).

The problem is that variation is harder to interpret in regulatory than in coding DNA.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gehring, W. J., Qian, Y. Q., Billeter, M., Furukubo-Tokunaga, K., Schier, A. F., Resendez-Perez, D., Affolter, M., Otting, G., and Wuthrich, K., 1994. Homeodomain – DNA recognition. Cell 78: 211–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, E. H., 2001. Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego
Mitchison, N. A., 1997. Partitioning of genetic variation between regulatory and coding gene segments: the predominance of software variation in genes encoding introvert proteins. Immunogenetics 46: 46–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S. B., 2000. Endless forms: the evolution of gene regulation and morphological diversity. Cell 101: 577–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enard, W., Khaitovich, P., Klose, J., Zollner, S., Heissig, F., Giavalisco, P., Nieselt-Struwe, K., Muchmore, E., Varki, A., Ravid, R., Doxiadis, G. M., Bontrop, R. E., and Paabo, S., 2002. Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Science 296: 340–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofer, T., Nathansen, H., Lohning, M., Radbruch, A., and Heinrich, R., 2002. GATA-3 transcriptional imprinting in Th2 lymphocytes: a mathematical model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 26: 26Google Scholar
Paillard, F., Chansel, D., Brand, E., Benetos, A., Thomas, F., Czekalski, S., Ardaillou, R., and Soubrier, F., 1999. Genotype-phenotype relationships for the renin angiotensin-aldosterone system in a normal population. Hypertension 34: 423–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maniatis, T., Falvo, J. V., Kim, T. H., Kim, T. K., Lin, C. H., Parekh, B. S., and Wathelet, M. G., 1998. Structure and function of the interferon-beta enhanceosome. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 63: 609–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, M. S., 1995. Prediction of function in DNA sequence analysis. J. Comput. Biol. 2: 87–115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucher, P., 1999. Regulatory elements and expression profiles. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 400–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanet, A., Marsan, L., and Sagot, M. F., 1999. Promoter sequences and algorithmical methods for identifying them. Res. Microbiol. 150: 779–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stormo, G. D., 2000. DNA binding sites: representation and discovery. Bioinformatics 16: 16–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, S. L., Buckland, P. R., Hoogendoorn, B., Guy, C., Smith, K., and O'Donovan, M. C., 2002. Experimental analysis of the annotation of promoters in the public database. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11: 1817–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burge, C. B., 1998. Modeling dependencies in pre-mRNA splicing signals. In Computational Methods in Molecular Biology, S. L. Salzberg, D. B. S., S. Kasif, Eds. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Carrington, M., Dean, M., Martin, M. P., and O'Brien, S. J., 1999. Genetics of HIV-1 infection: chemokine receptor CCR5 polymorphism and its consequences. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8: 1939–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchison, N. A., 2001. Polymorphism in regulatory gene sequences. Genome Biol. 2: 1–6Google ScholarPubMed
Kornman, K. S., and Duff, G. W., 2001. Candidate genes as potential links between periodontal and cardiovascular diseases. Ann. Periodontol. 6: 48–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asderakis, A., Sankaran, D., Dyer, P., Johnson, R. W., Pravica, V., Sinnott, P. J., Roberts, I., and Hutchinson, I. V., 2001. Association of polymorphisms in the human interferon gamma and interleukin-10 gene with acute and chronic kidney transplant outcome: the cytokine effect on transplantation. Transplantation 71: 674–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, K. G., Simon, R. M., Bailey-Wilson, J. E., Freidlin, B., Biddison, W. E., McFarland, H. F., and Trent, J. M., 1998. Clustering of non-major histocompatibility complex susceptibility candidate loci in human autoimmune diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 9979–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louis, P., Eliaou, J. F., Kerlan-Candon, S., Pinet, V., Vincent, R., and Clot, J., 1993. Polymorphism in the regulatory region of HLA-DRB genes correlating with haplotype evolution. Immunogenetics 38: 21–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louis, P., Vincent, R., Cavadore, P., Clot, J., and Eliaou, J. F., 1994. Differential transcriptional activities of HLA-DR genes in the various haplotypes. J. Immunol. 153: 5059–67Google ScholarPubMed
Baumgart, M., Moos, V., Schuhbauer, D., and Muller, B., 1998. Differential expression of major histocompatibility complex class II genes on murine macrophages associated with T cell cytokine profile and protective/suppressive effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6936–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, Y., Kamikawaji, N., Fujisawa, K., Yoshizumi, H., Yasunami, M., Kimura, A., and Sasazuki, T., 1991. Genetic control of immune response and disease susceptibility by the HLA-DQ gene. Res. Immunol. 142: 459–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottenhoff, T. H., Walford, C., Nishimura, Y., Reddy, N. B., and Sasazuki, T., 1990. Natural variation in immune responsiveness, with special reference to immunodeficiency and promoter polymorphism in class II MHC genes. Eur. J. Immunol. 20: 2347–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, D. B., and Mitchison, N. A., 1989. HLA-DQ molecules and the control of Mycobacterium leprae-specific T cell nonresponsiveness in lepromatous leprosy patients. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 75: 167–77Google Scholar
Mitchison, N. A., Muller, B., and Segal, R. M., 2000. Natural variation in immune responsiveness, with special reference to immunodeficiency and promoter polymorphism in class II MHC genes. Hum. Immunol. 61: 177–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowell, L. G., Kepler, T. B., Janitz, M., Lauster, R., and Mitchison, N. A., 1998. The distribution of variation in regulatory gene segments, as present in MHC class II promoters. Genome Res. 8: 124–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchison, N. A., and Roes, J., 2002. Patterned variation in murine MHC promoters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 19: 19Google Scholar
Beck, S., and Trowsdale, J., 2000. The human major histocompatibility complex: lessons from the DNA sequence. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 1: 117–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M., and Conery, J. S., 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondrashov, F. A., Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., and Koonin, E. V., 2002. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. 3: 1–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alba, M. M., Das, R., Orengo, C. A., and Kellam, P., 2001. Genomewide function conservation and phylogeny in the Herpesviridae. Genome Res. 11: 43–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alba, M. M., Lee, D., Pearl, F. M., Shepherd, A. J., Martin, N., Orengo, C. A., and Kellam, P., 2001. VIDA: a virus database system for the organization of animal virus genome open reading frames. Nucl. Acids Res. 29: 133–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muschen, M., Re, D., Brauninger, A., Wolf, J., Hansmann, M. L., Diehl, V., Kuppers, R., and Rajewsky, K., 2000. Somatic mutations of the CD95 gene in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells. Cancer Res. 60: 5640–3Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, T. J., Kim, S. J., and Park, J. H., 2000. Influence of the sequence variations of the HLA-DR promoters derived from human melanoma cell lines on nuclear protein binding and promoter activity. Yonsei Med. J. 41: 593–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derreumaux, S., and Fermandjian, S., 2000. Bending and adaptability to proteins of the cAMP DNA-responsive element: molecular dynamics contrasted with NMR. Biophys. J. 79: 656–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qians, X., Strahs, D., and Schlick, T., 2001. Dynamic simulations of 13 TATA variants refine kinetic hypotheses of sequence/activity relationships. J. Mol. Biol. 308: 681–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, S. E., Luong, L. A., Ogg, M. S., Hawe, E., and Miller, G. J., 2001. The interleukin-6-174 G/C promoter polymorphism is associated with risk of coronary heart disease and systolic blood pressure in healthy men. Eur. Heart J. 22: 2243–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsden, D. A., Baetz, K., and Wu, G. E., 1994. Conservation of sequence in recombination signal sequence spacers. Nucl. Acids Res. 22: 1785–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowell, L. G., Davila, M., Yang, K. Y., Kepler, T. B., and Kelsoe, G., 2002. Prospective estimation of recombination signal efficiency and identification of functional cryptic signals in the genome by statistical modeling. J. Exp. Med. 197: 207–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, J. E., Lieber, M. E., Mizuuchi, K., and Gellert, M., 1989. V(D)J recombination: a functional definition of the joining signals. Genes and Development 3: 1053–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livak, F., and Petrie, H. T., 2001. Somatic generation of antigen-receptor diversity: a reprise. Trends Immunol. 22: 608–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassing, C. H., Alt, F. W., Hughes, M. M., D'Auteuil, M., Wehrly, T. D., Woodman, B. B., Gartner, F., White, J. M., Davidson, L., and Sleckman, B. P., 2000. Recombination signal sequences restrict chromosomal V(D)J recombination beyond the 12/13 rule. Nature 405: 583–6Google Scholar
Liang, H. E., Hsu, L. Y., Cado, D., Cowell, L. G., Kelsoe, G., and Schlissel, M. S., 2002. The “dispensable” portion of RAG-2 is necessary for efficient V-to-DJ rearrangement during B and T cell development. Immunity 17: 639–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. D., and McBlane, J. F., 2000. Recombination-activating genes, transposition, and the lymphoid-specific combinatorial immune system: a common evolutionary connection. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 248: 111–35Google ScholarPubMed
Heldt, C., Listing, J., Sozeri, O., Blasing, F., Frischbutter, S., Muller, B., 2003. Differential expression of HLA class II genes associated with disease susceptibility and progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheuma. 48: 2779–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Infection and the Diversity of Regulatory DNA
    • By Lindsay G. Cowell, Department of Immunology, Campus Box 3010, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701, N. Avrion Mitchison, Department of Immunology, Windeyer Institute of Medical Science, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4JF, UK, Brigitte Muller, Deutsches Rheuma Zentrum Berlin, Shumannstrasse 21/22, 10117 Berlin-Mitte, Germany
  • Edited by Krishna R. Dronamraju, Foundation for Genetic Research, Houston, Texas
  • Book: Infectious Disease and Host-Pathogen Evolution
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546259.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Infection and the Diversity of Regulatory DNA
    • By Lindsay G. Cowell, Department of Immunology, Campus Box 3010, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701, N. Avrion Mitchison, Department of Immunology, Windeyer Institute of Medical Science, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4JF, UK, Brigitte Muller, Deutsches Rheuma Zentrum Berlin, Shumannstrasse 21/22, 10117 Berlin-Mitte, Germany
  • Edited by Krishna R. Dronamraju, Foundation for Genetic Research, Houston, Texas
  • Book: Infectious Disease and Host-Pathogen Evolution
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546259.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Infection and the Diversity of Regulatory DNA
    • By Lindsay G. Cowell, Department of Immunology, Campus Box 3010, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701, N. Avrion Mitchison, Department of Immunology, Windeyer Institute of Medical Science, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4JF, UK, Brigitte Muller, Deutsches Rheuma Zentrum Berlin, Shumannstrasse 21/22, 10117 Berlin-Mitte, Germany
  • Edited by Krishna R. Dronamraju, Foundation for Genetic Research, Houston, Texas
  • Book: Infectious Disease and Host-Pathogen Evolution
  • Online publication: 10 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546259.013
Available formats
×