1990). Employment, stress and family functioning. Chichester: Wiley. (
1994). Containing Cupid's arrow. Small Business Reports 19: 53–8. (
Byrne, D. and Neuman, J. H. (1992). The implications of attraction research for organizational issues. In (ed.), Issues, theory and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 29–70). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist 59: 676–84. (
1999). Not all is fair in love and work: co-workers’ preferences for and responses to managerial interventions regarding workplace romances. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20: 1043–56. and (
1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 288–97. (
1982). Sex in the office. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. and (
1999). Hierarchal workplace romance: an experimental examination of team member perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20: 1057–72. (
2000). An examination of the perceived fairness of workplace romance policies. Journal of Business and Psychology 14: 429–42. and (
2001). Young workers’ work values, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74: 543–58. and (
1986). A review and analysis of power dynamics in organizational romances. Academy of Management Review 11: 750–62. (
1989). Office romance: love, power and sex in the workplace. New York: Rawson Associates.(
1998). Managing the workplace romance: protecting employee and employer rights. Review of Business 19: 25–31. and (
1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. (
2001). A framework for investigating the link between workplace romance and sexual harassment. Group and Organizational Management 26: 206–29. and (
2003). Romantic relationships in organizations. Management Research 1: 161–9. and (
2004). Responding to sexual harassment complaints: effects of a dissolved workplace romance on decision-making standards. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95: 66–82. and (
2000). Effects of a dissolved workplace romance and rater characteristics on responses to a sexual harassment accusation. Academy of Management Journal 43: 869–80., , and (
1996). Attraction in organizations: a model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 17: 5–32., , and (
1986). What do tomorrow's managers think about sexual intimacy in the workplace?Business Horizons July–August: 30–6. (
2001). Workplace romances between senior-level executives and lower-level employees: an issue of work disruption and gender. Human Relations 54: 1519–44.(
1977). Coping with Cupid: the formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 30–45. (
1984). Attraction and harassment: dynamics of sexual harassment in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics 13: 35–46. and (
2005). Beyond the individual victim: linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal 48: 387–400. and (
2006). Don't screw the crew. British Journal of Management 17: 1–14. and (
Rosston, G. (2004). For whom the bridge tolls? Retrieved November 17, 2005. From San Francisco Chronicle. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/08/27/EDGMQ8EQ931.DTL.
2001). Managing workplace romances. SAM Advanced Management Journal 66: 4–11. and (
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) (1998). Workplace romance survey. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Public Affairs Department.
1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review 93: 119–35. (
Turner, N., Barling, J., and Zacharatos, A. (2002). Positive psychology at work. In and (eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 715–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2001). If you can't join them, beat them: effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 1058–69., , , and (
2000). A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology 85: 587–96. (
2002). The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23: 75–92.(