Aarts, Henk, and Dijksterhuis, Ap (2003). “The Silence of the Library: Environment, Situational Norm and Social Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(1): 18–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abramowitz, Alan I. (2010). The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Abrams, Samuel J., and Fiorina, Morris P. (2014). “Are Leaning Independents Just Deluded or Dishonest Weak Partisans?” Working Paper. Sarah Lawrence College and Stanford University.

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W. (1983). Change and Continuity in the 1980 Elections. (Rev. ed). Washington: C.Q. Press.Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. (1992). “Breaking the Iron Triangle: Social Psychology, Demographic Variables and Linear Regress in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14(3): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. (2002). “Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24(2): 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahn, T. K., Huckfeldt, Robert, Mayer, Alexander K., and Ryan, John Barry (2013). “Expertise and Bias in Political Communication Networks.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Political Science Association Committee on Political Parties (1950). “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report.” Supplement to the American Political Science Review 44(3), Part 2.

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto (1995). Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Arceneaux, Kevin (2012). “Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Michael, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Rogers, Todd (2014). “Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintended Consequences of Voter Persuasion Efforts” (May 26, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2307631

Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada (2015). “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348: 1130–1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Banning, James H. (1996). “Bumper Sticker Ethnography: Another Way to View the Campus Ecology.” The Campus Ecologist 14(3): 1–4.Google Scholar

Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer (2010). “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review 104(2): 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry (2002). “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2): 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashir, Nadia, Lockwood, Penelope, Chasteen, Alison L., Nadolny, Daniel, and Noyes, Indra (2013). “The Ironic Impact of Activists: Negative Stereotypes Reduce Social Change Influence.” European Journal of Social Psychology 43(7): 614–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, and Vohs, Kathleen (2001). “Bad Is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Paul Allen (1977). “Partisan Dealignment in the Postwar South.” American Political Science Review 71(2): 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Paul Allen (2002). “Encouraging Defection: The Role of Personal Discussion Networks in Partisan Desertions to the Opposition Party and Perot Votes in 1992.” Political Behavior 24(4): 309–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell, Greene, Steven and Huckfeldt, Robert (2002). “The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Paul Allen, and Jennings, M. Kent (1975). “Parents as ‘Middlepersons’ in Political Socialization.” The Journal of Politics 37(1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Paul Allen, and Jennings, M. Kent (1979). “Political Periods and Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 73(3): 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belli, Robert F., Traugott, Michael, Young, Margaret, and McGonagle, Katherine A. (1999). “Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source Monitoring.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63(1): 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J. (1999). “The Two Faces of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1209–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J. (2002). “Political Context and the Survey Response: The Dynamics of Racial Policy Opinion.” The Journal of Politics 64(2): 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berinsky, Adam (2004). “Can We Talk: Self-Presentation and the Survey Response.” Political Psychology 25(4): 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S. (2012). “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berinsky, Adam J., and Lavine, Howard (2012). “Self-Monitoring and Political Attitudes.” Improving Public Opinion Surveys: Interdisciplinary Innovation and the American National Election Studies (Aldrich, John and McGraw, Kathleen M., eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 27–45.Google Scholar

Berinsky, Adam, Margolis, Michelle, and Sances, Michael W. (2014). “Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berrens, Robert P., Bohara, Alok, Jenkins-Smith, Hank, Silva, Carol, and Weimer, David L. (2003). “The Advent of Internet Surveys for Political Research: A Comparison of Telephone and Internet Samples.” Political Analysis 11(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah (1999). “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 519–533.Google Scholar

Bishop, Bill (2008). The Big Sort: Why The Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Bishop, George, Meadow, Robert G, and Jackson-Beeck, Marilyn (1978). The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral and Policy Perspectives. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar

Blais, Andre, and Rubenson, Daniel (2013). “The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?” Comparative Political Studies 46(1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bond, Robert M., Fariss, Christopher J., Jones, Jason J., Kramer, Adam D. I., Marlow, Cameron, Settle, Jaimie E., and Fowler, James H. (2012). “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.” Nature 489: 295–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boydstun, Amber (2013). Making the News: Politics, the Media and Agenda Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brader, Ted (2006). Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas, and Suhay, Elizabeth (2008). “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, Stephen R., Cheek, Jonathan M., and Buss, Arnold H (1980). “An Analysis of the Self-Monitoring Scale.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(4): 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Deborah Jordan (2011). “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Female and Male Politicians.” Journal of Politics 73(2): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Jonathon D., and Gallagher, Frances M. (1992). “Coming to Terms with Failure: Private Self-Enhancement and Public Self-Effacement.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Jonathon D., Collins, Rebecca L., and Schmidt, Greg W. (1988). “Self-Esteem and Direct Versus Indirect Forms of Self-Enhancement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(3): 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryce, James. (1921). Modern Democracies, Vol. 1. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar

Burden, Barry C., Canon, David T., Mayer, Kenneth R., and Moynihan, Donald P. (2014). “Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Daniel M., and Powell, Eleanor Neff (2013). “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” The Journal of Politics 76(2): 492–505.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, John T, Petty, Richard E., Feinstein, Jeffrey A., and Blair, W.Jarvis, G. (1996) “Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life and Times of Individuals Varying in Need for Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 119(2) 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Campbell, Bruce A. (1979). The American Electorate: Attitudes and Action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Campbell, David E. (2004). “Acts of Faith: Churches and Political Engagement.” Political Behavior 26(2): 155–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmines, Edward G., Gerrity, Jessica C., and Wagner, Michael W. (2008). “Did the Media Do It? The Influence of News Coverage on the 2006 Congressional Elections.” Fault Lines: Why the Republicans Lost Congress (Mondak, Jeffery and Mitchell, Dona-Gene, eds.) New York: Routledge, 22–41.Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie, Koger, Gregory, Lebo, Matthew, and Young, Everett (2010). “The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 598–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, Travis J., Ferguson, Melissa J., and Hassin, Ran R. (2011). “A Single Exposure to the American Flag Shifts Support toward Republicanism up to 8 Months Later.” Psychological Science 22(8): 1011–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cialdini, Robert B., and Goldstein, Noah J. (2004). “Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.” Annual Review of Psychology 55: 591–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, Jacob (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar

Craig, Stephen C., Niemi, Richard G, and Silver, Glenn E (1990). “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12(3): 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darr, Joshua, and Levendusky, Matthew S (2014). “Relying on the Ground Game: The Placement and Effect of Campaign Field Offices.” American Politics Research 42(3): 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, Jack (1988). “Political Independence in America, Part I: On Being an Independent Partisan Supporter.” British Journal of Political Science 18(1): 77–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, Jack (1992). “Political Independence in America, Part III: In Search of Closet Partisans” Political Behavior 14(3): 261–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doherty, David (2013). “To Whom Do People Think Representatives Should Respond: Their District or the Country?” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowling, Conor M., and Wichowsky, Amber (2015). “Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dropp, Kyle, Jackman, Molly C., and Jackman, Saul (2013). “The Affordable Care Act: An Experiment in Federalism?” Brookings Institution Research Paper.

Druckman, James N. (2004). “Priming the Vote: Campaign Effects in a US Senate Election.” Political Psychology 25(4): 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N., Green, Don P., Kuklinski, Jim H., and Lupia, Arthur (eds.) (2011). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N., and Kam, Cindy D. (2011). “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base’.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Druckman, James, Green, Don P., Kuklinski, Jim H., and Lupia, Arthur, eds.) New York: Cambridge University Press, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N and Leeper, Thomas J. (2012) “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4) 875–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Effron, Daniel A., Cameron, Jessica S., and Monin, Benoit (2009). “Endorsing Obama Licenses Favoring Whites.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(3): 590–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elving, Ronald D. (1995). Conflict and Compromise: How Congress Makes the Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Enos, Ryan D., and Hersh, Eitan D. (2015). “Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers.” American Political Science Review 109(2): 252–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eveland, William P., and Hutchens, Myiah J. (2013). “The Role of Conversation in Developing Accurate Poliftical Perceptions: A Multilevel Social Network Approach.” Human Communication Research 39(4): 422–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faucheux, Ron (ed.) (2003). Winning Elections: Political Campaign Management, Strategy, and Tactics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Feldman, Stanley, and Conover, Pamela J. (1983). “Candidates, Issues and Voters: The Role of Inference in Political Perception.” The Journal of Politics 45(4): 810–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stanley, and Huddy, Leonie (2005). “Racial Resentment and White Opposition to Race-Conscious Programs: Principles or Prejudice?”American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. (2012). “If I Could Hold a Seminar for Political Journalists…” The Forum 10(4): 2–10.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel A., and Pope, Jeremy C. (2005). Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel A. and Pope, Jeremy C. (2008) “Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings. ” Journal of Politics 70(2): 556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, James, and Kam, Cindy (2007). “Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 69(3): 813–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, James (2006). “Altruism and Turnout.” The Journal of Politics 68(3): 674–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, Tim, and Hagar, Doug (2013). “‘Liking’ Your Union: Unions and New Social Media during Election Campaigns.” Labor Studies Journal 38(3): 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Charles H. (1984). “Issue Preferences, Socialization, and the Evolution of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28(3): 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Mark N. (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gangestad, Steven W, and Snyder, Mark (2000). “Self-Monitoring: Appraisal and Reappraisal.” Psychological Bulletin 126(4): 530–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gans, Herbert J. (1979). Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Geer, John (1991). “Do Open-Ended Questions Measure ‘Salient’ Issues?” Public Opinion Quarterly 55(3): 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P. (2000). “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94(3): 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilens, Martin, Sniderman, Paul M., and Kuklinski, James H. (1998). “Affirmative Action and the Politics of Realignment.” British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Noah J, Cialdini, Robert B., and Griskevicius, Vladas (2008). “A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels.” Journal of Consumer Research 35(3): 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Donald P (1988). “On the Dimensionality of Public Sentiment toward Partisan and Ideological Groups” American Journal of Political Science 32(3): 758–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S. (2008). Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout, Second Edition. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S., and Nickerson, David W. (2003). “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” The Journal of Politics 65(4): 1083–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Groenendyk, Eric (2013). Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind: How Loyalty and Responsiveness Shape Party Identification and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Großer, Jens, and Palfrey, Thomas R. (2014). “Candidate Entry and Political Polarization: An Antimedian Voter Theorem.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis (2010). The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hajnal, Zoltan, and Lee, Taeku (2010). Why Americans Don't Join the Party: Race, Immigration and the Failure (of Political Parties) to Engage the Electorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Harbridge, Laurel (2015). Is Bipartisanship Dead? Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbridge, Laurel, and Malhotra, Neil (2011). “Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbridge, Laurel, Malhotra, Neil, and Harrison, Brian F. (2014). “Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process.” Legislative Quarterly 39(3): 327–355.Google Scholar

Hardy, Bruce, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall (2005). “Can a Poll Affect Perception of Candidate Traits?” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5): 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heerwig, Jennifer A., and McCabe, Brian J. (2009). “Education and Social Desirability Bias: The Case of a Black Presidential Candidate.” Social Science Quarterly 90(3): 674–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, David J., Jackson, Robert A., and Mondak, Jeffery J. (2008). “Abramoff, Email, and the Mistreated Mistress.” Fault Lines: Why the Republicans Lost Congress (Mondak, Jeffery and Mitchell, Dona-Gene, eds.) New York: Routledge Press, 84–110.Google Scholar

Hersh, Eitan D., and Schaffner, Brian F. (2013). “Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity.” The Journal of Politics 75(2): 520–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (1995). Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (2002). Stealth Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Jackman, Simon (2003). “Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy.” American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 583–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirano, Shigeo and Snyder, James M. (2007) “The Decline of Third-Party Voting in the United States” Journal of Politics 69(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holbrook, Allyson L., and Krosnick, Jon A (2010). “Social Desirability Bias in Voter Turnout Reports Tests Using the Item Count Technique.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1): 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holbrook, Allyson L., Green, Melanie C., and Krosnick, Jon A. (2003). “Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67(1): 79–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtgraves, Thomas (1992). “The Linguistic Realization of Face Management: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension, Person Perception, and Cross-Cultural Communication.” Social Psychological Quarterly 55(2): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoskinson, Kevin (2001). “Ray Bradbury's Cold War Novels.” Ray Bradbury (Bloom, Harold, ed.). Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers, 125–140.Google Scholar

Hosmer, David W., and Lemeshow, Stanley (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Gregory A., and Paris, Celia (2013). “Assessing the Programmatic Equivalence Assumption in Question Wording Experiments: Understanding Why Americans Like Assistance to the Poor More Than Welfare.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John D. (2004). Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John D. (1987). “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81(4): 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John D. (1991). “Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence.” The Journal of Politics 53(1): 122–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John D. (1992). “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86(1): 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John D. (1995). Citizens, Parties, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddy, Leonie, Billig, Joshua, Bracciodieta, John, Hoeffler, Lois, Moynihan, Patrick, and Pugliani, Pat (1997). “The Effects of Interviewer Gender on the Survey Response.” Political Behavior 19(3): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene (2015). “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hur, Misun, Nasar, Jack L., and Chun, Bumseok (2010). “Neighborhood Satisfaction, Physical and Perceived Naturalness and Openness.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto (2005). “Speaking of Values: The Framing of American Politics.” The Forum 3(3): Article 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gourav, and Lelkes, Yptach (2012). “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J. (2014). “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 690–707.Google Scholar

Jackman, Simon, and Sniderman, Paul M. (2006). “The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments.” The Journal of Politics 68(2): 272–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackman, Simon, and Vavreck, Lynn (2009). The 2007–8 Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project. Palo Alto, CA: Polimetrix.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. (2009). “The Effects of the George W. Bush Presidency on Partisan Attitudes.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39(2): 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kane, Emily, and Macaulay, Laura J (1993). “Interviewer Gender and Gender Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Elihu (1957). “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-to-Date Report on an Hypothesis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 21(1): 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul. F (1955). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard (1979). “The Dimensionality of Party Identification: Cross-National Perspectives.” Comparative Politics 11(2): 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keeter, Scott, Zukin, Cliff, Andolina, Moly, and Jenkins, Krista (2002). “Improving the Measurement of Political Participation.” Presented at the Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago (April 25–28, 2002).

Keith, Bruce E., Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candice J., Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark C., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1992). The Myth of the Independent Voter. London: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Killian, Linda (2012). The Swing Vote: The Untapped Power of Independents. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, Donald R., Peters, Mark D., Abelson, Robert P., and Fiske, Susan T. (1980). “Presidential Prototypes.” Political Behavior 2(4): 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klar, Samara (2014a). “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klar, Samara (2014b). “Identity Importance and Political Engagement among American Independents.” Political Psychology 35(4): 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klar, Samara (2014c). “A Multidimensional Study of Ideological Preferences and Priorities among the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (Special Issue): 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Richard A., Ratliff, Kate, Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald B., Bahník, Stepan, Bernstein, Michael J,…Nosek, Brian A. (2014). “Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project.” Social Psychology 45(3): 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konda, Thomas M., and Sigelman, Lee (1987). “Public Evaluations of the American Parties, 1952–1984.” The Journal of Politics 49(3): 814–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraus, Sidney (2000). Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kriner, Douglas L., and Shen, Francis X. (2012). “How Citizens Respond to Combat Casualties: The Differential Impact of Local Casualties on Support for the War in Afghanistan.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(4): 761–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krupnikov, Yanna (2011). “When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 55(4): 797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krupnikov, Yanna, and Levine, Adam Seth (2010). “Measuring People's Willingness to Engage in Political Action.” Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. (Bucy, Eric P. and Holbert, Lance, eds.). New York: Routledge149–164.Google Scholar

Krupnikov, Yanna, and Levine, Adam Seth (2014). “Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1(1): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krupnikov, Yanna (2014). “How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout: The Effect of Timing.” Political Communication 31(3): 446–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krysan, Maria (1998). “Privacy and the Expression of White Racial Attitudes: A Comparison across Three Contexts.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62(4): 506–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuklinski, James H., Cobb, Michael D., and Gilens, Martin (1997). “Racial Attitudes and the ‘New South’.” The Journal of Politics 59(2): 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, Everett Carll (1985). “On Mandates, Realignments, and the 1984 Presidential Election.” Political Science Quarterly 100(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laband, David N., Pandit, Ram, Sophocleus, John P., and Laband, Anne M. (2009). “Patriotism, Pigskins, and Politics: an Empirical Examination of Expressive Behavior and Voting.” Public Choice 138(1–2): 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavine, Howard, and Snyder, Mark (1996). “Cognitive Processing and the Functional Matching Effect in Persuasion: The Mediating Role of Subjective Perceptions of Message Quality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32(6): 580–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Layman, Geoffrey, Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce (2006). “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.”Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel (1948). The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Chetkovich, Carol, Katz, Nancy, and Neblo, Michael (2010). “The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes.” Political Communication 27(3): 248–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Frances (2009). Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeper, Thomas J., and Mullinix, Kevin J. (2014). “To Whom, and With What Effect? Parallel Experiments on Framing.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC (August 28–August 31, 2014).Google Scholar

Leighley, Jan E., and Nagler, Jonathan (2013). Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew (2009). Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lippa, Richard (1978). “Expressive Control, Expressive Consistency, and the Correspondence between Expressive Behavior and Personality.” Journal of Personality 46(3): 438–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lippmann, Walter (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.Google Scholar

Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. New York. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, J. Scott (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luskin, Robert C., McIver, James P., and Carmines, Edward G. (1989). “Issues and the Transmission of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 33(2): 440–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candice J., and Westlye, M. C. (2011). “The Myth of the Independent Voter Revisited.” Facing the Challenge of Democracy: Explorations in the Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Participation (Sniderman, Paul and Highton, Benjamin, eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 238–263.Google Scholar

Makse, Todd, and Sokhey, Anand E. (2014). “The Displaying of Yard Signs as a Form of Political Participation.” Political Behavior 36(1): 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masket, Seth (2009). No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, Lilliana (2014). “I Disrespectfully Agree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128–145.Google Scholar

Mattes, Kyle, and Redlawsk, David P. (2014). The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McClendon, Gwyneth H. (2014). “Social Esteem and Participation in Contentious Politics: A Field Experiment at an LGBT Pride Rally.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDermott, Rose (2011). “Internal and External Validity.” Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Druckman, James, Green, Don P., Kuklinski, Jim H., and Lupia, Arthur, eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 27–40.Google Scholar

McDonald, Michael P., and Popkin, Samuel L. (2001). “The Myth of the Vanishing Voter.” American Political Science Review 95(4): 963–974.Google Scholar

Mendelberg, Tali (2001). The Race Card. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messing, Solomon, Franco, Annie, Wilkins, Arjun, Cable, Dustin, and Warshauer, Matthew (2014). “Campaign Rhetoric and Style on Facebook in the 2014 U.S. Midterms.” Facebook Research Note. October 10, 2014: https://www.facebook.com/notes/10152581594083859/.

Middleton, Joel A., and Green, Donald P. (2008). “Do Community-Based Mobilization Campaigns Work Even in Battleground States? Evaluating the Effectiveness of MoveOn's 2004 Outreach Campaign.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3(1): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill (1997). The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Monson, J. Quin (2004). “Get on Television versus Get on the Van: G.O.T.V. and the Ground War in 2002.” The Last Hurrah? Soft Money and Issue Advocacy in the 2002 Congressional Elections (Magleby, David B. and Monson, J. Quin, eds.) Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 90–116.Google Scholar

Mullinix, Kevin J., Druckman, James N., and Freese, Jeremy (2014). “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Working Paper.

Mutz, Diana C. (2002). “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutz, Diana, and Reeves, Byron (2005). “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nall, Clayton, and Mummolo, Jonathan (2014). “Why Partisans Don't Sort: How Quality Concerns Trump Americans’ Desire for Like-Minded Neighbors.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago (April 3–6, 2014).

Nicholson, Stephen P., and Segura, Gary M. (2012). “Who's the Party of the People? Economic Populism and the U.S. Public's Beliefs about Political Parties.” Political Behavior 34(2): 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niemi, Richard, and Jennings, M. Kent (1991). “Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 35(4): 970–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut (1987). “Under Way and Here to Stay: Party Realignment in the 1980s?” Public Opinion Quarterly 51(3): 376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oltmanns, Thomas F., Gleason, Marci E. J., Klonsky, E. David, and Turkheimer, Eric (2005). “Meta-Perception for Pathological Personality Traits: Do We Know When Others Think That We Are Difficult?” Consciousness and Cognition 14(4): 739–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oosterhof, Nikolaas, and Todorov, Alexander (2009). “Shared Perceptual Basis of Emotional Expressions and Trustworthiness: Impressions from Faces.” Emotion 9(1): 128–133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Paivio, Allan, and Csapo, Kalman (1971). “Short-Term Sequential Memory for Pictures and Words.” Psychonomic Science 24(2): 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panagopoulos, Costas (2009). “Partisan and Nonpartisan Message Content and Voter Mobilization: Field Experimental Evidence.” Political Research Quarterly 62(1): 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, Michael B., and Aarøe, Lene (2013). “Politics in the Mind's Eye: Imagination as a Link between Social and Political Cognition.” American Political Science Review 107(2): 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomper, Gerald (1976). “Impacts on the Political System.” American Electoral Behavior: Change and Stability. (Kirkpatric, Samuel, ed) Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 137–143.Google Scholar

Pope, Jeremy C. (2012). “Voting vs. Thinking: Unified Partisan Voting Does Not Imply Unified Partisan Beliefs.” The Forum 10(3): Article 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Vincent, Cappella, Joseph N., and Nir, Lilach (2002). “Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue during Campaign 2000.” Political Communication 19(1): 73–93.Google Scholar

Prior, Markus (2012). “Who Watches Presidential Debates? Measurement Problems in Campaign Effects Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(2): 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, Markus (2014). “Visual Political Knowledge: A Different Road to Competence?” The Journal of Politics 76(1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pronin, Emily (2009). “The Introspection Illusion” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 41 (Zanna, Mark, ed.). Burlington. VT: Elsevier Press, 1–67.Google Scholar

Ranney, Austin (ed.) (1979). The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar

Reeves, Keith (1997). Voting Hopes or Fears? White Voters, Black Candidates, and Racial Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, Douglas (2006). “Sample Matching: Representative Sampling from Internet Panels.” Polimetrix White Paper Series.

Rodriguez-Bailon, Rosa, Moya, Miguel, and Yzerbyt, Vincent (2000). “Why Do Superiors Attend to Negative Stereotypic Information about Their Subordinates? Effects of Power Legitimacy on Social Perception.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 651–671.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolfe, Meredith (2012). Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenstone, Steven, and Hansen, John M. (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Rowatt, Wade C., Cunninghan, Michael, and Druen, Perri B. (1998). “Deception to Get a Date.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(11): 1228–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roy, Robin E., Weibust, Kristin S., and Miller, Carol T. (2007). “Effects of Stereotypes about Feminists on Feminist Self-Identification.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 31(2): 146–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, John Barry (2013). “An Experimental Study of Persuasive Communication.” Political Communication 30(1): 100–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, David, Clarke, Harold D., and Stewart, Marianne (2007). “Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study.” Political Analysis 15(3): 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saramäki, Jari, Leicht, E. A., López, Eduardo, Roberts, Sam, Reed-Tsochas, Felix, and Dunbar, Robin (2014). “Persistence of Social Signatures in Human Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(3): 942–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party Government: American Government in Action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Scheufele, Dietram A. (2002). “Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and Their Implications for Participatory Behavior.” Communication Research 29(1): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlenker, Barry R., and Weigold, Michael F. (1989). “Goals and the Self-Identification Process: Constructing Desired Identities.” Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology (Pervin, , ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 243–290.Google Scholar

Schlenker, Barry R., and Weigold, Michael F. (1992). “Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management.” Annual Review of Psychology 43: 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sears, David O. (1969). “Political Behavior.” Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 5, Second Edition (Lindzey, and Aronson, , eds.) Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 315–458.Google Scholar

Sears, David O. (1986) “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Databse on Psychology's View of Human Nature” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(3) 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Settle, Jaime, Bond, Robert M., Coviello, Lorenzo, Farriss, Christopher J., Fowler, James H. and Jones, Jason J. (forthcoming) “From Posting to Voting: The Effects of Political Competition on Online Political Engagement.” Political Science Research and Methods. FirstView Article.

Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T. (2001). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Leigh S. (1983). “Toward Pepitone's Vision of a Normative Social Psychology: What Is a Social Norm?” Journal of Mind and Behavior 4(2): 275–293.Google Scholar

Shaw, Daron (2004). “Erratum for ‘The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1989–1999.’” The Journal of Politics 66(2): 611–615.Google Scholar

Shea, Daniel M., and Burton, Michael John (2006). Campaign Craft: The Strategies, Tactics, and Art of Political Campaign Management, 3rd edition. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Betsy (2012). The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Betsy, McConnell, Margaret, and Michelson, Melissa R. (2013). “Local Canvassing: The Efficacy of Grassroots Voter Mobilization.” Political Communication 30(1): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sirgy, M. Joseph, and Cornwell, Terri (2002). “How Neighborhood Features Affect Quality of Life.” Social Indicators Research 59(1): 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smidt, Corwin D. (2014). “Dynamics in Partisanship during American Presidential Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78(S1): 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Aaron, and Rainie, Lee (2008). “The Internet and the 2008 Election.” Pew Internet and American Life Project.

Sniderman, Paul M., and Carmines, Edward G. (1997). “Reaching Beyond Race.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30(3): 466–471.Google Scholar

Snyder, Mark (1974). “Self-Monitoring of Expressive Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30(4): 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Mark (1979). “Cognitive, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Consequences of Self-Monitoring.” Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect: Perception of Emotion in Self and Others (Pliner, Patricia, Blankstein, Kirk, and Spiegel, Irwin M., eds.) New York: Plenum Press, 181–202.Google Scholar

Snyder, Mark (1987). Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring. New York: W.H. Freeman/Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar

Snyder, Mark, Gangestad, Steve, and Simpson, Jeffry A. (1983). “Choosing Friends as Activity Partners: The Role of Self-Monitoring.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(5): 1061–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Mark and Simpson, Jeffry A. (1984). “Self-Monitoring and Dating Relationships.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6): 1281–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stieglitz, Stefan, Brockmann, Tobias, and Dang-Xuan, Ling (2012). “Usage of Social Media for Political Communication.” Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems 2012 Proceedings. Paper 22.

Stimson, James A. (1990). “A Macro Theory of Information Flow.” Information and Democratic Processes (Kuklinski, James and Ferejohn, John, eds.) Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 345–368.Google Scholar

Stimson, James A. (1993). “The Myth of the Independent Voter (Review).” American Political Science Review 87(2): 494–495.Google Scholar

Strahan, Erin J., Wilson, Anne E., Cressman, Kate E., and Buote, Vanessa (2006). “Comparing to Perfection: How Cultural Norms for Appearance Affect Social Comparisons and Self-Image.” Body Image 3(3): 211–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Streb, Matthew J., Burrell, Barbara, Frederick, Brian, and Genovese, Michael A. (2008). “Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(1): 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tamas, Bernard, and Hindman, Matthew Dean (2014). “Ballot Access Laws and the Decline of American Third-Parties.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 13(2): 260–276.Google Scholar

Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton (2006). “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terkildsen, Nayda (1993). “When White Voters Evaluate Black Candidates: The Processing Implications of Candidate Skin Color, Prejudice, and Self-Monitoring.” American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and White, Ismail K. (2002). “Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vavreck, Lynn (2007). “The Exaggerated Effects of Advertising on Turnout: The Dangers of Self-Reports.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(4): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay. L., and Brady, Henry (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wallack, Grace, and Hudak, John (2014). “How Much Did Your Vote Cost? Spending Per Voter in the 2014 Senate Races” FixGov Blog, Brookings Institute. http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2014/11/07-spending-per-voter-2014-midterm-senate-wallack-hudak

Walsh, Katherine Cramer (2004). Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wattenberg, Martin P. (1986). The Decline of American Political Parties: 1952–1954. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Christopher, and Federico, Christopher (2013). “Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences.” Political Psychology 34(1): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Christopher, Lavine, Howard, Huddy, Leonie, and Federico, Christopher (2014). “Placing Racial Stereotypes in Context: Social Desirability and the Politics of Racial Hostility.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). “A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification.” Political Behavior 2(1): 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberg, Herbert (1993). “The Myth of the Independent Voter. By Bruce E. Keith; David B. Magleby; Candice J. Nelson; Elizabeth Orr; Mark C. Westlye; Raymond E. Wolfinger (Review).” Public Opinion Quarterly 57(3): 428–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1995). “The Promising Adolescence of Campaign Surveys.” Campaigns and Elections American Style (Thurber, James A. and Nelson, Candice J., eds.) Boulder, CO: Westview, 181–191.Google Scholar

Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980). Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Zaccaro, Stephen J., Foti, Roseanne, and Kenny, David A. (1991). “Self-Monitoring and Trait-Based Variance in Leadership: An Investigation of Leader Flexibility across Multiple Group Situations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 76(2): 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John (ed.) (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley (1992). “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, Weiwu, Johnson, Thomas J., Seltzer, Trent, and Bichard, Shannon L. (2010). “The Revolution Will Be Networked: The Influence of Social Network Sites on Political Attitudes and Behaviors.” Social Science Computer Review 28(1): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimbardo, Philip G. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar