Ahl, F. (1976) Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1989) “Homer, Vergil, and Complex Narrative Structures in Latin Epic: An Essay,” ICS 14: 1–31.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1991) Sophocles' Oedipus: Evidence and Self-Conviction. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. and Roisman, H. M. (1996) The Odyssey Re-Formed. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Alter, R. (1981) The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1960) “Discontinuity in Lucretian Symbolism,” TAPA 91: 1–29.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1989) “Lycaon: Ovid's Deceptive Paradigm in Metamorphoses 1,” ICS 14: 91–101.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1993) “Form Changed: Ovid's Metamorphoses,” in Boyle, A. J. (ed.), Roman Epic, 108–24. London and New York.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1997) Ovid's Metamorphoses, Books 1–5. Norman, Oklahoma.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2002) “Vergil's Italy: Ethnography and Politics in First-century Rome,” in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Clio and the Poets, 123–42. Leiden.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. (1993) “The Addressees of the Ars poetica: Herculaneum, the Pisones and Epicurean Protreptic,” MD 31: 185–230.Google Scholar

Ashline, W. L. (1995) “The Problem of Impossible Fictions,” Style (DeKalb, Ill.) 29: 215–34.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1982) “Lucretius' Venus and Stoic Zeus,” Hermes 110: 458–70.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed.) (1947) T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Oxford.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1991) “Discordant Muses,” PCPS 37: 1–21.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” HSCP 95: 333–65; repr. in Barchiesi (2001), 105–27.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994) Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. Rome; trans. as The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley (1997).Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Roberts, D., Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, 181–208. Princeton.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1999) “Venus' Masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 112–26.

Barchiesi, A. (2001) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Translated by M. Fox and S. Marchesi. London.Google Scholar

Barton, C. (1984) “Vis mortua: Irreconcilable Patterns of Thought in the Works of Seneca and Lucan.” Dissertation Berkeley.

Bartsch, S. (1997) Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan's Civil War. Cambridge, Mass.

Bate, J. (1998) The Genius of Shakespeare. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. (1993) “Logic, Rhetoric, and Poesis,” Helios 20. 2: 143–72.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. (1997) “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics,” in Martindale (1997), 125–44.

Bennett, W. (1993) The Book of Virtues: a Treasury of Great Moral Stories. New York.Google Scholar

Bernbeck, E. (1967) Beobachtungen zur Darstellungsart in Ovids Metamorphosen. Munich.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1988) The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleisch, P. R. (1996) “On Choosing a Spouse: Aeneid 7.378–84 and Callimachus' Epigram 1,” AJP 117. 3: 453–72.Google Scholar

Bleisch, P. R. (1998) Review of O'Hara (1996a). AJP 119: 300–3.Google Scholar

Bleisch, P. R. (1999) “The Empty Tomb at Rhoeteum: Deiphobus and the Problem of the Past in Aeneid 6.494–547,” CA 18. 2: 187–226.Google Scholar

Bleisch, P. R. (2003) “The Regia of Picus: Ekphrasis, Italian Identity, and Artistic Definition in Aeneid 7.152–93,” in Thibodeau, P. and Haskell, H. (eds.), Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 88–109. Afton, Minnesota.Google Scholar

Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blusch, J. (1989) “Vielfach und Einheit: Bemerkungen zur Komposition von Catull c. 64,” Antike und Abendland 35: 116–30.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1980) P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen: Kommentar. Buch X–Ⅺ.Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bornmann, F. (1968) Callimachus, Hymnus in Dianam. Firenze.Google Scholar

Bragg, R. (2003) I Am a Soldier, Too: The Jessica Lynch Story. New York.Google Scholar

Bramble, J. (1970) “Structure and Ambiguity in Catullus 64,” PCPS 16: 22–41.Google Scholar

Braund, D. (1993) “Writing a Roman Argonautica: the Historical Dynamic,” Hermathena 154: 11–18.Google Scholar

Brown, P. M. (1988) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura I. Bristol.Google Scholar

Brown, R. D. (1987a) Lucretius on Love and Sex. A Commentary on De rerum natura IV, 1030–1287 with prolegomena, text, and transl. Leiden.Google Scholar

Brown, R. D. (1987b) “The Palace of the Sun in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” in Whitby, M., Hardie, P., Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, 211–20. Bristol.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1955) “P. Vergilius Maro,” RE 8A: 1021–1486.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1979) “Kynaithos, Polycrates, and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo,” in Bowersock, G., Burkert, W., Putnam, M. (eds.), Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, 53–62. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (1999) Review of Sedley (1998). BMCR 1999. 10. 29. http:// ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/1999/1999-10-29.html.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2003) Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura Book Five, Lines 772–1104. Oxford.Google Scholar

Carnes, J. S. (2001) “Degenerate Neoptolemus: Praise Poetry and the Novelization of the Aeneid,” in Peter, I. Barta (ed.), Carnivalizing Difference: Bakhtin and the Other, 99–117. London and New York.Google Scholar

Carson, A. (1992) “How Not to Read a Poem: Unmixing Simonides from Protagoras,” CP 87: 11–30.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (1999) “Facta Impia (Virgil, Aeneid 4.596–9),” CQ 49: 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clare, R. J. (1996) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius of Rhodes: Allusion and Exemplarity,” PCPS 42: 60–88.Google Scholar

Clare, R. J. (2002) The Path of the Argo: Language, Imagery and Narrative in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (1994) A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. (2002) Vergil's Aeneid. Decorum, Allusion and Ideology. Munich and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clay, D. (1983) Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1998) “The Theory of the Literary Persona in Antiquity,” MD 40: 9–40.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1983) The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1989) The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1998) “Venus and Mars (De Rerum Natura 1.31–40),” in Knox, P. and Foss, C. (eds.), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, Bd. 92, 3–15. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Colum, P. (1921) The Golden Fleece: And the Heroes Who Lived Before Achilles. New York.Google Scholar

Conington, J. (1963) The Works of Virgil with a Commentary. Rev. by Henry Nettleship. Hildesheim. Reprint of 1883–84 London edition.Google Scholar

Connors, C. (1994) “Famous Last Words: Authorship and Death in the Satyricon and Neronian Rome,” in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, & Representation, 225–35. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1991) Generi e Lettori: Lucrezio, L'elegia d'amore, l'enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan.

Conte, G. B. (1994) “Instructions for a Sublime Reader: Form of the Text and Form of the Addressee in Lucretius' De rerum natura,” chap. 1 in Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: an Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Costa, C. D. N. (1984) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura V. Oxford.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1987) “Quotation, Interpolation, Transposition,” Hermathena 143: 7–18.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1990) “Moral Judgement in Catullus 64,” GB 17: 113–22.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2001) “The Proem of Lucretius,” MH 58. 4: 201–11.Google Scholar

Cramer, R. (1998) Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgica. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalzell, A. (1982) “Lucretius,” in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. ii: Latin Literature, 207–29. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jong, Irene J. F. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacy, P. H. (1957) “Process and Value: An Epicurean Dilemma,” TAPA 88: 114–26.Google Scholar

DeBrohun, J. (1999) “Ariadne and the Whirlwind of Fate: Figures of Confusion in Catullus 64.149–57,” CP 94. 4: 419–30.Google Scholar

Depew, M. (1993) “Mimesis and Aetiology in Callimachus' Hymns,” in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus: Hellenistica Groningana 1, 57–77. Groningen.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. (1996) Pseudo-Lukrezisches im Lukrez: die unechten Verse in Lukrezens “De rerum natura.”Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewar, M. (1994) “Laying It On with A Trowel: The Proem to Lucan and Related Texts,” CQ 44. 1: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolezel, L. (1998) Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Due, O. (1974) Changing Forms. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. T. (1996) “Septima Aestas: The Puzzle of Aen. 1.755–6 and 5.626,” CW 90. 1: 41–3.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. T. (2001) King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil's Aeneid. Norman, Oklahoma.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1984) The Role of the Reader. Bloomington and London.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (1997) “Myth in Homer,” in Powell, B. and Morris, I. (eds.), New Companion to Homer, 415–41. Leiden.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.

Edwards, M. J. (1993) “Aeternus lepos: Venus, Lucretius, and the Fear of Death,” G&R 40: 68–78.Google Scholar

Elder, J. P. (1954) “Lucretius 1.1–149,” TAPA 85: 88–120.Google Scholar

Elliott, A. G. (1985) “Ovid and the Critics: Seneca, Quintilian, and ‘Seriousness’,”Helios 12: 9–20.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (1997) “Physics and Therapy,” in Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H., Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, 79–92. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1957) Recueil de textes latins archaïques. Paris.Google Scholar

Everdell, W. R. (1997) The First Moderns: Profiles in the Origins of Twentieth-Century Thought. Chicago and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1992) Lucan: De Bello Civili Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1990) “What Aeneid in Whose Nineties?” Vergilius 36: 74–80.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1992) “Dialogue of Genres in Ovid's ‘Lovesong of Polyphemus’ (Metamorphoses 13.719–897),” AJP 113: 235–68.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1994) “The Structure of Lucretius' ‘Anthropology’ (DRN 5.771–1457),” MD 33: 81–95.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1999) “Mea Tempora: Patterning of Time in the Metamorphoses,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 13–30.

Feldherr, A. (1999) “Putting Dido on the Map: Genre and Geography in Vergil's Underworld,” Arethusa 32: 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felson-Rubin, N. (1996) “Regarding Penelope,” in Schein, S. L. (ed.), Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, 163–83. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: a Study of Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989) “Plato and Poetry,” in Kennedy, (1989), 92–148.

Ferrari, G. R. F. (2000) Review of Press, G. A. (ed.), Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity (Lanham, MD 2000). BMCR 2000.11.10. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2000/2000-11-10.html.Google Scholar

Finkelpearl, E. (1990) “Psyche, Aeneas, and an Ass: Apuleius Metamorphoses 6.10–21,” TAPA 120: 333–47.Google Scholar

Fish, S. E. (1980) “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics,” in Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, 21–67. Cambridge, Mass., and London.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (1995) Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1991) “Unity in Greek Criticism and Poetry,” Arion 1. 3: 125–54.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1988) Review of Ross (1987). G&R 35: 93–5.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1989a) “Lucretius and Politics,” in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, 120–50. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1989b) Review of Thomas (1988). G&R 36: 235–6.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1990) “Deviant Focalisation in Virgil's Aeneid,” PCPS 36: 42–63 = Fowler (2000a), 40–63.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1991) Review of Segal (1990) and A. Schiesaro, Simulacrum et imago: gli argomenti analogici nel De Rerum Natura (Pisa 1990). G&R 39: 237–9.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1993) “Response to P. R. Hardie ‘Tales of Unity and Division in Latin Epic’,” in Molyneux, J. (ed.), Literary Responses to Civil Discord, 73–6. Nottingham.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1995) “From Epos to Cosmos: Lucretius, Ovid, and the Poetics of Segmentation,” in D. C. Innes, H. Hine, and C. Pelling (eds.) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his 75th Birthday, 1–18. Oxford.

Fowler, D. P. (2000a) Roman Constructions. Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000b) “Philosophy and Literature in Lucretian Intertextuality,” in Fowler (2000a), 138–55.

Fowler, D. P. (2000c) “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies,” in Fowler (2000a), 115–37 = MD 39 (1997), 13–34.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (1993) The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton.Google Scholar

Friedlander, P. (1939) “The Epicurean Theology of Lucretius' First Proem (Lucr. 1.44–49),” TAPA 70: 368–79.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. (1991) Shifting Paradigms: New Approaches to Horace's Ars poetica. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Furley, D. J. (1966) “Lucretius and the Stoics,” BICS 13: 13–33.Google Scholar

Fusillo, M. (1985) Il tempo delle argonautiche: un'analisi del racconto in Apollonio Rodio. Rome.Google Scholar

Gaisser, J. H. (1995) “Threads in the Labyrinth: Competing Views and Voices in Catullus 64,” AJP 116: 579–616.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (1994a) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (1994b) “Lucretius 4.1–25 and the Proems of the De Rerum Natura,” PCPS 40: 1–17.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things. The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1975) Ovid's Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1999) “Ovid's Poetology in the Metamorphoses,” in Ovid. Werk und Wirkung. Festgabe für Michael von Albrecht zum 65. Geburtstag, 305–14. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Gantz, T. (1993) Early Greek Myth: a Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. (1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia ii,” JRS 89: 19–37.Google Scholar

Gilchrist, K. (n.d.), “Paradox in the Mythological Chronology of Apollonius Rhodius.” Unpublished manuscript.

Gildenhard, I. and Zissos, A. (2000) “Inspirational Fictions: Autobiography and Generic Reflexivity in Ovid's Proems,” G&R 47: 67–79.Google Scholar

Givens, B. (1996) Roman Soldiers Don't Wear Watches: 501 Film Flubs – Memorable Movie Mistakes. Secaucus, NJ.Google Scholar

Godwin, J. (1995) Catullus, Poems 61–68. Warminster.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1995) Epic in Republican Rome. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1986) “Framing and Polyphony: Readings in Hellenistic Poetry,” PCPS 32: 25–52.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1985) “Eneide: La Lingua,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana 2: 262–78. Rome.Google Scholar

Gotoff, H. C. (1984) “The Transformation of Mezentius,” TAPA 114: 191–218.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. (1999) Review of Deufert (1996). Mnem. ser. 4 vol. 52: 748–55.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. (1942) “The Twenty-Second Idyll of Theocritus,” CR 56: 11–18.

Gow, A. S. F. (1950) Theocritus: Edited with a Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.

Granobs, R. (1997) Studien zur Darstellung römischer Geschichte in Ovids “Metamorphosen.”Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1991) Virgil: Aeneid Book Ⅺ. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Green, P. M. (1997) The Argonautika by Apollonios Rhodios. Translated, with introduction, commentary, and glossary. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Griffin, A. H. F. (1989) “Virgil's Unfinished Aeneid,” Pegasus 32: 3–10.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1990) “Contest and Contradiction in Early Greek Poetry,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays in Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, 185–205. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Griffiths, F. T. (1980) “The Structure and Style of the ‘Short Epics’ of Catullus and Virgil,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 2: Collection Latomus 168: 123–37.Google Scholar

Günther, H.-C. (1996) überlegungen zur Entstehung von Vergils Aeneis. Hypomnemata Heft 113. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halleran, M. R. (1997) “It's Not What You Say: Unspoken Allusions in Greek Tragedy?” MD 39: 151–63.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1987) Aristotle's Poetics. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1989) “Aristotle's Poetics,” in Kennedy, (1989), 149–83.

Halliwell, S. (1991) Review of Heath (1989). JHS 111: 230–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halperin, D. (1992) “Plato and the Erotics of Narrativity,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 95–126.

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1988) “Lucretius and the Delusions of Narcissus,” MD 20–1: 71–89.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1990) “Ovid's Theban History: The First ‘Anti-Aeneid’?,” CQ 40: 224–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1991) “The Janus Episode in Ovid's Fasti,” MD 26: 47–64.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1992) “Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, 59–82. London.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1994) Virgil: Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1995) “The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid, Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos,” CQ 45: 204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1996) “Virgil: A Paradoxical Poet?” PLLS 9: 103–21.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1997a) “Closure in Latin Epic,” in Roberts, D., Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, 139–62. Princeton.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1997b) “Questions of Authority: the Invention of Tradition in Ovid Metamorphoses, 15,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution, 182–98. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1998) Virgil. Greece & Rome. New Surveys in the Classics, no. 28. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1999) Review of Günther (1996). CR 49.1:49–50.

Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.) (1999) Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge Philological Society Suppl. Vol. 23. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harrison,, S. J. (ed.) (1990) Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison,, S. J. (1991) Vergil: Aeneid 10. With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. and Heyworth, S. J. (1998) “Notes on the Text and Interpretation of Catullus,” PCPS 44: 85–109.Google Scholar

Haslam, M. W. (1993) “Callimachus' Hymns,” in Harder, M. A. et al. (eds.), Callimachus: Hellenistica Groningana 1, 111–25. Groningen.Google Scholar

Haupt, M. (1966) P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen. Revised by R. Ewald and M. von Albrecht. Zürich and Dublin.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1989) Unity in Greek Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (1989) Tragic Rhetoric: An Interpretation of Sophocles' “Trachiniae.” Bern, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Paris.Google Scholar

Helzle, M. (1993) “Ovid's Cosmogony: Metamorphoses 1.5–88 and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry,” PLLS 7: 123–34.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. G. W. (1998) “Lucan: The Word at War,” in Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War, 165–211. New York and Cambridge. Revised from Ramus 16 (1987), 122–64.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. (1989–90) “What Was the Trojan Horse Made Of?: Interpreting Vergil's Aeneid,” YJC 3: 109–31.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. (1992) “Sidonian Dido,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 332–84.

Hexter, R. (1994) “Commentary, Reading, Writing,” One Hundred Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association: Abstract (Worcester, MA), 278.

Heyworth, S. (1994) “Some Allusions to Callimachus in Latin Poetry,” MD 33: 51–79.Google Scholar

Hill, D. E. (1999) Ovid, Metamorphoses IX–Ⅻ. Warminster.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1985) “Booking the Return Trip: Ovid and Tristia 1,” PCPS 211, n.s. 31: 13–32.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1987a) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1987b) “Generalising About Ovid,” Ramus 16: 4–31.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1992) “Arma in Ovid's Fasti: Part 2: Genre, Romulean Rome and Augustan Ideology,” Arethusa 25: 113–53.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” MD 30: 9–47.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1999) “After Exile: Time and Teleology from Metamorphoses to Ibis,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 48–67.

Hofmann, J. B. (1965) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Revised by A. Szantyr. 3rd edn. Munich.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. (1970) Ovid: Metamorphoses, Book VIII. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. (1990) Callimachus: Hecale. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, N. (1984) “Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus,” CQ 34: 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1971) “Numanus Remulus, Ethnography and Propaganda in Aen. ix, 598f,” Latomus 30: 1108–16.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1981) “Virgil and the Conquest of Chaos,” Antichthon 15:141–50 = Harrison (1990), 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1987) “Numano Remulo,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana Vol. iii: 778–9. Rome.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1991a) Virgilio: l'epopea in alambicco. Naples.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1991b) “Virgil, Parthenius, and the Art of Mythological Reference,” Vergilius 37: 31–6.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1995) A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1997) Review of Günther (1996). RFIC 125: 468–72.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2000) Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Mnemosyne Suppl. 198. Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2003) Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2006) Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. (1987) “Medea's Flight: the Fourth Book of the Argonautica,” CQ 37: 129–39.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes, Argonautica Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1991) “‘Breast is Best’: Catullus 64.18,” CQ n.s. 41: 254–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. New York and Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. (1996) Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. New York and Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2001) “The Date of De Rerum Natura,” CQ 51: 150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, S. (1997) “Argo: the First Ship?,” RhM 140: 249–57.Google Scholar

James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Janan, M. (1988) “The Book of Good Love. Design versus Desire in Metamorphoses 10,” Ramus 17: 110–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janan, M. (1994) “When the Lamp is Shattered:” Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale, Ill.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1998) “The Homeric Poems as Oral Dictated Texts,” CQ 48: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus. On Poems: Book 1. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1982) “Catullus and the Idea of a Masterpiece,” in Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal, 85–150. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1987) Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (2000) Lucretius and the Modern World. London.Google Scholar

Katz, M. A. (1991) Penelope's Renown: Meaning and Indeterminacy in the “Odyssey.”Princeton.Google Scholar

Keith, A. M. (1999) “Versions of Epic Masculinity in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” in Hardie, Barchiesi and Hinds (1999), 214–39.

Keith, A. M. (2000) Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.

Kennedy, G. (ed.) (1989) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism.Vol. i. Classical Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1976) “Ovidius Prooemians,” PCPS 22: 46–53.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1978) Review of F. Bömer, P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen: Kommentar. Buch IV–V. CR n.s. 28: 251–3.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1980) “Psyche and her Mysterious Husband,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature, 175–98. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1986) Introduction and Notes to Ovid, Metamorphoses, trans. A. D. Melville. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kepple, L. (1980) “The Textual and Thematic Contexts of Lucan's ‘Praise of Nero’ in the Bellum Civile.” Dissertation Harvard.

Kepple, L. (1981) Summary of Kepple (1980). HCSP 85: 383–5.Google Scholar

Kinsey, T. E. (1965) “Irony and Structure in Catullus 64,” Latomus 24: 911–31.Google Scholar

Kleve, K. (1966) “Lukrez und Venus (De Rerum Natura 1.1–49),” SO 41: 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingner, F. (1964) “Catulls Peleus-Epos,” in Studien zur Griechischen und Römischen Literatur, 156–224. Zurich.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1986) Ovid's Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1977) Catullus' Indictment of Rome. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Kovacs, D. (1987) “Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.2,” CQ 37: 458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafaye, G. (1904) Les métamorphoses d'Ovide et leurs modèles grecs. Paris; Repr. Hildesheim, 1971.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (1991) Review of Heath (1989). Ancient Philosophy 11: 465–73.Google Scholar

Larmour, D. H. J. (1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea, Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674), Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–51),” ICS 15: 131–41.Google Scholar

Laursen, S. (1992) “Theocritus' Hymn to the Dioscuri. Unity and Intention,” C&M 43: 71–92.Google Scholar

Leach, E. (1974) “Ekphrasis and the Theme of Artistic Failure in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” Ramus 3: 102–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, E. (1988) The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Lee, A. G. (1953) Ovid: Metamorphoses Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997) Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Little, D. (1970) “The Speech of Pythagoras in Metamorphosesxv and the Structure of the Metamorphoses,” Hermes 98: 340–60.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1972) “Tycho von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff on the Dramatic Technique of Sophocles,” CQ 22: 214–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. (1997) “Lucretius on Nature and the Epicurean Self,” in Algra, K. A., Koenen, M. H., Schrijvers, P. H. (eds.), Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, 125–39. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Lord, A. B. (1960) The Singer of Tales. New York.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1993) Review of Freudenburg (1993). BMCR 4.3.5. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1993/04.03.05.html.Google Scholar

Lucas, D. W. (1968) Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lüddecke, K. (1998) “Contextualizing the Voice in Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus,” MD 41: 9–33.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1978) Ciris: A Poem Attributed to Vergil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1983) “Vergil and the Politics of War,” CQ 33: 188–203 = Harrison (1990), 316–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil's “Aeneid.”Oxford.Google Scholar

Mack, S. (1978) Patterns of Time in Vergil. Hamden, Connecticut.Google Scholar

Mack, S. (1988) Ovid. New Haven.Google Scholar

Mackie, C. J. (1988) The Characterisation of Aeneas. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Mackie, C. J. (1991) “Nox erat …: Sleep and Visions in the Aeneid,” G&R 38: 59–61.Google Scholar

, R. (2002) Tibullus: Elegies: Text, Introduction and Commentary. Leeds.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (1989) The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1993a) Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1993b) “Descent into Hell: Reading Ambiguity, or Virgil and the Critics,” PVS 21: 111–50.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale, C. (2005) Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste: an Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Masters, J. M. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan's “Bellum Civile.”Cambridge.Google Scholar

Masters, J. M. (1994) “Deceiving the Reader: the Political Mission of Lucan Bellum Civile 7,” in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation, 151–77. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

May, C. (1995) “A Postmodern Challenge to Reference-World Construction: Gilbert Sorrentino's Mulligan Stew,” Style (DeKalb, Ill.) 29: 235–61.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (1988) “Aeneid 8.573 and Callimachus' Hymn to Zeus,” CQ 38: 260–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (2003) “Persona Problems. The Literary Persona in Antiquity Revisited,” MD 50: 55–80.Google Scholar

McHale, B. (1987) Postmodernist Fiction. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKim, R. (1985) “Myth Against Philosophy in Ovid's Account of Creation,” CJ 80: 97–108.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1980) Virgil's “Georgics:” A New Interpretation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar

Miller, A. M. (1986) From Delos to Delphi: a Literary Study of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo. Leiden.Google Scholar

Miller, J. F. (1991) Ovid's Elegiac Festivals: Studies in the “Fasti.”Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Miller, J. F. (1992) “The Fasti and Hellenistic Didactic: Ovid's Variant Aetiologies,” Arethusa 25: 11–31.Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. (1994) Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: the Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London and New York.Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.Google Scholar

Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic. Mnemosyne Supplement 90. Leiden.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1993) “Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura,” MD 31: 111–28.Google Scholar

Molviati-Toptsis, U. (1995) “Sed Falsa ad Caelum Mittunt Insomnia Manes (Aeneid 6.896),” AJP 116: 639–52.Google Scholar

Moorton, R. (1989) “The Innocence of Italy in Vergil's Aeneid,” AJP 110: 105–30.Google Scholar

Morrison, J. (1992) Homeric Misdirection: False Predictions in the “Iliad.”Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Morwood, J. (1999) “Catullus 64, Medea, and the François Vase,” G&R 46: 221–31.Google Scholar

Müller, G. A. (2003) Formen und Funktionen der Vergilzitate und -anspielungen bei Augustin von Hippo. Paderborn.

Murgia, C. (1987) “Dido's Puns,” CP 82: 50–9.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. (2003) “The Date of the Helen Episode,” HSCP 101: 405–26.Google Scholar

Murray, P. (1997) Plato on Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the “Metamorphoses.”Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil: Georgics: Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nagler, M. (1990) “Ethical Anxiety and Artistic Inconsistency: The Case of Oral Epic,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays in Classical and Comparative literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, 225–39. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1979) The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1992) “Mythological Exemplum in Homer,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 311–31.

Nagy, G. (1996) Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Narducci, E. (1999) “Deconstructing Lucan, ovvero Le nozze (coi fichi secchi) di Ermete Trismegisto e di Filologia,” in Nicastri, L. and Esposito, P. (eds.), Interpretare Lucano. Miscellanea di studi, 37–81. Naples = Maia 51 (1999), 349–87.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. (2001) Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (1995) Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss, J. and Johnston, S. (eds.), Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy and Art, 178–208. Princeton.Google Scholar

Newman, J. K. (1990) Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Nishimura-Jensen, J. (2000) “Unstable Geographies: The Moving Landscape in Apollonius' Argonautica and Callimachus' Hymn to Delos,” TAPA 130: 287–317.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1981) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI. 7th edn. Stuttgart. Only light corrections from 2nd edn. of 1916.Google Scholar

Norwood, F. (1954) “The Tripartite Eschatology of Aeneid 6,” CP 49:15–26.Google Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1992) “Vergil's Voice of the Women in Aeneidv,” Arethusa 25: 255–92.Google Scholar

Nünlist, R. (2003) “The Homeric Scholia on Focalization,” Mnemosyne 56. 1: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Connell, O' M. (1977) “Pictorialism and Meaning in Catullus 64,” Latomus 36: 746–56.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's “Aeneid.”Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1993a) “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ in Aeneid 4.56–66,” Arethusa 26: 99–114.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1993b) Review of Feeney (1991). Vergilius 39: 87–96.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1994) “They Might Be Giants: Inconsistency and Indeterminacy in Vergil's War in Italy,” in H. Roisman and J. Roisman (eds.), Studies in Roman Epic, Colby Quarterly 30: 206–26.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1995) Review of Hardie (1994). BMCR 95.07.11. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1995/95.07.11.html.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1996a) True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1996b) “An Unconvincing Argument about Aeneas and the Gates of Sleep,” Phoenix 50: 331–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1996c) “Vergil's Best Reader? Ovidian Commentary on Vergilian Etymological Wordplay,” CJ 91: 255–76.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1996d) Review of Ahl and Roisman (1996). BMCR 95.07.11. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1996/96.11.08.html.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (1997) “Virgil's Style,” in Martindale (1997), 241–58.

O'Hara, J. (1999) Review of Leigh (1997). CJ 94.2: 200–3.

O'Hara, J. (2001) “Callimachean Influence on Vergilian Etymological Wordplay,” CJ 96: 369–400.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (2005a) “‘Some God … or his Own Heart:’ Two Kinds of Epic Motivation in the Proem to Ovid's Metamorphoses,” CJ 100. 2: 149–61.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J. (2005b) “Trying not to Cheat: Responses to Inconsistencies in Roman Epic,” TAPA 135: 15–33.Google Scholar

Obbink, , D. (ed.) (1995) Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus on Piety: Critical Text with Commentary Part 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1970) A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1998) Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, S. D. (1991) Review of Katz (1991). BMCR 02.06.13. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1991/02.06.13.html.Google Scholar

Otis, B. (1970) Ovid as an Epic Poet. Cambridge, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

Parker, H. (1984) Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons: Literary Authority in American Fiction. Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1966) “The Two Voices of Vergil's Aeneid,” in Commager, S. (ed.), Virgil: A Collection of Critical Essays, 107–23. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar

Pasquali, G. (1920) “Il carme 64 di Catullo,” SIFC 1: 1–23.Google Scholar

Patin, M. (1868) “L'Anti-Lucrèce chez Lucrèce,” in Études sur la poésie latine I, 117–37. Paris.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. (1989) The Poet's Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil's “Georgics.”Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. (1992) Review of Farrell (1991). CP 87: 269–74.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. (1994) “Ambiguity and Irony: the Last Resort?,” Helios 21: 63–74.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. (1997) “The Lament of Juturna: Pathos and Interpretation in the Aeneid,” TAPA 127: 257–86.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. (2002) “The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil,” Vergilius 48: 3–39.Google Scholar

Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (1970) Catullus: The Poems. London.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, N. S. (1993) Anxiety Veiled: Euripides and the Traffic in Women. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Reckford, K. J. (1981) “Helen in Aeneid 2 and 6,” Arethusa 14: 85–99.Google Scholar

Reckford, K. J. (1995) “Recognizing Venus i: Aeneas Meets his Mother,” Arion 3. 2–3: 1–42.Google Scholar

Rhorer, C. C. (1980) “Ideology, Tripartition and Ovid's Metamorphoses (1.5–451),” Arethusa 13: 299–313.Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. (1970) Poetries and Sciences; a Reissue of Science and Poetry (1926, 1935) with Commentary. New York.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (2002) “Narrative Techniques and Narrative Structures in the Metamorphoses,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, 271–304. Leiden.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997) “Her Master's Voice: Sappho's Dialogue with Homer,” MD 39: 123–49.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O. Jr. (1975) Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O. Jr. (1987) Virgil's Elements: Physics and Poetry in the “Georgics.”Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudich, V. (1997) Dissidence and Literature under Nero: The Price of Rhetoricization. New York.Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. M. (1992) “Unity and Variety in Ancient Criticism, Some Observations on a Recent Study,” Mnemosyne 45: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, E. A. (2001) “The Meaning of Vergil's Aeneid: American and German Approaches,” CW 94: 145–71.Google Scholar

Schmitzer, U. (1990) Zeitgeschichte in Ovids Metamorphosen: Mythologische Dichtung unter politischem Anspruch. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scodel, R. (1977) “Apollo's Perfidy: Iliadv 59–63,” HSCP 81: 55–7.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (1986) “Literary Interpretation in Plato's Protagoras,” AncPhil 6: 25–37.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (1997) “Pseudo-Intimacy and the Prior Knowledge of the Homeric Audience,” Arethusa 30. 2: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scodel, R. (1998) “The Removal of the Arms, the Recognition with Laertes, and Narrative Tension in the Odyssey,” CP 93. 1: 1–17.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (1999) Credible Impossibilities: Conventions and Strategies of Verisimilitude in Homer and Greek Tragedy. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, C. (1969) “Myth and Philosophy in the Metamorphoses: Ovid's Augustanism and the Augustan Conclusion of Book xv,” AJP 90: 257–92.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1990) Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, C. (1999) “Ovid's Meleager and the Greeks: Trials of Gender and Genre,” HSCP 99: 301–40.Google Scholar

Selden, D. L. (1992) “Caveat lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance,” in Selden and Hexter (1992), 461–512.

Selden, D. L. (1998) “Alibis,” CA 17. 2: 290–419.Google Scholar

Selden, D. L. and Hexter, R. (eds.) (1992) Innovations of Antiquity. New York and London.Google Scholar

Sens, A. (1992) “Theocritus, Homer, and the Dioscuri: Idyll 22.137–223,” TAPA 122: 335–50.Google Scholar

Sens, A. (1997) Theocritus, Dioscuri (Idyll 22): Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Göttingen.

Sharrock, A. (1994) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. (2000) “Intratextuality: Texts, Parts, and (W)holes in Theory,” in Sharrock, and Morales, H. (eds.), Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations, 1–39. Oxford.Google Scholar

Shumate, N. (1996) Crisis and Conversion in Apuleius' Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, M. (1989) “Ut decuit cinaediorem: Power, Gender, and Urbanity in Catullus 10,” Helios 16: 7–23.Google Scholar

Skinner, M. (1994) “Remembrance of a Guest: Theseus in Callimachus' Hecale and Catullus 64,” LCM 19: 147–8.Google Scholar

Sklenár, R. (2003) The Taste for Nothingness. A Study of “Virtus” and Related Themes in Lucan's “Bellum civile.”Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, M. F. (ed.) (1982) Lucretius. De rerum natura. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. (1972) “The World of the Dead in Book 6 of the Aeneid,” CP 67: 31–41 = Harrison (1990), 208–23.Google Scholar

Solodow, J. B. (1988) The World of Ovid's “Metamorphoses.”Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Squillante Saccone, M. (1987) “Discordanze,” Enciclopedia Virgiliana Vol. II: 95–7. Roma.Google Scholar

Stern, J. (1978) “Theocritus' Epithalamium of Helen,” RBPh 56: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, M. (1985) The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Summers, K. (1995) “Lucretius and the Epicurean Tradition of Piety,” CP 90. 1: 32–57.Google Scholar

Sutherland, J. (1996) Is Heathcliff a Murderer? Great Puzzles in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sutherland, J. (1997) Can Jane Eyre Be Happy? More Puzzles in Classic Fiction. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sutherland, J. (1998) Where was Rebecca Shot? Curiosities, Puzzles, and Conundrums in Modern Fiction. London.Google Scholar

Suzuki, M. (1989) Metamorphoses of Helen. Authority, Difference and the Epic. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar

Syndikus, H. P. (1984) Catull: eine Interpretation. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1982) “Review Article. Editing Ovid's Metamorphoses: Problems and Possibilities,” CP 77: 342–60.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1995) “The Silence of Cephalus: Text and Narrative Technique in Ovid, Metamorphoses 7.685ff.,” TAPA 125: 99–111.Google Scholar

Taylor, P. (1995) “The Green Berets: Film in Context,” History Today 45. 3: 21–5.Google Scholar

Theodorakopoulos, E. (2000) “Catullus 64: Footprints in the Labyrinth,” in Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.), Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations, 115–41. Oxford.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1982a) Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1982b) “Catullus and the Polemics of Poetic Reference,” AJP 103: 144–54 = Thomas (1999), 12–32.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1985) “From Recusatio to Commitment: The Evolution of the Vergilian Programme,” PLLS 5: 61–73 = Thomas (1999), 101–13.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil: Georgics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1990) “Ideology, Influence, and Future Studies in the Georgics,” Vergilius 36: 64–70.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1993) “Callimachus back in Rome,” in M. A. Harder, R. F. Regtuit, G. C. Wakker (eds.), Callimachus: Hellenistica Groningana 1, 197–215. Groningen = Thomas (1999), 206–28.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1996) “Genre Through Intertextuality: Theocritus to Virgil and Propertius” in M. A. Harder, R. F. Regtuit, and G. C. Wakker (eds.), Theocritus: Hellenistica Groningana II, 227–44. Groningen = Thomas (1999), 246–66.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1998) “The Isolation of Turnus. Aeneid Book 12,” in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.), Vergil's “Aeneid:” Augustan Epic and Political Context, 271–302. London.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2004) “‘Drownded in the Tide:’ The Nauagika and Some ‘Problems’ in Augustan Poetry,” in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII 309), 259–75. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2004–5) “Torn between Jupiter and Saturn: Ideology, Rhetoric and Culture Wars in the Aeneid,” CJ 100. 2: 121–47.Google Scholar

Thomson, D. F. S. (1997) Catullus. Edited with a Textual and Interpretative Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar

Timpanaro, S. (1976) The Freudian Slip: Psychoanalysis and Textual Criticism. London.Google Scholar

Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.Google Scholar

Tissol, G. (2002) “The House of Fame: Roman History and Augustan Politics in Metamorphoses 1–15,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, 305–35. Leiden.Google Scholar

Todorov, T. (1977) The Poetics of Prose, trans. R. Howard. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Toll, K. (1997) “Making Roman-ness and the Aeneid,” CA 16. 1: 34–56.Google Scholar

Townend, G. B. (1983) “The Unstated Climax of Catullus 64,” G&R 30: 21–30.Google Scholar

Traube, E. G. (1992) Dreaming Identities: Class, Gender, and Generation in 1980s Hollywood Movies. Boulder, Col.Google Scholar

Tsagarakis, O. (1979) “Oral Composition, Type-scenes, and Narrative Inconsistencies in Homer,” GB 8: 23–48.Google Scholar

Uhrmeister, V. and Bing, P. (1994) “The Unity of Callimachus' Hymn to Artemis,” JHS 114: 19–34.Google Scholar

Nortwick, T. (1980) “Aeneas, Turnus, and Achilles,” TAPA 110: 303–14.Google Scholar

Sickle, J. (1987) “The Elogia of the Cornelii Scipiones and the Origins of Epigram at Rome,” AJP 108: 41–55.Google Scholar

Waldock, A. J. A. (1966) Sophocles the Dramatist. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Weber, C. (1969) “The Diction of Death in Latin Epic,” Agon 3: 45–68.Google Scholar

Weber, C. (1983) “Two Chronological Contradictions in Catullus,” TAPA 113: 263–71.Google Scholar

Wheeler, S. M. (1995a) “Imago mundi: Another View of the Creation in Ovid's Metamorphoses,” AJP 116: 95–121.Google Scholar

Wheeler, S. M. (1995b) “Ovid's use of Lucretius in Metamorphoses 1.67–8,” CQ 45: 200–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, S. M. (1995c) Review of Myers (1994). BMCR 95.03.31. http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ bmcr/1995/95.03.31.html.Google Scholar

Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Wheeler, S. M. (2002) “Lucan's Reception of Ovid's Metamorphoses,” Arethusa 35: 361–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, P. (1993) Promised Verse. Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, P. (2002) “Ovid and the Augustan Milieu,” in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, 1–25. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1982) Virgil: The Georgics. New York.Google Scholar

Williams, G. W. (1968) Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, G. W. (1978) Change and Decline: Roman Literature in the Early Empire. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.

Williams, G. W. (1983) Technique and Ideas in the “Aeneid.”New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (1973) The Aeneid of Virgil: Books 7–12. London.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. B. (2000) Sense and Nonsense in Homer: a Consideration of the Inconsistencies and Incoherences in the Texts of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. (1985) Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius's “The Golden Ass.”Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1974) Cinna the Poet, and Other Roman Essays. Leicester.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. I. (1999) “Petronius as Paradox: Anarchy and Artistic Integrity,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Oxford Readings in the Roman Novel, 1–49. Oxford = TAPA 102 (1971), 631–84.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980) “Horace's Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–77.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983) “Catullus, Ennius, and the Poetics of Allusion,” ICS 8: 251–66.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1989) “ROMANE, MEMENTO: Justice and Judgement in Aeneid 6,” TAPA 119: 263–84.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1997) “Rome and Its Traditions,” in Martindale (1997), 188–203.

Zissos, A. (1999) “Allusion and Narrative Possibility in the Argonautica of Valerius Flaccus,” CP 94: 289–301.Google Scholar

Zissos, A. and I. Gildenhard (1999) “Problems of Time in Metamorphoses 2,” in Hardie, Barchiesi, and Hinds (1999), 31–47.

Zwierlein, O. (1999) Die Ovid- und Vergil-Revision in tiberischer Zeit. Band I: Prolegomena. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar