Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
In Defense of Pluralism
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The work of early pluralist thinkers, from Arthur Bentley to Robert Dahl, inspired much optimism about democracy. They argued that democracy was functioning well, despite disagreements arising among the diversity of interests represented in policy-making processes. Yet it is unlikely that anyone paying attention to news coverage today would share such optimism. The media portray current policy-making processes as intractably polarized, devoid of any opportunity to move forward and adopt essential policy changes. This book aims to revive our long-lost sense of optimism about policy-making and democracy. Through original research into biotechnology policy-making in North America and Europe, Éric Montpetit shows that the depiction of policy-making offered by early pluralist thinkers is not so far off the present reality. Today's policy decision-making process - complete with disagreement among the participants - is consistent with what might be expected in a pluralist society, in sharp contrast with the negative image projected by the media.

Reviews

‘Politics, and especially the interest-group struggle, gets a bad rap. In this spirited defense of democratic, pluralist politics, Éric Montpetit compares the practice of politics with what the media says about that process in biotechnology policy. He finds serious distortions in media depictions that, he argues, need redressing. Montpetit's defense is straightforward, solidly empirical, and his case is well-made. The book is a must-read for policy scholars, students in public policy courses, journalists covering politics, and policy activists. It is a needed bromide for today's overly cynical view of the democratic political process.'

Bryan D. Jones - University of Texas, Austin

‘Éric Montpetit shines a light on policy processes under the shadow of mainstream politics and, in doing so, shows that pluralistic democracies are not quite as distressed as commonly depicted in the mass media. His book forces a much-needed introspection of our prior assumptions and baseline knowledge about how we study, understand, and assess policy processes. Grounded in theory and backed by solid empirical evidence, this book remains accessible to academics and non-academics looking to connect studies of policy processes and democratic politics.'

Christopher Weible - University of Colorado, Denver

‘In Defense of Pluralism cuts against the grain of many popular and scholarly accounts by showing how policy actors in North America and Europe have a much more nuanced set of beliefs about genetically engineered foods and stem cell research than media coverage of these controversies would lead us to believe. Montpetit shows that disagreement over contentious issues does not undermine policy actors' ability to address pressing, complex problems. The quality of the research in this book is truly impressive, and its findings are presented in a highly accessible style that will appeal to a broad range of readers.'

Adam Sheingate - The Johns Hopkins University

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Aarts, Kees, and Semetko, Holli A.. “The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement.” The Journal of Politics 65, no. 3 (2003): 759–84.
Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert D., and Rockman, Bert A.. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Austen, Ian, and Kanter, James. “Canada Settles a Crop Trade Complaint against Europe.” New York Times, July 16, 2009.
Barke, Richard P., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.. “Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy.” Risk Analysis 13 (1993): 425–39.
Bauer, Martin W., Kohring, Matthias, Allansdottir, Agnes, and Gutteling, Jan. “The Dramatisation of Biotechnology in Elite Mass Media.” In Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy, edited by Gaskell, George and Bauer, Martin W., 3552. London: Science Museum, 2001.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Breunig, Christian, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Jones, Bryan D., Mortensen, Peter B., Huytemans, Michiel Nuytemans, and Walgrave, Stefaan. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2009): 603–20.
Baumgartner, Frank R., De Boef, Suzanna L., and Boydstun, Amber E.. The Decline of Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992.
Bee, Peta. “Sport Braced as the Gene Genie Escapes from Its Bottle.” The Guardian, September 13, 2004.
Beetham, David. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991.
Bemelmans-Videc, Marie-Louise, Rist, Ray C., and Vedung, Evert, eds. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
Bennett, Colin J., and Howlett, Michael. “The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.” Policy Sciences 25 (1992): 275–94.
Bentley, Arthur F. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1908.
Bernauer, Thomas. Genes, Trade and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Bleiklie, Ivar, Goggin, Malcolm, and Rothmayr, Christine, eds. Governing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Cross Country Comparison. London: Routledge, 2004.
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
Bolt, Neville. The Violent Image: Insurgent Propaganda and the New Revolutionaries. Columbia/Hurst Series. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
Bonneuil, Christophe. “Cultures Épistémiques et Engagement Public Des Chercheurs Dans La Controverse OGM.” Natures Sciences Sociétés 14, no. 3 (July 2006): 257–68.
Bonny, Sylvie. “How Have Opinions about GMOs Changed over Time? The Situation in the European Union and the USA.” CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 3 (2008): 117.
Boykoff, Maxwell T. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Boykoff, Maxwell T., and Boykoff, Jules M.. “Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press.” Global Environmental Change 14, no. 2 (July 2004): 125–36.
Bradley, Raymond S. Global Warming and Political Intimidation: How Politicians Cracked Down on Scientists as the Earth Heated Up. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2011.
Braybrooke, David, and Lindblom, Charles E.. A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: The Free Press, 1970.
Brooks, David. “What Moderation Means.” New York Times, October 26, 2012.
Brulle, Robert J., Carmichael, Jason, and Jenkins, Craig J.. “Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern over Climate Change in the U.S., 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114, no. 2 (2012): 169–88.
Cacciatore, Michael A., Yeo, Sara K., Scheufele, Dietram A., Xenos, Michael A., Choi, Doo-Hun, Brossard, Dominique, Becker, Amy B., and Corley, Elizabeth A.. “Misperceptions in Polarized Politics: The Role of Knowledge, Religiosity, and Media.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47, no. 3 (July 2014): 654–61.
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick. Agir Dans Un Monde Incertain: Essai Sur La Démocractie Technique. Paris: éditions du Seuil, 2001.
Cappella, Joseph N., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Carpenter, Daniel P. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
Chase, Steven. “GM Food-Label Panel Reaches an Impasse: Ottawa Should Set Mandatory Regulations for Genetically Modified Fare, Critics Urge.” Globe and Mail, March 14, 2003.
Clovers, Charles. “Exclusion Zones around GM Crops to Be Extended.” Daily Telegraph, January 19, 2002.
Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D.. “The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory.” The Journal of Politics 33, no. 4 (November 1, 1971): 892915.
Cobb, Roger W., and Rochefort, David A.. “Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice.” Policy Studies Journal 21 (1993): 5671.
Coleman, William D., and Skogstad, Grace, eds. Policy Communities and Policy Networks: A Structural Approach. Missisauga: Copp Clark Pitman, 1990.
Collingridge, David, and Reeve, Colin. Science Speaks to Power: The Role of Experts in Policymaking. London: Frances Printers, 1986.
Cook, Timothy E. Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Coroller, Catherine. “Le Gouvernement Rend Les OGM Transparents.” Libération, July 26, 2001.
Crick, Bernard. In Defence of Politics. 5th ed. London: Continuum, 2005.
Dahl, Robert A. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.
Doering, Ronald L., and Hughes, Valerie. “We Need to Win: Once Digested, Arguments over EU’s Moratorium on Genetically Modified Crops Boil Down to Science v. Politics.” National Post, February 7, 2006.
Domingo, José L., and Bordonaba, Jordi Giné. “A Literature Review on the Safety of Genetically Modified Plants.” Environment International 37 (2011).
Douglas, Mary, and Wildavsky, Aaron. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: California University Press, 1982.
Druckman, James N.Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication 22, no. 4 (October 2005): 463–81.
Dryzek, John S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Dubuc, Alain. “Le 1%: Mythes et Réalités.” La Presse, January 30, 2013.
Edwards, Steven. “Wealthy Continent Mired in Poverty: National Leaders Enrich Themselves at People’s Expense.” National Post, March 31, 2004.
Einsiedel, Edna F., Jelsøe, Erling, and Breck, Thomas. “Publics at the Technology Table: The Consensus Conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia.” Public Understanding of Science 10 (2001): 8398.
Elenbaas, Matthijs, and de Vreese, Claes H.. “The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism and Vote Choice among Young Voters.” Journal of Communication 58 (2008): 550–67.
Eliasoph, Nina. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Entman, Robert M.Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 5158.
Entman, Robert M., and Herbst, Susan. “Reframing Public Opinion as We Have Known It.” In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, edited by Bennett, Lance W. and Entman, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Faden, Ruth R. and Gearhart, John D.. “Facts on Stem Cells.” Washington Post, August 2004.
Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., and Leiserowitz, A.. “Climate on Cable: The Nature and Impact of Global Warming Coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 17, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 331.
Flinders, Matthew V. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Frank, Andrew. “Administrative Role Definition and Social Change.” Human Organization 22, no. 4 (December 1, 1963): 238–42.
Fukuyama, Francis. “Our Cloning Policy, Hostage to a Stalemate.” Washington Post, February 15, 2004.
Gans, Herbert J. Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.
Gaskell, George, Bauer, Martin W., and Durant, John. “The Representation of Biotechnology: Policy, Media and Public Perception.” In Biotechnology in the Pubic Sphere: A European Sourcebook, edited by Durant, John, Bauer, Martin W., and Gaskell, George, 312. London: Science Museum, 1998.
Gillis, Justin. “Monsanto Pulls Plan to Commercialize Gene-Altered Wheat.” Washington Post, May 11, 2004.
Gillis, Justin. “No Deal on Biotech Food: Industry, Opponents Fail to Agree on Recommendation for Regulation.” Washington Post, May 30, 2003.
Gillis, Justin. “GM Food v. Manure.” National Post, August 2001.
Granovetter, Mark. “The Impact of Social Structures on Economic Outcomes.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2005): 3350.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis F.. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis F.. “The Mindsets of Political Compromise.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2010): 1125–43.
Gutteling, Jan M., Olofsson, Anna, Fjoestad, Byörn, Kohring, Matthias, Goerke, Alexander, Bauer, Martin W. and Rusanen, Timo. “Media Coverage 1973–1996: Trends and Dynamics.” In Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, edited by Bauer, Martin W. and Gaskell, George, 95128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Hajer, Maarten A. Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Hall, Peter. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (1993): 275–96.
Hall, Stephen S. “Panel About to Weigh In On Rules for Assisted Fertility.” New York Times, March 30, 2004.
Heclo, Hugh. A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1977.
Heclo, Hugh. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In The New American Political System, edited by King, Anthony. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978.
Heclo, Hugh. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.
Henderson, Mark. The Geek Manifesto: Why Science Matters. London: Bantam, 2012.
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth, Theiss-Morse. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Highfield, Roger. “Britain May Pay the Price for Botched GM Debate, Says Reith Lecturer.” Daily Telegraph, April 16, 2005.
Hirschman, Albert O. Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. 20th anniversary ed. / with a new foreword by Frank, Robert H.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Holyoke, Thomas T. Competitive Interests: Competition and Compromise in American Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Ikeda, Ken’ichi, and Pappi, Franz Urban. “Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2005): 497514.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Hudson, Kathy L., Scott, Joan, and Faden, Ruth. Values in Conflict: Public Attitudes on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Baltimore, MD: The Genetics and Public Policy Center Phoebe R. Berman Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, 2005.
Hulme, Mike. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Ingold, Karin. “Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy: Ingold: Network Structures within Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 3 (August 2011): 435–59.
Ingold, Karin, and Gschwend, Muriel. “Science in Policy-Making: Neutral Experts or Strategic Policy-Makers?West European Politics 37, no. 5 (September 3, 2014): 9931018.
Ingold, Karin, and Varone, Frédéric. “Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from the Climate Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22, no. 2 (April 1, 2012): 319–46.
Jack, Ian. “Canada to Join the U.S. in Fighting EU’s GM Food Ban.” National Post, May 13, 2003.
Jackson, Dan. “Strategic Media, Cynical Public? Examining the Contingent Effects of Strategic News Frames on Political Cynicism in the United Kingdom.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (2011): 75101.
Jasanoff, Sheila. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Jasanoff, Sheila. “(No?) Accounting for Expertise.” Science and Public Policy 30, no. 3 (June 1, 2003): 157–62.
Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Silva, Carol L., and Murray, Christopher. “Beliefs about Radiation: Scientists, the Public and Public Policy.” Health Physics 97, no. 5 (2009): 519–27.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., St-Clair, Gilbert K., and Woods, Brian. “Explaining Change in Policy Subsystems: Analysis of Coalition Stability and Defection over Time.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (1991): 851–80.
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Jowit, Juliette and Vidal, John. “Genetically Modified Crops Could Bring Benefits, Says Environmental Secretary.” The Guardian, June 5, 2010.
Kagan, Jerome. The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities in the 21st Century. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Wittlin, Maggie, Slovic, Paul, Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, Braman, Donald, and Mandel, Gregory. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change, May 27, 2012.
Kass, Leon R. “How One Clone Leads to Another.” New York Times, January 24, 2003.
Katznelson, Ira. Desolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge after Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust. New York; Chichester: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Kaufman, Marc. “Gene-Spliced Wheat Stirs Global Fears.” Washington Post, February 27, 2001.
Kaufman, Marc. “Journal Editors Disavow Article on Biotech Corn.” Washington Post, April 4, 2002.
Brants, Kees, de Vreese, Claes, Möller, Judith, and van Praag, Philip. “The Real Spiral of Cynicism? Symbiosis and Mistrust between Politicians and Journalists.” International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (2010): 2540.
Kenny, David A. Dyadic Data Analysis. Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press, 2006.
Kickert, Walter. “Steering at a Distance: A New Paradigm of Public Governance in Dutch Higher Education.” Governance 8, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 135–57.
Krugman, Paul. “The Excel Depression.” New York Times, April 19, 2003.
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Kuyek, Devlin. Good Crop/Bad Crop: Seed Politics and the Future of Food in Canada. Toronto: Between the Lines, 2007.
Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Lachapelle, Erick, Montpetit, Éric, and Gauvin, Jean-Philippe. “Public Perceptions of Expert Credibility on Policy Issues: The Role of Expert Framing and Political Worldviews.” Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 4 (November 2014): 674–97.
Lakshmi, Rama. “Indian Harvests First Biotech Cotton Crop: Controversy Surrounds Policy Change.” Washington Post, May 2003.
Larcher, Gérard, Bizet, Jean, and Pastor, Jean-Marc. “OGM: Sortir de L’impasse.” Le Figaro, June 25, 2003.
Latour, Bruno. “From the World of Science to the World of Research?Science 280, no. 5361 (April 10, 1998): 208–9.
Launay, Guillaume. “Pour Que Les OGM Se Vendent, on Leur Invente Une Utilité Sociale.” Libération, February 4, 2008.
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” The American Political Science Review 97 (2003): 311–31.
Lawrence, Felicity. “It Is Not Too Late to Shut the Door on GM Foods.” The Guardian, October 17, 2009.
Leach, William D., and Sabatier, Paul A.. “To Trust An Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models in Collaborative Policymaking.” American Political Science Review 99 (2005): 491504.
Lindblom, Charles E. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
Lindblom, Charles E.Still Muddling, Not Yet Through.” Public Administration Review 39 (1979): 517–26.
Lindblom, Charles E., and Woodhous, Edward J.. The Policy Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
Lipset, Martin S., and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Free Press, 1967.
Lodge, Martin, and Matus, Kira. “Science, Badgers, Politics: Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Change in Bovine Tuberculosis Policy in Britain.” Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 3 (August 2014): 367–90.
Lundberg, Erik. “Does the Government Selection Process Promote or Hinder Pluralism? Exploring the Characteristics of Voluntary Organizations Invited to Public Consultations.” Journal of Civil Society, March 14, 2013, 120.
Majone, Giandomenico. Evidence, Argument & Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.
Mansbridge, Jane J.A Deliberative Theory of Interest Representation.” In The Politics of Interest: Interest Groups Transformed, 3257. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992.
May, Robert. “GM Could Be Good for You.” The Guardian, November 29, 2002.
Mennessier, Marc, and Cyrile, Louis. “Un Champ de ‘maïs Médicament’ Détruit.” Le Figaro, September 3, 2003.
Miller, Scott. “EU Deadlocks on Biotech Food.” Globe and Mail, December 9, 2003.
Mitchell, Neil J., Herron, Kerry G., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Whitten, Guy D.. “Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide: Scientists’ Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and European Union.” British Journal of Political Science 37, no. 04 (September 18, 2007): 753–64.
Mizruchi, Mark S.Similarity of Political Behavior among Large American Corporations.” American Journal of Sociology 95, no. 2 (September 1, 1989): 401–24.
Mondak, Jeffery J. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.
Montpetit, Éric. “A Policy Network Explanation of Biotechnology Policy Differences between the United States and Canada.” Journal of Public Policy 25 (2005): 339–66.
Montpetit, Éric. “Between Detachment and Responsiveness: Civil Servants in Europe and North America.” West European Politics 34 (2011): 1250–71.
Montpetit, Éric. “Does Holding Beliefs with Conviction Prevent Policy Actors from Adopting a Compromising Attitude?Political Studies 60, no. 3 (2012): 621–42.
Montpetit, Éric. “Governance and Policy Learning in the European Union: A Comparison with North America.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (2009): 1185–203.
Montpetit, Éric. Misplaced Distrust: Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2003.
Montpetit, Éric. “Policy Design for Legitimacy: Expert Knowledge, Citizens, Time and Inclusion in the United Kingdom’s Biotechnology Sector.” Public Administration 86 (2008): 259–77.
Montpetit, Éric. “Scientific Credibility, Disagreement, and Error Costs in 17 Biotechnology Subsystems.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 3 (2011): 513–33.
Montpetit, Éric, Rothmayr, Christine, and Varone, Frederic, eds. The Politics of Biotechnology in North America and Europe: Policy Networks, Institutions and Internationalization. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007.
Montpetit, Éric, and Rouillard, Christian. “Cultures and the Democratization of Risk Management: The Widening Biotechnology Gap between Canada and France.” Administration and Society 39 (2008): 907–30.
Mucciaroni, Gary, and Quirk, Paul J.. Deliberative Choices: Debating Public Policy in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Mutz, Diana C. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Newton, Kenneth. “Mass Media Effects: Mobilization or Media Malaise?British Journal of Political Science 29 (1999): 577–99.
Nisbet, Matthew C.Public Opinion about Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68 (2004): 131–54.
Norris, Pippa. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. New York: Schocken, 1971.
O’Neill, Onora. A Question of Trust. 5. printing. The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Page, Benjamin I., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. Class War?: What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Pinard, Maurice. Motivational Dimensions in Social Movements and Contentious Collective Action. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011.
Pollitt, Christopher. The Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University, 2003.
Pollitt, Christopher, and Bouckaert, Geert. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
Pralle, Sarah B.Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy.” Journal of Public Policy 23, no. 3 (September 2003): 233–60.
Pressman, Jeffrey, and Wildavsky, Aaron. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
Pross, Paul A. Group Politics and Public Policy. Vol. 2nd ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Quatremer, Jean. “L’Europe S’apprête À Dire Oui Aux OGM.” Libération, July 2, 2003.
Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Rap, Carole. “Monsanto Cultive L’amalgame.” Libération, September 22, 2006.
Rhodes, R.A.W. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.
Rosenthal, Elisabeth. “Both Sides Cite Science to Address Altered Corn.” New York Times, December 2007.
Roy, Alexis. Les Experts Face Au Risque: Le Cas Des Plantes Transgéniques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.
Sabatier, Paul A.An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences 21 (1988): 129–68.
Sabatier, Paul A.Knowledge, Policy Oriented Learning, and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8 (1987): 649–92.
Sabatier, Paul A.Policy Change over a Decade or More.” In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, edited by Sabatier, Paul A. and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., 1340. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.
Sabatier, Paul A. ed. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., eds. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 117–66. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Weible, Christopher M.. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Sabatier, Paul A.., 117–67. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Zafonte, Matthew. “Policy Knowledge: Advocacy Organizations.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Smelser, Neil J. and Baltes, Paul B., 17:11563–68. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Zafonte, Matthew. “The Views of Bay/Delta Water Policy Activists on Endangered Species Issues.” West/Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 2 (1995): 131–46.
Sabatier, Paul A., Hunter, Susan, and McLaughlin, Susan. “The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents.” Political Research Quarterly 40, no. 3 (September 1, 1987): 449–76.
Saint-Martin, Denis. Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Salter, Lord. Memoirs of a Public Servant. London: Faber and Faber, 1961.
Sample, Ian. “Oil-Rich GM Plant May Ease Pressure on Fish Stocks.” The Guardian, May 12, 2004.
Sanger, David E. “Bush Links Europe’s Ban on Bio-Crops with Hunger.” New York Times, May 22, 2003.
Scharpf, Fritz W.The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration.” Public Administration 66 (1988): 239–78.
Schattschneider, Elmer E. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1975.
Schneider, Ann L., and Ingram, Helen. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1997.
Schön, Donald A., and Rein, Martin. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: BasicBooks, 1994.
Schwarz, Michiel, and Thompson, M.. Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.
Scoffield, Heather. “Altered Corn a Threat to Butterflies Monarchs.” Globe and Mail, August 25, 2000.
Scoffield, Heather. “Farmers Face a Growing Problem as the Agriculture Industry Braces Itself for a Consumer-Led Backlash Against Genetically Modified Foods.” Globe and Mail, January 10, 2000.
Selden, Sally Coleman, Brewer, Gene A., and Brudney, Jeffrey L.. “Reconciling Competing Values in Public Administration: Understanding the Administrative Role Concept.” Administration & Society 31, no. 2 (May 1, 1999): 171204.
Semetko, Holli A., and Valkenburg, Patti M.. “Framing Europe Politics: A Content of Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication 50 (2000): 93109.
Silva, Carol L., Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Barke, Richard P.. “Reconciling Scientists’ Beliefs about Radiation Risks and Social Norms: Explaining Preferred Radiation Protection Standards.” Risk Analysis 27, no. 3 (June 2007): 755–73.
Smith, Jeremy. “Stakes Are Raised in Euro GMO Debate: EU Wants End to Bans.” National Post, June 6, 2007.
Soroka, Stuart N. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. “Opinion–Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 35, no. 04 (August 22, 2005): 665–89.
Staats, Elmer B.Public Service and the Public Interest.” Public Administration Review 48, no. 2 (1988): 601–5.
Stoker, Gerry. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2006.
Stone, Deborah A.Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (1989): 281300.
Strömbäck, Jesper, and Shetaha, Adam. “Media Malaise or a Virtuous Circle? Exploring the Causal Relationships between News Media Exposure, Political News Attention and Political Interest.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (2010): 575–97.
Swedlow, Brendon. “Advancing Policy Theory with Cultural Theory: An Introduction to the Special Issue: Advancing Policy Theory with Cultural Theory.” Policy Studies Journal 42, no. 4 (November 2014): 465–83.
“Synthetic Cells: It’s Life, but Not as We Know It.” The Guardian, May 22, 2010.
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (July 2006): 755–69.
Tarrow, Sidney G.Mad Cows and Social Activists: Contentious Politics in the Trilateral Democracies’.” In Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, edited by Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Tarrow, Sidney G. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Taverne, Dick. “Careless Science Costs Lives.” The Guardian, February 18, 2005.
Thompson, M, Ellis, Richard, and Wildavsky, Aaron. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.
Toke, David, and Marsh, David. “Policy Networks and the GM Crops Issue: Assessing the Utility of a Dialectical Model of Policy Networks.” Public Administration 81 (2003): 229–51.
Truman, David B. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951.
Vliegenthart, Rens, and Walgrave, Stefaan. “When the Media Matter for Politics: Partisan Moderators of the Mass Media’s Agenda-Setting Influence on Parliament in Belgium.” Party Politics 17, no. 3 (June 11, 2010): 321–42.
Vogel, David. “Ships Passing in the Night: GMOs and the Politics of Risk Regulation in Europe and the United States.” Working Paper of the Centre for the Management of Environmental Resources. European Institute of Business Administration, 2002.
Wade, Nicholas C. “In the Genome Race, the Sequel Is Personal.” New York Times, September 4, 2007.
Walzer, Michael. Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2004.
Weible, Christopher M.Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (2008): 615–35.
Weible, Christopher M., Siddiki, Saba N., and Pierce, Jonathan J.. “Foes to Friends: Changing Contexts and Changing Intergroup Perceptions.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 13 (2011): 499526.
Weinger, Mackenzie. “POLITICO’S Top 10 State of the Union Moments.” Politico, January 2012.
Williams, Richard. “Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects.” The Stata Journal 12, no. 2 (2012): 308–31.
Wilson, Emily. “Faced by Public Fears, the Government Hopes It Can Dodge the Genetically Modified Fudge.” The Guardian, September 27, 2003.
Younge, Gary. “New York Times Journalist Jailed.” The Guardian, July 2005.
Zaller, John R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.