Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: November 2011

8 - Nuisance

Summary

With the exceptions of defamation and privacy, private nuisance is probably the area of tort law in which the HRA has had the most influence so far. One of the notable aspects of the relationship between nuisance law and the HRA has been the co-existence of both the ‘vertical’ and the ‘horizontal’ effect of the HRA in this context, so that in the case law we can find examples of claimants bringing common law nuisance actions against public authorities alongside direct actions under the HRA, and examples of cases in which it has been argued that the nuisance analysis may itself be affected by human rights considerations. The purpose of this chapter is to explore all these different aspects of the relationship between nuisance and the HRA.

The chapter is divided into three main parts. In the first part, I consider the ‘vertical effect’ of the HRA in environmental nuisance cases, looking first at the relevant Articles of the Convention, then at the case law of the Strasbourg court, and then at the English case law since the HRA came into force. In the second part of the chapter, I consider the relationship between the vertical effect of the HRA and the law of nuisance. In particular, I identify the advantages and disadvantages for a claimant of the two possible routes to redress, and the inter-relationship between the two types of claim when they arise on the same set of facts. Finally, in the third part of the chapter, I consider the possible ‘horizontal effect’ of the HRA on the law of nuisance itself, looking in particular at the standing rules and the statutory authority defence.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law
  • Online ISBN: 9780511920844
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920844
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Praduroux, S. 2008
2004
Anderson, D. 1999
1986
1990
1987
1989
1994
1998
2003
2005
2007
Allen, T.Property and the Human Rights Act 1998OxfordHart 2005
Fairgrieve, D.State Liability in Tort: A Comparative StudyOxford University Press 2003
Miller, C.Environmental Rights in a Welfare State? A Comment on DeMerieuxOxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 2003 111
(ed.), K. OliphantThe Law of TortLondonLexisNexis Butterworths 2007
1986
2002
2004
1996
Harris, D. J.Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick's Law of the European Convention on Human RightsOxford University Press 2009
2002
2001
2004
2000
1997
Bagshaw, R.Private Nuisance and the Defence of the RealmLaw Quarterly Review 120 2004
Tofaris, S. 2009
2008
Wright, J.Tort Law and Human RightsOxfordHart 2001
Mullis, A.Oliphant, K.TortsBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan 2011
1981
Kneebone, S. 1986
Stevens, R.Torts and RightsOxford University Press 2007 102
2000
Bright, S.Liability for the Bad Behaviour of OthersOxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 2001
Winfield, P. H.PrivacyLaw Quarterly Review 47 1931
1937