Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:45:52.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Influence of image registration on validation efforts

from PART I - The Importance of Image Registration for Remote Sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

By
Bin Tan  and
Curtis E. Woodcock
Edited by
Jacqueline Le Moigne ,
Nathan S. Netanyahu  and
Roger D. Eastman
Bin Tan
Affiliation:
Earth Resources Technology Inc., Maryland
Curtis E. Woodcock
Affiliation:
Boston University, Massachussets
Jacqueline Le Moigne
Affiliation:
NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center
Nathan S. Netanyahu
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University, Israel and University of Maryland, College Park
Roger D. Eastman
Affiliation:
Loyola University Maryland
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Currently, several high level satellite-based data products relevant to Earth science system and global change research are derived from medium spatial resolution remote sensing observations. Because of their high temporal frequency and important spatial coverage, these products, also called biophysical variables, are very useful to describe the mass and energy fluxes between the Earth's surface and the atmosphere. In order to check the relevance of using such products as inputs into land surface models, it is of importance to assess their accuracy. Validation activity consists in evaluating by independent means the quality of these biophysical variables. Currently, these variables are derived from coarse-resolution remote sensing observations. Validation methods consist in generating a ground truth map of these products at high spatial resolution. It is produced by using ground measurements of the biophysical variable and radiometric data from a high spatial resolution sensor. The relationship between biophysical variable and radiometric data, called the transfer function, allows extending the local ground measurements to the whole high spatial resolution image. The resulting biophysical variable map is aggregated to be compared with the medium spatial resolution satellite biophysical products. Three important geometrical issues influence the validation results: (1) The localization error of the local ground measurements, (2) the localization error between high and medium resolution images, and (3) the point spread function (PSF) associated with the medium spatial resolution remote sensing observations. This work aims at analyzing the influence of these issues within the validation process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Image Registration for Remote Sensing , pp. 24 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Curran, P. J. (1988). The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24, 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, S., Fang, H., Chen, M., Shuey, C. J., Walthall, C., Daughtry, C., Morisette, J., Schaaf, C., and Strahler, A. (2002). Validating MODIS land surface reflectance and albedo products: Methods and preliminary results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisette, J. T., Privette, J. L., and Justice, C. O. (2002). A framework for the validation of MODIS land products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishihama, M., Wolfe, R. E., Solomon, D., Patt, F., Blanchette, J., Fleig, A., and Masuoka, E. (1997). MODIS Level 1A Earth Location: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. NASA Technical Memorandum, SDST-092, Version 3. Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
Privette, J. L., Myneni, R. B., Knyazikhin, Y., Mukufute, M., Roberts, G., Tian, Y., Wang, Y., and Leblanc, S. G. (2002). Early spatial and temporal validation of MODIS LAI product in Africa. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, B., Hu, J., Zhang, P., Huang, D., Shavanov, V. N., Weiss, M., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B. (2005). Validation of MODIS LAI product in croplands of Alpilles, France. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D01107, doi:10.1029/2004JD004860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Y., Woodcock, C. E., Wang, Y., Privette, J. L., Shabanov, N. V., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Buermann, W., Dong, J., Veikkanen, B., Häme, T., Andersson, T. K., Ozdogan, M., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B. (2002). Multiscale analysis and validation of the MODIS LAI product: I. Uncertainty assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., and Li, Z. (2002). Validation of the land-surface temperature products retrieved from Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Woodcock, C. E., Buermann, W., Stenberg, P., Voipio, P., Smolander, H., Hame, T., Tian, Y., Hu, J., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B. (2004). Evaluation of the MODIS LAI algorithm at a coniferous forest site in Finland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91, 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, R. E., Nishihama, M., Fleig, A. J., Kuyper, J. A., Roy, D. P., Storey, J. C., and Patt, F. S. (2002). Achieving sub-pixel geolocation accuracy in support of MODIS land science. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, C. E., Collins, J. B., and Jupp, D. L. B. (1997). Scaling remote sensing models. In Scaling-up: From Cell to Landscape, Gardingen, P. R., Foody, G. M., and Curran, P. J., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–77.Google Scholar
Yang, K., and Wolfe, R. E. (2001). MODIS level 2 grid with the ISIN map projection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sydney, Australia, Vol. 7, pp. 3291–3293.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×