Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:17:51.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

John Haiman
Affiliation:
Macalester College, Minnesota
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikhenvald, A. 2010. The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexandre, Pierre. 1966. Préliminaire à une présentation des idéophones bulu. Neue afrikanischen Studien, Lukas, Johannes (ed.) (Hamburger Beiträge zur Afrika-Kunde, 5), 928. Hamburg: Deutsches Institut für Afrika-Forschung.Google Scholar
Alpher, B. 2001. Ideophones in interaction with intonation and the expression of new information in some indigenous languages of Australia. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 924. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ameka, F. 2001. Ideophones and the adjective class. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 2548. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amha, A. 2001. Ideophones and compound verbs in Wolaitta. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 4962. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49/4:765–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. and Zide, N.. 2002. Issues in Proto-Munda and Proto-Austroasiatic nominal derivation: The bimoraic constraint. In Macken, M. (ed.), 5574. Papers from the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Flagstaff: Arizona State University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. 1982. Universals of aspect and parts of speech. In Hopper, P. (ed.), 91114. Tense/Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, R. 1989. Comparative and Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Arcadi, A. 2003 Is gestural communication more sophisticated than vocal communication in wild chimpanzees? Response to Corballis 2003: appears as 210–11 in Corballis 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arensburg, B., Tillier, A.M., Vandermeersch, B., Duday, H., Scheparts, L.A., and Rak, Y.. 1989. A middle Palaeolithic human hyoid bone. Nature 338:758–60.Google Scholar
Argyle, M. and Cook, M.. 1976. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Stokoe, Wm., and Wilcox, S.. 1995. Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. and Wilcox, S.. 2007. The Gestural Origin of Language. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, R.E. 1985. Tamil. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Asher, R.E. and Kumar, T.C.. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 1946. Mimesis: Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, E. 1968. Nouns and noun phrases. In Bach, B. and Harms, R. (eds.), 90122. Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Linehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. 1974. Naturalness in historical reconstruction and changes that are not natural. Papers from the parasession on Natural Phonology, CLS. 13–20.Google Scholar
Bakker, P.E. 2003. Reduplication in Saramaccan. In Kouwenberg, S. (ed.), 7382. Twice as Meaningful: Reduplication in Pidgins, Creoles, and other Contact Languages. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Ball, W. 1960. A Short Account of the History of Mathematics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bally, C. 1926. Le langage et la vie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A. 1966. A Grammar of Yoruba. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. and Ferguson, C.. 1988. Introduction. In Barlow, and Ferguson, (eds.), 122. Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Barry, D. 1988a. Dave Barry’s Greatest Hits, 3436. New York: Fawcett.Google Scholar
Barry, D. 1988b. The rules. Dave Barry’s Greatest Hits, 116–19. New York: Fawcett.Google Scholar
Barry, D. 1992. Dave Barry Does Japan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1968. The Fashion System. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Bates, E. et al. 1975. The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 21:205–26.Google Scholar
Bates, E. 1979. Intentions, conventions, and symbols. In Bates, E. et al. (eds.), 3368. The Emergence of Symbols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. et al. 1979. The Emergence of Symbols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. et al. 1983. Names, gestures and objects: Symbolization in infancy and aphasia. In Nelson, K.E. (ed.) Children’s Language, 4:59123. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bateson, G. 1955. The message ‘this is play’. In Schaffner, B. (ed.), 145242. Group Processes: Second Conference on Group Processes. New York: Josiah Macey Foundation.Google Scholar
Beck, D. pdf. Ideophones, adverbs, and predicate modifiers in Upper Necaxa Totonac. www.ualberta.ca/~dbeck/ideophones.pdf.Google Scholar
Behaghel, O. 1932. Deutsche Syntax, volume IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M. and Allen, C.. 1998. Intentional communication and social play. In Bekoff, M. and Byers, J. (eds.). Animal Play: Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives, 97114. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M. and Byers, J. (eds.). 1998. Animal Play: Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13/2:145204.Google Scholar
Bell, C. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U. and Klima, E.. 1976. The two faces of the sign. In Steklis, et al. (eds.). Origins and Evolution of Human Language and Speech 514-538. New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. and Klima, E.. 1979. The Signs of Language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, P.K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Geoffrey. 2014. Aesthetic elements in Temiar grammar. In Williams, (ed.), 3660. The Aesthetics of Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1946. Structure at relations de personne dans le verbe. Benveniste, E. problèmes de linguistique générale 225–36. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1935 (1984). Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen. Paris: Adrien-MaisonNeuve.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T.. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berglund, K. and Vogt, H.. 1962. On the validity of glottochronology. Current Anthropology 3:115–53.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, G. 1906. On Blendings of Synonyms or Cognate Expressions in English. Lund: Håkan Olsson.Google Scholar
Bernardis, P., Bello, A., Pettenati, P., Stefanini, S., and Gentilucci, M.. 2008. Manual actions affect vocalizations of infants. Experimental Brain Research, 184:599603.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1995. Language and Human Behaviour. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. [1971]/2010. Essays on Body Motion and Communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Birkholtz, S. 2015. Cantonese ideophones. Unpublished Honors thesis, Macalester College.Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 1996. Areal typology and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 20/3:519–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, S. 2000. The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blench, R.M., ms. Ideophones and the sensory world.Google Scholar
Bloom, R. 1979. Language creation in the manual modality: A Preliminary investigation. Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis, Department of Behavioral Sciences: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. [1933]/1973. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Blust, R. 1977. The proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian subgrouping: A preliminary report.Google Scholar
Bodomo, A. 2006. The structure of ideophones in African and Asian languages: The Case of Dagaare and Cantonese. In Mugane, J. et al. (eds.), 203–13. Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Languages and Linguistics in Broad Perspectives. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bodomo, A. 2000–8. A Corpus of Cantonese Ideophones. Ms. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Boer, B. de. 2000. Emergence of sound systems through self-organization. In Knight, et al. (eds.), 177–98. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boer, B. de. 2002. Evolving sound systems. In Cangelosi, A. and Parisi, D. (eds.), 7998. Simulating the Evolution of Language. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. 1993. Aspects of transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees. In Gibson, K. and Ingold, T. (eds.), 171–83. Tools, Language, and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1940. Word affinities. American Speech 15/1:6273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1961. Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. The Hague: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1975. Aspects of language. 2nd edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1979. To catch a metaphor: You as norm. American Speech 54:194209.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1985. The inherent iconism of intonation. In Haiman, J. (ed.), 97108. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1986. Intonation and Its Parts. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. and Gerstman, L.. 1957. Disjuncture as a clue to constructs. Word 13:246–55.Google Scholar
Bomhart, A. and Kerns, J.. 1994. The Nostratic Macro-family. The Hague: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bonner, J. 1980. The Evolution of Culture in Animals. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bopp, F. 1816. Ueber das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache. Frankfurt a.M.: Andreäische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Borges, J.L. 1964a. Averroes’ search. In Yates, Donald and Irby, James (ed. and trans.), 148–55. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings by J.L. Borges. New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
Borges, J.L. 1964b. The lottery of Babylon. In Yates, Donald and Irby, James (ed. and trans.), 3035. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and other Writings by J.L. Borges. New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J.L. 2003. Gesture in language evolution: Could I but raise my hand to it! (appears as response in Corballis 2003).Google Scholar
Bréal, M. 1897. Essai de sémantique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. and Partridge, E.. 1931. Songs and Slang of the British Soldier: 1914–1918. (3rd edition). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Browman, C. and Goldstein, L.. 1984. Dynamic modelling of phonetic structure. Haskins laboratories Status reports on Speech research July 1–December 31, 1984: 1–17.Google Scholar
Browman, C. and Goldstein, L.. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Haskins laboratories Status reports on Speech Research 111/112:2342.Google Scholar
Brownell, H., Gardner, H., Prather, P., and Martino, G.. 1995. Language, communication, and the right hemisphere. Handbook of Neurological and Language Disorders 33: 325–49.Google Scholar
Brugmann, K. and Delbrück, B.. 1911. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, 2er Band, 2er Teil. 2te Bearbeitung. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Brunelle, M. and Xuyen, Le Thi. 2014. Why is sound symbolism so common in Vietnamese? In Williams, J. (ed.), 83-98. The Aesthetics of Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bullowa, M. (ed.) 1979. Before Speech. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. 2006. The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burenhult, N. 2005. A Grammar of Jahai. ANU.Google Scholar
Burling, R. 2005. The Talking Ape. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2002. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Givon, T. and Malle, B. (eds.), 109–34. The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2007. Frequency and the Organization of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. et al. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Call, J. and Tomasello, M.. 2007a. The gestural repertoire of chimpanzees. In Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (eds.), 1739. The Gestural Communication of Apes and Monkeys. Mahwah, NJ, and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Call, J. and Tomasello, M. (eds.). 2007b. The Gestural Communication of Apes and Monkeys. Mahwah, NJ, and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. 1994. A Grammar of Supyire. The Hague: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carr, E.H. 1961. What Is History? New York: Pelican.Google Scholar
Carter, A. 1975. The transformation of sensorimotor morphemes into words. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. 10:3147.Google Scholar
Cartmill, M. 1990. Human uniqueness and theoretical content in paleoanthropology. International Journal of Primatology 11/3:173–92.Google Scholar
Cartmill, M. and Smith, F.. 2009. The Human Lineage. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Calvin, Wm. 1996. The Cerebral Cortex. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. and Seyfarth, R.. 1990. How Monkeys See the World. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. and Seyfarth, R.. 2007. Baboon Metaphysics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Childs, T. 1988. The phonology of Kisi ideophones. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 10:165–90.Google Scholar
Childs, T. 1989. Where do ideophones come from? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19/2:5576.Google Scholar
Childs, T. 1994. African ideophones. In Hinton, L. et al. (eds.), 247–79. Studies in Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, T. 1995. A Grammar of Kisi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Childs, T. 1996. Where have all the ideophones gone? The death of a word category in Zulu. Pdf.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. [1959]/1964. Review of B.F. Skinner’s ‘Verbal behaviour’. In Fodor, J. and Katz, J. (eds.), 547–78. The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1972. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2010. Some simple evo devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Larson, R.K., Deprez, V., and Yamakido, H. (eds.), 4562. The Evolution of Human Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chrisomalis, S. 2010. Numerical Notation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, S. 1988. The Design of Agreement. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chun-Leuh, . 2007. Ve:jjakaw: kmae. [Khmer grammar]. Phnom Penh: Pon Caun and Tiang Ciat.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. 1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R.. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66/4:764805.Google Scholar
Clark, R. 1978. The transition from action to gestures. In Locke, A. (ed.), 231–57. Action, Gesture, and Symbol. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, N., Bussey, T., and Dickinson, A.. 2003. Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:685–91.Google Scholar
Cole, P. 1982. Quechua. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. and Smith, N. (1977). Lingua Descriptive Studies questionnaire. Lingua 42/1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. 2004. A Grammar of Dene Suline (Chipewyan). Winnipeg: Algonkian and Iroquoian Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cooke, J. 1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. 2002. From Hand to Mouth. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. 2003. From mouth to hand: Gesture,speech, and the evolution of right-handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26:199260.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. 2011. The Recursive Mind. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corina, D., Poisner, H., Bellugi, U., Feinberg, T., Dowd, D., O’Grady-Batch, L. 1992. Dissociation between linguistic and non-linguistic gestural systems: A case for compositionality. Brain and Language 43:414–47.Google Scholar
Courtenay, K. 1976. Ideophones defined as a phonological class in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics 7, supplement 6:1326.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. 2004. Writing Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, D. 2001. Setswana ideophones as uninflected predicative lexemes. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 7586. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Creissels, D. and Sambou, P.. 2013. Le Mandinka. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Cyffer, N. and Hutchison, J.. 1990. A Dictionary of the Kanuri Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dahl, O. 2005. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dakupu, M.E.K. and Ford, K., 1988. The Central Togo languages. In Dakupu, (ed.), 119–54. The Languages of Ghana. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Danto, A. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darmesteter, A. [1886]/ 1925. La vie des mots, 15me édition. Paris: Librairie Delagrave.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871 (1972). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1877. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd edition. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davies, J. 1990. Kobon. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1999. Foreword. In Blackmore, S. (ed.), vii-xvii. The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 2014. The Greatest Show on Earth. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. 1974. Neutralization, iteration, and ideophones: The locus of language in Jamaica. In DeCamp, D. and Hancock, I. (eds.), 4660. Pidgins and Creoles: Current Trends and Prospects. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. 1949. Structural linguistics and syntactic laws. Word 5:112.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. 2009. Reading in the Brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. 1998. Our Cosmic Origins. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, D. 1979. Hixkaryana. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dhorree, C. and Tosco, M.. 1998. 111 Somali ideophones. Journal of African Cultural Studies 11/2:125–56.Google Scholar
Diamond, A.S. 1959. The History and Origin of Language. New York: The Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society 8:440–7.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1976. Expressives in Semai. In Jenner, P. et al. (eds.), 1:246–64. Austroasiatic Studies. University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1979. Expressive Phonology and Prosaic Phonology: Studies in Mon-Khmer Phonetics and Phonology in Honor of Eugenie J. Henderson, (Thongkum, Therapan et al., eds.), 4959. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Diller, K. and Cann, R.. 2009. Evidence against a genetic-based revolution in language 50,000 years ago. In Botha, R. and Knight, C. (eds.), 135–49. The Cradle of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G.J. 1983. The Turkana Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2009a. How to do things with ideophones: Obervations on the use of Vivid sensory language in Siwu. SOAS Research Seminar, June 3, 2009.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2009b. Ideophones in Unexpected Places. Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory. London.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2013. Ideophones and gesture in everyday speech. Gesture 13/2:143–65.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. to appear. Ideophones and reduplication: On the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in LanguageGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 2002. Australian Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 2013. Basic Linguistic Theory, volume 3. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doke, C. 1927. Text-book of Zulu Grammar. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Doke, C. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Dolgopolsky, A. 1964. Gipoteza drevnejshego rodstva jazykovykh semej Severnoj Eurazii s verojatnostnoj tochki zrenija. [Evaluating the probability of hypotheses of deep genetic relationships among the language families of Northern Eurasia]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2:5363.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 1999. Mimesis and the executive suite. In Hurford, J.R. et al. (eds.), 4467. Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donegan, P. 1985. On the Natural Phonology of Vowels. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Duden, , 1999. Das grosse deutsche Wörterbuch in 10 Bänden. Mannheim, etc.: Duden Verlag.Google Scholar
Dumestre, G. 1998. Les idéophones: le cas du bambara. Faits de langues 11/12:321–34.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. 1996. Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, M. 1961. Les impressifs en Vietnamien. Bulletin de la Société des Etudes Indochinoises. 36/1.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. 2001. Consciousness: The remembered present. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929:111–22.Google Scholar
Egbokhare, F. 2001. Phonosoemantic correspondences in Emai attributive ideophones. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 8796. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P, and Vigorito, J.. 1971. Speech perception in infants. Science 171/3968:303–6.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W.. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17/2: 124–9.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W.. 1975. Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Elders, S. 2001. Defining ideophones in Mundang. Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz 97–110.Google Scholar
Ellegard, A. 1953. The Auxiliary Do. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ellenberg, J. 2015. How Not to Be Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Emery, N. and Clayton, N.. 2001. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies in scrub jays. Nature 414:443–6.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. and Lane, H. (eds.) 2000. The Signs of Language Revisited. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Epps, P. 2008. A Grammar of Hup. The Hague: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Escalona, S. 1973. Basic modes of social interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 19:205–32.Google Scholar
Evans, N. 2003. Bininj Gun-Wok: A Pan Dialectal Grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku, and Kune. (Pacific Linguistics 541) Canberra; Research School of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
Eves, H. 1953. An Introduction to the History of Mathematics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fagen, R. 1981. Animal Play Behaviour. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faltz, L. 1998. The Navajo Verb. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Farmer, S. 2008. The origins of nonsense: Bo’ri’va sap in Khmer. Unpublished Honors dissertation Macalester College.Google Scholar
Feldman, H., Goldin-Meadow, S., and Gleitman, L.. 1978. Beyond Herodotus. In Lock, A., (ed.), 351414. Action, Symbol and Gesture. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. 1973. The Revival of a Classical Tongue. The Hague: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fenck, A. and Fenck-Oczlon, G.. 2009. Some parallels between language and music from a cognitive and evolutionary perspective. Musicae Scientiae 13:201–26.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15:325–40.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. 1964. Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist 66/6, pt.2:103–14.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. 1973. Two processes of reduplication in the American Sign Language. Foundations of Language 9:469–80.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1994. The law wishes to have a formal existence. 141–79. There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech! And It’s a Good Thing, Too. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fitch, W.T. 2010. The Evolution of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fitch, T. and Hauser, M.. 2003. Unpacking ‘honesty’. In Simmon, A., Popper, A., and Fay, R. (eds.), 65137. Acoustic Communication. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Flavell, J., Flavell, E., and Green, F.. 1987. Young children’s knowledge about the apparent/real and pretend/real distinctions. Developmental Psychology. 23:816–22.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S. 1990. Tense and Narrativity. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. 1979. La métaphore en phonétique. Ottawa: Didier.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. 1986. Reported speech in French and Hungarian. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), 255309. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. 2002. The Languages within Language: An Evolutive Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Foris, D. 2000. A Grammar of Sochiapan Chinantec. University of Texas at Arlington: SIL International.Google Scholar
Fortune, G. 1962. Ideophones in Shona. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frei, H. 1929. La grammaire des fautes. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Frishberg, N. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51/3:696719.Google Scholar
Gabas, Nilson, and van der Auwera, Johan. 2004. Ideophones in Karo. Language, Culture, and Mind (Achard, Michel and Kemmer, Suzanne eds.), 397413. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. 1979. Self-awareness in primates. American Scientist 67/4:417–21.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. 2011. Future Babble. New York: Plume/Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.A. and Gardner, B.T.. 1969. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science 165/3894:664–72.Google Scholar
Gentilucci, M., Benuzzi, F., Gangitano, M., and Grimaldi, S. 2001. Grasp with hand and mouth: A kinematic study on healthy subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86:16851699.Google Scholar
Gentilucci, M. and Corballis, M. 2006. From manual gesture to speech: A gradual transition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30:949960.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1955. The Religion of Java. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gil, D. 2005. From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In Hurch, B. (ed.), 3456. Studies on Reduplication. Berlin/ The Hague: Mouton- de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel. 2007. Stumbling on Happiness. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Givon, T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. 2005. The Languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1978. Response cries. Language 54/4:787815.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. The Resilience of Language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. 2009. From Gesture to Word. In Bavin, E. (ed.), 145–60. The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. and Feldman, H. 1977.The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science 197:401–3.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. 1933. Some aspects of evolution. Science 78/2003:539–47.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. 1995. The phonological composition of personal pronouns: Implications for genetic hypotheses. BLS 21, Parasession on historical issues in sociolinguistics:117–28.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. and Heath, J.. 1998. Sex, sound symbolism, and sociolinguistics. Current Anthropology 39/4:421–49.Google Scholar
Gorgoniev, Yu. 1966. Grammatika Kxmerskogo jazyka. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Nauka.Google Scholar
Gould, S. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. and Vrba, E.. 1982. Exaptation: A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8/1: 415.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1963. The Languages of Africa. IJAL 29/1, Part II. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful constituents. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), 73–113. Universals of Language, 2nd edition. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1971a [1957]. Language and evolutionary theory. In Dil, A. (ed.), 7892. Language, Culture and Communication: Essays by Joseph H. Greenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1971b [1959]. Language and evolution. In Dil, A. (ed.), 106–25. Language, Culture and Communication: Essays by Joseph H. Greenberg. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, , 1971c. The Indo-Pacific hypothesis. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), volume 8, 807–71. Current Trends in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Greenberg, J. et al. (eds.), volume 3: 4982. Universals of Language. Stanford: University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1985. Some Iconic Relationships among Time, Place, and Discourse Deixis. In Haiman, J. (ed.), 217–88. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1989. Classification of American Indian languages: A reply to Campbell. Language 65/1:107–14.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 2000–2. Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenspan, S. and Shanker, S.. 2004. The First Idea. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Gregerson, K. 1984. Pharyngeal symbolism and Rengao phonology. Lingua 62:209–38.Google Scholar
Grinevald (Craig), C. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: A study in language and culture. In Craig, C. (ed.), 263–93. Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Groos, K. 1898. The Play of Animals. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: Mouton- de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hagège, C. 1993. The Language Builder. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1980. Hua, a Papuan Language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1985. Natural Syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1989. Alienation in grammar. Studies in Language 13/1:129–70.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1991. Hua-English Dictionary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1994. Ritualization and the Development of Language. Perspectives on Grammaticalization Ed. By Pagliuca, W., 328. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 1998. Talk Is Cheap. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2003. Explaining infixation. In Polinsky, M. and Moore, J. (eds.), 105–20. The Nature of Explanation. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2010. The creation of new words. Linguistics 48/3:547–72.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2011. Cambodian: Khmer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. 2014. Six motives for repetition. In MacWhinney, B., Mal’chukov, A., and Moravcsik, E. (eds.), 246–60. Competing Motivations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. and Kuteva, T.. 2003. The symmetry of counterfactuals. In Bybee, J. and Noonan, M. (eds.), 101–24. Complex Sentences in Grammar and in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hall, E. 1959. The Silent Language. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hall, R., Comhaire-Sylvain, S., Ormonde McConell, H., and Métraux, A.. 1953. Haitian Creole: Grammar, Texts, Vocabulary. Philadelphia: American Folklore Society.Google Scholar
Hall, S. 1998. Object Play in Mammals. In Bekoff, M. and Byers, J. (eds.), 4560. Animal Play: Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The Sound Symbolic System of Japanese. Studies in Japanese Linguistics, volume 10: Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Harnad, S., Steklis, H., and Lancaster, J. (eds.) 1976. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Harper-Collins German Dictionary. (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. et al. (eds.). 2005. World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, T.. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–79.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. 1979. How to talk to your brother-in-law in Guugu-Yimidhirr. In Shopen, T. (ed.), 160239. Languages and their speakers. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, C. 1951. The Ape in Our House. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. 2000. Afro-Asiatic. In Heine, B. and Nurse, D. (eds.), 7498. African Languages: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Healey, P. 1965. Telefol Verb Phrases. Pacific Linguistics, Series A: 5: 27–53. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1998a. Hermit crabs. Language 74/1:728–59.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1998b. Pragmatic skewing in 1 < – > 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. IJAL 64/2:83104.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2008. A Grammar of Jamsay. Berlin: Mouton – de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heath, J. ms. Expressive adverbials (ideophones) in Jamsay (Dogon).Google Scholar
Hedinger, R. 2008. A Grammar of Akoose. Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Heine, B. 1968. Die Verbreitung und Gliederung der Togorestsprachen. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Heine, B. to appear. A reference grammar of German.Google Scholar
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalizatio. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. and Reh, M.. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Heller, J. 1972. Catch – 22. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. 1971. The Indispensable Foundation: A Selection from the Writings of Henry Sweet. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henshilwood, C., Yates, R., Jacobs, Z., Tribolo, C., Duller, G.A.T., Mercier, N., Sealy, J., Valladas, H., Watts, I., and Wintle, A.G.. 2002. Emergence of modern human behaviour: Middle stone age engravings from South Africa. Science 295:1278–80.Google Scholar
Herodotus, . 1954. The Histories [tr. By A. de Sélincourt]. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hewes, G.W. 1973. Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Current Anthropology 14:524.Google Scholar
Hewes, G. 1976. Current status of gestural theories of language origin. Steklis and Harnad, 482–504.Google Scholar
Hirosi, Y. 2013. Deconstruction of the speaker and the three-tier model of language use. Tsukuba English Studies 32:128.Google Scholar
Hock, H. and Joseph, B.. 1996. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship. Berlin: Mouton- de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203/3:8896.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. 1987. Emergent grammar. In Aske, J. et al. (eds.), 139–57. Papers of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N.L. 1973. The illusion of beauty. Perception 2:429–39.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. 1988. The Structure and Function of the Kanuri Ideophone. Harsunan Nijeriya. Vol XIV. Twentieth Year Commemorative Edition. Kano, Nigeria: Centre for the Study of Nigerian Languages.Google Scholar
Huttar, G.L. and Huttar, M.. 1994. Ndyuka. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. et al. 1971. Les débuts de la function symbolique. Archives de Psychologie 41:187243.Google Scholar
Ivanova, G. 2002. On the Relation between Sound, Word Structure and Meaning in Japanese Mimetics. Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ivanova, G. 2006. Sound-symbolic approach to Japanese mimetic words. Toronto Working papers in Linguistics 26:103–14.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. and Goldin-Meadow, S.. 2005. Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science 16/3:367–71.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. and Thelen, E.. 2003. The hand leads the mouth in ontogenesis too. Response to Corballis 2003: Appears as 225–6 in Corballis 2003.Google Scholar
Jaques, A. 1941. Shangana-Tsona ideophones and their tones. Bantu Studies 15/3:205–44.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Philip. 2001. Hausa (LOALL, 7). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1931. Principles of historical phonology. Reprinted in Keiler, A. (ed.) 1972, 121–38. A Reader in Historical Linguistics. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1931 [1972]. Principles of historical phonology. In Keiler, A. (ed.), 121–38. A Reader in Historical Linguistics. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1959. Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. Project on Russian, Department of Slavic languages, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1965. Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes 13:2137.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. [1943]/ 1971. Boas’ view of grammatical meaning. In Collected Writings II, 98135. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jaynes, J. [1984]/2000. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jendraschek, G. 2001. Semantic and structural properties of Turkish ideophones. Turkic Languages, 5:88103.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. [1894]/ 1993. Progress in Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. [1922]/1964. Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. [1924]/ 1992. The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Volume 6: Morphology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Volume 3: Syntax: The First Volume. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Johansson, N. and Zlatev, J.. 2013. Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. PJOS 5/1:320.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. 2001. The ideophone in Didinga. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 121–38. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kabuta, N.S. 2001. Ideophones in Ciluba. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 139–54. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kakeshi, Hisao, Ikahiro, T., and Shourup, Lawrence C. (eds.). 1996. Dictionary of Iconic Expressions in Japanese. The Hague:Mouton.Google Scholar
Karlgren, B. [1923]/1962. Sound and Symbol in Chinese. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kawai, M. 1965. Newly acquired pre-cultural behaviour in the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima Islet. Primates 6:130.Google Scholar
Kegl, J., Senghas, A., and Coppola, M. 2001. Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In De Graff, M. (ed.) Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Language Change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keller, R. 1994. Sprachwandel: von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache (2e Auflage). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Kellogg, W. and Kellogg, A.. 1933. The Ape and the Child. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kelso, J. and Tuller, B.. 1982. Exploring the information support for speech. Status Report in Speech Research 69:43–54. New Haven: Haskins Laboratories.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1991. Some considerations for a theory of language origins. Man 26:199221.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, C. 2001. University and diversity: Ideophones from Baka and Khoe. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 155–64. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, C. 2008. A Grammar of Modern Khwe. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Kim-Reynaud, Y.-K. 1976. Semantic features in phonology: Evidence from vowel harmony in Korean. Chicago Linguistic Society 12:397412.Google Scholar
Kimura, D. 1976. The neural basis of language qua gestures. In Whitaker, H. and Whitaker, H.A., (eds.), 145–56. Studies in Neurolinguistics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35:379415.Google Scholar
Kita, S. 2003 (ed.) Pointing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kita, S. 2008. World-view of protolanguage speakers as inferred from semantics of sound symbolic words: A case of Japanese mimetics. In Masataka, Nobuo (ed.), 2538. The Origins of Language. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
Kita, S. and Őzyürek, A.. 2003. What does crosslinguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48:1632.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, C. and Lehrer, A.. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14/5:739–59.Google Scholar
Klamer, M. 1998. A Grammar of Kambera. The Hague: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klamer, M. 2001. Expressives and Iconicity in the Lexicon. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 165–82. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Klassen, D. 1999. You can’t have silence with your palms up. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Klett’s Modern German Dictionary. 1994. Chicago: NTC.Google Scholar
Knight, C. 1999. Play as a precursor of phonology and syntax. In Knight, C. et al. (eds), 99119. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knott, A. 2012. Sensorimotor Cognition and Natural Language Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kohler, E., Keysers, C, Umiltà, M., Fogassi, L., Gallego, V., and Rizzolatti, G.. 2003. Hearing sounds, Understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297:846–9.Google Scholar
Kohn, M. and Mithen, S.. 1999. Hand-axes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity 73:518–26.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. 2012. A Universe from Nothing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kreiman, J. and Sidtis, D.. 2011. Foundations of Voice Studies. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krings, M., Stone, A., Schmitz, R., Krainitzki, H., Stoneking, M., and Pääbo, S.. 1997. Neanderthal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell 90:1930.Google Scholar
Kruspe, N. 2004. A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. and Miller, J.. 1975. Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced – voiceless discrimination in alveolar palatal consonants. Science 190:169–72.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Gerth, D.. 1904. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, Band 2. Hannover.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C.. 1955. Lateinische Grammatik. 3e Auflage. Band 2. Leverkusen: Gottschalksche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kulemeka, A. 1993. The Status of the Ideophone in Chichewa. Doctoral thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Kulemeka, A. 1995. Sound symbolism and grammatical frameworks: A typology of ideophones in Asian and African languages. South African Journal of African Languages 15/2:73- 95.Google Scholar
Kundera, M. 1977. La vie est ailleurs. (tr. Kerel, F.). Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Kunene, Daniel. 1965. The ideophone in Southern Sesotho. Journal of African Languages 4:1939.Google Scholar
Kunene, Daniel. 1978. Ideophones in Sesotho. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Kunene, D. 2001. Speaking the act. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 183–91. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1981. Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language 57/2: 267308.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladd, R. 1978. Stylized intonation. Language 54:517–40.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. Third edition. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 2006. A Course in Phonetics. Fifth edition. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lane, H., Pillard, R., and French, M.. 2000. Origins of the American Deaf-World. Emmorey, K. and Lane, H. (eds.), 77100.Google Scholar
Lane, N. 2009. Life Ascending. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lang, A. 1975. The semantics of classificatory verbs in Enga (and other Papua New Guinea Languages). Pacific Linguistics B:39. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
Lanham, L.W. 1960. The comparative phonology of Nguni. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1990. How to do things with junk. Journal of Linguistics 26:79102.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1994. Old English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, W.-M. 1999. A Study of Adjectives in Cantonese. Unpublished MPhil. Thesis, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Laver, J. 1994. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leakey, M. and Hay, R.. 1979. Pliocene footprints in the Laetoli beds at Laetoli, Northern Tanzania. Nature 278:317–23.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-S. 1992. Phonology and Sound Symbolism of Korean Ideophones. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 1982/1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Leskien, A. 1902/3. Schallnachahmungen und Schallverba im Litauischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 13:165212.Google Scholar
Leskien, A. and Rottmann, O.. 2002. Handbuch der altbulgarischen Sprache. 11e Auflage. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. 1987. Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘theory of mind’. Psychology Review 94:412–26.Google Scholar
Lester, L. and Skousen, R.. 1974. The phonology of drunkenness. Parasession on Natural Phonology. CLS 233–9.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. 1999. The Turkish Language Reform. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, C. and Thompson, S.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. et al. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 431–61.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. 1973. On the evolution of language. Cognition 2/1: 5994.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. 1984. The Biology and Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. and Blumstein, S.. 1988. Speech Physiology, Speech Perception, and Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. and Crelin, E.S.. 1971. The speech of Neanderthal man. Linguistic Inquiry 2/2:203–22.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. and Klima, E.. 1996. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Fischer, S. and Siple, P. (eds.), 191210. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, volume 2: Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, C. 1990. Eine Welt aus Zahlen. (tr. Schneider, L.). Droemer: Knaur.Google Scholar
Lydall, S. 2000. Having fun with ideophones: A sociolinguistic look at ideophones in Hamar. In Yimam, et al. (eds.), volume 2: 886911. Ethiopian Studies at the End of the Second Millennium. Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Lynch, J., Ross, M., and Crowley, T.. 2002. Proto-Oceanic. In Lynch, J. et al. (eds.), 5491. The Oceanic Languages. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1963. Structural Semantics: Analysis of Part of the Vocabulary of Plato. London: Papers of the Philological Society.Google Scholar
Macaulay, D. 1976. Underground. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
MacDonald, L. 2013. A Dictionary of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1978. The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research on Child Development 43/1:1123.Google Scholar
Madan, A. 1911. Living Speech in Central and South Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Maduka, Omen. 1988. Size and shape ideophones in Nembe. Studies in African Linguistics 19/2:93113.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. [1958]/2001. Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, . 1948. Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Ya. 1970. Genetic Analysis of Word Formation. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), volume 3, 305–64. Current Trends in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mamet, M. 1955. La langue Mtomba. Tervuren: Commission de linguistique Africaine.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. 1953. Die Bildung der lautsymbolischen Wörter im Türkischen. Oriens 6:5062.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. 1960. The Categories and Types of English Word-Formation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Marchese, L. 1988. Noun classes and agreement systems in Kru. In Barlow, M. and Ferguson, C., (eds.), 323–41. Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. 1955. L’économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Masur, E. 1980. Development of communicative gestures in mother-infant interaction. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 19:121–8.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, L. (ed.), 7195. Consonant Types and Tone. Los Angeles: Dept. of Linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. 1982. The Grammar of Lahu. 2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. 1990. On megalolinguistic comparison. Language 66/1:106–20.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. 2005. Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 33:168.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 2001. What Evolution Is. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1983. Phonological Features and Morphological Structure. Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series, #59. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. (ed.) 1982. The Oxford Companion to Animal Behavior. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. and Tofighbaksh, J.. 2000. Birds of a feather flock conjointly(?): Rhyme as reason in Aphorisms. Psychological Science 11/5:424–8.Google Scholar
McGregor, W. 2001. Ideophones as the source of verbs in North Australian languages. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 205–21. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264:746–8.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1985. So you think gestures are non-verbal? Psychological Review 92/3:350–71.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 2012. How Language Began. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 2015. Why We Gesture. (Cambridge University Press: to appear)Google Scholar
Meigs, A.S. 1984. Food, Sex, and Pollution: A New Guinea Religion. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. [1912]/1948. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 6/12.Google Scholar
Meir, R.P. and Newport, E.I.. 1990. Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in Language acquisition. Language 66:123.Google Scholar
Meir, R.P. and Willerman, R.. 1995. Prelinguistic gesture in deaf and hearing humans. In Emmorey, K. and Reilly, J. (eds.), 391409. Language, Gesture, and Space. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbawm.Google Scholar
Melo, H.F.F. 2004. Ideofones: Um estudo no falar paraense. http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/1716.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. and Moore, M.. 1977. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198:75–8.Google Scholar
Miller, M. and Byers, J.. 1998. Sparring as play in young pronghorn males. In Bekoff, M. and Byers, J. (eds.), 141–60. Animal Play: Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, S. 1973. Ends, means, and galumphing: Some leitmotifs in play. American Anthropologist 75:8798.Google Scholar
Mirchev, K. 1978. Istoriceska grammatika na blgarskija ezik. Sophia: Nauka I Izkustvo.Google Scholar
Mirsky, J. 1937. The Eskimo of Greenland. In Mead, M. (ed.), 5186. Cooperation and Competition among Primitive Peoples. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mithen, S. 2006. The Singing Neanderthals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, M. 1982. The synchronic and diachronic behaviour of plops, squeaks, croaks, sighs, and moans. International Journal of American Linguistics 48/1:4958.Google Scholar
Moon, S. and Lindblom, B.. 2003. Two Experiments on Oxygen Consumption during Speech Production: Vocal Effort and Speaking Tempo. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: 3129–32.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg, et al. (eds.), volume 3:297334. Universals of Human Language. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C.L. 1906. The Interpretation of Nature. New York: Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar
Morris, D. 1956. Typical intensity and its relation to the problem of ritualization. Behaviour 11:112.Google Scholar
Moshi, L. 2008. Ideophones in KiVunjo-Chaga. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3/2:185216.Google Scholar
Mphande, L. 1989. A Phonological Analysis of the Ideophone in ChiTukumba. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Mphande, L. 1992. Ideophones and African verse. Research in African Literatures 23/1:117–29.Google Scholar
Msimang, C.T. and Poulos, G.. 2001. The ideophone in Zulu: A re-examination of conceptual and descriptive notions. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 235–50. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mumford, L. 1960. Art and Technics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nacaskul, K. 1976. Types of elaboration in some Southeast Asian languages. In Jenner, P. et al. (eds.), 873–90. Austroasiatic Studies, Part II. University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2001. Are ideophones really as weird and extra-systematic as linguists make them out to be? In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 251–8. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Dinh- Hoa. 1965. Parallel constructions in Vietnamese. Lingua 15:125–39.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1990. Linguistic diversity and the first settlement of the new world. Language 66/3:475512.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. [1878]/1996. Human, all too human. tr. Holland, R.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. and Tolskaja, M.. 2001. A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton – de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nishida, K. 2013. A proposal of two levels of the public self to Hirose’s Three-Tier model. Tsukuba English Studies 32:7190Google Scholar
Noss, P. 2001. Ideas, phones, and Gbaya verbal art. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 259–70. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. 2001. Ideophones in Pastaza Quechua. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 271–85. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. 1983. Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view. Phonetica 40:118.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic uses of speech. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J., and Ohala, J. (eds.), 325–47. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Olawsky, K. 2006. A Grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ong, W. 1982. Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orlansky, M.D. and Bonvillian, J.D.. 1985. Sign language acquisition: Language development in children of deaf parents and implicatons for other populations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 31:127–43.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. 1940 [1968]. New words. In Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian (eds.), volume 2: 311. Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. 1944 [1968]. Propaganda and demotic speech. In Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian (eds.), volume 3: 135–41. Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Ourn, N. and Haiman, J.. 2000. Symmetrical compounds in Khmer. Studies in Language 24/3:483517.Google Scholar
Paget, R. 1930. Human Speech. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Paget, R. 1944. The origin of language. Science 99:1415.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. 1998. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. and Syder, F.. 1983. Natural selection in syntax. Journal of Pragmatics 7/5: 551–79.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. 1940 [1955]. Philosophical Writings of C.S. Peirce. (ed. Buchler, J.). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Pellis, S. and Pellis, V.. 1998. The structure-function interface in the analysis of play fighting. In Bekoff, M. and Byers, J. (eds.), 114–60. Animal Play: Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. 1970. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Petöfi, A. 1848. Feltámadott a tenger. [The sea has risen]. Petöfi összes versei [complete poems of Petöfi]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1967. The Mental Development of the Child. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pilhofer, G. 1933. Grammatik der Kâte-Sprache. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Pinnow, H.-J. 1965. Personal pronouns in Austroasiatic: A historical study.(tr. Shorto, H.) Lingua 14:342.Google Scholar
Plank, F. 2003. Double articulation. In Plank, F. (ed.), 337–95. Noun Phrase Structures in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Plooij, F.X. 1978. Traits of language in wild chimpanzees? In Locke, A. (ed.) 111–32.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. 1980a. Deletion and disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 56/2:371–85.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. 1980b. The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing constraints on /s/ deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), 5568. Locating Language Variation in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. 1981. Mortal phonemes as plural morphemes. In Sankoff, D. and Cedergren, H. (eds.), 5972. Variation Omnibus. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1976. Unended Quest. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Poser, W. 1992. The Salinan and Yurumangui data in Language in the Americas. IJAL 58/2:202–29.Google Scholar
Poulos, G. 1990. A Linguistic Analysis of Venda. Pretoria: Via Afrika.Google Scholar
Pound, L. 1914. Blends: Their Relation to English Word Formation. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D., Bering, J., Giambrone, S.. 2003. Chimpanzees ‘pointing’: Another error of the argument by analogy? In Kita, S. (ed.), 3568. Pointing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prakorb, P. 1992. The problem of aspirates in Central Khmer and Northern Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies 22:251–6.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. 1990. Yoruba. In Comrie, B. (ed.) 771–90. The World’s Major Languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. et al. 2003. Chimpanzees ‘pointing’. In Kita, S. (ed.), 3568. Pointing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Premack, and Woodruff, . 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:515–26.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D. 2006. Can constructed action be considered obligatory? Lingua 117:12851314.Google Scholar
Rabel, L. 1961. Khasi: A Language of Assam. Baton Rouge: State University of Louisiana Press.Google Scholar
Rabel-Heyman, L. 1976. Sound Symbolism and Khasi Adverbs. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies, Volume 2. (Pacific Linguistics C-42). Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ratanakul, S. 2001. Adverbs in Sgaw Karen. Mon-Khmer Studies 31:127–34.Google Scholar
Ratliff, M. 1992. Meaningful Tone: A Study of Tonal Morphology in Compounds, Form Classes and Expressive Phrases in White Hmong. Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University, Special Report No. 27.Google Scholar
Ratliff, M. 1997. Hmong-Mien demonstratives and pattern persistence. Mon-Khmer Studies 27:317–28.Google Scholar
Ratliff, M. 2004. Vocabulary of environment and subsistence in Hmong-Mien protolanguage. In Tapp, N. et al. (eds.), 147–65. Hmong/Miao in Asia. Chiang Mai: Silkworm books.Google Scholar
Ratliff, M. 2014. White Hmong reduplicative expressives. In Williams, J. (ed.), 179–88. The Aesthetics of Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Réage, P. 1954. Histoire d’O. Paris: Pauvert.Google Scholar
Reilly, J. 2000. Bringing affective language into the service of language: Acquiring perspective marking in narratives. In Emmorey, K. and Reilly, J. (eds.), 415434. Language, Gesture, and Space. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbawm.Google Scholar
Reiss, S. 1950. The Rise of Words and Their Meanings. New York: The Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Rennison, J. 1997. Koromfe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rice, K. 1989. A Grammar of Slave. Berlin/New York: Mouton-de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rischel, J. 1995. Minor Mlabri. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculaneum.Google Scholar
Ritzer, G. 1993. The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 21/5:188–94.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 1987. Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Roffe, G. Harris, J.G. and Chamberlain, J.R. (eds.) 1975. Rhyme, reduplication, etc., in Lao. In Studies in Tai Linguistics in Honor of William Gedney, 285317. Bangkok: Cent. Inst. Engl. Lang.Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD, MIT.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. Ms. Ritual Behavior and the Origin of Modern Cognition. Pdf.Google Scholar
Roulon, P. 1983. Specificité de l’adverbe in Gbaya ‘bodoe’. In Kaye, J. et al. (eds.), volume 2, 379–89. Current approaches to African languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Roulon-Doko, P. 2001. Le statut des idéophones en Gbeya. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 287301. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rowlands, E.C. 1970. Ideophones in Yoruba. African Language Studies 289–97. https://macalester.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/PDF/164206.pdf.Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl. 2001. Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 303–20. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, M. 1994. The Origin of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1946. History of Western Philosophy. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, B. [1940]/1973. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Safina, C. 2015. Beyond Words: What Animals Think and Feel. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Sagart, L. 1994. The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai. Oceanic Linguistics 43/2:411–44.Google Scholar
Samarin, William. 1965. Perspective on African ideophones. African Studies 24:117–21.Google Scholar
Samarin, William. 1967. Determining the meanings of ideophones. Journal of West African Linguistics 4/2:3541.Google Scholar
Samarin, William. 1971. Survey of Bantu ideophones. African Language Studies 12:130–68.Google Scholar
Samarin, William. 2001. Testing hypotheses about African ideophones. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 321–37. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1915. The Na-Dene languages: A preliminary report. American Anthropologist 17/3:534–58.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1921. Language. New York: Harvester.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of experimental psychology 12:225–39.Google Scholar
Sárosi, Zs. 2003. Morfématörténet [Historical morphology]. In Kiss, J. and Pusztai, Fernec (eds.), 129–72. Magyar nyelvtörténet [History of the Hungarian Language]. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. De. [1916]/1974. Cours de linguistique générale (ed. De Mauro, T.). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbauch, S. et al. 1998. Apes, Language, and the Human Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaller, G. 1964. The Year of the Gorilla. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Schlegel, J.B. 1857. Schlüssel der Ewesprache. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, H. 1885. Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Robert Oppenheimer.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and Complex Verbs in Jaminjung. (Max-Planck-Institute Series in Psycholinguistics: 14). Wangeningen: Ponsen and Looijen.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2001. Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 354–73. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, E. and Debrunner, R.. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Band 2. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Sedaris, D. 2004. The change in me. 7286. Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denims. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Seiler, W. 1985. Imonda, a Papuan language. Pacific Linguistics B-93. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Senghas, A. et al. 2004. Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language of Nicaragua. Science 305:1779–82.Google Scholar
Shubin, N. 2008. Your Inner Fish. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. 2004. Person. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. 1969. Biology and Man. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Singleton, J, Goldin-Meadow, S., and McNeill, D.. 1995. The Cataclysmic Break between Gesticulation and Sign: Evidence against a Unified Continuum of Gestural Communication. Language, Gesture, and Space, ed. Emmorey, K. and Reilly, J., 287311. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sisovat, P. 1972. Bo’ri’va: sap knong phiasa: kmae [Servant words in Khmer]. Phnom Penh: Privately printed.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. 1963. A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Capricorn books.Google Scholar
Skinner, B.F. 1957. Verbal Behaviour. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. and Slobin, D. (eds.), 175208. Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 2002. Language evolution, acquisition and diachrony: Probingthe parallels. In Givon, T. and Malle, B. (eds.), 375–92. The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 2009. The study of animal metacognition. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences 13/9:389–96.Google Scholar
Smithers, C. 1954. Some English ideophones. Archivum Linguisticum 6:73111.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sridhar, S.N. 1990. Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. 1969. The acquisition of phonetic representation. CLS 4:443–54.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. 2007. Sui adjective reduplication as poetic morpho-phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16/2:87111.Google Scholar
Starostin, G. 2009. Dene-Yeniseian and Dene-Caucasian: Pronouns and other Thoughts. Athabascan/Dene Languages Conference, Berkeley, California. Pdf.Google Scholar
Steever, S. 1998. Introduction to the Dravidian languages. In Steever, S. (ed.), 139. Dravidian languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, C. 1914. Psychologie der frühen Kindheit. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Stern, C. and Stern, W.. 1912. Die Kindersprache. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. 1960. Sign Language Structure. (Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Reports, 8). University of Buffalo, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. 2001. Language in Hand: Why Sign Came before Speech. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Stolz, T. 2008. Total reduplication vs. echo-word formation in language-contact situations. In Siemund, P. and Kintana, N. (eds.), 107–32. Language Contact and Contact Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, R. 1967. Auditory communication among vervet monkeys. In Altmann, S.A., (ed.). Social Communication among Primates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1985. Perceiving phonetic events. In Warren, W. and Shaw, R. (eds.), 139–51. Persistence and Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1998. The particulate origins of language generativity: From syllable to gesture. In Hurford, J.R., Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Knight, C. (eds.), 202–21. Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. 2000. Evolutionary implications of the particulate principle: Imitation and the dissociation of phonetic form from semantic function. In Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M., and Hurford, J. (eds.), 161–76. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E.H. 1947. An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R. and Woll, B.. 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O. 1983. Kammu Phonology and Morphology. Malmo: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. 1952. Lexico-statistical dating of prehistoric ethnic contact. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96/4: 452–63.Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. 1971. The Origin and Diversification of Language. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. [1880]/ 1971. The Indispensable Foundation: A Selection from the Writings of Henry Sweet. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. 1978. Play and Aggression: A Study of Rhesus Monkeys. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 1995. The Fossil Trail. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 2012. Masters of the Planet. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 2014. Communication and human uniqueness. In Pina, M. and Gontier, N. (eds.), 219–27. The Evolution of Social Communication in Primates. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1985. Nkore-Kiga. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1995. Linguistic Categorization. Second edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D’Arcy. 1917. [1971] On Growth and Form. (1971 abridged edition edited by Bonner, J.T.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. 1998. Self-assesssment in juvenile play. In Bekoff, M. and Byers, J. (eds.), 183204. Animal Play: Evolutionary, Comparative, and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. [1965]/ 1987. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Honolulu: U. of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Tiktin, H. 1905. Rumänisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 1952. ‘Derived’ activities: Their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 27:132.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Call, J.. 1997. Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Call, J.. 2007a. Ape gestures and the origins of language. Call and Tomasello 2007, 221–39.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Call, J.. 2007b. Introduction. In Call and Tomasello 2007a, 1–15.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. et al. 1993. Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:495552.Google Scholar
Torrend, J. 1881. A Comparative Grammar of the South African Bantu Languages. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.Google Scholar
Trager, G.L. 1958. Paralanguage: A First Approximation. University of Buffalo, department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, H. 1996. Sound symbolism in deictic words. Fonetik 96:147–50, Swedish Phonetics Conference, Nässlingen 29–31 May, 1996.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tronick, E., Als, H., and Brazelton, T.B.. 1980. The infant’s communicative competencies and the achievement of intersubjectivity. In Key, M. (ed.), 261–73. The Relationship of Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ts’ao Ts’ui-yün. 1961. A preliminary study of descriptive words in the Miao language of eastern Kweichow. In Parnell, H. (ed.), Linguistic Series V, Data paper no. 88, 187210. Miao and Yao Linguistic Studies: Selected Articles in Chinese, translated by Yü-hung, Chang and Kwo-ray, Chu. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. [1938]/ 1957. A note on Old High German umlaut. Joos, (ed.) Readings in Linguistics, volume 1, 85–8. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. 1865. Researches into the early history of mankind and the development of civilization. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Udoh, I.I. 2007. Fortition and reduplication in Leggbo ideophones. Journal of African Languges and Linguistics 28/1:5770.Google Scholar
Ultan, R. 1978. Size-sound symbolism. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), volume 2: 527–68. Universals of Human Language. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. 1958. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Tome II, 2ème partie. Lyon: IAC.Google Scholar
Vajda, E. 2010. A Siberian Link with Na-Dene languages. Kari, J. and potter, B. (eds.), 33-99. The Dene-Yeniseian connection. Fairbanks, Alaska: University of Alaska Depatment of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Von Frisch, K. 1967. The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Von Raffler-Engel, Walburga. 1983. On the synchronous development of gesticulation and vocalization in man’s early communicative behaviour. In de Grolier, E. (ed.), 285311. Glossogenetics: The origin and evolution of language: Proceedings of the International transdisciplinary Symposium on Glossogenetics. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. [1934]/ 1986. Thought and Language. Tr. Kozulin, A.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. 1979. Consciousness as a problem of psychology of behaviour. Soviet Psychology 17:2930.Google Scholar
Waal, F. de. 1996. Good Natured. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waal, F. de. 2001. The Ape and the Sushi Master. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Waal, F. de. 2013. The Bonobo and the Atheist. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Waal, F. de and Lanting, F.. 1997. Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B. 2005. Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B. 2015. Ištiktukai ‘eventives’ – the Baltic precursors of ideophones and why they remain unknown in typology. In Arkadiev, P. (ed.), 491521. Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. 2014. Grammatical aesthetics in Wa. In Williams, J. (ed.), 99117. The Aesthetics of Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, R. 2001. Some southeast Asian ideophones vs. some African ideophones. In Voeltz, E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), 385405. Ideophones. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Watters, John. 2000. Syntax. African Languages (Heine, and Nurse, , eds.), 194230. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weidert, A. 1973. I Tknong Amwi: Deskriptive Analyse eines Wardialekts des Khasi. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1993. A fish caught in time. New York: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., and Herzog, M.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), 95189. Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weisser, E. 2008. Ashkii Bizaad, Verbal morphology loss in one young speaker’s Navajo. Unpublished Honors thesis, Macalester College.Google Scholar
Welmers, W. 1973. African Language Structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wescott, R. 1973. Tonal icons in Bini. Studies in African linguistics 4:197205.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich Hermann. 1927. Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Meinhof, Festschrift, ed. Franz Boas, 315328. Hamburg: J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Westermann, D. 1930. A Study of the Ewe Language. (tr. Bickford-Smith, A.L.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitelock, D. 1982. White Hmong Language Lessons. Southeast Asian Refugee Studies, Occasional papers, 2. Minneapolis: Center for Urban and regional Affairs, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1974. The semantics of direct and indirect discourse. Papers in Linguistics 7/3:267307.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. 2004. Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 15/2:119–47.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. 2004a. Gesture and language. Gesture 4/1:4373.Google Scholar
Williams, J. 2014. (ed.) The Aesthetics of Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. 1975. Sociobiology. Harvard: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Wolfart, H.C. 1973. Plains Cree: A Grammatical Study. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Wolff, E. 1992. Referenzgrammatik des Hausa. Műnchen/Hamburg: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Wolpoff, M., Mannheim, B., Mann, A., Hawks, J., Caspari, R., Rosenberg, K., Frayer, D., Gill, G., and Clark, G.. 2004. Why not the Neanderthals? World Archaeology 36/4:527–46.Google Scholar
Woodworth, N.L. 1991. Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics 29:273–99.Google Scholar
Wray, A. 1998. Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Language and Communicaton 18:4767.Google Scholar
Wu, Mengqi. 2014. The Structure of Ideophones in Southern Sinitic. MA dissertation, University of Hong Kong. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/207650.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. 1900. Völkerpsychologie: Erster Teil, Die Sprache. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. and Yerkes, A.. 1929. The Great Apes. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R., Murphy, S., and Inglehart, M.. 1989. Feeling and facial efference. Psychological Review 96:395416.Google Scholar
Zinober, B. and Martlew, M.. 1985. Development of communicative gestures. In Barret, M. (ed.), 183215. Children’s Single-Word Speech. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. 2014. Human uniqueness, bodily mimesis, and the evolution of language. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical studies 27:197219.Google Scholar
Zuraw, K. 2002. Aggressive reduplication. Phonology 19:395439.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • John Haiman, Macalester College, Minnesota
  • Book: Ideophones and the Evolution of Language
  • Online publication: 28 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • John Haiman, Macalester College, Minnesota
  • Book: Ideophones and the Evolution of Language
  • Online publication: 28 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • John Haiman, Macalester College, Minnesota
  • Book: Ideophones and the Evolution of Language
  • Online publication: 28 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897.008
Available formats
×