Adams, D. M., Alig, R. J., Callaway, J. M., McCarl, B. A. and Winnett, S. M. (1996). The Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM): Model Description. USDA Forest Service Report PNW-RP-495.
Adams, D. M., Alig, R. J., McCarl, B. A. et al. (2005). FASOMGHG Conceptual Structure, and Specification: Documentation. http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/mccarl%2Dbruce/FASOM.html.
Birdsey, R. A. (1996). Carbon storage for major forest types and regions in the conterminous United States. In Forests and Global Change, Vol. 2: Forest Management Opportunities for Mitigating Carbon Emissions, ed. and . Washington DC: American Forests.
2003). Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45, 650–673., et al. (
1996). The economic consequences of substituting carbon payments for crop subsidies in US agriculture. Environmental and Resource Economics 7, 15–43. and (
2004). Should we consider the co-benefits of agricultural GHG offsets. Choices, 3rd Quarter, www.choicesmagazine.org/2004-3/climate/2004-3-10.htm. and (
Greenpeace (2003). Sinks in the CDM: After the climate, biodiversity goes down the drain. http://elonmerkki.net/GP_CDMSinks_ analysi.pdf.
IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. , , and . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2004). Economic Investigation of Discount Factors for Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emission Offsets. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University. (
1998). The Potential of U.S. Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect. Chelsea, MI: Sleeping Bear Press Inc.., , and (
Lee, H.-C. (2002). The Dynamic Role for Carbon Sequestration by the U.S. Agricultural and Forest Sectors in Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University.
Lee, H.-C., McCarl, B. A., Gillig, D. and Murray, B. C. (2005). U.S. agriculture and forestry based greenhouse gas emission mitigation: an economic exploration of time dependent effects. In Rural Lands, Agriculture and Climate beyond 2015: Usage and Management Responses, ed. and . Dordrecht: Kluwer Press.
2001). Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. Environmental Science and Policy 4, 259–268., and (
2002). Quantifying the impacts on biodiversity of policies for carbon sequestration in forests. Ecological Economics 40(1), 71–87., and (
2000). Agriculture's role in a greenhouse gas emission mitigation world: an economic perspective. Review of Agricultural Economics 22(1), 134–159. and (
2001). The cost of GHG mitigation in U.S. agriculture and forestry. Science 294, 2481–2482. and (
McCarl, B. A. and Spreen, T. H. (1996). Applied mathematical programming using algebraic systems. Available at http://agecon.tamu.edu/faculty/mccarl.
McCarl, B. A., Murray, B. C. and Schneider, U. A. (2001). Jointly estimating carbon sequestration supply from forests and agriculture. Paper presented at Western Economics Association Meetings, San Francisco, July 5–8, 2001.
McCarl, B. A., Gillig, D. Lee, H.-C. et al. (2005). Potential for biofuel-based greenhouse gas emission mitigation: rationale and potential. In Agriculture as a Producer and Consumer of Energy, ed. , and . Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing, pp. 300–316.
2005). Water quality co-effects of greenhouse gas mitigation in US agriculture. Climatic Change 71, 341–372., , et al. (
2003). Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from and afforestation policy in Wisconsin. Land Economics 79(1), 74–85. and (
1997). The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 27, 279–292. (
Sands, R. D. and McCarl, B. A. (2005). Competitiveness of terrestrial greenhouse gas offsets: are they a bridge to the future? Paper presented at the USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium, Baltimore, Maryland, March 22–24, 2005.
Schneider, U. (2000). Agricultural Sector Analysis on Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation in the United States. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University.
2003). Economic potential of biomass based fuels for greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Environmental and Resource Economics 24(4), 291–312. and (
2007). Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emission Offsets Generated by Changing Management. Durham, NC: Duke University Press., et al. (
2002). Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 1930–1946. and (
1984). A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Transactions of the ASAE 27, 129–144., and (