Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: May 2011

Chapter 16 - Artificial gametes

Summary

Discovering the genetic variants associated with ovarian response to gonadotropins is an important step towards individualized pharmacogenetic protocols of ovarian stimulation. More than 90% of the genetic variability is caused by the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Pharmacogenetics is the science that describes the relationship between genetic variability and drug response and studies how to tailor pharmacological therapy to the genetic features of the individual patient and how to improve desired actions and minimize side effects. Different genes have been studied in relation to the characteristics of the normal ovarian cycle or different individual responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene (FSHR) is crucial in follicular maturation: inactivating FSHR mutations almost always leads to amenorrhea and activating mutations can cause a spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or predispose to iatrogenic ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

1. PalermoG, JorisH, DevroeyP, Van SteirteghemAC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17–18.
2. FishelS, GreenS, BishopM, et al. Pregnancy after intracytoplasmic injection of spermatid. Lancet 1995;345:1641–2.
3. TesarikJ, MendozaC, TestartJ. Viable embryos from injection of round spermatids into oocytes. N Engl J Med 1995;333:525.
4. TesarikJ, BahceciM, OzcanC, et al. Restoration of fertility by in-vitro spermatogenesis. Lancet 1999;353:555–6.
5. CohenJ, ScottR, AlikaniM, et al. Ooplasmic transfer in mature human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 1998;4:269–80.
6. KimuraY, YanagimachiR. Development of normal mice from oocytes injected with secondary spermatocyte nuclei. Biol Reprod 1995;53:855–62.
7. KimuraY, TatenoH, HandelMAet al. Factors affecting meiotic and developmental competence of primary spermatocyte nuclei injected into mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 1998;59:871–7.
8. KubelkaM, MoorRM. The behaviour of mitotic nuclei after transplantation to early meiotic ooplasts or mitotic cytoplasts. Zygote 1997;5:219–27.
9. TesarikJ, NagyZP, SousaM, et al. Fertilizable oocytes reconstructed from patient’s somatic cell nuclei and donor ooplasts. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;2:160–4.
10. TakeuchiT, VeeckLL, RosenwaksZ, et al. How to generate human oocytes from diploid somatic nuclei. Fertil Steril 2001;76(Suppl 1):S68–9.
11. Lacham-KaplanO, DanielsR, TrounsonA. Fertilization of mouse oocytes using somatic cells as male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;2:203–9.
12. TatenoH, AkutsuH, KamiguchiY, et al. Inability of mature oocytes to create functional haploid genomes from somatic cell nuclei. Fertil Steril 2003;79:216–18.
13. HeindryckxB, LiermanS, Van der ElstJ, et al. Chromosome number and development of artificial mouse oocytes and zygotes. Human Reproduction 2004;19:1189–94.
14. ChenS-U, ChangC-Y, LuC-C, et al. Microtubular spindle dynamics and chromosome complements from somatic cell nuclei haploidization in mature mouse oocytes and developmental potential of the derived embryos. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1181–8.
15. GalatV, OzenS, RechitskyS, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of human somatic cell haploidization. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:199–204.
16. TakeuchiT, NeriQV, PalermoGD. Construction and fertilization of reconstituted human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:309–18.
17. FulkaJ Jr, MartinezF, TeplaO, et al. Somatic and embryonic cell nucleus transfer into intact and enucleated immature mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2160–4.
18. Tesarik, J. Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental embryo origin. Embryos from syngamy between a gamete and a haploidized somatic cell. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1933–7.
19. KubiakJZ, JohnsonMH. Human infertility, reproductive cloning and nuclear transfer: a confusion of meanings. BioEssays 2001;23:359–64.
20. PaliulisLV, NicklasRB. The reduction of chromosome number in meiosis is determined by properties built into the chromosomes. J Cell Biol 2000;150:1223–32.
21. WoodsLM, HodgesCA, BaartE, et al. Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice. J Cell Biol 1999;145:1395–406.
22. LichtenM. Meiotic recombination: breaking the genome to save it. Curr Biol 2001;11:R253–6.
23. LibbyBJ, De La FuenteR, O’BrienMJ, et al. The mouse meiotic mutation mei1 disrupts chromosome synapsis with sexually dimorphic consequences for meiotic progresion. Dev Biol 2002;242:174–87.
24. BernardP, MaureJF, JaverzatJP. Fission yeast Bub1 is essential in setting up the meiotic pattern of chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:522–6.
25. Eichenlaub-RitterU. Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental origin. Reconstitution of gametes for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2003;18:473–5.
26. MooreDP, Orr-WeaverTL. Chromosome segregation during meiosis: building an unambivalent bivalent. Curr Top Dev Biol 1998;37:263–99.
27. BickelSE, Orr-WeaverTL. Holding chromatids together to ensure they go their separate ways. Bioessays 1996;18:293–300.
28. McGrathJ, SolterD. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 1984;37:179–83.
29. SuraniMA, BartonSC, NorrisML. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984;308:548–50.
30. TesarikJ, MendozaC. Genomic imprinting abnormalities: a new potential risk of assisted reproduction. Mol Hum Reprod 1996;2:295–8.
31. BrandeisM, KafriT, ArielM, et al. The ontogeny of allele-specific methylation associated with imprinted genes in the mouse. EMBO J 1993;12:3669–77.
32. LathamKE, McGrathJ, SolterD. Mechanistic and developmental aspects of genetic imprinting in mammals. Int Rev Cytol 1995;160:53–98.
33. HumpherysD, EgganK, AkutsuH, et al. Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell and cumulus cell nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:12889–94.
34. ShiotaK, YanagimachiR. Epigenetics by DNA methylation for development of normal and cloned animals. Differentiation 2002;69:162–6.
35. MannMR, ChungYG, NolenLD, et al. Disruption of imprinted gene methylation and expression in cloned preimplantation stage mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 2003;69:902–14.
36. ChungYG, RatnamS, ChailletJR, et al. Abnormal regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression in cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 2003;69:146–53.
37. SantosF, ZakhartchenkoV, StojkovicM, et al. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. Curr Biol 2003;13:1116–21.
38. ToyookaY, TsukenawaN, AkasuR, et al. Embryonic stem cells can form germ cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:11457–62.
39. GeijsenN, HoroschakM, KimK, et al. Derivation of embryonic germ cells and male gametes from embryonic stem cells. Nature 2004;427:148–54.
40. NayerniaK, NolteJ, MichelmannHW, et al. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cells give rise to male gametes that can generate offspring mice. Dev Cell 2006;11:125–32.
41. HübnerK, FuhrmannG, ChristensonLK, et al. Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 2003;300:1251–6.
42. ClarkAT, BodnarMS, FoxM, et al. Spontaneous differentiation of germ cells from human embryonic stem cells in vitro. Hum Mol Gen 2004;13:727–39.
43. TilgnerK, AtkinsonSP, GolebiewskaA, et al. Isolation of primordial germ cells from differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2008;26:3075–85.
44. AflatoonianB, RubanL, JonesM, et al. In vitro post-meiotic germ cell development from human embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod 2009;24:3150–9.
45. NovakI, LightfootDA, WangH, et al. Mouse embryonic stem cells form follicle-like ovarian structures but do not progress through meiosis. Stem Cells 2006;24:1931–6.
46. JohnsonJ, CanningJ, KanekoT, et al. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 2004;428:145–50.
47. JohnsonJ, BagleyJ, Skaznik-WikielM, et al. Oocyte generation in adult mammalian ovaries by putative germ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell 2005;122:303–15.
48. NayerniaK, LeeJH, DrusenheimerN, et al. Derivation of male germ cells from bone marrow stem cells. Lab Invest 2006;86:654–63.
49. EgganK, JurgaS, GosdenR, et al. Ovulated oocytes in adult mice derive from non-circulating germ cells. Nature 2006;441:1109–14.
50. LeeHJ, SelesniemiK, NiikuraY, et al. Bone marrow transplantation generates immature oocytes and rescues long-term fertility in a preclinical mouse model of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3198–204.
51. FuX, HeY, XieC, LiuW. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation improves ovarian function and structure in rats with chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage. Cytotherapy 2008;10:353–63.
52. SelesniemiK, LeeHJ, NiikuraT, TillyJLYoung adult donor bone marrow infusions into female mice postpone age-related reproductive failure and improve offspring survival. Aging 2009;1:49–57.
53. ZouK, YuanZ, YangZ, et al. Production of offspring from a germline stem cell line derived from neonatal ovaries. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:631–36.
54. DycePW, WenL, LiJ. In vitro germline potential of stem cells derived from fetal porcine skin. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:384–90.
55. DannerS, KajahnJ, GeismannC, et al. Derivation of oocyte-like cells from a clonal pancreatic stem cell line. Mol Hum Reprod 2007;13:11–20.
56. LinherK, DyceP, LiJ. Primordial germ cell-like cells differentiated in vitro from skin-derived stem cells. PLoS One 2009;4:e8263.
57. LiuY, WuC, LyuQ, et al. Germline stem cells and neo-oogenesis in the adult human ovary. Dev Biol 2007; 306: 112–20.
58. Virant-KlunI, ZechN, RozmanP, et al. Putative stem cells with an embryonic character isolated from the ovarian surface epithelium of women with no naturally present follicles and oocytes. Differentiation 2008;76:843–56.
59. Virant-KlunI, RozmanP, CvjeticaninB, et al. Parthenogenetic embryo-like structures in the human ovarian surface epithelium cell culture in postmenopausal women with no naturally present follicles and oocytes. Stem Cells Dev 2009;18:137–50.
60. ZechNH, ShkumatovA, VerlinskyY. Oocyte-like structures arising from cells of follicular fluid are not captured in aspirates. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:443–8.