Ames, R. T. (2002). “Yin and Yang.” In Cua, A. S., ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. London: 847.Google Scholar

Amit, E., Algom, D., and Trope, Y. (2009). “Distance-Dependent Processing of Pictures and Words.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(3): 400–415.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., and Keltner, D. (2012). “The Local-Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-Being.” Psychological Science 23(7): 764–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arbib, M. A., and Rizzolatti, G. (1999). “Neural Expectations: A Possible Evolutionary Path from Manual Skills to Language.” In Van Loocke, P., ed., The Nature of Concepts: Evolution, Structure and Representation. Florence, KY: 128–154.Google Scholar

Attardo, S. (2005). “Review of Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing.” Pragmatics and Cognition 13(2): 434–438.Google Scholar

Attardo, S. (2009). “Review of Sarcasm and Other Mixed Messages: The Ambiguous Ways People Use Language.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 22(4): 472–474.Google Scholar

Attardo, S., Hempelmann, C. F., and Di Maio, S. (2002). “Script Oppositions and Logical Mechanisms: Modeling Incongruities and Their Resolutions.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15(1): 3–46.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1961). “The Meaning of a Word.” In Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J., eds., Philosophical Papers of J. L. Austin. Oxford: 23–43.Google Scholar

Aziz-Aadeh, L. (2013). “Embodied Semantics for Language Related to Actions: A Review of fMRI and Neuropsychological Research.” In Coello, Y. and Bartolo, A., eds., Language and Action in Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: 278–283.Google Scholar

Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., and Trope, Y. (2006). “The Association between Psychological Distance and Construal Level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(4): 609–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnhart, C. L. (1972). The World Book Dictionary. Chicago.Google Scholar

Barr, D. J., and Keysar, B. (2002). “Anchoring Comprehension in Linguistic Precedents.” Journal of Memory and Language 46(2): 391–418.Google Scholar

Barr, D. J., and Keysar, B. (2005). “Making Sense of How We Make Sense: The Paradox of Egocentrism in Language Use.” In Colston, H. L. and Katz, A. N., eds., Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences. Mahwah, NJ: 21–42.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2010). “Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future.” Topics in Cognitive Science 2(4): 716–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barsalou, L. W. (2016). “On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23(4): 1122–1142.Google Scholar

Baynham, M. (1996). “Humor as an Interpersonal Resource in Adult Numeracy Classes.” Language and Education 10(2–3): 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, S. D., and Weber, A. (2016). “Bilinguial and Monolingual Idiom Processing Is Cut from the Same Cloth: The Role of the L1 in Literal and Figurative Meaning Activation.” Frontiers in Psychology 7, ArtID 1350.Google Scholar

Bell, N. (2012). “Formulaic Language, Creativity, and Language Play in a Second Language.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 189–205.Google Scholar

Bell, N. (2015). We Are Not Amused: Failed Humor in Interaction. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, N. (2017). Multiple Perspectives on Language Play. Berlin.Google Scholar

Berenson, T. (2016). “Here Are Trump and Rubio’s Best Schoolyard Insults.” Time Magazine, March 1, 2016 (http://time.com/4242827/donald-trump-marco-rubio-insults. Accessed January 19, 2019).Google Scholar

Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York.Google Scholar

Berra, Y. (1998). The Yogi Book: I Really Didn’t Say Everything I Said. New York.Google Scholar

Bianculli, D. (2017). “50 Years Later, The Biting Satire of ‘The Smothers Brothers’ Still Resonates.” Broadcast on NPR, Fresh Air (https://n.pr/2GisVdE. Accessed April 15, 2019).Google Scholar

Blankenship, K. L., and Craig, T. Y. (2005). “The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 24(1): 3–24.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1950). “Rime, Assonance, and Morpheme Analysis.” Word 6: 117–136.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. (2000). “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors.” Cognition 75: 1–27.Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., and Ramscar, M. (2002). “The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thoughts.” Psychological Science 13(2): 185–189.Google Scholar

Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., and Pulvemuller, F. (2009). “Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension.” Cerebral Cortex 19(8): 1905–1914.Google Scholar

Boulenger, V., Shtyrov, Y., and Pulvermüller, F. (2012). “When Do You Grasp the Idea? MEG Evidence for Instantaneous Idiom Understanding.” NeuroImage 59: 3502–3513.Google Scholar

Bowdle, B., and Gentner, D. (2005). “The Career of Metaphor.” Psychological Review 11: 193–216.Google Scholar

Brone, G., Feyaerts, K., and Veale, T. (2006). “Introduction: Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Humor.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 19(3): 203–228.Google Scholar

Bronte, C. (1847a). Jane Eyre. London.Google Scholar

Bronte, E. (1847b). Wuthering Heights. London.Google Scholar

Brooks, M. (director) (1974). Young Frankenstein. Motion picture. Twentieth Century Fox.Google Scholar

Brown, G. S. (29 December, 2018). “4 Can’t-Miss Trips for 2019.” ABC News: https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Travel/miss-trips-2019/story?id=59929657. Accessed April 15, 2019.Google Scholar

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Brown, R. (1958). Words and Things. New York.Google Scholar

Brown, R. M. (1973). Rubyfruit Jungle. New York.Google Scholar

Brown, R. W., Black, A. H., and Horowitz, A. E. (1955). “Phonetic Symbolism in Natural Languages.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50(3): 388.Google Scholar

Bryant, B. (1960). “Love Hurts.” Song, recorded by the Everly Brothers.Google Scholar

Burgers, C. F., van Mulken, M. J. P., and Schellens, P. J. (2013). “On Irony, Images and Creativity: A Corpus-Analytic Approach.” In Veale, T., Feyaerts, K., and Forceville, C. J., eds., Creativity and the Agile Mind: A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Multifaceted Phenomenon. Berlin: 293–311.Google Scholar

Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., and Steen, G. J. (2016). “Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse through Metaphor, Hyperbole and Irony.” Communication Theory 26(4): 410–430.Google Scholar

Burghardt, G. M. (2006). The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Burns, Z. C., Caruso, E. M., and Bartels, D. M. (2012). “Predicting Premeditation: Future Behavior Is Seen as More Intentional than Past Behavior.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(2): 227–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., and Papagno, C. (2011). “Literal, Fictive and Metaphorical Motion Sentences Preserve the Motion Component of the Verb: A TMS Study.” Brain and Language 119(3): 149–157.Google Scholar

Cain, K., and Towse, A. S. (2008). “To Get Hold of the Wrong End of the Stick: Reasons for Poor Idiom Understanding in Children with Reading Comprehension Difficulties.” Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 51(6): 1538–1549.Google Scholar

Cain, K., Towse, A. S., and Knight, R. S. (2009). “The Development of Idiom Comprehension: An Investigation of Semantic and Contextual Processing Skills.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102(3): 280–298.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (2001). Working with Spoken Discourse. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Discourse. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., and Chatterjee, A. (2010). “Stimulus Design Is an Obstacle Course: 560 Matched Literal and Metaphorical Sentences for Testing Neural Hypotheses about Metaphor.” Behavior Research Methods 42: 651–664.Google Scholar

Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., and Chatterjee, A. (2013). “From Novel to Familiar: Tuning the Brain for Metaphors.” NeuroImage 59: 3212–3221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caruso, E. M., and Shafir, E. (2006). “Now That I Think about It, I’m in the Mood for Laughs: Decisions Focused on Mood.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19(2): 155–169.Google Scholar

Caruso, E. M., Gilbert, D. T., and Wilson, T. D. (2008). “A Wrinkle in Time: Asymmetric Valuation of Past and Future Events.” Psychological Science 19(8): 796–801.Google Scholar

Caruso, E. M., Waytz, A., and Epley, N. (2010). “The Intentional Mind and the Hot Hand: Perceiving Intentions Makes Streaks Seem Likely to Continue.” Cognition 116(1): 149–153.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D., and Dijkstra, K. (2010). “Motor Action and Emotional Memory.” Cognition 115: 179–185.Google Scholar

Casey, P., Lownes, V., and Gil, D. (producers), and MacNaughton, I. (director) (1971). And Now for Something Completely Different. Motion picture. Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar

Chapman, G., Cleese, J., Gilliam, T., Idle, E., Innes, N., Jones, T., and Palin, M. (writers), and MacNaughton, I. (director) (1974). “The Light Entertainment War.” TV series episode. In I. MacNaughton (producer), Monty Python’s Flying Circus, BBC.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. (2008). “The Neural Organization of Spatial Thought and Language.” Seminars in Speech and Language 29: 226–238.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. (2010). “Disembodying Cognition.” Language and Cognition 2: 79–116.Google Scholar

Chen, E., Widick, P., and Chatterjee, A. (2008). “Functional–Anatomical Organization of Predicate Metaphor Processing.” Brain and Language 107: 194–202.Google Scholar

Chevalier, T. (1999). Girl with a Pearl Earring. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Chopra, D., ed. (1998). The Love Poems of Rumi. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (2016). “Cognitive Linguistics, Gesture Studies, and Multimodal Communication.” Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 603–618.Google Scholar

Cienki, A., and Muller, C. (2008b). “Metaphor, Gesture, and Thought.” In Gibbs, R. W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press (pp. 483–501).Google Scholar

Cienki, A., and Muller, C., eds. (2008a). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. M., and Goldberg, A. E. (2014). “Metaphorical Sentences are More Emotionally Engaging than Their Literal Counterparts.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26: 2585–2595.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., and Schaefer, E. F. (1987). “Collaborating on Contributions to Conversations.” Language and Cognitive Processes 2(1): 19–41.Google Scholar

Clayton, E. (2008). Aesop, Aristotle, and Animals: The Role of Fables in Human Life. Humanitas 21(1 and 2): 179–200.Google Scholar

Cline, A. (December 7, 2018). “Top George Carlin quotes on religion.” Retrieved from: www.thoughtco.com/top-george-carlin-quotes-on-religion-4072040.Google Scholar

Cohen, D., Heisserer, E., Lunder, K., Metzger, T., Popelka, M., and Wlodkowski, S. (executive producers) and Villeneuve, D. (director) (2016). Arrival. Motion picture. Lava Bear Films.Google Scholar

Cokely, E. T., and Feltz, A. (2009). “Individual Differences, Judgment Biases, and Theory-of-Mind: Deconstructing the Intentional Action Side Effect Asymmetry.” Journal of Research in Personality 43(1): 18–24.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (1997). “Salting a Wound or Sugaring a Pill: The Pragmatic Functions of Ironic Criticism.” Discourse Processes 23(1): 25–45.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2000a). “Dewey Defeats Truman: Interpreting Ironic Restatement.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19(1): 46–65.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2000b). “On Necessary Conditions for Verbal Irony Comprehension.” Pragmatics and Cognition 8(2): 277–324.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2002). “Contrast and Assimilation in Verbal Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 111–142.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2015). Using Figurative Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2017a, April). Embodied simulations and verbal irony. The Third International Symposium on Figurative Thought and Language, Osijek, Croatia.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2017b). “Irony Performance and Perception: What Underlies Verbal, Situational and Other Ironies?” In Athanasiadou, A. and Colston, H., eds., Irony in Language Use and Communication. Series: Figurative Thought and Language, vol. 1 (pp. 19–42). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2017c, October). “What Do Children Know and When Do They Know It?: Figurative Thought and Language in Development/Acquisition.” Paper, Acquiring Figurative Meanings: International Linguistics Conference. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2018a, June). “Embodied Meaning in Embedded Metaphor: Variable Pragmatic Effects of Metaphorical and Non-Metaphorical Proverbs.” Paper, Researching and Applying Metaphor 12 (RaAM-12). Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2018b). “Irony as Indirectness Cross-Linguistically: On the Scope of Generic Mechanisms.” In Capone, A., ed., Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 19 (pp. 109–131). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (2018c, September). “Why There’s a There There In, ‘There’s a Metaphor: Tragically Hip and Hockey Metaphors in Canadian English.” Paper, Metaphor in Englishes Around the World, Third International Workshop, Klagenfurt, Austria.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L. (in press). “Figurative Language Development/Acquisition Research: Status and Ways Forward.” Journal of Pragmatics.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., and Brooks, E. N. (2008, May). “Pragmatic Effects of Metonymy.” Poster session presented at the meeting of the Association for Psychological Science. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., and Jindrich, P. L. (2000, June). “‘Been There, Done That’:  Comprehending Asyndeton.” Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society. Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., and Katz, A. N., eds. (2005). Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences. Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., and Keller, S. B. (1998). “You’ll Never Believe This: Irony and Hyperbole in Expressing Surprise.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27(4): 499–513.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., and Kinney, E. (2015, July). “Producing Figurative Pragmatic Effects: Endings Justifying Meanings.” Paper, Thirteenth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., and Kodet, A. (2008, April). “Embodiment in Word Meanings.” Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Colston, H. L., and O’Brien, J. (2000a). “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(11): 1557–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colston, H. L., and O’Brien, J. (2000b). “Contrast of Kind Versus Contrast of Magnitude: The Pragmatic Accomplishments of Irony and Hyperbole.” Discourse Processes 30(2): 179–199.Google Scholar

Colston, H., Sims, M., Pumphrey, M., Kinney, E., Evangelista, X., Vandermolen-Pater, N., Feeny, G. (in press). “Embodied Simulations and Verbal Irony Comprehension.” In Brdar, M. and Brdar-Szabo, R., eds. Figurative Thought and Language in Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Conrad, J. (1899). Heart of Darkness. London: Blackwood’s Magazine.Google Scholar

Culicover, P. A., and Nowak, A. (2002). “Markedness, Antisymmetry and the Complexity of Constructions.” Language Variation Yearbook 2: 5–30.Google Scholar

Culicover, P. A., and Winkler, S. (2008). “English Focus Inversion.” Journal of Linguistics 44(3): 625–658.Google Scholar

Culicover, P. W., and Jackendoff, R. (1999). “The View from the Periphery: The English Comparative Correlative.” Linguist Inquiry, 30, 543–571.Google Scholar

Danesi, M. (2009). “Opposition Theory and the Interconnectedness of Language, Culture, and Cognition.” Sign Systems Studies, 37 (1/2), 11–42.Google Scholar

Davis, R. (1961). “The Fitness of Names to Drawings: A Cross-Cultural Study in Tanganyika.” British Journal of Psychology, 52, 259–268.Google Scholar

DePatie, D. H. (producer), and Jones, C., and Noble, M. (directors). (1963). Transylvania 65000. Motion picture. Warner Brothers.Google Scholar

Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., and Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). “A Piece of the Action: Modulation of Sensory-Motor Regions by Action Idioms and Metaphors.” NeuroImage, 83, 862–869.Google Scholar

Desai, R., Binder, J., and Conant, L. (2011). “The Neural Career of Sensory-Motor Metaphors.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2376–2386.Google Scholar

Dickens, C. (1859). A Tale of Two Cities. London: Chapman and Hill.Google Scholar

Doerr, A. (2014). All the Light We Cannot See. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Dove, G. O. (2009). “Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism.” Cognition, 110, 412–431.Google Scholar

Dress, M. L., Kreuz, R. J., Link, K. E., and Caucci, G. M. (2008). “Regional variation in the use of sarcasm.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (1), 71–85.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. E., Banas, J. A., Rodriguez, D., Liu, S-J., and Abra, G. (2012). “Humor Use in Power-Differentiated Interactions.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(4), 469–489.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eggers, D. (2012). A Hologram for the King. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., and Stivers, T. (2007). Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Epley, N., Caruso, E., and Bazerman, M. H. (2006). “When Perspective Taking Increases Taking: Reactive Egoism in Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 872–889.Google Scholar

Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., and Gilovich, T. (2004). “Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (3), 327–339.Google Scholar

Escandell-Vidal, V., and Leonetti, M. (2014). “Fronting and Irony in Spanish.” In Dufter, A., Toledo, A. S. O., eds., Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 309–342). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Escher, M. C. (2001). M. C. Escher: The Graphic Work. Cologne: Taschen.Google Scholar

Eskildsen, S. W. (2017). “The Emergence of Creativity in L2 English: A Usage-Based Case-Study.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 281–316). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Fausey, C. M., and Boroditsky, L. (2010). “Subtle Linguistic Cues Influence Perceived Blame and Financial Liability.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(5), 644–650.Google Scholar

Fausey, C. M., and Matlock, T. (2011). “Can Grammar Win Elections?” Political Psychology, 32(4), 563–574.Google Scholar

Feingold, A., and Mazzella, R. (1991). “Psychometric Intelligence and Verbal Humor Ability.” Personality and Individual Differences, 12 (5), 427–435.Google Scholar

Fernardino, L., Contant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Blindauer, K., Hiner, B., Spangler, K., and Desai, R. H. (2013). “Where Is the Action? Action Sentence Processing in Parkinson’s Disease.” Neuropsychologia, 51, 1510–1517.Google Scholar

Firth, A. (1996). “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality: On “Lingua Franca” English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259.Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H., and Zwaan, R. A. (2008). “Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.Google Scholar

Forceville, C. J. and Urios-Aparisi, E., eds. (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Forster, E. M. (1971). Maurice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Foster, S. (1848). Oh! Susanna. Song, recorded by The Singing Dogs.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. W., and Fowler, F. G. (1905). The Works of Lucian of Samosata. Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fraley, B., and Aron, A. (2004). “The Effect of a Shared Humorous Experience on Closeness in Initial Encounters.” Personal Relationships, 11 (1), 61–78.Google Scholar

Franzen, J. (2010). Freedom. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Gallese, V., and Lakoff, G. (2005). “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory–Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge.” Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.Google Scholar

García Márquez, G. (1985). Love in the Time of Cholera. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Geffen, A. (producer), and Davis, M., Sommerfield, A, and McGown, (directors) (2015). Great Barrier Reef with David Attenborough. Documentary, BBC.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1981a). “Memory for Requests in Conversation.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 630–640.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1981b). “Your Wish is My Command: Convention and Context in Interpreting Indirect Requests.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1983). “Do People Always Process the Literal Meanings of Indirect Requests?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 524.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1986). “On the Psycholinguistics of Sarcasm.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115 (1), 3–15.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2000). “Irony in Talk among Friends.” Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2006). “Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation.” Mind and Language, 21, 434–458.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., and Colston, H. L. (2007). Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., and Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., and McCarrell, N. S. (1990). “Why Boys Will Be Boys and Girls Will Be Girls: Understanding Colloquial Tautologies.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(2), 125–145.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., and Mueller, R. A. G. (1988). “Conversational Sequences and Preference for Indirect Speech Acts.” Discourse Processes, 11 (1), 101–116.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., and O’Brien, J. (1991). “Psychological Aspects of Irony Understanding.” Journal of Pragmatics, 16 (6), 523–530.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., and Francozo, E. (2004). “Metaphor is Grounded in Embodied Experience.” Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., and Samermit, P. (2017). “How Does Irony Arise in Experience?” Athanasiadou, In A. and Colston, H. L., eds., Irony in Language Use and Communication (pp. 43–60). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gilligan, V. (writer) and MacLaren, M. (director). (2012). “Gliding over all.” Television series episode. In Bernstein, M. (producer), Breaking Bad. New York: AMC.Google Scholar

Gilligan, V., Gould, P., Hutchinson, G., and Marion, H. (writers) and Gilligan, V. (director). (2018). “Wiedersehen.” Television series episode. In Bernstein, M. (producer), Better Call Saul. New York: AMC.Google Scholar

Giora, R. (1991). “On the Cognitive Aspects of the Joke.” Journal of Pragmatics, 16 (5), 465–485.Google Scholar

Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O., and Mendelson, I. (2015). “Default Sarcastic Interpretations: On the Priority of Nonsalient Interpretations.” Discourse Processes, 52 (3), 173–200.Google Scholar

Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Levi, N. A., and Sabah, H. (2005). “On Negation as Mitigation: The Case of Negative Irony.” Discourse Processes, 39(1), 81–100.Google Scholar

Giora, R., Givoni, S., and Fein, O. (2015). “Defaultness Reigns: The Case of Sarcasm.” Metaphor and Symbol, 30 (4), 290–313.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. (2010). “Embodiment as a Unifying Perspective for Psychology.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 586–596.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., and Gallese, V. (2012). “Action-Based Language: A Theory of Language Acquisition, Comprehension, and Production.” Cortex, 48 (7), 905–922.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., and Kaschak, M. P. (2002). “Grounding Language in Action.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 558–565.Google Scholar

Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (2003). “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (5), 219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Golden, A. (1997). Memoirs of a Geisha. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Gracian, B. (2005). The Art of Worldly Wisdom (translated by J. Jacobs). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Gruskoff, M. (producer), and Brooks, M. (director). (1974). Young Frankenstein. Motion picture. Los Angeles: Twentieth Century-Fox.Google Scholar

Guardian News and Media Ltd. (2008). Great Speeches of the Twentieth Century. London: Cornerstone.Google Scholar

Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Balint, K., and Doicaru, M. M., eds. (2017). Narrative Absorption, Vol. 27: Linguistic Approaches to Literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. (2006). When Madeline was Young. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Hann, D. (2017). “Building Rapport and a Sense of Communal Identity through Play in a Second Language Classroom.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 219–244). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hanne, M., and Hawken, S. J. (2007). “Metaphors for Illness in Contemporary Media.” Medical Humanities, 33, 93–99.Google Scholar

Hao, Y., and Veale, T. (2009). “Support structures for linguistic creativity: A computational analysis of creative irony in similes.” Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from: www.cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-archival-conference-information.Google Scholar

Hao, Y., and Veale, T. (2010). “An Ironic Fist in a Velvet Glove: Creative Mis-representation in the Construction of Ironic Similes.” Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 20 (4), 635–650.Google Scholar

Harris, R. A. (2013). A Handbook of Rhetorical Devices. Virtual Salt.Google Scholar

Haugh, M. (2017). “Jocular Language Play, Social Action and (Dis)Affiliation in Conversational Interaction.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 143–168). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hauk, O., and Pulvemuller, F. (2004). “Neurophysiological Distinction of Action Words in the Fronto-Central Cortex.” Human Brain Mapping, 21 (3), 191–201.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. (1988). A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, N. (1850). The Scarlet Letter. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar

Helzer, E. G., Connor-Smith, J. K., and Reed, M. A. (2009). “Traits, States, and Attentional Gates: Temperament and Threat Relevance as Predictors of Attentional Bias to Social Threat.” Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 22(1), 57–76.Google Scholar

Heritage, S. (October 11, 2018). “‘S’all good, man’: How Better Call Saul became superior to Breaking Bad.” The Guardian, Culture Section.Google Scholar

Holland, M. K., and Wertheimer, M. (1964). “Some Physiognomic Aspects of Naming, or, Maluma and Takete Revisited.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 111–117.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (2000). “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humor Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies, 2 (2), 159–185.Google Scholar

Holmes, J., and Marra, M. (2002). “Having a Laugh at Work: How Humor Contributes to Workplace Culture.” Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (12), 1683–710.Google Scholar

Holt, E. (2017). “‘This System’s So Slow’: Negotiating Sequences of Laughter and Laughables in Call-Center Interaction.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 93–118). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Honeck, R. P. (1997). A Proverb in Mind: The Cognitive Science of Proverbial Wit and Wisdom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Horton, W. S., and Keysar, B. (1996). “When Do Speakers Take into Account Common Ground?” Cognition, 59(1), 91–117.Google Scholar

Hosinger, E. (2013). “Representing Idioms: Syntactic and Contextual Effects on Idiom Processing.” Language and Speech, 56 (3), 373–394.Google Scholar

Houston, K. (2013). Shady Characters: The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols and Other Typographical Marks. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Hugo, V. (1831). The Hunchback of Notre Dame. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Huth, T. (2017). “Playing with Turns, Playing with Action? A Social-Interactionist Perspective.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 47–72). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Idema, W. L. (2009). The White Snake and Her Son: A Translation of the Previous Scroll of Thunder Peak with Related Texts. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Idema, W. L. (2012). “Old Tales for New Times: Some Comments on the Cultural Translation of China’s Four Great Folktales in the Twentieth Century.” Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies, 9 (1), 25–46.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1999). “Possible Stages in the Evolution of the Language Capacity.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (7), 272–279.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, T., and Hofel, L. (2003). “Descriptive and Evaluative Judgment Processes: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Processing Symmetry and Aesthetics.” Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3 (4), 289–299.Google Scholar

James, L., and Pinker, S. (2010). “Rationales for Indirect Speech: The Theory of the Strategic Speaker.” Psychological Review, 117 (3), 785–807.Google Scholar

Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., and Chatterjee, A. (2016). “Metaphor: Bridging Embodiment to Abstraction.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 (4), 1080–1089.Google Scholar

Jones, H. (1985). “No One is to Blame.” Song, recorded by H. Jones.Google Scholar

Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A Corpus-Based Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kable, J. W., Kan, I. P., Wilson, A., Thompson-Schill, S. L., and Chatterjee, A. (2005). “Conceptual Representations of Action in the Lateral Temporal Cortex.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1855–1870.Google Scholar

Kable, J. W., Lease-Spellmeyer, J., and Chatterjee, A. (2002). “Neural Substrates of Action Event Knowledge.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 795–805.Google Scholar

Kasser, T., and Ryan, R. M. (1993). “A Dark Side of the American Dream: Correlates of Financial Success as a Central Life Aspiration.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410.Google Scholar

Katz, A. (2017). “The Standard Experimental Approach to the Study of Irony: Let Us Not Be Hasty in Throwing out the Baby with the Bathwater.” In Athanasiadou, A. and Colston, H. L., eds., Irony in Language Use and Communication (pp. 237–254). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Katz, S. (1992). “Mystical Speech and Mystical Meaning.” In Katz, S. T., ed., Mysticism and Language (pp. 3–41). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2007). “Formulaic Language in English Lingua Franca.” In Kecskes, I. and Horn, L. R., eds., Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects (pp. 191–218). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I., and Horn, L., eds. (2007). Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I., and Mey, J. (2008). Mouton Series in Pragmatics: Vol. 4. Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker–Hearer. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I., and Papp, T. (2003). “How to Demonstrate the Conceptual Effect of L2 on L1? Methods and Techniques.” In Cook, V, ed., Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S., and Wiley, C. (2008). “Neuroanatomical Distribution of Five Semantic Components of Verbs: Evidence from fMRI.” Brain and Language, 107 (1), 16–43.Google Scholar

Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonaldIII, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., and Carter, C. S. (2004). “Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control.” Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026.Google Scholar

Kerouac, J. (1957). On the Road. New York City: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Kersteen-Tucker, Z. (1991). “Long-Term Repetition Priming with Symmetrical Polygons and Words.” Memory and Cognition, 19 (1), 37–43.Google Scholar

Keysar, B. (1994). “Discourse Context Effects: Metaphorical and Literal Interpretations.” Discourse Processes, 18(3), 247–269.Google Scholar

Keysar, B. (2007). “Communication and Miscommunication: The Role of Egocentric Processes.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(1), 71–84.Google Scholar

Keysar, B. (2008). “Egocentric Processes in Communication and Miscommunication.” In Kecskes, I. and Mey, J., eds., Mouton Series in Pragmatics: Vol. 4. Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker–Hearer (pp. 277–296). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., and Henly, A. S. (2002). “Speakers’ Overestimation of Their Effectiveness.” Psychological Science, 13(3), 207–212.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., and Brauner, J. S. (2000). “Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension.” Psychological Science, 11(1), 32–38.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., and Paek, T. S. (1998). “Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge: Process Models of Common Ground in Comprehension.” Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., Barr, D., and Horton, W. S. (1998). “The Egocentric Basis of Language Use: Insights from a Processing Approach.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7 (2), 46–50.Google Scholar

Kidd, S. M. (2003). The Secret Life of Bees. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Kiley, T., Harris, S., Pasetta, M., Gary, S., and Davis, B. (directors) (1967–1970). The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour. Television series. New York: CBS.Google Scholar

Kingsolver, B. (1998). The Poisonwood Bible. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Kingsolver, B. (2002). Small Wonder: Essays. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar

Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar

Konopka, A. E., and Bock, K. (2009). “Lexical or Syntactic Control of Sentence Formulation? Structural Generalizations from Idiom Production.” Cognitive Psychology, 58 (1), 68–101.Google Scholar

Koshoibekova., M. (2015). “The Legend of Dong Yong and the Seventh Fairy: The Heartbreaking Tale of an Orphan and The Daughter of the Jade Emperor.” The World of Chinese. Retrieved from: www.theworldofchinese.com/2015/04/the-legend-of-dong-yong-and-the-seventh-fairy.Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kovecses, Z. (2011). “Recent Developments in Metaphor Theory: Are the New Views Rival Ones?” Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 11–25.Google Scholar

Kovecses, Z. (2013). “The Metaphor-Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy.” Metaphor and Symbol, 28 (2), 75–88.Google Scholar

Kunneman, F., Liebrecht, C., van Mulken, M., and van den Bosch, A. (2015). “Signaling Sarcasm: From Hyperbole to Hashtag.” Information Processing and Management, 51 (4), 500–509.Google Scholar

Lacey, S., Stilla, R., and Sathian, K. (2012). “Metaphorically Feeling: Comprehending Textural Metaphors Activates Somatosensory Cortex.” Brain and Language, 120, 416–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lauro, L. J. R., Mattavelli, G., Papagno, C., and Tettamanti, M. (2013). “She Runs, the Road Runs, My Mind Runs, Bad Blood Runs between Us: Literal and Figurative Motion Verbs: An fMRI Study.” Neuroimage, 83, 361–371.Google Scholar

Lawrence, D. H. (1928). Lady Chatterley’s Lover. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, N., and Hedgcock, J. S. (2017). “Anti-Language: Linguistic Innovation, Identity Construction and Group Affiliation among Emerging Speech Communities.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 347–376). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Lennon, J., and McCartney, P. (1967). “All you need is love.” Song, recorded by The Beatles.Google Scholar

Leroux, G. (1911). The Phantom of the Opera. Paris: Pierre Laie.Google Scholar

LeRoy, M., and Freed, A. (producers), and Fleming, I (director) (1939). The Wizard of Oz. Motion picture. Los Angeles: Metro Goldwyn Mayer.Google Scholar

Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Liu, D. (2008). Idioms: Description, Comprehension, Acquisition, and Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1975). “Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report.” Cognitive Psychology, 7 (4), 560–572.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (1993). “Psychologists in the Eyewitness World.” American Psychologist, 48 (5), 550–552.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F. (2003). “Make-Believe Memories.” Cognitive Psychology, 58 (1), 867–873.Google Scholar

Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., and Burns, H. J. (1978). “Semantic Integration of Verbal Information into a Visual Memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19.Google Scholar

Lorenz, K. (1943). “Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung.” Z. Tierpsychol, 5, 233–519.Google Scholar

Lucariello, J. (1994). “Situational Irony: A Concept of Events Gone Awry.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123 (2), 129–145.Google Scholar

Lusch, V. R., and Colston, H. L. (2000, June). “A Gender Difference in Asyndeton.” Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society,Miami, FL.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maglio, S. J., and Trope, Y. (2012). “Disembodiment: Abstract Construal Attenuates the Influence of Contextual Bodily State in Judgment.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 211–216.Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z., and Caramazza, A. (2008). “A Critical Look at the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis and a New Proposal for Grounding Conceptual Content.” Journal of Physiology, 102, 59–70.Google Scholar

Mann, T. (1912). Death in Venice. Frankfurt: S. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar

Mark, E. (2016, April 15). “Song of everlasting sorrow.” Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from: www.ancient.eu/article/888.Google Scholar

Markel, N. N., and Hamp, E. P. (1960). “Connotative Meanings of Certain Phoneme Sequences.” Studies in Linguistics, 15(1), 47–61.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Martins, A. P. (2018, December 29). “Top 10 Weird Gifts for Christmas 2018.” Retrieved from: www.NBCnews.com.Google Scholar

Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., and Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). “An fMRI Investigation of the Neural Correlates Underlying the Processing of Novel Metaphoric Expressions.” Brain and Language, 100, 115–126.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1943). “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review, 50 (4), 370–396.Google Scholar

Mather, V., and Rogers, K. (September 23, 2015.) “Behind the Yogi-isms: Those Said and Unsaid.” New York Times.Google Scholar

Maurer, D., Pathman, T., and Mondloch, C. J. (2006). “The Shape of Boubas: Sound–Shape Correspondences in Toddlers and Adults.” Developmental Science, 9 (3), 316–322.Google Scholar

McCullough, C. (1977). The Thorn Birds. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

McEwan, I. (2001). Atonement. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

McGill, V. J., and Parry, W. T. (1948). “The Unity of Opposites: A Dialectical Principle.” Science and Society, 12 (4), 418–444.Google Scholar

McGraw, P. A., and Warren, C. (2010). “Benign Violations: Making Immoral Behavior Funny.” Psychological Science, 21 (8), 1141–1149.Google Scholar

Mearns, H. (1899). Antigonish. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigonish_(poem).Google Scholar

Mervosh, S. (2018). ‘Mr. President, That’s a Good One’: Congressman Replies to Trump’s Vulgar Tweet. New York Times, Politics.Google Scholar

Mesmer‐Magnus, J., Glew, D. J., and Viswesvaran, C. (2012). “A Meta‐Analysis of Positive Humor in the Workplace.” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27 (2), 155–190.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. (1936). Gone with the Wind. London: Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. (December 29, 2018). “The 10 best films of 2018.” Retrieved from: www.CBSnews.com.Google Scholar

Morrow, L. (2005). The Best Year of Their Lives: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon in 1948: Learning the Secrets of Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Muller, C., and Cienki, A. (2009). “Words, Gestures, and Beyond: Forms of Multimodal Metaphor in the Use of Spoken Language.” In Forceville, C. J., and Urios-Aparisi, E., eds., Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 297–328). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nabakov, V. (1955). Lolita. Paris: Olympia Press.Google Scholar

New York Times (December 14, 2011). “Obama’s speech to troops at Fort Bragg.” Politics section.Google Scholar

Nezlek, J. B., Feist, G. J., Wilson, C. F., and Plesko, R. M. (2001). “Day-to-Day Variability in Empathy as a Function of Daily Events and Mood.” Journal of Research in Personality, 35 (4), 401–423.Google Scholar

Nezlek, J. G., Schultz, A., Lopes, P., and Smith, V. C. (2007). “Naturally Occurring Variability in State Empathy.” In Farrow, T., Woodruff, P., eds., Empathy in Mental Illness (pp. 187–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nguyen, V. T. (2015). The Sympathizer. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Nielsen, A., and Rendall, D. (2011). “The Sound of Round: Evaluating the Sound-Symbolic Role of Consonants in the Classic Takete-Maluma Phenomenon.” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65 (2), 115.Google Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (2003). “Issues in Conversational Joking.” Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (9), 1333–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (2009). “A Theory of Humor in Interaction.” Journal of Literary Theory, 3 (2), 261–284.Google Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (2017). “Language Play in Conversation.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 11–46). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1995). Love’s Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Obert, A., Gierski, F., Calmus, A., Portefaix, C., Declercq, C., Pierot, L., and Caillies, S. (2014). “Differential Bilateral Involvement of the Parietal Gyrus during Predicative Metaphor Processing: An Auditory fMRI Study.” Brain and Language, 137, 112–119.Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. (1932). Opposition: A Linguistic and Psychological Analysis. London: Paul, Trench and Trubner.Google Scholar

Ondaatje, M. (1992). The English Patient. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar

Onysko, A. (2016). “A Note on the Relation between Cognitive Linguistics and Wordplay.” In Knospe, S., Onysko, A., and Goth, M., eds., Crossing Languages to Play with Words: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 71–78). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Oring, E. (2011). “Parsing the Joke: The General Theory of Verbal Humor and Appropriate Incongruity.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24 (2), 151–158.Google Scholar

Otsuji, E., and Pennycook, A. (2017). “Cities, Conviviality and Double-Edged Language Play.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 199–218). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Panther, K. U., and Thornburg, L. (1998). “A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (6), 755–769.Google Scholar

Panther, K. U., and Thornburg, L., eds. (2003). Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Panther, K. U., & Thornberg, L. L. (2012). “Antonymy in Language Structure and Use.” In Brdar, M., Raffaelli, I., & Fuchs, M. Z., eds., Cognitive Linguistics between Universality and Variation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Panther, K-U., and Radden, G., eds. (1999). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Parault, S. J., and Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). “Sound-Symbolism: A Piece in the Puzzle of Word Learning.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(4), 329–351.Google Scholar

Pashler, H. (1990). “Coordinate Frame for Symmetry Detection and Object Recognition.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16 (1), 150–163.Google Scholar

Pasternak, B. (1957). Doctor Zhivago. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Pecher, D., and Zwaan, R. A., eds. (2005). Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Penny, M. (2014). Outside, Inside. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Perez-Sobrino, P. (2014). “Meaning Construction in Verbomusical Environments: Conceptual Disintegration and Metonymy.” Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 130–151.Google Scholar

Pexman, P. M., and Zvaigzne, M. T. (2004). “Does irony go better with friends?” Metaphor and Symbol, 19(2), 143–163.Google Scholar

Picard, U., and Silberman, S. (producers), and Buñuel, L. (writer and director) (1974). The Phantom of Liberty. Motion picture. Paris: Twentieth Century Fox.Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J., and Garrod, S. (2013). “An Integrated Theory of Language Production and Comprehension.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (4), 329–347.Google Scholar

Pitzl, M. (2018). Creativity in English as a Lingua Franca: Idiom and Metaphor. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Pogrebin, M., and Poole, E. (1988). “Humor in the Briefing Room: A Study of the Strategic Uses of Humor among Police.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17 (2), 183–210.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1978). “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints.” In Schenkein, J., ed., Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984). “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J., eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A., and Bell, N. (2007). “Learning to Play, Playing to Learn: FL Learners as Multicompetent Language Users.” Applied Linguistics, 28 (4), 556–578.Google Scholar

Proulx, A. (1993). The Shipping News. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. S., and Hubbard, E. M. (2001). “Synaesthesia – A Window into Perception, Thought and Language.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3–34.Google Scholar

Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., and Tyler, L. K. (2009). “Modulation of Motor and Premotor Cortices by Actions, Action Words and Action Sentences.” Neuropsychologia, 47, 388–396.Google Scholar

Rasse, C. (2016). “Feeling for others: Environmental justice, emotion, and moral imagination in ethnic American literature.” Unpublished master’s thesis. Klagenfurt, Austria: Alpen-Adria-Universitat.Google Scholar

Rasse, C. (2017). Review of the book Narrative Absorption, vol. 27, “Linguistic Approaches to Literature.” Scientific Study of Literature, 7 (2), 257–261.Google Scholar

Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., and McRae, K. (2003). “Spatial Representations Activated during Real-Time Comprehension of Verbs.” Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.Google Scholar

Richter, G. (2015). “Trump: Anti-Rubio Ad Is ‘Nothing Personal,’ Just Payback.” Retrieved from: www.Newsmax.com.Google Scholar

Riettta, T. (director). (2019). “Credit Card Envy.” Television Commercial. Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar

Ritchie, G. (1999). “Developing the Incongruity-Resolution Theory.” In Binsted, K. and Ritchie, G., eds., Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Creative Language: Stories and Humour (pp. 78–85). Edinburgh: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D. (2008). “X IS A JOURNEY: Embodied Simulation in Metaphor Interpretation.” Metaphor and Symbol, 23(3), 174–199.Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., and Arbib, M. A. (1999). “‘From Grasping to Speech: Imitation Might Provide a Missing Link’: Reply.” Trends in Neurosciences, 22 (4), 152.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. M., and Kreuz, R. J. (1994). “Why Do People Use Figurative Language?” Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–163.Google Scholar

Robinson, K. S. (2012). 2312. New York: Orbit, Hachette Book Group.Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, F. J., and Marial Uson, R. (2007). “High-Level Metaphor and Metonymy in Meaning Construction.” In Radden, G., Kopcke, K-M., Berg, T., and Siemund, P., eds., Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Russo, R. (2002). The Whore’s Child and Other Stories. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Jefferson, Gail (1974). “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar

Sanford, D. (2014). “Idiom as the Intersection of Conceptual and Syntactic Schemas.” Language and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language and Cognitive Science, 6 (4), 492–509.Google Scholar

Savickiene, I., and Dressler, W.U., eds. (2007). The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Saygin, A., McCullough, S., Alac, M., and Emmorey, K. (2010). “Modulation of BOLD Response in Motion-Sensitive Lateral Temporal Cortex by Real and Fictive Motion Sentences.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2480–2890.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organisation of Repair in Conversation.” Language, 53 (2), 361–382.Google Scholar

Schlink, B. (1995). The Reader. New York: Vintage International.Google Scholar

Schneider, K. P., and Strubel-Burgdorf, S. (2012). “Diminutive –let in English.” SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 9 (10), 15–32.Google Scholar

Schomp, V. (2010). The Ancient Chinese: Myths of the World. New York: Benchmark Books.Google Scholar

Schourup, L. (2011). “The Discourse Marker Now: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics, 43(8), 2110–2129.Google Scholar

Schuessler, A. (2007). ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1975). “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L., eds., In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L., eds., Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2009). “Common Ground and Different Realities: World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca.” World Englishes, 28(2), 236–245.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W. (1596). “A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” In Bevington, D., ed., The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Volume II (scene 1, line 134). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W. (1993). Romeo and Juliet. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Shelley, C. (2001). “The Bicoherence Theory of Situational Irony.” Cognitive Science, 25, 775–818.Google Scholar

Sherman-Palladino, A., and Kirshner, R. (writers), and Chemel, L. S. (director) (2007). “Santa’s Secret Stuff.” Television series episode. In G. Abrams (Producer), Gilmore Girls. Burbank: The WB.Google Scholar

Sicherl, E. (2018). “A Comparison of Diminutive Expressions in English and Slovene as Exemplified by Roald Dahl’s Matilda.” Languages in Contrast, 18 (1), 283–306.Google Scholar

Sicherl, E., Žele, A. (2011). “Nominal Diminutives in Slovene and English.” Linguistica, 51, 135–142Google Scholar

Sidhu, D. M., Pexman, P. M., and Saint-Aubin, J. (2016). “From the Bob/Kirk Effect to the Benoit/Éric Effect: Testing the Mechanism of Name Sound Symbolism in Two Languages.” Acta Psychologica, 169, 88–99.Google Scholar

Silverstein, J. (December 29, 2018). “The biggest unsolved mysteries of 2018.” Retrieved from: www.CBSnews.com.Google Scholar

Sinkeviciute, V. (2017). “‘Everything He Says to Me It’s Like He Stabs Me in the Face’: Frontstage and Backstage Reactions to Teasing.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 169–198). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Smith, R. (2018). The Biology of Beauty: The Science behind Human Attractiveness. Santa Barbara: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

Smothers, T., and Smothers, R. (1965). “Mom Always Liked You Best.” Recorded by T. Smothers and R. Smothers.Google Scholar

Solska, A. (2012). “Relevance-Theoretic Comprehension Procedure and Processing Multiple Meanings in Paradigmatic Puns.” In Walaszewska, E. and Piskorska, A., eds., Relevance Theory: More than Understanding. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Sontag, S. (1979). Illness as Metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Sontag, S. (1989). Aids and Its Metaphors. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stover, H. (2011). “Awareness in Metaphor Understanding.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 65–82.Google Scholar

Styne, J., and Cahn, S. (1947). “It’s Magic.” Recorded by D. Day.Google Scholar

Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and Constructions In Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sullivan, K. (2016). “Integrating Constructional Semantics and Conceptual Metaphor.” Constructions and Frames, 8 (2), 141–165.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E. (2017). “Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising: Building Viewpoint in Multimodal Multi-Space Blends.” Journal of Pragmatics, 122, 65–76.Google Scholar

Takanashi, H. (2007). “Orthographic Puns: The Case of Japanese Kyoka.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20 (3), 235–239.Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., and Boroditsky, L. (2011). “Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE, 6 (2), ArtID e16782Google Scholar

Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2010). “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance.” Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.Google Scholar

Trump, D. J., [@realDonaldTrump] (November 12, 2017). Tweet. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com.Google Scholar

Tsur, R. (2009). “Metaphor and Figure-Ground Relationship: Comparisons from Poetry, Music, and the Visual Arts.” In Brone, G and Vandaele, J, eds., Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps (pp. 237–278). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Utsumi, A. (2000). “Verbal Irony as Implicit Display of Ironic Environment: Distinguishing Ironic Utterances from Nonirony.” Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806.Google Scholar

Uttich, K., and Lombrozo, T. (2010). “Norms Inform Mental State Ascriptions: A Rational Explanation for the Side-Effect Effect.” Cognition, 116(1), 87–100.Google Scholar

Van Dam, J., and Bannink, A. (2017). “The First English (EFL) Lesson: Initial Settings or the Emergence of a Playful Classroom Culture.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 245–280). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Veale, T. (2004). “Incongruity in Humor: Root-Cause or Epiphenomenon?” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17 (4), 410–428.Google Scholar

Veale, T. (2009). “Hiding in Plain Sight: Figure-Ground Reversals in Humour.” In Brone, G and Vandaele, J, eds., Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps (pp. 279–286). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Veale, T. (2012). “A Computational Exploration of Creative Similes.” In MacArther, F., Oncins-Martinez, J. L., Sanchez-Garcia, M., and Piquer-Piriz, A. M., eds., Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture and Communication (pp. 329–343). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Veale, T. (2013). “Strategies and Tactics for Ironic Subversion.” In Dynel, M., ed., Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory (pp. 321–339). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Veale, T., and Alessandro, V. (2017). “Sparks Will Fly: Engineering Creative Script Conflicts.” Connection Science, 29 (4), 332–349.Google Scholar

Veale, T., Feyaerts, K., and Brone, G. (2006). “The Cognitive Mechanisms of Adversarial Humor.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 19 (3), 305–338.Google Scholar

Vrabie, I. (2017). “The Conceptual Category of the Diminutive in English and Romanian: Existence, Recurrence, Status in Contemporary Language.” Bulletin of the Transilvania Univeristy of Brasov, Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies, 10 (59), 37–46.Google Scholar

Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Östergaard, S., Östergaard, L., and Roepstorff, A. (2005). “Motion Verb Sentences Activate Left Posterior Middle Temporal Cortex despite Static Context.” NeuroReport, 16, 649–652.Google Scholar

Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A., and Lund, T. E. (2011). “BOLD Response to Motion Verbs in Left Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus during Story Comprehension.” Brain and Language, 119, 221–225.Google Scholar

Wallentin, M., Östergaard, S., Lund, T. E., Östergaard, L., and Roepstorff, A. (2005). “Concrete Spatial Language: See What I Mean?” Brain and Language, 92, 221–233.Google Scholar

Wang, S. (1995). The Story of the Western Wing. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ward, G. L., and Hirschberg, J. (1991). “A Pragmatic Analysis of Tautological Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics, 15(6), 507–520.Google Scholar

Watson, C. E., Cardillo, E. R., Ianni, G. R., and Chatterjee, A. (2013). “Action Concepts in the Brain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1191–1205.Google Scholar

Welch, A. (December 29, 2018). “Google’s top trending health questions of 2018.” Retrieved from: www.CBSnews.com.Google Scholar

Wenderoth, P. (1994). “The Salience of Vertical Symmetry.” Perception, 23 (2), 221–236.Google Scholar

Westbury, C. (2005). “Implicit Sound Symbolism in Lexical Access: Evidence from an Interference Task.” Brain and Language, 93 (1), 10–19.Google Scholar

Westbury, C. (2018). “Implicit Sound Symbolism Effect in Lexical Access, Revisited: A Requiem for the Interference Task Paradigm.” Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 15 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Westbury, C., Hollis, G., Sidhu, D. M., and Pexman, P. M. (2018). “Weighing Up the Evidence for Sound Symbolism: Distributional Properties Predict Cue Strength.” Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 122–150.Google Scholar

White, H. D. (2011). “Relevance Theory and Citations.” Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3345–3361.Google Scholar

Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The Power of Silence. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar

Williams, L. E., and Bargh, J. A. (2008). “Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth.” Science, 322(5901), 606–607.Google Scholar

Williams, M. (December 29, 2018). “12 best and worst movies of 2018: All the films you need to see and avoid.” Retrieved from: www.ABCnews.com.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. (2011). “Parallels and Differences in the Treatment of Metaphor in Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 128, 195–213.Google Scholar

Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. L., and Gibbs, R. W. (2007). “Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension.” Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. L., and Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). “Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension.” Cognitive Science, 31, 721–731.Google Scholar

Winter, B., and Srinivasan, M. (June 2018). “Is metaphorical asymmetry actually based on concreteness? The role of word frequency.” Presentation at the Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM) conference, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar

Yu, A. (2001). Rereading the Stone: Desire and the Making of Fiction in the Dream of the Red Chamber. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Yuan, H., and Chunde, Z. (2008). Princess Peacock: Tales from the Other Peoples of China. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Zayts, O., and Schnurr, S. (2017). “Laughter as ‘Serious Business’: Clients’ Laughter in Prenatal Screening for Down’s Syndrome.” In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 119–142). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Zharikov, S., and Gentner, D. (2002). “Why Do Metaphors Seem Deeper than Similes?” In Gray, W. D. and Schunn, C., eds., Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 976–981). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., and Taylor, L. J. (2006). “Seeing, Acting, Understanding: Motor Resonance in Language Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11.Google Scholar