Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:32:01.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Federal Courts and Suburban Segregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2009

Charles M. Lamb
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

Richard Nixon made an aggressive attempt to influence the United States Supreme Court during the 1968 presidential election and his first term as president. He vigorously criticized the criminal procedure decisions of the Warren Court in his 1968 campaign and vowed to name “strict constructionists” to the Court. President Nixon then had the remarkable opportunity of appointing four justices to the Supreme Court during his first three years in the White House. As central components of his Southern Strategy, Nixon selected Chief JusticeWarren E. Burger in 1969 and Associate Justices Harry A. Blackmun in 1970, Lewis F. Powell in 1971, and William H. Rehnquist in 1971. All were conservatives, as were Clement Haynesworth and G. Harrold Carswell, the two Nixon nominees rejected by the Senate. “These events placed the selection process of Supreme Court justices – and Supreme Court policymaking – on the front burner of American politics,” Sheldon Goldman observes. Rehnquist was later promoted to chief justice by President Reagan, perpetuating the “Nixon Court.” Nixon appointees therefore held the pivotal center seat on the Supreme Court for over three decades, sustaining Nixon's legacy long after he left office.

During the 1970s and 1980s, President Nixon's four Supreme Court appointees voted overwhelmingly as a unified bloc in criminal procedure and civil rights cases, precisely the areas of constitutional law emphasized by Nixon's Southern Strategy. This highly cohesive voting pattern enhanced the likelihood of Nixon's influence on the Court.

Type
Chapter
Information
Housing Segregation in Suburban America since 1960
Presidential and Judicial Politics
, pp. 204 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×