Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:33:50.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Public-service Broadcasting in an Authoritarian Setting: The Case of Radio Television Hong Kong and the Development of Television Documentary Film in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Ian Aitken
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Baptist University
Michael Ingham
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

HISTORICAL SUMMARY: THE ROAD TO THE HANDOVER

During the 1970s, agitation for political reform remained muted amongst the local population in Hong Kong, and no substantive political leadership emerged from within that population to promote such reform. This was partly due to the fact that the local community and its leaders had been kept out of governance and executive authority by the colonial regime for so long that they had become habituated to that circumstance. However, it was also partly because, by the 1970s, the colonial regime was administering Hong Kong fairly well. Following the confrontation of the late 1960s some action had been taken against corruption through the inauguration of the Independent Commission against Corruption in 1974. The rule of law remained sovereign, and largely independent of government. Necessary if still inadequate welfare reforms had been enacted. Social stability now seemed reasonably assured, and the colonial government was finally proving more responsive to the needs of the population. By the mid-1970s Hong Kong was also becoming incrementally more prosperous, and the evidence suggests that this led large sections of the local population to preoccupy themselves more with matters related to family situation and pecuniary advantage than with suffrage. Of course, the colonial presence was still widely resented, but the small-government model which prevailed meant the local community did not have to encounter its existence too recurrently. If that presence also created the framework for local business to succeed, and wealth to accumulate, as seemed to be the case, then the local community were prepared to tolerate it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×