Affholder, C. (1966–7) “L'exégèse morale d'Homère,”BFS 45: 287–93.Google Scholar

Aitken, E. B. (2004) “Why a Phoenician? A proposal for the historical occasion for the Heroikos,” in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 267–84.

Alcock, S. E. (1997) “The heroic past in a Hellenistic present,” in Hellenistic Constructs. Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography, ed. Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P., and Gruen, E.. Berkeley: 20–34.Google Scholar

Allen, T. W., ed. (1912) Homeri Opera, vol. v. Oxford.

Aly, W. (1957) “Aut prodesse volunt aut delectare poetae,” in Strabon von Amaseia. Untersuchungen über Text, Aufbau und Quellen der Geographika. Bonn: 376–85.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1976) Studies in Lucian's Comic Fiction. Leiden.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1986) Philostratus. Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century ad. London.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic. A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. New York and London.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1996) “Lucian's Verae Historiae,” in The Novel in the Ancient World, ed. Schmeling, G.. Leiden: 555–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreani, M. (1998) “Il naufragio nella Storia vera di Luciano,” Patavium 6 (11): 133–47.Google Scholar

Apfel, H. V. (1938) “Homeric criticism in the fourth century bc,” TAPhA 69: 245–58.Google Scholar

Arnim, H., ed. (1893) Dionis Prusaensis quem vocant Chrysostomus quae exstant omnia, vol. i, 2nd edn. Reprinted (1962). Berlin.

Arnim, H. (1898) Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa. Berlin.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1991) “Philodemus' poetic theory and On the Good King According to Homer,” ClAnt 10: 1–45.Google Scholar

Aujac, G. (1966) Strabon et la science de son temps. Paris.Google Scholar

Aujac, G. (1969) “Notice,” in Strabon Géographie, t. i, 1 (Introduction générale – Livre 1), ed. Aujac, G. and Lasserre, F.. Paris: 3–57.Google Scholar

Austin, N. (1994) Helen of Troy and Her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar

Avenarius, G. (1956) Lukians Schrift zur Geschichtsschreibung. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Baladié, R., ed. (1978) Strabon. Géographie. Tome v, Livre 8. Paris.

Bartley, A., ed. (2009) A Lucian for our Times. Newcastle upon Tyne.

Baumbach, M. and Bär, S., eds. (2007) Quintus Smyrnaeus. Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, H., ed. (1880) Die geographischen Fragmente des Eratosthenes. Leipzig.

Bernard, W. (1990) Spätantike Dichtungstheorien. Untersuchungen zu Proklos, Herakleitos und Plutarch. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beschorner, A. (1992) Untersuchungen zu Dares Phrygius. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Beschorner, A. (1999) Helden und Heroen, Homer und Caracalla. Übersetzung, Kommentar und Interpretationen zum Heroikos des Flavios Philostratos. Bari.Google Scholar

Betz, H. D. (1996) “Heroenverehrung und Christusglaube. Religionsgeschichtliche Beobachtungen zu Philostrats Heroicus,” in Geschichte – Tradition – Reflexion. Festschrift für Martin Hengel zum 70. Geburtstag. Bd. II. Griechische und römische Religion, ed. Cancik, H., Lichtenberger, H., and Schäfer, P.. Tübingen: 119–39. Translated in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 25–48.Google Scholar

Bickerman, E. J. (1952) “Origenes gentium,” CPh 47: 65–81.Google Scholar

Bigwood, J. M. (1989) “Ctesias' Indica and Photius,” Phoenix 43, 302–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billault, A., ed. (1994) Lucien de Samosate. Paris.

Billault, A. (2000) L'Univers de Philostrate. Brussels.Google Scholar

Billault, A. (2006) “Rhétorique et herméneutique dans le Discours troyen (xi) de Dion Chrysostome,” Papers on Rhetoric 7: 1–16.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (1984) “Strabone e la difesa di Omero nei Prolegomena,” in Strabone. Contributi allo studio della personalità e dell'opera i, ed. Prontera, F.. Perugia: 127–53.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (1988) “Dai ‘Prolegomena’ all'Italia: premesse teoriche e tradizione,” in Strabone e l'Italia antica, ed. Maddoli, G.. Perugia: 127–43.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (1989) Tradizioni epiche e storiografia. Studi su Erodoto e Tucidide. Naples.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (1992) “‘Salvare’ Omero. A proposito di Strabone viii 3,16,” PP 47: 241–55.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (1994) “Strabone e Omero. Aspetti della tradizione omerica nella descrizione del Peloponneso,” in Strabone e la Grecia, ed. Biraschi, A. M.. Naples: 23–57.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (1996) “Teopompo e l'uso del mito. A proposito di FgrHist 115 F381,” Hermes 124: 160–9.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (2000) “Omero e aspetti della tradizione omerica nei libri straboniani sull'Asia Minore,” in Strabone e l'Asia Minore, ed. Biraschi, A. M. and Salmeri, G.. Perugia: 45–72.Google Scholar

Biraschi, A. M. (2005) “Strabo and Homer: a chapter in cultural history,” in Strabo's Cultural Geography. The Making of a Kolossourgia, ed. Dueck, D., Lindsay, H., and Pothecary, S.. Cambridge: 73–85.Google Scholar

Blomqvist, K. (1989) Myth and Moral Message in Dio Chrysostom. A Study in Dio's Moral Thought, with a Particular Focus on his Attitudes towards Women. Diss., Lund.Google Scholar

Bolonyai, G. (2001) “The uses of progymnasmata: the case of ‘refutations’ and Dio's Trojan Oration,” AAntHung 41: 25–34.Google Scholar

Bompaire, J. (1958) Lucien écrivain. Imitation et création. Paris.Google Scholar

Bompaire, J. (1988) “Comment lire les Histoires vraies de Lucien?” in Hommages à Henri Le Bonniec. Res sacrae, ed. Porte, D. and Néraudau, J.-P.. Brussels: 31–9.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bornmann, F. (1994) “Giuoco allusivo e parodia letteraria nelle Vere storie di Luciano,” in Storia, poesia e pensiero nel mondo antico. Studi in onore di Marcello Gigante, ed. del Franco, F.. Naples: 63–7.Google Scholar

Bouquiaux-Simon, O. (1968) Les lectures homériques de Lucien. Mémoires de la Classe des Lettres ser. 2, t. lix, fasc. 2. Brussels.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1994) Fiction as History. Nero to Julian. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1970) “Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic,” P&P 46: 3–41.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1989) “Greek sophists and Greek poetry in the second sophistic,” ANRW II.33.1, 209–58.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1994) “Philostratus: writer of fiction,” in Greek Fiction. The Greek Novel in Context, ed. Morgan, J. R. and Stoneman, R.. New York and London: 181–202.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2009) “Philostratus: the life of a sophist,” in Bowie and Elsner (2009): 19–32.

Bowie, E. L. and Elsner, J., eds. (2009) Philostratus. Cambridge.

Brancacci, A. (1985) Rhetorike philosophousa. Dione Crisostomo nella cultura antica e bizantina. Naples.Google Scholar

Branham, R. B. (1989) Unruly Eloquence. Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bréchet, C. (1999) “Le De audiendis poetis de Plutarque et le procès platonicien de la poésie,” RPh 73: 209–44.Google Scholar

Briand, M. (2005) “Lucien et Homère dans les Histoires vraies: pratique et théorie de la fiction au temps de la Seconde Sophistique,” Lalies 25: 127–49.Google Scholar

Brillante, C. (1990) “History and the historical interpretation of myth,” in Approaches to Greek Myth, ed. Edmunds, L.. Baltimore: 93–138.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1972) “Ennius and the Hellenistic worship of Homer,” CPh 93: 547–67.Google Scholar

Broggiato, M., ed. (2001) Cratete di Mallo. I frammenti. La Spezia.

Bruno Sunseri, G. (1997) “Poesia e storiografia in Eforo di Cuma,” QS 46: 143–67.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956) Les mythes d'Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Bunbury, E. H. (1883) A History of Ancient Geography among the Greeks and Romans from the Earliest Ages till the Fall of the Roman Empire. 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar

Burstein, S. (2008) “Greek identity in the Hellenistic period,” in Hellenisms. Culture, Identity, and Ethnicity from Antiquity to Modernity, ed. Zacharia, K.. Aldershot, Hampshire: 59–77.Google Scholar

Butti de Lima, P. (1996) L'inchiesta e la prova. Immagine storiografica, pratica giuridica e retorica nella Grecia classica. Turin.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. (1994) Imaginary Greece. The Contexts of Mythology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Caiazza, G. (2001) “Un esempio di interpretazione omerica: Dione di Prusa sulla questione del muro acheo a Troia (Or. xi § 76),” in Ricerche su Dione di Prusa. Naples: 41–63.Google Scholar

Caiazza, G. (2002) “Alcune note critico-testuali al Troiano (Or. xi) di Dione di Prusa,” in Scritti in onore di Italo Gallo, ed. Torraca, L.. Salerno: 123–38.Google Scholar

Caizzi, F. D., ed. (1966) Antisthenis Fragmenta. Milan.

Cameron, A. (2006) Greek Mythography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Camerotto, A. (1998) Le metamorfosi della parola. Studi nella parodia in Luciano di Samosata. Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar

Casanova, A. (2005) “Il Grillo di Plutarco e Omero,” in Les grecs de l'antiquité et les animaux. Le cas remarquable de Plutarque, ed. Boulogne, J.. Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex: 97–110.Google Scholar

Casson, L. (1974) Travel in the Ancient World. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Chatzis, A. (1914) Der Philosoph und Grammatiker Ptolemaios Chennos. Leben, Schriftstellerei und Fragmente (mit Ausschluss der Aristotelesbiographie). Erster Teil. Einleitung und Text. Paderborn.Google Scholar

Chiron, P. (2005) “Aspects rhétoriques et grammaticaux de l'interprétation allégorique d'Homère,” in Allégorie des poètes, allégorie des philosophes, ed. Dahan, G. and Goulet, R.. Paris: 35–58.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1997) “In search of the author of Strabo's Geography,” JRS 87: 92–110.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History. Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cohoon, J. W. (1932) Dio Chrysostom, vol. i. Loeb Classical Library. New York and London.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1991) The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2001) “Problems of the past in Imperial Greek education,” in Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, ed. Too, Y. L.. Leiden: 339–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1984) Thucydides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cook, R. M. (1955) “Thucydides as archaeologist,” ABSA 50: 266–70.Google Scholar

Corcella, A. (1984) Erodoto e l'analogia. Palermo.Google Scholar

Cribiore, R. (2001) Gymnastics of the Mind. Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.Google Scholar

D'Ippolito, G. (2004) “L'Omero di Plutarco,” in La biblioteca di Plutarco, ed. Gallo, I.. Naples: 11–36.Google Scholar

D'Ippolito, G. (2007) “Omero al tempo di Plutarco,” in Plutarco e la cultura della sua età, ed. Cacciatore, P. V. and Ferrari, F.. Naples: 57–84.Google Scholar

Dachs, H. (1913) Die λύσις ἐκ τοῦ προσώπου. Ein exegetischer und kritischer Grundsatz Aristarchs und seine Neuanwendung auf Ilias und Odyssee. Erlangen.Google Scholar

Danek, G. (2000) “Lukian und die Homer-Erklärung (Verae Historiae 1, 37 und Odyssee 10, 203–9),” AAntHung 40: 87–91.Google Scholar

Darbo-Peschanski, C. (1987) Le discours du particulier. Essai sur l'enquête hérodotéene. Paris.Google Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. (2005) “Convention versus realism in the Homeric epics,” Mnemosyne 58: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacy, P. (1948) “Stoic views of poetry,” AJPh 69: 241–71.Google Scholar

Lannoy, L. (ed.)(1977) Flavii Philostrati Heroicus. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Lannoy, L. (1997) “Le problème des Philostrate (état de la question),” ANRW II.34.3: 2362–449.

Romilly, J. (1967) Histoire et raison chez Thucydide. 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar

del Cerro Calderón, G. (1997) “Las claves del Discurso Troyano de Dión de Prusa,” Habis 28: 95–106.Google Scholar

Demoen, K. and Praet, D., eds. (2009) Theios Sophistes. Essays on Flavius Philostratus' Vita Apolloni. Leiden and Boston.

Desideri, P. (1978) Dione di Prusa. Un intellettuale greco nell'impero romano. Messina-Florence.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1991) “Dione di Prusa fra ellenismo e romanità,” ANRWii. 33.5: 3882–902.Google Scholar

Dickie, M. (1995) “The geography of Homer's world,” in Homer's World, ed. Andersen, Ø. and Dickie, M.. Bergen: 29–56.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1986) “Philosophie-Wissenschaft-Allgemeinbildung,” in Aspects de la philosophie hellénistique, ed. Flashar, H. and Gigon, O.. Entretiens sur l'Antiquité classique 32. Vandoeuvres-Geneva: 185–231.Google Scholar

Doležel, L. (1998) Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Dowden, K. (1992) The Uses of Greek Mythology. New York and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowden, K. (2009) “Reading Diktys: the discrete charm of bogosity,” in Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel, ed. Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S., and Schmeling, G.. Barkhuis, NL: 155–68.Google Scholar

Drules, P.-A. (1998) “Dion de Pruse lecteur d'Homère,” Gaia 3, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (1987) “Homèrologie et politique: le cas d'Aristodémos de Nysa,” in Stemmata. Mélanges de philologie, d'histoire et d'archéologie grecques offerts à Jules Labarbe, ed. Servais, J.et al. Liège and Louvain-la-Neuve: 15–24.Google Scholar

Dueck, D. (1999) “The date and method of composition of Strabo's ‘Geography,’” Hermes 127: 467–78.Google Scholar

Dueck, D. (2000) Strabo of Amasia. A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. New York and London.Google Scholar

Dueck, D. (2005) “Strabo's use of poetry,” in Strabo's Cultural Geography. The Making of a Kolossourgia, ed. Dueck, D., Lindsay, H. and Pothecary, S.. Cambridge: 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eitrem, S. (1929) “Zu Philostrats Heroikos,” SO 8: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engels, J. (1999) Augusteische Oikumenegeographie und Universalhistorie im Werk Strabons von Amaseia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (1995) “Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: the Museum and Library of Alexandria,” G&R 42: 38–48.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (2001) Troy Between Greece and Rome. Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.Google Scholar

Falappone, M. (2006) “Citazioni della tragedia attica nelle ‘archaiologiai,’” in Memoria di testi teatrali antichi, ed. Vox, O.. Lecce: 67–104.Google Scholar

Farinelli, C. (1995) “Le citazioni omeriche in Erodoto ii, 116–17,” AION (filol) 17: 5–29.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2004) “Roman Homer,” in Fowler (2004): 254–71.

Fauth, W. (1979) “Utopische Inseln in den Wahren Geschichten des Lukian,” Gymnasium 86: 39–58.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic. Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. (1975) Utopias of the Classical World. London.Google Scholar

Fernández Delgado, J. A. (2000) “Le Gryllus, une éthopée parodique,” in Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch, ed. Stockt, L.. Leuven: 171–82.

Flinterman, J.-J. (1995) Power, Paideia, and Pythagoreanism. Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs, and Political Ideas in Philostratus' Life of Apollonius. Amsterdam.

Floratos, C. S. (1972) Strabon über Literatur und Poseidonios. Athens.

Ford, A. (1999a) “Performing interpretation: early allegorical exegesis of Homer,” in Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World. The Poetics of Community, ed. M. Beissinger, J. Tylus, and S. Wofford. Berkeley: 33–53.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1999b) “Reading Homer from the rostrum: poems and laws in Aeschines' Against Timarchus,” in Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy, ed. S. Goldhill and R. Osborne. Cambridge: 231–56.

Ford, A. (2002) The Origins of Criticism. Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.

Fornaro, S. (2000) “Accuse e difese d'Omero: Platone nell'orazione undicesima di Dione Crisostomo,” Eikasmos 11: 249–65.Google Scholar

Fornaro, S. (2002) “Omero cattivo storico: l'Orazione xi di Dione Crisostomo,” in Montanari (2002): 547–60.

Fowler, R. L. (1996) “Herodotus and his contemporaries,” JHS 116: 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. L. (2000) Early Greek Mythography. Oxford.

Fowler, R. ed. (2004) The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge.CrossRef

Frazer, R. M., tr. (1966) The Trojan War. The Chronicles of Dictys of Crete and Dares the Phrygian. Bloomington, IN.

French, R. (1994) Ancient Natural History. Histories of Nature. New York and London.

Friedländer, L. (1907–13) Roman Life and Manners under the Early Empire, tr. L. A. Magnus. London. Reprinted (1979). New York.

Fromentin, V. (1988) “L'attitude critique de Denys d'Halicarnasse face aux mythes,” BAGB: 318–26.Google Scholar

Fuchs, E. (1993) Pseudologia. Formen und Funktionen fiktionaler Trugrede in der griechischen Literatur der Antike. Heidelberg.

Fuchs, E. (1996) “Die 11. Rede des Dion Chrysostomos als Lügenerzählung,” Lexis 14: 125–36.Google Scholar

Funke, H. (1986) “Poesia e storiografia,” QS 12: 71–91.Google Scholar

Fusillo, M. (1988) “Le miroir de la Lune: L'Histoire vraie de Lucien de la satire à l'utopie,”Poétique 73: 109–35. Reprinted and translated as “‘The mirror of the moon: Lucian's A True Story – from satire to utopia,” in (1999) Oxford Readings in the Greek Novel, ed. S. Swain. Oxford: 351–81.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1981) “True history and false history in classical antiquity,” JRS 71: 50–62.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1982) “Political and cultural aspects of the classicistic revival in the Augustan Age,” ClAnt 1: 43–65.Google Scholar

Gaede, R., ed. (1880) Demetrii Scepsii quae supersunt. Greifswald.

Gagarin, M. (1990) “The nature of proofs in Antiphon,” CPh 85: 22–32.Google Scholar

Gangloff, A. (2006a) Dion Chrysostome et les mythes. Hellénisme, communication et philosophie politique. Grenoble.

Gangloff, A. (2006b) “Mentions et citations de poètes chez Dion Chrysostome: manipulation et statut de la parole mythico-poétique dans le discours sophistique,” in Hôs ephat', dixerit quispiam, comme disait l'autre…: Mécanismes de la citation et de la mention dans les langues de l'Antiquité, ed. C. Nicolas. Grenoble: 101–22.

Gangloff, A. (2007) “Peuples et préjuges chez Dion de Pruse et Lucien de Samosate,” REG 120: 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garbrah, K. A. (1977) “The scholia on the ending of the Odyssey,” WJA n.F. 3, 7–17.Google Scholar

Gärtner, H. (1978) “Zoilos,” RE Suppl. 15: 1531–54.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1997) Palimpsests. Literature in the Second Degree, tr. C. Newman and C. Doubinsky. Lincoln, NE. Originally (1982) Paris.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D. H. J. (1994) “Lucian and historiography: ‘De Historia Conscribenda’ and ‘Verae Historiae,’” ANRW 34.2: 1448–509.Google Scholar

Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D. H. J. (1998) Lucian's Science Fiction Novel True Histories. Leiden.

Geus, K. (2002) Eratosthenes of Kyrene. Studien zur hellenistischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Munich.

Giangrande, G. (2000) “Sobre el texto de Dión Crisóstomo, Oratioxi,” Myrtia 15: 247–52.Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G., ed. (1990) Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae. 2nd edn. Naples.

Gibson, C., tr. (2009) Libanius's Progymnasmata. Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta.

Gigon, O., ed. (1987) Aristotelis Opera. Volumen Tertium. Librorum Deperditorum Fragmenta. Berlin.CrossRef

Ginzburg, C. (1999) History, Rhetoric, and Proof. Hanover and London.

Goldhill, S. (2002) Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge.

Gomme, A. W. (1945) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. i: Introduction and Commentary on Book I. Oxford.

Graf, F. (1993) Greek Mythology. An Introduction, tr. T. Marier. Baltimore. Originally (1987) Griechische Mythologie. Munich and Zürich.

Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer. Cambridge.

Grentrup, H. (1914) De Heroici Philostratei fabularum fontibus. Münster.

Grethlein, J. (2006) “The manifold uses of the epic past: the embassy scene in Herodotus 7. 153–63,” AJPh 127: 485–509.Google Scholar

Griffin, N. E. (1908) “The Greek Dictys,” AJPh 29: 329–35.Google Scholar

Grossardt, P. (1998) Die Trugreden in der Odyssee und ihre Rezeption in der antiken Literatur. Bern.

Grossardt, P. (2004) “Ein Echo in allen Tonarten – der ‘Heroikos’ von Flavius Philostrat als Bilanz der antiken Troia-Dichtung,” ST 14: 231–8.Google Scholar

Grossardt, P. (2006) Einführung, Übersetzung und Kommentar zum Heroikos von Flavius Philostrat. 2 vols. Basel.

Grossardt, P. (2009) “How to become a poet? Homer and Apollonius visit the mound of Achilles,” in Demoen, and , Praet (2009): 75–94.

Grube, G. M. A. (1965) The Greek and Roman Critics. Toronto.

Gyselinck, W. and Demoen, K. (2009) “Author and narrator: fiction and metafiction in Philostratus' Vita Apollonii,” in Demoen and Praet (2009): 95–128.

Hall, J. (1981) Lucian's Satire. New York.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2000) “The subjection of muthos to logos: Plato's citations of the poets,” CQ 50: 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1997) “Semeion e tekmerion. L'evoluzione del vocabolario di segni e indicazioni nella Grecia classica,” in I Greci. Storia, cultura, arte, società, vol. ii, ed. S. Settis. Turin: 1169–87.Google Scholar

Hansen, D. U. (2006) “Orte ohne Wiederkehr. Überlegungen zu utopischen Städten und Stätten,” in Fremde Wirklichkeiten. Literarische Phantastik und antike Literatur, ed. Hömke, N. and Baumbach, M.. Heidelberg: 261–76.Google Scholar

Hansen, W. (2003) “Strategies of authentication in ancient popular fiction,” in The Ancient Novel and Beyond, ed. Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M., and Keulen, W.. Leiden: 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, M. (1989) Unity in Greek Poetics. Oxford.

Heath, M. (1998) “Was Homer a Roman?” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 10: 23–56.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2000) “Do heroes eat fish? Athenaeus on the Homeric lifestyle,” in Athenaeus and his World. Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire, ed. Braund, D. and Wilkins, J.. Exeter: 342–52.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2003) “Pseudo-Dionysius Art of Rhetoric 8–11: figured speech, declamation, and criticism,” AJPh 124: 81–106.Google Scholar

Hedreen, G. (1991) “The cult of Achilles in the Euxine,” Hesperia 60: 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1987) “Three approaches to Greek mythography,” in Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. J. N. Bremmer. London: 242–77.Google Scholar

Hercher, R. (1855–6) “Über die Glaubwürdigkeit der Neuen Geschichte des Ptolemaeus Chennus,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, suppl. 1: 269–93.

Hesk, J. (2000) Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens. Cambridge.CrossRef

Higbie, C. (1997) “The bones of a hero, the ashes of a politician: Athens, Salamis, and the usable past,” ClAnt 16: 278–307.Google Scholar

Hillgruber, M. (1994) Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero. 2 vols. Leipzig.

Hintenlang, H. (1961) Untersuchungen zu den Homer-Aporien des Aristoteles. Heidelberg.

Hodkinson, O. (2007) “Sophists in disguise: rival traditions and conflicts of intellectual authority in Philostratus' Heroicus,” Lampeter Working Papers in Classics (www.lamp.ac.uk/ric/workin_papers/list_of_papers.html#Hodkinson).

Hofmann, P. (1905) Aristarchs Studien “de cultu et victu heroum” im Anschluss an Karl Lehrs. Munich.

Höistad, R. (1948) Cynic Hero and Cynic King. Studies in the Cynic Conception of Man. Uppsala.

Höistad, R. (1951) “Was Antisthenes an allegorist?” Eranos 49: 16–30.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (1996) “Novel-like works of extended prose fiction ii,” in The Novel in the Ancient World, ed. G. Schmeling. Leiden: 621–53.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1987) Thucydides. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1991) A Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. i: Booksi–iii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Householder, F. W. (1941) Literary Quotation and Allusion in Lucian. New York.Google Scholar

Howie, J. G. (1998) “Thucydides and Pindar: the Archaeology and Nemean 7,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 10: 75–130.Google Scholar

Hude, C., ed. (1927) Herodoti Historiae, vol. i. 3rd edn. Oxford.

Huhn, F. and Bethe, E. (1917) “Philostrats Heroikos und Diktys,” Hermes 52: 613–24.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2004) “Homer and Greek literature,” in Fowler (2004): 235–53.

Hunter, R. (2009) “The Trojan Oration of Dio Chrysostom and ancient Homeric criticism,” in Narratology and Interpretation. The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, ed. Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A.. Berlin and New York: 43–62.Google Scholar

Hunter, V. (1982) Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hussey, E. (1995) “Ionian inquiries: on understanding the Presocratic beginnings of science,” in The Greek World, ed. Powell, A.. New York and London: 530–49.Google Scholar

Huxley, G. L. (1973) “Aristotle as antiquary,” GRBS 14: 271–86.Google Scholar

Huxley, G. L. (1979) “Historical criticism in Aristotle'sHomeric Questions,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 79: 73–81.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C. (1989) “Augustan critics,” in Kennedy (1989): 245–73.

Ivančik, A. (1996) “Die hellenistischen Kommentare zu Homer Il. 13, 3–6. Zur Idealisierung des Barbarenbildes,” in Hellenismus, ed. B. Funck. Tübingen: 671–92.

Jacob, C. (1994) “L'ordre généalogique. Entre le mythe et l'histoire,” in Transcrire les mythologies. Tradition, écriture, historicité, ed. M. Detienne. Paris: 169–202.

James, A. and Lee, K. (2000) A Commentary on Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica V. Leiden.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (2009) “Constructing elite reading communities in the High Empire,” in Ancient Literacies. The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, ed. Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N.. Oxford: 320–30.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.CrossRef

Jones, C. P. (1986) Culture and Society in Lucian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRef

Jones, C. P. (1999) Kinship Diplomacy in the Ancient World. Cambridge, MA.

Jones, C. P. (2000) “The emperor and the giant,” CPh 95: 476–81.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (2001) “Philostratus' Heroikos and its setting in reality,” JHS 121: 141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, H. L., ed. (1917) The Geography of Strabo, vol. i. Cambridge, MA and London.

Jouan, F. (1966) Dion Chrysostome. Discours Troyen (XI) qu'Ilion n'a pas été prise. 2 vols. Diss., Paris.

Jouan, F. (2002) “Mensonges d'Ulysse, mensonges d'Homère: une source tragique du Discours troyen de Dion Chrysostome,” REG 115: 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahles, W. R. (1976) Strabo and Homer. The Homeric Citations in the Geography of Strabo. Diss., Loyola University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Kakridis, J. (1971) ᾽Αεὶ ϕιλέλλην ὁ ποιητής? in Homer Revisited. Lund: 54–67. Revised version of (1956) WS 69: 26–42.

Kakridis, J. (1974) “A Cynic Homeromastix?” in Serta Turyniana. Studies in Greek Literature and Palaeography in honor of Alexander Turyn, ed. Heller, J. L. and Newman, J. K.. Urbana, IL: 361–73.Google Scholar

Kayser, C. L., ed. (1870–1) Flavii Philostrati opera auctoria C. L. Kayser. 2 vols. Leipzig.

Kennedy, G. A. (1958) “Isocrates' Encomium of Helen: a Panhellenic document?” TAPhA 89: 77–83.CrossRef

Kennedy, G. A. (1963) The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A., ed. (1989) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Vol. i: Classical Criticism. Cambridge.

Kennedy, G. A. tr. (2004) Progymnasmata. Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden.

Kidd, I. G. (1990) Posidonius. ii. Commentary. (ii) Fragments 150–293. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2007) “The portrait of Homer in Strabo's Geography,” CPh 102: 363–89.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2008) “Dio of Prusa, Or. 61, Chryseis, or reading Homeric silence,” CQ 58: 601–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindstrand, J. F. (1973) Homer in der zweiten Sophistik. Uppsala.Google Scholar

Kindstrand, J. F. (1979–80) “Sostratus – Hercules – Agathion. The rise of a legend,” Annales Societatis Litterarum Humaniorum Regiae Upsaliensis: 50–79.

König, J. (2005) Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2004) “‘The birth of the reader’: Plutarch as a literary critic,” Scholia, n.s. 13: 3–27.Google Scholar

Koster, S. (1970) Antike Epostheorien. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1915) “Randbemerkungen XXXI,” RhM 70: 607–10.Google Scholar

Laird, A. J. W. (2003) “Fiction as a discourse of philosophy in Lucian's Verae Historiae,” in The Ancient Novel and Beyond, ed. Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M., and Keulen, W.. Leiden: 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamberton, R. (1986) Homer the Theologian. Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. (1997) “Homer in antiquity,” in A New Companion to Homer, ed. Morris, I. and Powell, B.. Leiden: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamberton, R. (2002) “Homeric allegory and Homeric rhetoric in ancient pedagogy,” in Montanari, (2002): 185–205.

Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J., eds. (1992) Homer's Ancient Readers. The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic's Earliest Exegetes. Princeton.

Lanata, G. (1963) Poetica pre-platonica. Testimonianze e frammenti. Florence.Google Scholar

Lane Fox, R. (1986) Pagans and Christians. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Lasserre, F. (1982) “Strabon devant l'empire romain,” ANRWii.30.1: 867–96.Google Scholar

Legrand, Ph.-E., ed. (1936) Hérodote. Histoires Livre ii. Paris.

Lemarchand, L. (1926) Dion de Pruse. Les oeuvres d'avant l'exile. Paris.Google Scholar

Leyden, W. (1949–50) “Spatium historicum,” DUJ 42, n.s. 11: 89–104.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. (2003) Lucian. On the Syrian Goddess. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ligota, C. R. (1982) “‘This story is not true.’ Fact and fiction in antiquity,” JWI 45: 1–13.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. (1975) Herodotus, Book ii. Introduction. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. (1988) Herodotus, Book ii. Commentary 99–182. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966) Polarity and Analogy. Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1992) “Stoic readings of Homer,” in Lamberton and Keaney (1992): 41–66.

Luce, T. J. (1989) “Ancient views on the causes of bias in ancient historical writing,” CPh 84: 16–31.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N., ed. (2001) The Historian's Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford.

Maclean, J. K. B. (2004) “The αἶνοι of the Heroikos and the unfolding transformation of the Phoenician merchant,” in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 251–65.

Maclean, J. K. B. and Aitken, E. B., trs. (2001) Flavius Philostratus. Heroikos. Atlanta.

Maclean, J. K. B. and Aitken, E. B., eds. (2004) Philostratus's Heroikos. Religion and Cultural Identity in the Third Century ce. Leiden.Google Scholar

Maeder, D. (1991) “Au seuil des romans grecs: effets de réel et effets de création,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 4: 1–33.Google Scholar

Mal-Maeder, D. (1992) “Les détournements homériques dans l'‘Histoire vraie’ de Lucien: le repatriement d'une tradition littéraire,” EL 2: 123–46.Google Scholar

Manetti, G. (1993) Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity, tr. C. Richardson. Bloomington, IN. Originally (1987) Teorie del segno nell'antichità classica. Milan.

Mangoni, C., ed. (1993) Filodemo. Il quinto libro della Poetica (PHerc. 1425 e 1538). Naples.

Mantero, T. (1966) Richerche sull' Heroikos di Filostrato. Genoa.Google Scholar

Marcozzi, D., Sinatra, M., and Vannicelli, P. (1994) “Tra epica e storiografia: il «catalogo delle navi»,” SMEA 33: 163–74.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marrou, H. I. (1956) A History of Education in Antiquity, tr. G. Lamb. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Martin, R. P. (2002) “A good place to talk: discourse and topos in Achilles Tatius and Philostratus,” in Space in the Ancient Novel, ed. Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S.. Groningen: 143–60.Google Scholar

Matteuzzi, M. (2000–2) “A proposito di Omero ‘babilonese’ (Lucian VHii 20),” Sandalion 23–5: 49–51.

Meijering, R. (1987) Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia. Groningen.Google Scholar

Meineke, A., ed. (1866) Strabonis Geographica. Leipzig.

Merkle, S. (1989) Die Ephemeris belli Troiani des Diktys von Kreta. Frankfurt and New York.Google Scholar

Merkle, S. (1994) “Telling the true story of the Trojan War: the eyewitness account of Dictys of Crete,” in The Search for the Ancient Novel, ed. Tatum, J.. Baltimore and London: 183–98.Google Scholar

Merkle, S. (1996) “The truth and nothing but the truth: Dictys and Dares,” in The Novel in the Ancient World, ed. Schmeling, G.. Leiden: 563–80.Google Scholar

Mesk, J. (1920–1) “Zur elften Rede des Dio von Prusa,” WS 42: 115–24.Google Scholar

Mestre, F. (1990) “Homère, entre Dion Chrysostome et Philostrate,” AFB 13: 89–101.Google Scholar

Mestre, F. (2004) “Refuting Homer in the Heroikos of Philostratus,” in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 127–41.

Miles, G. (2005) “Music and immortality: the afterlife of Achilles in Philostratus' Heroicus,” AncNarr 4: 66–78.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1978) “The career and conversion of Dio Chrysostom,” JHS 98: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1995) “Dio Chrysostom, Greece, and Rome,” in Ethics and Rhetoric. Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C.. Oxford: 177–92.Google Scholar

Möllendorff, P. (2000) Auf der Suche nach der verlogenen Wahrheit. Lukians Wahre Geschichten. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Möllendorff, P. (2006a) “Sophistische Phantastik: Lukians Lügenfreunde,” in Fremde Wirklichkeiten. Literarische Phantastik und antike Literatur, ed. Hömke, N. and Baumbach, M.. Heidelberg: 187–201.Google Scholar

Möllendorff, P. (2006b) “Camels, Celts, and Centaurs. Lucian's Aesthetic Concept of the Hybrid,” in Desultoria scientia. Genre in Apuleius' Metamorphoses and Related Texts, ed. R. R. Nauta. Groningen: 63–86.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1990) The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Montanari, F. (1987) “Hyponoia e allegoria: piccole considerazioni preliminari,” in Studi offerti ad Anna Maria Quartiroli e Domenico Magnino. Pavia: 11–19.Google Scholar

Montanari, F. ed. (2002) Omero tremila anni dopo. Rome.

Montgomery, W. A. (1901) Dio Chrysostom as Homeric Critic. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Montgomery, W. A. (1902) “Oration XI of Dio Chrysostomus,” in Studies in Honor of Basil Gildersleeve. Baltimore: 405–12.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1987) “Homère chez Galien,” in Stemmata. Mélanges de philologie, d'histoire et d'archéologie grecques offerts à Jules Labarbe, ed. Servais, J.. Liège and Louvain-la-Neuve: 25–37.Google Scholar

Morgan, J. R. (1985) “Lucian's True Histories and the Wonders Beyond Thule of Antonius Diogenes,” CQ 35: 475–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, T. (1998) Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mosshammer, A. A. (1979) The Chronicles of Eusebius and Greek Chronographic Tradition. Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1989) “The structure and function of Odysseus' Apologoi,” TAPhA 119: 15–30.Google Scholar

Nadeau, J. Y. (1970) “Ethiopians,” CQ 20: 339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (1993) “Utopie-Parodie in Lukians Wahren Geschichten,” in Literaturparodie in Antike und Mittelalter, ed. Ax, W. and Glei, R. F.. Trier: 41–56.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (2002) “Homerphilologie auf der Insel der Seligen: Lukian, VHii 20,” in Epea Pteroenta. Beiträge zur Homerforschung. Festscrift für Wolfgang Kullmann zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. Reichel, M. and Rengakos, A.. Stuttgart: 151–62.Google Scholar

Neumann, K. J. (1886) “Strabons Gesammturtheil über die homerische Geographie,” Hermes 21: 134–41.Google Scholar

Neville, J. W. (1977) “Herodotus on the Trojan War,” G&R 24: 3–12.Google Scholar

Newby, Z. (2007) “Reading the allegory of the Archelaos Relief,” in Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World, ed. Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R.. Cambridge: 156–78.Google Scholar

Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2005) Lucian's Self-conscious Fiction. Theory in Practice. Diss., Dublin.Google Scholar

Ní Mheallaigh, K (2008) “Pseudo-documentarism and the limits of ancient fiction,” AJPh 129: 403–31.Google Scholar

Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2009) “Monumental fallacy: the teleology of origins in Lucian's Verae Historiae,” in A Lucian for our Times, ed. Bartley, Adam. Newcastle upon Tyne: 11–28.Google Scholar

Nickau, K. (1990) “Mythos und Logos bei Herodot,” in Memoria rerum veterum. Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Ax, W. Stuttgart: 83–100.Google Scholar

Nicolai, R. (2001) “Thucydides' Archaeology: between epic and oral traditions,” in Luraghi (2001): 263–85.

Nicolai, R. (2003) “La poesia epica come documento,” in L'uso dei documenti nella storiografia antica, ed. A. M. Biraschi, P. Desideri, S. Roda, and G. Zecchini. Perugia: 79–109.Google Scholar

Niese, B. (1877) “Apollodors Commentar zum Schiffskataloge als Quelle Strabos,” RhM 32: 267–307.Google Scholar

Olivieri, A. (1898) “Gli studi omerici di Dione Crisostomo,” RFIC 26: 568–607.Google Scholar

Ollier, F. (1962) Lucien. Histoire vraie. Paris.Google Scholar

Paassen, C. (1957) The Classical Tradition of Geography. Groningen.Google Scholar

Parry, H. (1994) “The Apologos of Odysseus: lies, all lies?” Phoenix 48: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paschalis, M. (2005) “Pandora and the Wooden Horse: a reading of Triphiodorus' Ἄλωσις ᾿Ιλίου,” in Roman and Greek Imperial Epic, ed. M. Paschalis. Herakleion: 91–115.Google Scholar

Patillon, M. and Bolognesi, G., eds. (1997) Aelius Théon. Progymnasmata. Paris.

Pavano, A. (1998) “Le redazioni latine e il presunto originale greco dell'opera di Darete Frigio,” Sileno 24: 207–18.Google Scholar

Pavel, T. (1986) Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Pearson, L. (1942) The Local Historians of Attica. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Pédech, P. (1964) La méthode historique de Polybe. Paris.Google Scholar

Pépin, J. (1976) Mythe et allégorie. Les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes. 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar

Pépin, J. (1993) “Aspects de la lecture antisthénienne d'Homère,” in Le Cynisme ancien et ses prolongements, ed. M.-O. Goulet-Cazé and R. Goulet. Paris: 1–13.Google Scholar

Pernot, L. (1994) “Lucien et Dion de Pruse,” in Billault (1994): 109–16.

Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar

Phillips, E. D. (1953) “Odysseus in Italy,” JHS 73: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piérart, M. (1983) “L'historien ancien face aux mythes et aux légendes,” LEC 51: 47–62.Google Scholar

Pontani, F. (2000) “Il proemio al Commento all'Odissea di Eustazio di Tessalonica (con appunti sulla tradizione del testo),” BollClass ser. 3, 21: 5–58.

Pontani, F. ed. (2005) Eraclito. Questioni omeriche sulle allegorie di Omero in merito agli dèi. Pisa.

Porter, J. I. (1992) “Hermeneutic lines and circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the exegesis of Homer,” in Lamberton and Keaney (1992): 67–114.

Porter, J. I. (1993) “The seductions of Gorgias,” ClAnt 12: 267–99.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2001) “Ideals and ruins. Pausanias, Longinus, and the Second Sophistic,” in Pausanias. Travel and Memory in Ancient Greece, ed. S. Alcock, J. F. Cherry, and J. Elsner. Oxford: 63–92.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2004) “Homer: the history of an idea,” in Fowler (2004): 324–43.

Pothecary, S. (2002) “Strabo, the Tiberian author: past, present and silence in Strabo's Geography,” Mnemosyne 55: 387–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pratt, L. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar. Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Prontera, F. (1993) “Sull'esegesi ellenistica della geografia omerica,” in Philanthropia kai Eusebeia. Festschrift für Albrecht Dihle zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Most, G. W., Petersmann, H., and Ritter, A. M.. Göttingen: 387–97.Google Scholar

Radt, S., ed. (2002) Strabons Geographika. Band 1: Prolegomena, Buch i–iv: Text und Übersetzung. Göttingen.

Radt, S. ed. (2006) Strabons Geographika. Band 5: Abgekürzt zitierte Literatur. Buch i–iv: Kommentar. Göttingen.

Ramin, J. (1979) Mythographie et géographie. Paris.Google Scholar

Reuter, D. (1932) Untersuchungen zum Euboikos des Dion von Prusa. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1975) “Homeric professors in the age of the sophists,” PCPhS, n.s. 21: 65–81.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1980) “Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad: a sketch,” CQ 30: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1981) “The contest of Homer and Hesiod and Alcidamas' Mouseion,” CQ 31: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1985) “Pindar and later literary criticism in antiquity,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 5: 384–9.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. J. (1992) “Aristotle's reading of Homer and its background,” in Lamberton and Keaney (1992): 30–40.

Richardson, N. J. (1993) “Homer and his ancient critics,” in The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. vi: Books 21–24. Cambridge: 25–49.Google Scholar

Ritoók, Z. (1995) “Some aesthetic views of Dio Chrysostom and their sources,” in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, ed. J. G. J. Abbenes, S. R. Slings, and I. Sluiter. Amsterdam: 125–34.Google Scholar

Robert, L. (1980) “Lucien en son temps,” in À travers l'Asie Mineure. Poètes et prosateurs, monnaies grecques, voyageurs et géographie. Paris: 393–436.Google Scholar

Robinson, C. (1979) Lucian and his Influence in Europe. London.Google Scholar

Romm, J. (1990) “Wax, stone, and Promethean clay: Lucian as plastic artist,” ClAnt 9: 74–98.Google Scholar

Romm, J. (1992) The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought. Geography, Exploration and Fiction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Rose, V., ed. (1886) Aristotelis Fragmenta. Leipzig.

Rosén, H. B., ed. (1987) Herodotus. Historiae. Vol. i. Leipzig.

Russell, D. A. (1981) Criticism in Antiquity. Bristol.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (2003) “The rhetoric of the Homeric Problems,” in Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R.. Oxford: 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. A., and Konstan, D. (2005) Heraclitus: Homeric Problems. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A., and Winterbottom, M., eds. (1970) Ancient Literary Criticism. The Principal Texts in New Translations. Oxford.

Rusten, J. (1980) Dionysius Scytobrachion. Opladen.Google Scholar

Rusten, J. (2004) “Living in the past: allusive narratives and elusive authorities in the world of the Heroikos,” in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 143–58.

Rutherford, I. (2009) “Black sails to Achilles: the Thessalian pilgrimage in Philostratus' Heroicus,” in Bowie and Elsner (2009): 230–47.

Sacks, K. (1981) Polybius on the Writing of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Sage, M. (2000) “Roman visitors to Ilium in the Roman imperial and late antique period: the symbolic functions of a landscape,” ST 10: 211–31.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (1993) “Le ‘je’ de Lucien,” in L'invention de l'autobiographie d'Hésiode à Saint Augustine, ed. M.-F. Baslez, P. Hoffmann, and L. Pernot. Paris: 253–70.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (1994) “Lucien ethnographe,” in Billault (1994): 149–70.

Saïd, S. (2000) “Dio's use of mythology,” in Swain (2000a): 161–86.

Santoni, A. (2002) “Miti dell'Odissea nel Περὶ ᾿Απίστων di Palefato,” in La mythologie et l'Odyssée. Hommage à Gabriel Germain, ed. A. Hurst and F. Letoublon. Geneva: 145–55.Google Scholar

Saraceno, C. (1998) “Omero, Odisseo e Luciano: una lettura di Storia vera, i, 3,” Métis 13: 401–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scarcella, A. M. (1988) “Mythe et ironie: Les vraies histoires de Lucien,” in Peuples et pays mythiques, ed. F. Jouan and B. Deforge. Paris: 169–76. Reprinted in A. M. Scarcella (1993), Romanzo e romanzieri. Note di narratologia greca, vol. ii. Perugia: 409–17.Google Scholar

Schäublin, C. (1977) “Homerum ex Homero,” MH 34: 221–7.Google Scholar

Scheer, T. J. (2003) “The past in a Hellenistic present: myth and local tradition,” in A Companion to the Hellenistic World, ed. A. Erskine. Oxford: 216–31.Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. M. (1976) “Strabo on Homer,” Mnemosyne 29: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schepens, G. (2006) “Travelling Greek historians,” in Le vie della storia: migrazioni di popoli, viaggi di individui, circolazione di idee nel Mediterraneo antico, ed. M. G. Angeli Bertinelli and A. Donati. Rome: 81–102.Google Scholar

Schirren, T. (2005) Philosophos Bios. Die antike Philosophenbiographie als symbolische Form. Studien zur Vita Apollonii des Philostrat. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. (1976) Die Erklärungen zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias. Munich.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. (2002) “The Homer of the scholia: what is explained to the reader?” in Montanari (2002): 159–83.

Schmitz, T. A. (1997) Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Schmitz, T. A. (2000) “Plausibility in the Greek orators,” AJPh 121: 47–77.Google Scholar

Schröder, S. (1990) Plutarchs Schrift De Pythiae Oraculis. Text, Einleitung und Kommentar. Stuttgart.

Schouler, B. (1986) “Le déguisement de l'intention dans la rhétorique grecque,” Ktèma 11: 257–72.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. (1999) Credible Impossibilities. Conventions and Strategies of Verisimilitude in Homer and Greek Tragedy. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Seeck, G. A. (1990) “Dion Chrysostomos als Homerkritiker (Or. 11),” RhM 133: 97–107.Google Scholar

Shayegan, M. R. (2004) “Philostratus's Heroikos and the ideation of late Severan policy toward Arscacid and Sasanian Iran,” in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 285–315.

Shimron, B. (1973) “Πρῶτος τῶν ἡµεῖς ἴδµεν,” Eranos 71: 45–51.

Skiadas, A. D. (1965) Homer im griechischen Epigramm. Athens.Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. (1940) “Some works of Philostratus the Elder,” TAPhA 71: 556–72.Google Scholar

Speyer, W. (1970) Bücherfunde in der Glaubenswerbung der Antike. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stengel, A. (1911) De Luciani veris historiis. Berlin.Google Scholar

Stern, J., tr. (1996) Palaephatus. On Unbelievable Tales. Wauconda, IL.Google Scholar

Stern, J. (2003) “Heraclitus the paradoxographer: On Unbelievable Tales,” TAPhA 133: 51–97.Google Scholar

Strasburger, H. (1972) Homer und die Geschichtsschreibung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Struck, P. (2004) TheBirth of the Symbol. Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1992) “Antonius Diogenes and Lucian,” LCM 17.5: 74–6.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1994) “Dio and Lucian,” in Greek Fiction. The Greek Novel in Context, ed. J. R. Morgan and R. Stoneman. New York and London: 166–80.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire. Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World ad 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar

Swain, S. ed. (2000a) Dio Chrysostom. Politics, Letters, and Philosophy. Oxford.

Swain, S. (2000b) “Reception and interpretation” in Swain (2000a): 13–50.

Szarmach, M. (1978) “Le ‘Discours Troyen’ de Dion de Pruse,” Eos 66: 195–202.Google Scholar

Tate, J. (1953) “Antisthenes was not an allegorist,” Eranos 51: 14–22.Google Scholar

Täubler, E. (1927) Die Archaeologie des Thukydides. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (1989) Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context. Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tomberg, K.-H. (1968) Die Kaine Historia des Ptolemaios Chennos. Bonn.Google Scholar

Too, Y. L. (1995) The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates. Text, Power, Pedagogy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Too, Y. L. (1998) The Idea of Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Torraca, L. (2001) “Roma e l'Europa nella prospettiva di un ‘provinciale’: Dione di Prusa di fronte all'impero,” in L'Idea di Roma nella cultura antica, ed. F. Giordano. Naples: 243–76.Google Scholar

Tozzi, P. (1967) “Acusilao di Argo,” RIL 101: 581–624.Google Scholar

Trachsel, A. (2002) “La Troade: entre espace littéraire et paysage historique,” ARF 4: 41–53.Google Scholar

Trachsel, A. (2007) La Troade. Un paysage et son héritage littéraire: les commentaires antiques sur la Troade. Basel.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (1990) “Plato's Phaedrus in second-century Greek literature,” in Antonine Literature, ed. D. A. Russell. Oxford: 141–73.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. tr. (1997) Maximus of Tyre. The Philosophical Orations. Oxford.

Tsakmakis, A. (1995) Thukydides über die Vergangenheit. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Usener, K. (1994) “Diktys und Dares über den Troischen Krieg: Homer in der Rezeptionskrise?” Eranos 92: 102–20.Google Scholar

Vagnone, G. (2000) “Note al testo della Or. xi di Dione di Prusa (Troiano): 1. cc. 20–21; 2. cc. 22–24 (pp. 119–121 v. Arnim),” QUCC 65: 107–13.Google Scholar

Vagnone, G. ed. (2003a) Dione di Prusa. Troiano. Or. XI. Edizione critica, traduzione e commento. Rome.

Vagnone, G. (2003b) “Note al testo e all'interpretazione del Troiano di Dione di Prusa,” QUCC 73: 139–45.Google Scholar

Vagnone, G. (2007) “Storia e ideologia nel Discorso Troiano di Dione di Prusa,” in Costruzione e uso del passato storico nella cultura antica, ed. P. Desideri, S. Roda, and A. M. Biraschi. Alexandria: 379–86.Google Scholar

Valgimigli, M. (1911–12) “La or. lviii (᾿Αχιλλεύς) di Dione Crisostomo,” BFC 18: 207–10.Google Scholar

Valgimigli, M. (1912) La critica letteraria di Dione Crisostomo. Bologna.Google Scholar

Valk, M. (1953) “Homer's nationalistic attitude,” AC 22: 5–26.Google Scholar

Valk, M. ed. (1971–87) Eustathii archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis. Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem pertinentes ad fidem codicis Laurentiani. 4 vols. Leiden.

Venini, P. (1981) “Ditti Cretese e Omero,” MIL 37: 161–98.Google Scholar

Verdin, H. (1977) “Les remarques critiques d'Hérodote et de Thucydide sur la poésie en tant que source historique,” in Historiographia antiqua. Commentationes Lovanienses in honorem W. Peremans septuagenarii editae. Leuven: 53–76.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1988) Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination, tr. P. Wissing. Chicago. Originally (1983) Les Grecs ont-ils cru à leurs mythes?Paris.Google Scholar

Vischer, R. (1965) Das einfache Leben. Wort- und motivgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu einem Wertbegriff der antiken Literatur. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1960) “History and tragedy,” Historia 9: 216–34.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1974) “Polybius and the Sicilian straits,” Kokalos 20, 5–17.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1979) Polybius. An Historical Commentary, vol. iii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Walcot, P. (1977) “Odysseus and the art of lying,” AncSoc 8: 1–19.Google Scholar

Wardman, A. E. (1960) “Myth in Greek historiography,” Historia 9: 401–13.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2001) “The Progymnasmata as practice,” in Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, ed. Y. L. Too. Leiden: 289–316.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2006) “Fiction, mimesis and the performance of the Greek past in the Second Sophistic,” in Greeks on Greekness. Viewing the Greek Past under the Roman Empire, ed. D. Konstan and S. Saïd. Cambridge: 27–46.Google Scholar

Weil, R. (1977) “Aristotle's view of history,” in Articles on Aristotle 2. Ethics and Politics, ed. J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji. London: 202–17.Google Scholar

West, M. L., ed. (2003) Homeric Hymns. Homeric Apocrypha. Lives of Homer. Cambridge, MA.

Whitmarsh, T. (1998) “The birth of a prodigy: Heliodorus and the genealogy of Hellenism,” in Studies in Heliodorus, ed. Hunter, R.. Cambridge: 93–124.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2004) “The harvest of wisdom: landscape, description, and identity in the Heroikos,” in Maclean and Aitken (2004): 237–49.

Whitmarsh, T. (2006) “True histories: Lucian, Bakhtin, and the pragmatics of reception,” in Classics and the Uses of Reception, ed. Martindale, C. and Thomas, R. F.. Oxford: 104–15.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2007) “Prose literature and the Severan dynasty,” in Severan Culture, ed. S. Swain, S. Harrison, and J. Elsner. Cambridge: 29–51.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2009) “Performing heroics: landscape, language, and identity in Philostratus' Heroicus,” in Bowie and Elsner (2009): 205–29.

Winiarczyk, M. (2002) Euhemeros von Messene. Leben, Werk und Nachwirkung. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winkler, J. J. (1982) “The mendacity of Kalasiris and the narrative strategy of Heliodoros' Aithiopika,” YCS 27: 93–158.Google Scholar

Winston, D. (1976) “Iambulus' Island of the Sun and Hellenistic literary utopias,” Science Fiction Studies 3: 219–27.Google Scholar

Wipprecht, F. (1902–8) Zur Entwicklung der rationalistischen Mythendeutung bei den Griechen. 2 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Wolff, M. J. (1932) “Der Lügner Homer,” GRMS 20: 53–65.Google Scholar

Wright, M. (2005) Euripides' Escape-Tragedies. A Study of Helen, Andromeda, and Iphigenia among the Taurians. Oxford.

Zeitlin, F. (2001) “Visions and revisions of Homer,” in Being Greek Under Rome, ed. Goldhill, S.. Cambridge: 195–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar