Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - The Danger and the Promise of Heidegger, an American Perspective

Summary

Enframing is, as it were, the photographic negative of enowning.

Heidegger (FS 60/GA15 366)

INTRODUCTION: THE DANGER AND THE PROMISE OF HEIDEGGER

Thanks to Heidegger, we have learned to hear the ambiguity of subjective and objective genitives in phrases with the form, “The X of Y.” We needed to be taught to hear this ambiguity, because it is concealed by the impossible simultaneity of its dual meanings. Critique of Pure Reason, for example, signifies both criticism directed at pure reason and criticism belonging to pure reason. Ordinarily, however, we hear the title of Kant's great work only as an objective genitive, as a critique directed at the earlier pretensions of pure reason (which, with Anselm and Descartes, went so far as to try to prove God's existence solely by analyzing the concept “God,” as we saw in Chapter 1), and so not also as a subjective genitive, as a critique used by pure reason in order to circumscribe and secure its own legitimate domain. What is more, even after we learn to recognize that Critique of Pure Reason also means the critique that belongs to pure reason, we still cannot hear both meanings at the same time. This is because we hear one meaning instead of the other; what we hear occupies the place of what we do not.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Heidegger, Art, and Postmodernity
  • Online ISBN: 9780511976605
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976605
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×