Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- 14 Designing Perception Experiments
- 15 Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis: Basic Concepts and Practical Applications
- 16 Multireader ROC Analysis
- 17 Memory Effects and Experimental Design
- 18 Observer Models as a Surrogate to Perception Experiments
- 19 Implementation of Observer Models
- 20 Value and Limitations of Observer Models
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- Index
- References
20 - Value and Limitations of Observer Models
from Part III - Perception Metrology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2018
Book contents
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques, Second Edition
- Reviews
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Medical Image Perception
- Part I Historical Reflections and Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Science of Image Perception
- Part III Perception Metrology
- 14 Designing Perception Experiments
- 15 Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis: Basic Concepts and Practical Applications
- 16 Multireader ROC Analysis
- 17 Memory Effects and Experimental Design
- 18 Observer Models as a Surrogate to Perception Experiments
- 19 Implementation of Observer Models
- 20 Value and Limitations of Observer Models
- Part IV Clinical Performance Assessment
- Part V Computational Perception
- Part VI Applied Perception
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , pp. 300 - 304Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Adler, R.J. (2000). On excursion sets, tube formulas and maxima of random fields. Ann Appl Probab, 10(1), 1–74.Google Scholar
Barrett, H.H., Yao, J., Rolland, J.P., Myers, K.J. (1993). Observer models for assessment of image quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90(21), 9758–9765.Google Scholar
Bochud, F.O., Valley, J.-F., Verdun, F.R., Hessler, C., Schnyder, P. (1999). Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys, 26(7), 1365–1370.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, D.P. (2006). A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm. Phys Med Biol, 51, 3449–3462.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, D.P. (2013). A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysis. Acad Radiol, 20(7), 915–919.Google Scholar
Gifford, H.C. (2014). Efficient visual-search observer models for pet. Br J Radiol, 87(1039), 20140017.Google Scholar
Hand, D.J. (1996). Statistics and the theory of measurement. J R Statist Soc A, 159, 445–492.Google Scholar
Hoeschen, C., Tischenko, O., Buhr, E., Illers, H. (2005). Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images. Radiat Protect Dosim, 114(1–3), 75–80.Google Scholar
Kohli, M., Prevedello, L.M., Filice, R.W., Geis, J.R. (2017). Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. Am J Roentgenol, 208(4), 754–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A. (1989). Searching for lung nodules: visual dwell indicates location of false-positive and false negative decisions. Invest Radiol, 4, 472–478.Google Scholar
Myers, K.J., Barrett, H.H. (1987). Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. J Opt Soc Am A, 4(12), 2447–2457.Google Scholar
Popescu, L.M. (2008). Model for the detection of signals in images with multiple suspicious locations. Med Phys, 35(12), 5565–5574.Google Scholar
Popescu, L.M. (2011). Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of FROC curve. Med Phys, 38(10), 5690–5702.Google Scholar
Popescu, L.M., Myers, K.J. (2013). CT image assessment by low contrast signal detectability evaluation with unknown signal location. Med Phys, 40(11), 111908–111910.Google Scholar
Rolland, J.P., Barrett, H.H. (1992). Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. J Opt Soc Am A, 9(5), 649–658.Google Scholar
Sharp, P., Barber, D.C., Brown, D.G., Burgess, A.E., Metz, C.E., Myers, K.J., Taylor, C.J., Wagner, R.F., Brooks, R., Hill, C.R., Kuhl, D.E., Smith, M.A., Wells, P., Worthington, B. (1996). Medical Imaging: The Assessment of Image Quality. ICRU Report 54. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements.Google Scholar
Suppes, P., Zinnes, J.L. (1963). Basic measurement theory. In: Luce, R.L., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
Swets, J.A. (1973). The relative operating characteristic in psychology. Science, 183, 990–1000.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.F., Brown, D.G. (1985). Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems. Phys Med Biol, 30(6), 489–518.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Summers, R.M. (2012). Machine learning and radiology. Med Image Analysis, 16(5), 933–951.Google Scholar