Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T15:51:42.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Social Reproduction Feminism and Deweyan Habit Ontology

from Part III - Socially Embeddded and Culturally Extended Habits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2020

Fausto Caruana
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience (Parma), Italian National Research Council
Italo Testa
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Parma
Get access

Summary

This chapter draws upon John Dewey's habit ontology in order to spell out the metaphysical commitments of social reproduction feminism. First, it outlines the current feminist debates around social reproduction (SR) in order to show where and to what extent this notion demands further conceptualization. It then presents an account of SR that hinges on Dewey's concept of habituation, which can be characterized as a spiral of second and first nature. It goes on to show how this conception of habit can help articulate SR's role in the production of persons, the maintenance of social groups and even in the reproduction of society. This discloses a perspective on the role of SR as enabling both social domination and transformation. Finally, we recapitulate and conclude by noting some implications of the resulting habit ontology of SR for feminist political thought.

Type
Chapter
Information
Habits
Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory
, pp. 438 - 458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addams, Jane. 2002. Democracy and Social Ethics (1902) Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Arruzza, Cinzia. 2016. “Functionalist, Determinist, Reductionist: Social Reproduction Feminism and Its Critics.” Science and Society 80 (1): 930.Google Scholar
Arruzza, Cinzia, Bhattacharya, Tithi, and Fraser, Nancy. 2019. Feminism for the 99%. A Manifesto. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Tithi, ed. 2017a. Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Tithi. 2017b. “Introduction: Mapping Social Reproduction Theory.” In Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. Edited by Bhattacharya, Tithi, 120. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, Johanna and Laslett, Barbara. 1991. “Gender, Social Reproduction, and Women's Self-Organization: Considering the US Welfare State.” Gender & Society 5 (3): 31133.Google Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel. 2017. A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (2006). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Parnet, Claire. 2002. Dialogues II. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1973. Lectures in China, 1919–1920. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1981. “Experience and Nature.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 1: 1925, Experience and Nature. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 1437. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1983. “Human Nature and Conduct.” In The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, vol. 14: 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 1230. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984a. “The Public and Its Problems.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 2: 1925–1927, Essays, Reviews, Miscellany, and The Public and Its Problems. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 235372. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984b. “The Inclusive Philosophical Idea.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 3: 1927–1928. Essays, Reviews, Miscellany, and “Impressions of Soviet Russia”. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 4154. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984c. “The Quest for Certainty.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 4: 1929. The Quest for Certainty. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 1230. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987. “Art as Experience.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 10: 1934. Art as Experience. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 1230. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988a. “Freedom and Culture.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 13: 1938–1939. Experience and Education, Freedom and Culture, Theory of Evaluation, and Essays. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 63188. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988b. “Time and Individuality.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 14: 1939–1941. Essays, Reviews, and Miscellany. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 63188. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2010. “Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit: 1897, University of Chicago.” In John Dewey's Philosophy of Spirit. With the 1897 Lectures on Hegel. Edited by Shook, John R. and Good, James A., 93176. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2012. Unmodern Philosophy and Modern Philosophy. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, 2015. “Lectures in Social and Political Philosophy (China), edited by Roberto Frega and Roberto Gronda.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7 (2): 139.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Bentley, Arthur. 1991. “Knowing and the Known.” In The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, vol. 16: 1949–1952. Essays, Typescripts, and Knowing and the Known. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, 1294. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Hook, Sidney. 1926. Political Philosophy. Class Lecture Notes, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia. 1975a. “Wages against Housework.” In Revolution at Point Zero. Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, 1522. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia. 1975b. “Counterplanning from the Kitchen.” In Revolution at Point Zero. Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, 2840. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia. 2004. “Women, Land Struggles, and Globalization: An International Perspective.” In Revolution at Point Zero. Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, 2840. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia. 2012. Revolution at Point Zero. Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia. 2019. “Social Reproduction Theory.” Radical Philosophy 2.04 (Spring): 557. www.radicalphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/radical_philosophy_2_04_federici-social-reproduction-theory.pdf.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Susan. 2017. “Children, Childhood and Capitalism: A Social Reproduction Perspective.” In Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. Edited by Bhattacharya, Tithi, 11230. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2014. “Behind Marx's Hidden Abode. For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism.” New Left Review 86 (March-April): 5572.
Fraser, Nancy. 2017. “Crisis of Care? On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism.” In Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. Edited by Bhattacharya, Tithi, 2136. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Jaeggi, Rahel. 2018. Capitalism. A Conversation in Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gregoratto, Federica. 2017. “Agonistic Recognition, Intersections and the Ambivalence of Family Bonds: John Dewey's Critical Theory Manifesto in China.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1): 12745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2010. Philosophy of Mind, Revised and with an Introduction by Michael Inwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel and Särkelä, Arvi. 2019. “Anerkennung als assoziiertes Leben. Zur Aktualität von John Deweys Vorlesungen in China.” In John Dewey, Sozialphilosophie. Vorlesungen in China 1919/20. Edited by Honneth, Axel and Särkelä, Arvi, 23059. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, Heikki and Laitinen, Arto. 2007. “Analyzing Recognition: Identification, Acknowledgment, and Recognitive Attitudes towards Persons.” In Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Theory. Edited by van den Brink, Bert and Owen, David, 3356. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, Heikki, Laitinen, Arto, Quante, Michael, and Testa, Italo. Forthcoming. The Social Ontology of Personhood.Google Scholar
Leffers, M. Regina. 1993. “Pragmatists Jane Addams and John Dewey Inform the Ethic of Care.” Hypatia 8 (2): 6477.Google Scholar
Levine, Steven. 2015. “Hegel, Dewey and Habits.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4): 63256.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital, vol. I. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mezzadri, Alessandra. 2019. “On the Value of Social Reproduction.” Radical Philosophy 2.04 (Spring): 3341. www.radicalphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/radical_philosophy_2_04_mezzadri-on-the-value-of-social-reproduction.pdfGoogle Scholar
Santarelli, Matteo. 2019. La vita interessata: Una proposta teorica a partire da John Dewey. Macerata/Rome: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Santarelli, Matteo. Forthcoming. “Psychology, Moral Theory and Politics: Dewey's Mature Theory of Interest in Ethics (1932).” In John Dewey's Ethical Theory: The 1932 Ethics. Edited by Frega, R. and Levine, S.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Särkelä, Arvi. 2013. “Ein Drama in drei Akten. Der Kampf um öffentliche Anerkennung nach Dewey und Hegel.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61 (5–6): 68196.Google Scholar
Särkelä, Arvi. 2017. “Degeneration of Associated Life: Dewey's Naturalism about Social Criticism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1): 10726.Google Scholar
Särkelä, Arvi. 2018. Immanente Kritik und soziales Leben. Selbsttransformative Praxis nach Hegel und Dewey. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017a. “Dewey's Social Ontology: A Pragmatist Alternative to Searle's Approach to Social Reality.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (1): 4062.Google Scholar
Testa, Italo. 2017b. “Dominant Patterns in Associated Living: Hegemony, Domination, and Ideological Recognition in Dewey's Lectures in China.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1): 2552.Google Scholar
Uluorta, Hasmet M. 2009. The Social Economy. Working Alternatives in a Globalizing Era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×