Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Introductory rules
- Section II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- Section III Arbitral proceedings
- Article 17 General provisions
- Article 18 Place of arbitration
- Article 19 Language
- Article 20 Statement of claim
- Article 21 Statement of defence
- Article 22 Amendments to the claim or defence
- Article 23 Pleas as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
- Article 24 Further written statements
- Article 25 Periods of time
- Article 26 Interim measures
- Article 27 Evidence
- Article 28 Hearings
- Article 29 Experts appointed by the arbitral tribunal
- Article 30 Default
- Article 31 Closure of hearings
- Article 32 Waiver of right to object
- Section IV The award
- APPENDIX 1 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- APPENDIX 2 Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Index
- References
Article 27 - Evidence
from Section III - Arbitral proceedings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Introductory rules
- Section II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- Section III Arbitral proceedings
- Article 17 General provisions
- Article 18 Place of arbitration
- Article 19 Language
- Article 20 Statement of claim
- Article 21 Statement of defence
- Article 22 Amendments to the claim or defence
- Article 23 Pleas as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
- Article 24 Further written statements
- Article 25 Periods of time
- Article 26 Interim measures
- Article 27 Evidence
- Article 28 Hearings
- Article 29 Experts appointed by the arbitral tribunal
- Article 30 Default
- Article 31 Closure of hearings
- Article 32 Waiver of right to object
- Section IV The award
- APPENDIX 1 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- APPENDIX 2 Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Guide to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules , pp. 298 - 323Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, Evidence before International Tribunals, rev. ed. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘International Arbitration and the Duty to Know the Law’, Journal of International Arbitration, 28(3) (2011), 201.Google Scholar
, and , Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003), para. 22–26.Google Scholar
, in et al., ‘The Standards and Burden of Proof in International Arbitration’, Arbitration International, 10 (1994), 335Google Scholar
and , ‘Submitting Evidence in an International Arbitration: The Common Lawyer’s Guide’, Journal of International Arbitration, 20(3) (2003), 291.Google Scholar
, ‘The Standard of Proof in International Commercial Arbitration’ Arbitration, 77 (2011), 304.Google Scholar
, ‘Can the Plausibility Standard of Proof Developed in Mass Claims Arbitrations Also Be Useful in Commercial Cases’, in , , , and (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (Paris: ICC Publishing, 2005), 378Google Scholar
, and , The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2006), 612–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Evidence before International Tribunals: The Need for Some Standard Rules’, International Lawyer, 28(1) (1994), 49Google Scholar
and , Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (London: Thomson/Sweet and Maxwell, 2007), 557.Google Scholar
, International Economic Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 441
and , ‘The Role of Witness Statements in International Commercial Arbitration’, in (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? ICCA Congress Series No 13 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2007), 653Google Scholar
and , ‘Witness Testimony Pursuant to the 1999 IBA Rules on Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration: Novel or Tested Standards?’, Journal of International Arbitration, 17(1) (2000), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Obtaining Evidence from Third Parties in International Arbitration’, Arbitration International, 17(2) (2001), 161.Google Scholar
, Handbook of UNCITRAL Arbitration: Commentary, Precedents and Materials for UNCITRAL-Based Arbitration Rules (London: Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited, 2010), 395.Google Scholar
Electronic Disclosure: A Report of a Working Party Chaired by the Honourable Mr Justice Cresswell (London: Her Majesty’s Court Service, 2004)
. ‘The New Reality of Electronic Document Production in International Arbitration: A Catalyst for Convergence?’, Arbitration International, 25(1) (2009), 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Production of Documents in International Arbitration: A Commentary on Article 3 of the New IBA Rules on Evidence’, Arbitration International, 18(4) (2002), 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. ‘Discovery in Investment Arbitration Involving Republic of Korea’, Asian International Arbitration Journal, 4(2) (2008), 139.Google Scholar
, ‘UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings and the Conduct of Evidence: A New Approach to International Arbitration’, Journal of International Arbitration, 14(2) (1997), 73.Google Scholar
Award and Dissenting Opinion of 16 December 2002, Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v United Mexican States, 7 ICSID Reports 407, 412–13
(ed.), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration Volume XI (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1986), 312–24
Computer Sciences Corp. v The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Award No 221–65–1, 16 April 1986, 10 Iran–United States Claims Tribunal Reports 269, 302 (1987)
Sedco, Inc. v Islamic Republic of Iran, Award No 309–129–3, 7 July 1987, 15 Iran–United States Claims Tribunal Reports 23, 55 (1987)
Ultrasystems Inc v Islamic Republic of Iran, Concurring Opinion of R. Mosk in Award No 27–84–3, 4 March 1983, 2 Iran–United States Claims Tribunal Reports 114, 115 (1983)
(ed.), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration Volume XXI (Kluwer Law International 1996), para. 68 (Edgar Protiva and Eric Protiva v The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran)
, International Commercial Arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009), 1878–1922.Google Scholar
(ed.), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration Volume XIV (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1989), 408
(ed.), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration Volume XIV (The Hague: Kluwer Law International 1989), 407
(ed.), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration Volume XXI (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996), paras. 37–8