Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: June 2014

Introduction: Guantánamo and Beyond


THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS SCHEME ESTABLISHED BY President George W. Bush on November 13, 2001, has garnered considerable national and international contro-versy. The commissions’ creation has focused significant global attention on the use of military courts as a mechanism to process and try individuals suspected of involvement in terrorist acts or offenses committed during armed conflict. As this book goes to press, the military commissions are still operational with President Obama indicating recently that he had asked the Department of Defense to designate a site in the United States where further military commissions' proceedings would be held. Upon taking office in 2008, President Obama signed an executive order requiring the closure of the detention center at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, within a year. In the intervening twelve months various alternatives were explored including freeing those prisoners whose petitions for habeas corpus were successful, placing other prisoners on trial before military commissions or civilian courts, and seeking an alternative holding location for those individuals likely to remain incarcerated without trial. Despite substantial hand wringing nationally and internationally, a large group of individuals remains incarcerated at Guantánamo, and for some of them, operational progress to trial before a military tribunal continues. The Obama administration relinquished its earlier position that indefinite detention without trial was not acceptable in a democratic society, and reinstated the full, if moderately amended, operation of the military commissions.

Framed by and against this political backdrop, this collection addresses the phenomena of what we broadly term “due process excep-tionalism.” The essays included in this collection bring together the viewpoints of leading international, comparative, national security, and legal history experts from the United States and elsewhere. The collection also benefits from contributions by policy makers who offer policy-oriented analyses of the structural, legal, and political issues arising out of the use of exceptional courts and military commissions. These contributions include assessments of the relationship between exceptional courts and other intersecting and overlapping arenas in the context of U.S. domestic constitutional law, international law, international human rights law, and international humanitarian law; the patterns, similarities, and disjunctions that emerge as we view the process of resorting to such courts in comparative perspective; and the political and legal challenges that the creation or operation of such courts creates within states and for the international community.

Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala, The Emergence of Diversity: Differences in Human Rights Jurisprudence, 19 Fordham Int'l L. J. 101 (1995)
Gross, Oren and Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala, From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 23 Hum. Rts. Q. 625 (2001).
O’Neill, Aidan, The Lockerbie Bombing Case: A Miscarriage of Justice (2010)
Cheyney, Edward P., The Court of the Star Chamber, 18 Am. Hist. Rev. 727 (1913).
Stevenson, Richard W., President Makes It Clear: Phrase Is “War on Terror,” NY Times Aug. 4, 2005.
Schmitt, Eric and Shanker, Thom, U.S. Officials Retool Slogan for Terror War, NY Times July 26, 2005.
Scheuerman, William E., Presidentialism and Emergency Powers, in Emergencies and the Limits of Legality 258, 266 (Ramraj, Victor ed., 2008)
Jackson, Richard, Political Language, Policy Formulation and the Practice of Torture in the War on Terrorism: Implications for Human Rights (2006)
Tyler May, Elaine, Echoes of the Cold War: The Aftermath of September 11 at Home, in September 11 in History: A Watershed Moment? 35 (Dudziak, Mary L. ed., 2003).
Haynes, William J., Enemy Combatants (2002)
Associated Press, Obama Abandons Term “Enemy Combatant” (Mar. 13, 2009)
Margulies, Peter, Putting Guantanamo in the Rear-View Mirror: The Political Economy of Detention Policy, 32 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 339, 339 (2010).
Finn, Peter, Most Guantanamo Detainees Low-Level Fighters, Task Force Report Says, Wash. Post May 29, 2010.
Finn, Peter, Obama Endorses Indefinite Detention Without Trial for Some, Wash. Post May 22, 2009.
Shane, Scott and Landler, Mark, Obama Clears Way for Guantánamo Trials, NY Times Mar. 7, 2011.
Fiss, Owen, Imprisonment without Trial (2011)
Gearty, Conor, Rethinking Civil Liberties in a Counter-Terrorism World, in Field Day Review 125 (Deane, Seamus and Mac Suibhne, Breandán, eds., 2007).
Lahav, Pnina, A Barrel Without Hoops: The Impact of Counterterrorism on Israel's Legal Culture, 10 Cardozo L. Rev. 529, 531 (1988)
Walker, Clive, Keeping Control of Terrorists without Loosing Constitutionalism, 59 Stanford L. Rev. (2007).