Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:27:03.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion: Peace and naval disarmament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Lawrence Sondhaus
Affiliation:
University of Indianapolis
Get access

Summary

“This treaty ends, absolutely ends, the race in competition in naval armament,” Charles Evans Hughes assured the assembled audience, presenting the final draft of the Washington Naval Treaty. “At the same time it leaves the relative security of the great naval powers unimpaired.” It was the crowning achievement in the career of one of the most talented American leaders never to serve as president, and a moment filled with irony. Hughes, former governor of New York and Supreme Court justice, had been the Republican nominee for president in 1916 and only narrowly lost to Woodrow Wilson. Now, in February 1922, as secretary of state in the isolationist administration of President Warren G. Harding, he had the honor of presenting the product of negotiations he had conducted over the previous three months in the spirit of the fourth of Wilson’s Fourteen Points, which had called for disarmament “to the lowest point consistent with domestic safety.” Coming after the reduction of the German navy by the Treaty of Versailles and the virtual destruction of the former tsarist fleet in the Russian civil war, the Washington conference of 1921–22 completed the cycle of naval disarmament, reducing by negotiation the fleets of the five remaining naval powers: Britain, the United States, Japan, France, and Italy.

The course of the Great War at sea had confirmed the deterrent capacity of capital ships, and that they did not have to be risked in combat in order to have strategic relevance. As a consequence, just ten were sunk during the war, of which four were lost in port by accident or sabotage, joined by two more, one Russian and one Austro-Hungarian, sunk after those navies had stopped fighting. Thus, at war’s end, 116 of the 128 capital ships commissioned by the eight largest belligerent navies since HMS Dreadnought in December 1906 remained afloat, far more than anyone could justify maintaining in peacetime. But as the peace conference opened at Paris, no one would have predicted that, just three years later, at Washington, a treaty would be signed imposing tonnage quotas that, as initially applied, allowed the five leading navies combined to maintain just sixty-three capital ships.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Great War at Sea
A Naval History of the First World War
, pp. 352 - 370
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pusey, Merlo J., Charles Evans Hughes, 2 vols. (New York: Macmillan, 1952), vol. 2, p. 488Google Scholar
Ruge, Friedrich, Scapa Flow 1919: The End of the German Fleet, trans. Masters, Derek, ed. Watts, A. J. (London: Ian Allan, 1973), pp. 50–51Google Scholar
Roskill, Stephen, Naval Policy Between the Wars: The Period of Anglo-American Antagonism, 1919–1929 (London: Collins, 1968), p. 94Google Scholar
Conway’s All the World’s Fighting Ships, 1922–1946 (London: Conway Maritime Press, 1985), pp. 257–258
Goldstein, Erik, “The Evolution of British Diplomatic Strategy for the Washington Conference,” in Goldstein, Erik and Maurer, John (eds.), The Washington Conference, 1921–22: Naval Rivalry, East Asian Stability, and the Road to Pearl Harbor (London: Frank Cass, 1994), pp. 14Google Scholar
Asada, Sadao, “From Washington to London: The Imperial Japanese Navy and the Politics of Naval Limitation, 1921–30,” in Goldstein, Erik and Maurer, John (eds.), The Washington Conference, 1921–22: Naval Rivalry, East Asian Stability, and the Road to Pearl Harbor (London: Frank Cass, 1994), pp. 152–153Google Scholar
Blatt, Joel, “France and the Washington Conference,” in Goldstein, Erik and Maurer, John (eds.), The Washington Conference, 1921–22: Naval Rivalry, East Asian Stability, and the Road to Pearl Harbor (London: Frank Cass, 1994), pp. 192–219Google Scholar
Yamato, Ichihashi, The Washington Conference and After: A Historical Survey (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1928), pp. 365–385Google Scholar
Chalmers, W. S., The Life and Letters of David, Earl Beatty (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1951), pp. 454–465Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×