Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: April 2013

7 - Einstein's gravitational theory

Summary

You boil it in sawdust: you salt it in glue

You condense it with locusts and tape

Still keeping one principal object in view –

To preserve its symmetrical shape.

Lewis Carrroll, The Hunting of the Snark

The preceding chapter dealt with the kinematics of the curved spacetime geometry, that is, the description of the geometry and its curvature. We now come to the dynamics of the geometry, that is, the interaction of the geometry and matter. This interaction is the essence of Einstein’s equations for the gravitational field.

There are several routes that lead to Einstein’s equations; they differ in their starting points. One route begins with the equations of the linear approximation of Chapter 3 and adds the assumption that the exact, nonlinear equations are of second differential order and are endowed with general invariance. These assumptions suffice to completely determine the exact, nonlinear equations for the gravitational field.

That the linear equations imply the full nonlinear equations is a quite remarkable feature of Einstein’s theory of gravitation. Given some complicated set of nonlinear equations, it is always easy to derive the corresponding linear approximation; but in general, if we know only the linear approximation, we cannot reconstruct the nonlinear equations. What permits us to perform this feat in gravitational theory is the requirement of general invariance. As we will see later, this requirement states that the form and the content of the equations must remain unchanged under all coordinate transformations.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Anderson, J. D., et al. (1992). Recent Developments of Solar-System Tests of General Relativity. In Sixth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, ed. Sato, H. and Nakamura, T.. Singapore: World Scientific.
Anderson, J. L. (1967). Principles of Relativity Physics. New York: Academic Press.
Callan, C. G., Coleman, S., and Jackiw, R. (1970). Ann. Phys. 59, 42.
Ciufolini, I., and Pavlis, E. C. (2004). Nature 431, 958.
Damour, T., and Ruffini, R. (1974). Comptes Rendus 279A, 971.
de Sitter, W. (1916). Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 77, 155 and 481.
Deser, S. (1970). Gen. Rel. and Grav. 1, (1970).
Droste, J. (1917). Kön. Ned. Acad. Wet. Proc. 19, 197. Translated in Gen. Rel. and Grav. 34, 1545 (2002).
Drummond, L. T., and Hathrell, S. J. (1980). Phys. Rev. D 22, 343.
Eddington, A. (1923). The Mathematical Theory of Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Einstein, A. (1911). Ann. d. Physik 35, 898.
Einstein, A. (1918). Ann. d. Physik 55, 241.
Everitt, C. W. F., et al. (2011). Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 221101.
Gupta, S. N. (1957). Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 334.
Kretschmann, E. (1917). Ann. d. Physik 35, 575.
Levi-Civita, T. (1926). The Absolute Differential Calculus. London: Blackie & Son.
Ohanian, H. C. (1987). Am. J. Phys. 55, 428.
Ohanian, H. C. (2008). Einstein's Mistakes. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Page, T. L. (1952). Astrophys. J. 116, 63.
Page, T. L. (1970). Astrophys. J. 132, 910.
Papapetrou, A. (1951). Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 209, 248.
Papapetrou, A. (1974). Lectures on General Relativity. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Schwarzschild, K. (1916). Sitzb. Deut. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Kl. Math.-Phys. Tech., 189.
Trautman, A. (1964). Foundations and Current Problems in General Relativity. In Lectures on General Relativity, ed. Trautman, A., Pirani, F. A. E., and Bondi, H.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Trautman, A. (1966). Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 89, 3; translated in Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 9, 319 (1966).
Weisberg, J. M., Romani, R. W., and Taylor, J. (1989). Astrophys. J. 347, 1030.
Will, C. M. (1993). Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, J. G., Newhall, X. X., and Dickey, J. O. (1996). Phys. Rev. D 53, 6730.