Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:51:39.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Coexistence and Traceability of GMOs in the Agro-Food Sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

Michael Baram
Affiliation:
Boston University Law School
Mathilde Bourrier
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
Get access

Summary

Introduction and Regulatory Framework

The worldwide acreage of genetically modified (GM) plants is growing year by year and amounted to more than 114 million hectares in 2007 (ISAAA, 2008; James, 2005, 2006). In contrast to the globally growing use of GM plants in agriculture, the acceptance of GM food is still low in the European Union (EU) (Gaskell et al., 2006) as well as in Germany (Frank, 2004). In the opinion of most EU consumers there is nothing to gain by applying GMO ingredients but serious disadvantages may occur. Some of the often-mentioned concerns of EU consumers are negative long-term health and/or environmental impacts, the extreme difficulties of reversing GMO technology as soon as it becomes widespread, and a rising monopolization of huge seed and food processing companies resulting in a larger dependency of farmers as well as ethical concerns. Furthermore, the share of people thinking that it is useful to apply biotechnology to food production decreased in the recent years (Gaskell et al., 2006). It is interesting that there are significantly more consumers concerned about GM food than about medical applications of biotechnology (Frank, 2004; European Commission, 2002; Gaskell et al., 2006). In the case of GM food the high opposition of European consumers “is accompanied by perceptions of relatively high risk” (Gaskell et al., 2006) which is unacceptable for many EU consumers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angevin, F., Klein, E. K., Choimet, C., Meynard, C. M., Rouw, A., & Sohbi, Y. (2001). Modélisation des effets des systèmes de culture et du climat sur les pollinisations croisées chez le maïs. In: INRA-FNSEA (Ed.), Pertinence économique et faisabilité d'une filière sans utilisation d'OGM. pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
Beckmann, V., Soregaroli, K., & Wesseler, J. (2006). Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88, No. 5, pp. 1193–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, A.-K., Lheureux, K., Libeau-Dulos, M. et al. (2002). Scenarios for co-existence of genetically modified, conventional, and organic crops in European agriculture. Report EUR 20394EN, Seville.
,Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming, Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union K, p. 2624.
James, C. (2005). Global review of commercialized transgenic plants 2005. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
James, C. (2006). Global review of commercialized transgenic plants 2006. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Degenhardt, H., Horstmann, F., & Mülleder, N. (2003). Bt-Mais in Deutschland – Erfahrungen mit dem Praxisanbau von 1998 bis 2002. Mais 31, No. 2, pp. 75–77.Google Scholar
,Directorate-General for Agriculture European Commission. (2002). Economic Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops on the Agri-Food Sector – A Synthesis. http://www.ec.europe.eu/comm/agriculture/publi/gmo/gmo.pdf. Call date 25/05/06.
,European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2003a). Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. Official Journal of the European Union.
,European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2003b). Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003. Official Journal of the European Union.
Fagan, J. (2004). Without a trace? New GMO labelling rules. In: The European Food & Drink Review, Special Feature. http://www.efdreview.com. Call date 27/05/06.
Frank, R. (2004). European Consumer Study 2004. In: Themenbereich: Ernährung und Gesundheit. Nürnberg. Gesellschaft für Konsum-, Markt- und Absatzforschung e.V.
Gaskell, G. et al. (2006). Eurobarometer 64.3 – Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends. Report to DG Research of the European Commission.
Hirzinger, T., Menrad, K. (2005). Effects of the regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and 1830/2003 on the German food industry. In: Messéan, A. (Ed.) (2005). Proceedings, Second International Conference on Co-Existence between GM and non-GM-based agricultural supply chains, pp. 125–130.Google Scholar
Hirzinger, T., & Menrad, K. (2006). Implementation of EU legislation concerning GMOs in the German food and feed industry. Paper presented at the 10th ICABR-Conference “Agricultural Biotechnology: Facts, Analysis and Policies” from June 29–July 2, 2006, in Ravello (Italy).
Hugger, H. (2004). Personal communication on economics of maize seed production in southwest Germany. Regional Commission/Council of Fribourg, August 2004.
,ISAAA. (2008). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief 37–2007: Executive Summary.
Jany, K.-D., & Schuh, S. (2005). Die neuen EU-Verordnungen Nr. 1829/2003 und Nr. 1830/2003 zu genetisch veränderten Lebens- und Futtermitteln: die Kennzeichnung. Journal für Ernährungsmedizin, 2, 6–12.Google Scholar
Bail, M., & Meynard, J. M. (2001). Isolement des collectes et maitrise des dissémination au champ. Rapport du groupe 3 du programme de recherche « Pertinence économique et faisabilité d'une filière sans utilisation d'OGM ». INRA – FNSEA, 56 p.
Menrad, K. (2003). Strategies and economic assessments. In: Boelt, B. (Ed.) (2003). Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops (GMCC 03) dated 13.-14.11.2003, Slagelse (Dänemark), pp. 137–139.
Menrad, K., & Reitmeier, D. (2006). New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Economic assessment of coexistence schemes and measures. Final report to IPTS, Seville, Science Centre Straubing.
Menrad, K., & Reitmeier, D. (2006). New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Economic assessment of coexistence schemes and measures. Science Centre Straubing.
Messéan, A., & Angevin, F., Gomez-Barbero, M., Menrad, K., Rodriguez-Cerezo, E. (2006). New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Final report to the European Commission. Seville.
Reitmeier, D., & Menrad, K. (2006). Coexistence costs under German regulation – Case Study of Bt maize. Paper presented at the 10th ICABR-Conference “Agricultural Biotechnology: Facts, Analysis, and Policies” from June 29th to July 2nd, 2006 in Ravello (Italy).
Reitmeier, D., Menrad, K., Demont, M., Deams, W., & Turley, D. (2006). Guidelines of work package 5 concerning task 5.2 and 5.3 within Project SIGMEA. Science Centre Straubing.
Teyssier, D. (2004). Index des prix et des normes agricoles 2004–2005, 20e édition, Paris, 2004.
Tolstrup, K., Andersen, S. B., Boelt, B., et al. (2003). Report from the Danish working group on the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. DIAS report Plant production No. 94. Tjele, Denmark.
,Transgen (2005 B). Weltweiter Anbau von transgene Pflanzen 2005. In: http://www.transgen.de/gentechnik/pflanzenanbau/531.doku.html.
Weber, W. E., Bringezu, T, et al. (2005a). Koexistenz von gentechnisch verändertem und konventionellem Mais – Ergebnisse des Erprobungsanbaus zu Silomais 2004. Mais 1(32), pp. 1–5.
Weber, W. E., Bringezu, T, et al. (2005b). Koexistenz von gentechnisch verändertem und konventionellem Mais – Ergebnisse des Erprobungsanbaus Körnermais 2004. Mais 2(32), pp. 1–3.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×