Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:59:11.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David J. Bartholomew
David J. Bartholomew
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
God, Chance and Purpose
Can God Have It Both Ways?
 , pp. 243 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayala, Francisco J. 2003. ‘Intelligent Design: the original version’, Theology and Science 1: 9–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. 2007. Darwin's Gift to Science and Religion. Washington DC: The Joseph Henry PressGoogle Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László 2003. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. New York: Plume, Penguin Group (USA) Inc.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1982. Stochastic Models for Social Processes (third edition). Chichester, UK and New York:John Wiley and Sons LtdGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1984. God of Chance. London: SCM Press. Electronic version available at www.godofchance.com (no charge)Google Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1996. Uncertain Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press (paperback version, 2000)Google Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1988. ‘Probability, statistics and theology (with discussion)’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 151: 137–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behe, Michael 1996. Darwin's Black Box: the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Peter L. 1998. Against the Gods: the Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Bovens, Luc and Hartmann, Stephen 2003. Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Box, Joan Fisher 1978. R. A. Fisher, the Life of a Scientist. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Brecha, Robert J. 2002. ‘Schrödinger's cat and divine action: some comments on the use of quantum uncertainty to allow for God's action in the world’, Zygon 37: 909–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Mark 2002. Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Theory of Networks. New York and London: W. W. Norton & CompanyGoogle Scholar
Byl, John 2003. ‘Indeterminacy, divine action and human freedom’, Science and Christian Belief 15:2, 101–15Google Scholar
Coleman, Simon and Carlin, Leslie 2004. The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-evolutionism in English-speaking countries. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
Colling, Richard G. 2004. Random Designer: Created from Chaos to Connect with the Creator. Borbonnais, Ill.: Browning PressGoogle Scholar
ConwayMorris, Simon Morris, Simon 2003. Life's Solution. Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul 2006. The Goldilocks Enigma: Is the Universe Just Right for Life?Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard 2006 [1996]. Climbing Mount Improbable. London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 1998. Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 1999. Intelligent Design: the Bridge between Science and Theology. Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity PressGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham, Md.: Rowan and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2004. The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design. Downers Grove, Ill. and Leicester, UK: Intervarsity PressGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. and Rüse, Michael (eds.) 2004. Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, Michael 1985. Evolution: a Theory in Crisis. London: Burnett Books, produced and published by HutchinsonGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Marion and Stone, Mervyn 1981. ‘Nightingale on Quetelet’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 244: Part i, 66–79, Part iii, 332–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowe, Phil 2005. Galileo, Darwin and Hawking: the Interplay of Science, Reason and Religion. Grand Rapids, Mich. and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Garon, Henry A. 2006. The Cosmic Mystique. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis BooksGoogle Scholar
Gleick, James 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. 1989. Wonderful Life: the Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik 1998. ‘The idea of creation and the theory of autopoietic processes’, Zygon 33: 333–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik (ed.) 2003a. From Complexity to Life: On the Emergence of Life and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik 2003b. ‘Risk and religion: towards a theology of risk’, Zygon 38: 355–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik 2006. ‘Beyond secularist supersessionism: risk, religion and technology’, Ecotheology 11: 137–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyde, C. C. and Seneta, E. (eds.) 2001. Statisticians of the Centuries. Berlin: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, J. H. 1970. Arguments for the Existence of God. London and Basingstoke: MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Peter E. 2005. Theology and Modern Physics. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
Holder, Rodney D. 2004. God, the Multi-verse and Everything: Modern Cosmology and the Argument from Design. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Fred 1983. The Intelligent Universe. London: Michael JosephGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Fred and WickhamasingheChandra, N. 1981. Evolution from Space. London: J. M. Dent and SonsGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart 1993. The Origins of Order, Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart 1995. At Home in the Universe: the Search for Laws of Complexity. London: VikingGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart 2000. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, William 1988. ‘Miracles and statistics: the casual assumption of independence’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83: 929–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation (second edition). London: International Library of Philosophy, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Lineweaver, Charles H. and Davis, Tamara M. 2002. ‘Does the rapid appearance of life on Earth suggest that life is common in the universe?’, Astrobiology, 2:2, 293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, W. I. 1965. The Existence of God, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. B. (ed.) 2003. Perspectives on an Evolving Creation. Grand Rapids, Mich. and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. R. 1999. Finding Darwin's God: a Scientist's Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, an imprint of HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin 1987. The Society of Mind. London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Monod, Jacques 1970. Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Editions du Seuil. English translation Chance and Necessity by Austryn Wainhouse (1972). London: CollinsGoogle Scholar
Montefiore, Hugh 1985. The Probability of God. London: SCM PressGoogle Scholar
Morton, Glenn and Simons, Gordon 2003. ‘Random worms: evidence of random and non-random processes in the chromosomal structure of the archaea, bacteria and eukaryotes’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 55: 175–84Google Scholar
O'Leary, Denyse 2004. By Design or by Chance. Minneapolis: Augsburg BooksGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osler, Margaret J. 1994. Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (paperback, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, Dean L. 1997. A Case against Accident and Self-organisation. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur 1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine and Human (enlarged edition). London: SCM PressGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Gregory R. 2002. ‘The Intelligent-Design movement, science or ideology’, Zygon 37: 7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primack, Joel and Abrams, Ellen 2006. The View from the Centre of the Universe: Discovering Our Extraordinary Place in the Cosmos. London: Fourth EstateGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John 1984. The Quantum World. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John 2006. ‘Where is natural theology today?’, Science and Christian Belief 18: 169–79Google Scholar
Pollard, W. G. 1959. Chance and Providence. London: Faber and FaberGoogle Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey and Peacocke, Arthur (eds.) 1995. Chaos and Complexity, Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, and Berkeley, Calif.: The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.Google Scholar
Rüst, Peter 2005. ‘Dimensions of the human being and of divine action’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 57: 191–201Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas 2000. ‘Does God cheat at dice?: divine action and quantum possibilities’, Zygon 35: 517–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas 2002. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. 1935. ‘Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik’, Naturwissenschaftern 23: 807–12, 823–8, 844–9. Eng. trans. John D. Trimmer, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124 (1980): 323–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, K. and Walgate, J. 2002. ‘The anthropic principle: Life in the universe’, Zygon 37: 925–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedes, Taede A. 2003. ‘Is our universe deterministic? Some philosophical and theological reflections on an elusive topic’, Zygon 38: 955–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter 1998. Explaining Chaos. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproul, R. C. 1994. Not a Chance: the Myth of Chance in Modern Science and Cosmology, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker BooksGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, Steven 2003. SYNC; the Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard 2004. The Existence of God (second edition). Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, Howard 2003. ‘Are bacterial flagella designed: reflections on the rhetoric of the modern ID movement’, Science and Christian Belief 15: 117–40.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith 1990. Divine Action. London: CollinsGoogle Scholar
Ward, Keith 1996. God, Chance and Necessity. Oxford: OneWorld PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Ward, Keith 2000. ‘Divine action in the world of physics: response to Nicholas Saunders’, Zygon 35: 901–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Wesley J. 2004. ‘The Divine Action Project’, Theology and Science 2: 31–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Wesley J. 2005. ‘Further reflections on “The Divine Action Project”’, Theology and Science 3: 71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, Thomas 2006. ‘Chance in the theology of Leonard Hodgson’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 56: 284–93Google Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. 2003. ‘Intelligent Design: the original version’, Theology and Science 1: 9–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. 2007. Darwin's Gift to Science and Religion. Washington DC: The Joseph Henry PressGoogle Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László 2003. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. New York: Plume, Penguin Group (USA) Inc.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1982. Stochastic Models for Social Processes (third edition). Chichester, UK and New York:John Wiley and Sons LtdGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1984. God of Chance. London: SCM Press. Electronic version available at www.godofchance.com (no charge)Google Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1996. Uncertain Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press (paperback version, 2000)Google Scholar
Bartholomew, David J. 1988. ‘Probability, statistics and theology (with discussion)’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 151: 137–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behe, Michael 1996. Darwin's Black Box: the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Peter L. 1998. Against the Gods: the Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Bovens, Luc and Hartmann, Stephen 2003. Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Box, Joan Fisher 1978. R. A. Fisher, the Life of a Scientist. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Brecha, Robert J. 2002. ‘Schrödinger's cat and divine action: some comments on the use of quantum uncertainty to allow for God's action in the world’, Zygon 37: 909–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Mark 2002. Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Theory of Networks. New York and London: W. W. Norton & CompanyGoogle Scholar
Byl, John 2003. ‘Indeterminacy, divine action and human freedom’, Science and Christian Belief 15:2, 101–15Google Scholar
Coleman, Simon and Carlin, Leslie 2004. The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-evolutionism in English-speaking countries. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
Colling, Richard G. 2004. Random Designer: Created from Chaos to Connect with the Creator. Borbonnais, Ill.: Browning PressGoogle Scholar
ConwayMorris, Simon Morris, Simon 2003. Life's Solution. Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Paul 2006. The Goldilocks Enigma: Is the Universe Just Right for Life?Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard 2006 [1996]. Climbing Mount Improbable. London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 1998. Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 1999. Intelligent Design: the Bridge between Science and Theology. Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity PressGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased without Intelligence. Lanham, Md.: Rowan and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. 2004. The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design. Downers Grove, Ill. and Leicester, UK: Intervarsity PressGoogle Scholar
Dembski, William A. and Rüse, Michael (eds.) 2004. Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, Michael 1985. Evolution: a Theory in Crisis. London: Burnett Books, produced and published by HutchinsonGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Marion and Stone, Mervyn 1981. ‘Nightingale on Quetelet’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 244: Part i, 66–79, Part iii, 332–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowe, Phil 2005. Galileo, Darwin and Hawking: the Interplay of Science, Reason and Religion. Grand Rapids, Mich. and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Garon, Henry A. 2006. The Cosmic Mystique. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis BooksGoogle Scholar
Gleick, James 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. 1989. Wonderful Life: the Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik 1998. ‘The idea of creation and the theory of autopoietic processes’, Zygon 33: 333–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik (ed.) 2003a. From Complexity to Life: On the Emergence of Life and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik 2003b. ‘Risk and religion: towards a theology of risk’, Zygon 38: 355–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Neils Henrik 2006. ‘Beyond secularist supersessionism: risk, religion and technology’, Ecotheology 11: 137–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyde, C. C. and Seneta, E. (eds.) 2001. Statisticians of the Centuries. Berlin: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, J. H. 1970. Arguments for the Existence of God. London and Basingstoke: MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Peter E. 2005. Theology and Modern Physics. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
Holder, Rodney D. 2004. God, the Multi-verse and Everything: Modern Cosmology and the Argument from Design. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing LtdGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Fred 1983. The Intelligent Universe. London: Michael JosephGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Fred and WickhamasingheChandra, N. 1981. Evolution from Space. London: J. M. Dent and SonsGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart 1993. The Origins of Order, Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart 1995. At Home in the Universe: the Search for Laws of Complexity. London: VikingGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart 2000. Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, William 1988. ‘Miracles and statistics: the casual assumption of independence’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83: 929–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation (second edition). London: International Library of Philosophy, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Lineweaver, Charles H. and Davis, Tamara M. 2002. ‘Does the rapid appearance of life on Earth suggest that life is common in the universe?’, Astrobiology, 2:2, 293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, W. I. 1965. The Existence of God, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. B. (ed.) 2003. Perspectives on an Evolving Creation. Grand Rapids, Mich. and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. R. 1999. Finding Darwin's God: a Scientist's Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, an imprint of HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin 1987. The Society of Mind. London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Monod, Jacques 1970. Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Editions du Seuil. English translation Chance and Necessity by Austryn Wainhouse (1972). London: CollinsGoogle Scholar
Montefiore, Hugh 1985. The Probability of God. London: SCM PressGoogle Scholar
Morton, Glenn and Simons, Gordon 2003. ‘Random worms: evidence of random and non-random processes in the chromosomal structure of the archaea, bacteria and eukaryotes’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 55: 175–84Google Scholar
O'Leary, Denyse 2004. By Design or by Chance. Minneapolis: Augsburg BooksGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osler, Margaret J. 1994. Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (paperback, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, Dean L. 1997. A Case against Accident and Self-organisation. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur 1993. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine and Human (enlarged edition). London: SCM PressGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Gregory R. 2002. ‘The Intelligent-Design movement, science or ideology’, Zygon 37: 7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primack, Joel and Abrams, Ellen 2006. The View from the Centre of the Universe: Discovering Our Extraordinary Place in the Cosmos. London: Fourth EstateGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John 1984. The Quantum World. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John 2006. ‘Where is natural theology today?’, Science and Christian Belief 18: 169–79Google Scholar
Pollard, W. G. 1959. Chance and Providence. London: Faber and FaberGoogle Scholar
Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey and Peacocke, Arthur (eds.) 1995. Chaos and Complexity, Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, and Berkeley, Calif.: The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.Google Scholar
Rüst, Peter 2005. ‘Dimensions of the human being and of divine action’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 57: 191–201Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas 2000. ‘Does God cheat at dice?: divine action and quantum possibilities’, Zygon 35: 517–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas 2002. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. 1935. ‘Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik’, Naturwissenschaftern 23: 807–12, 823–8, 844–9. Eng. trans. John D. Trimmer, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124 (1980): 323–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, K. and Walgate, J. 2002. ‘The anthropic principle: Life in the universe’, Zygon 37: 925–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedes, Taede A. 2003. ‘Is our universe deterministic? Some philosophical and theological reflections on an elusive topic’, Zygon 38: 955–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter 1998. Explaining Chaos. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproul, R. C. 1994. Not a Chance: the Myth of Chance in Modern Science and Cosmology, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker BooksGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, Steven 2003. SYNC; the Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard 2004. The Existence of God (second edition). Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Till, Howard 2003. ‘Are bacterial flagella designed: reflections on the rhetoric of the modern ID movement’, Science and Christian Belief 15: 117–40.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith 1990. Divine Action. London: CollinsGoogle Scholar
Ward, Keith 1996. God, Chance and Necessity. Oxford: OneWorld PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Ward, Keith 2000. ‘Divine action in the world of physics: response to Nicholas Saunders’, Zygon 35: 901–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Wesley J. 2004. ‘The Divine Action Project’, Theology and Science 2: 31–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildman, Wesley J. 2005. ‘Further reflections on “The Divine Action Project”’, Theology and Science 3: 71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, Thomas 2006. ‘Chance in the theology of Leonard Hodgson’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 56: 284–93Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • David J. Bartholomew, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: God, Chance and Purpose
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807701.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • David J. Bartholomew, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: God, Chance and Purpose
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807701.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • David J. Bartholomew, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: God, Chance and Purpose
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807701.016
Available formats
×