Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:31:35.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Gauging the labour market effects of international trade openness: an application to the US manufacturing sector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

Filippo di Mauro
Affiliation:
European Central Bank
Stéphane Dees
Affiliation:
European Central Bank
Warwick J. McKibbin
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The increasing trade integration of emerging markets, in conjunction with rapid technological change, has exerted significant pressures on the labour markets of developed economies in recent decades. It has been argued that increased trade openness has led to the attrition of low-skilled jobs in certain sectors to developing countries, with growing imports of labour-intensive manufactured goods from developing countries accompanied by a fragmentation of production across borders. At the same time, technological change has probably contributed to a sectoral reallocation of production biased against primarily low-skilled workers in developed economies. These two phenomena have become progressively intertwined, given the role of trade in technology diffusion and adoption both directly (e.g. through imports of capital goods or convergence in technical efficiency) and indirectly (through pressure on firms exposed to trade to innovate).

Regional integration agreements may have amplified the effects of trade on labour market developments as such agreements both create and divert trade, while also implying scale and competition effects that lead to changes in country specialisation (see, for instance, Venables, 2001). In the case of the United States, the North American Free Trade Agreement has led to such regionalisation of trade, and has therefore probably been important in shaping labour market developments, particularly in those sectors most open to trade. Naturally, the impacts of trade openness are likely to be strongest in those sectors most subject to competition, either domestic and foreign – that is, those producing traded goods, such as the manufacturing sector.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, F., and Brock, E. (2003), ‘Sectoral Employment Effects of Trade and Productivity in the Europe’, Applied Economics, 35, 2, 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiti, M., and Wei, S.-J. (2005), ‘Service Offshoring, Productivity, and Employment: Evidence from the United States’, Working Paper no. 05/238, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
Anderton, R., and Oscarsson, S. (2002), ‘Inequality, Trade and Defensive Innovation in the USA’, Research Paper no. 2002/28, Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, University of Nottingham.
Baily, M., and Lawrence, R. Z. (2004), ‘What Happened to the Great US Job Machine? The Role of Trade and Electronic Offshoring’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2:2004, 211–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B. and Schott, P. K. (2006), ‘Survival of the Best Fit: Exposure to Low-wage Countries and the (Uneven) Growth of US Manufacturing Plants’, Journal of International Economics, 68, 1, 219–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (1998), ‘Play It Again, Sam: A New Look at Trade and Wages’, mimeo, Columbia University, New York.
Bronfenbrenner, K., and Luce, S. (2004), ‘The Changing Nature of Corporate Global Restructuring: The Impact of Production Shifts on Jobs in the US, China, and Around the Globe’, submission to the US–China Economic and Security Review Commission, Washington, DC.
Chen, N., Imbs, J. and Scott, A. (2004), ‘Competition, Globalization and the Decline of Inflation’, Discussion Paper no. 4695, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Dees, S., di Mauro, F., Pesaran, M. H. and Smith, L. V. (2007), ‘Exploring the International Linkages of the Euro Area: A Global VAR Analysis’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 1, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B., Rhee, Y. and Tong, H. (2004), ‘The Impact of China on the Exports of Other Asian Countries’, Working Paper no. 10768, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Feenstra, R. C. (2007), ‘Globalization and Its Impact on Labor’, Global Economy Lecture, Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, 8 February.
Griliches, Z. (1979), ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 1, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. (1987), ‘The Employment and Wage Effects of Import Competition in the United States’, Journal of International Economic Integration, 2, 1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006), ‘The Rise of Offshoring: It's Not Wine for Cloth Anymore’, mimeo, Princeton University, NJ.
Hiebert, P., and Vansteenkiste, I. (2008), ‘International Trade, Technological Shocks and Spillovers in the Labour Market: A GVAR Analysis of the US Manufacturing Sector’, Applied Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, D. (2005), ‘Economic Relationships between the US and China’, testimony before the Committee on Ways and Means, US House of Representatives, Washington, DC, 14 April.
,Hong Kong Monetary Authority (2004), ‘The Impact of a Renminbi Appreciation on Global Imbalances and Intra-regional Trade’, Quarterly Bulletin, March, 16–26.Google Scholar
Jaumotte, F., and Tytell, I. (2007), ‘The Globalization of Labor’, in World Economic Outlook (Spring) (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund), 161–92.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. Z. (2000), ‘Does a Kick in the Pants Get You Going or Does It Just Hurt? The Impact of International Competition on Technological Change in US Manufacturing’, in Feenstra, R. C. (ed.), The Impact of International Trade on Wages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 197–224.Google Scholar
Molnar, M., Pain, N. and Taglioni, D. (2006), ‘The Internationalisation of Production, International Outsourcing and OECD Labour Markets’, Working Paper no. 561, Economics Department, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
Neary, J. P. (2005), ‘The Stolper–Samuelson Theorem’, in McCusker, J. J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of World Trade since 1450 (New York: Macmillan), 719–20.
,OECD (2005), ‘Trade-adjustment Costs in OECD Labour Markets: A Mountain or a Molehill?’, in OECD Employment Outlook (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 23–72.Google Scholar
Revenga, A. L. (1992), ‘Exporting Jobs? The Impact of Import Competition on Employment and Wages in US Manufacturing’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1, 255–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D., and Shatz, H. (1994), ‘Trade and Jobs in US Manufacturing’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1994, 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terfous, N. (2006), ‘Globalization and the Labour Market in the Developed Countries’, Diagnostics Prévisions et Analyses Economiques, 96.Google Scholar
Thoenig, M., and Verdier, T. (2003), ‘A Theory of Defensive Skill-biased Innovation and Globalization’, American Economic Review, 93, 3, 709–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. J. (2001), ‘International Trade: Economic Integration’, in Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Oxford: Pergamon), 7843–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. (1994), North–South Trade, Employment and Inequality: Changing Fortunes in a Skill-driven World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1995), ‘How Trade Hurt Unskilled Workers’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 3, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. (1998), ‘Globalisation and the Rise in Labour Market Inequalities’, Economic Journal, 108, 1463–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×