Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:01:11.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Agricultural landscape changes through globalisation and biodiversity effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jørgen Primdahl
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Simon Swaffield
Affiliation:
Lincoln University, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Changes in agricultural systems through the process of globalisation and the need to increase farm productivity over the past few decades have led to dramatic land-cover changes as well as the introduction of new technologies that are major threats to biodiversity in many parts of the world (Donald et al., 2001; Norris, 2008). Loss of biodiversity is a global concern for many reasons. The first is that the loss of a species is a non-reversible process; this has led to Nature Conservation treaties and policies at world and national scales. The second reason is that species must be protected not only for their intrinsic value, but also because of the services they provide to society. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (www.millenniumassessment.org) has emphasised the latter aspect, and ‘ecosystem services’ (Carpenter et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2007) is now a key word on many agendas, whether in the realm of nature protection or landscape management. From this perspective, the main cause of biodiversity loss is an overemphasis on production services (food and fibre) at the expense of other services such as water purification, pest control or pollination. The two main proximal causes that lead to loss of species are habitat loss (transformation of natural or semi-natural habitats to arable land) and heavy use of energy in the form of mineral fertilisers, especially nitrogen, pesticides and soil tillage (Matson et al., 1997). All have adverse effects, though they may favour some species that become pests.

Type
Chapter
Information
Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes
Change Patterns and Policy trends in Developed Countries
, pp. 57 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. H. and Hoekstra, T. W. (1992). Toward a Unified Ecology. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Aviron, S., Burel, F., Baudry, J. and Schermann, N. (2005). Carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes: impacts of habitat features, landscape context at different spatial scales and farming intensity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 108, 3, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aviron, S., Nitsch, H., Jeanneret, P. et al. (2009). Ecological cross compliance promotes farmland biodiversity in Switzerland. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, J. E. (2004). Divided culture: integrating agriculture and conservation biology. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 2, 10, 537–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudry, J., Bunce, R. G. H. and Burel, F. (2000a). Hedgerow diversity: an international perspective on their origin, function, and management. Journal of Environmental Management, 60, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudry, J., Burel, F., Thenail, C. and Coeur, D. (2000b). A holistic landscape ecological study of the interactions between farming activities and ecological patterns in Brittany, France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A. and Wilson, J. D. (2003). Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 4, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, J. -P., Laurent, C. and Leclercq, V. (1983). Le monde du soja. Paris: Maspéro/La découverte, Coll. repères.Google Scholar
Burel, F., Baudry, J., Butet, A. et al. (1998). Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes. Acta Oecologica, 19, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burel, F. and Baudry, J. (2003). Landscape Ecology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Cabrera, A. L. (1968). Vegetación de la provincia de Buenos Aires. In Flora de la provincia de Buenos Aires1. Colecc. Cientif. IV (ed.) A. L. Cabrera. Buenos Aires: INTA.
Carpenter, S. R., DeFries, R., Dietz, T. et al. (2007). Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science, 314, 257–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavia, R., Gómez Villafañe, I. E., Cittadino, E. A. et al. (2005). Effects of cereal harvest on abundance and spatial distribution of the rodent Akodon azarae in central Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 107, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuente, E. B., Suárez, S. A. and Ghersa, C. M. (2006). Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 115, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delucchi, G. (2006). Las especies vegetales amenazadas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires: una actualización. APRONA Bol. Cient., 39, 19–31.Google Scholar
Di Giacomo, A. S. and Krapovickas, S. (2005). Conserving the Grassland Important Bird Areas (IBAs) of Southern South America: Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and Brazil. In Bird Conservation Implementation and Integration in the Americas: Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference, 20–24 March 2002, Vol. 1 (ed.) Ralph, C. J. and Rich, T. D.. Asilomar, California.Google Scholar
Donald, P. F., Green, R. E. and Heath, M. F. (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London – Biological Sciences, 268, 1462, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J., Brosi, B., Daily, G. C. et al. (2008). Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 7, 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudin, L., Marguerie, D. and Lanos, P. (2008). Correlation between spatial distributions of pollen data, archaeological records and physical parameters from north-western France: a GIS and numerical analysis approach. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17, 585–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghersa, C. M. and León, R. J. G. (1999). Successional changes in agroecosystems of the Rolling Pampa. In Ecosystems of the World 16: Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground (ed.) Walker, L. R.. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hauman, L. (1925). Les phanérogame adventices de la flore argentine. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 33, 319–345.Google Scholar
Hodara, K. and Busch, M. (2006). Return to preferred habitats (edges) as a function of distance in Akodon azarae (Rodentia, Muridae) in cropfield-edge systems of central Argentina. Journal of Ethology, 24, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, R., Tuell, J., Fiedler, A., Gardiner, M. and Landis, D. (2009). Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: the role of native plants. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleijn, D. and Sutherland, W. J. (2003). How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 6, 947–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, C. (2001). The multifunctionality of agriculture. In Towards an Agreement between Europe and the Mercosur (ed.) Durand, M. -F., Giordano, P. and Valladao, A.. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po., pp. 409–425.Google Scholar
Coeur, D., Baudry, J., Burel, F. and Thenail, C. (2002). Why and how we should study field boundaries biodiversity in an agrarian landscape context. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 89, 1–2, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P., Smyth, C. and Boutin, S. (2004). Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 70, 2, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G. and Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 277, 504–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michelena, R. O., Irurtia, C. B., Vavruska, F. A., Mon, R. and Pittaluga, A. (1989). Degradación de suelos en el Norte de la Regio′n Pampeana. Publ. Tec. 6. INTA. Centros regionales de Buenos Aires Norte. Córdoba, Entre Ríos y Santa Fe: Proyecto de Agricultura Conservacionista, pp. 69–77.
Norris, K. (2008). Agriculture and biodiversity conservation: opportunity knocks. Conservation Letters, 1, 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, L. R. (1926). Las malezas de los cultivos en el partido de Pergamino. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria UBA, 5, 75–188.Google Scholar
Parodi, L. R. (1930). Ensayo fitosociológico sobre el Partido de Pergamino. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria UBA, 9, 271.Google Scholar
Poggio, S. L. (2007). Relaciones entre la diversidad de especies vegetales y la heterogeneidad espacial del paisaje agrícola pampeano. PhD thesis. University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pullin, A. S., Knight, T. M., Stone, D. A. and Charman, K. (2004). Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biological Conservation, 119, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabater, S., Butturini, A., Clement, J. -C. et al. (2003). Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic gradient: patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems, 6, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarriquet, P., Delettre, Y. and Marmonier, P. (2006). Effects of catchment disturbance on stream invertebrates: comparison of different habitats (vegetation, benthic and interstitial) using bio-ecological groups. Annales de Limnologie, 46, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soriano, A. (1991). Río de la Plata grasslands. In Ecosystems of the World 8. Natural Grasslands (ed.) Coupland, R. T.. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Söyrinki, N. (1991). On the alien flora of the province of Buenos Aires. Annals Botanici Fennici, 28, 59–79.Google Scholar
Trigo, E. J. and Cap, E. J. (2006). Ten Years of Genetically Modified Crops in Argentine Agriculture. Buenos Aires: Argentine Council for Information and Development of Biotechnology – ArgenBio.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K. and Swinton, S. M. (2007). Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 64, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×