Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:07:15.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Global ideology and voter sentiment as determinants of international financial liberalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Dennis P. Quinn
Affiliation:
Professor in the Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy group, McDonough School of Business Georgetown University
A. Maria Toyoda
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Villanova University
Beth A. Simmons
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Frank Dobbin
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Geoffrey Garrett
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Scholars have long argued that the spread of ideas and values matters for the adaptation and reform of government policies. (See, for example, the essays in Hall 1989.) In this chapter, we investigate whether and how either liberal or restrictive international financial policies on capital account regulation spread globally, both through the direct effects of changes in global ideology on government policy and indirectly, through policy diffusion between other states.

In the following sections we: (1) provide a detailed account of the mechanisms of diffusion, focusing on the theoretical basis for the global, grassroots spread of ideas that affect government policies; (2) identify valid indicators of ideological change that will aid in identifying the mechanisms through which it is diffused; (3) discuss our models and methods, focusing on how ideology is diffused indirectly and globally through influence on other governments' policies; and (4) report the results of our study, and offer concluding remarks.

How ideas spread

While global convergence toward political and economic liberalism might be a defining story of the last two decades of the twentieth century, we find scant evidence that convergence around a particular set of policies regarding capital account liberalization is consistent over time or space. During the entire twentieth century, many distinct waves of international financial openness and closure diffused worldwide.

Based upon the work of many scholars, we know many of the domestic and international political and economic forces that account for change in international financial openness.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abiad, Abdul and Mody, Ashoka. 2005. Financial Reform: What Shakes It? What Shapes It?American Economic Review 95 (1):66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2):239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, Manuel and Bover, Olympia. 1995. Another Look at the Instrumental Variables Estimation of Error-Components. Review of Economic Studies 68 (1):277–97.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 2001. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Available through www.databanks.sitehosting.net/.
Blundell, Richard W. and Bond, Stephen R.. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1):115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonardi, Jean-Philippe and Gerald Keim. 2002. Nonmarket Strategies in Election Issues: A Theoretical Framework Based on Information and Reputation Cascades. Paper presented at Strategy and the Business Environment Conference, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Bound, John, Jaeger, David A., and Baker, Regina M.. 1995. Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimations when the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 443–50.Google Scholar
Brune, Nancy, Geoff Garrett, Alexandra Guisinger, and Jason Sorens. 2001. The Political Economy of Capital Account Liberalization. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California.
Budge, Ian. 1992. ECPR Party Manifestos Project [computer file]. 3rd ed. Colchester: ESRC Data Archive.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. and Mair, Peter. 1984. Left-right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgments. European Journal of Political Research 12: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. 2002. Neoliberalism's Role in Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
Conway, Patrick. 2004. Endogenous IMF Conditionality: Theoretical and Empirical Implications. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, San Diego, California.
Dobbin, Frank, Geoffrey Garrett, and Beth A. Simmons. 2003. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Democracy and Markets. Paper presented at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs Conference on International Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalism, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Doornik, Jurgen and Hendry, David F.. 2001. Econometric Modeling Using PCGive 10: Volume III. London: Timberlake Consultants.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel. 2002. The Development and Implementation of IMF and World Bank Conditionality. Hamburg Institute of International Economics Discussion Paper # 165.
Drezner, Daniel. 2001. Globalization and Policy ConvergenceInternational Studies Review 3: 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, John H. 1988. The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East European Business Law. 1991. The Evolution of Business Law in the USSR. March 1.
Eichengreen, Barry. 2001. Capital Account Liberalization: What Do the Cross-Country Studies Tell Us?World Bank Economic Review 15 (3):341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry J. and Leblang, David. 2003. Capital Account Liberalization and Growth: Was Mr. Mahathir Right?International Journal of Finance and Economics 8 (3):205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electionworld.org. n.d. Available from http://www.electionworld.org [accessed February 2003].
Elkins, Zachary, Andrew Guzman, and Beth A. Simmons. 2004. The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Paper presented at a conference on International Diffusion of Political and Economic Liberalization, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 1994. Transition Report: Foreign Direct Investment. October.
Evans, Peter. 1997. The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization. World Politics 50: 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion and Babb, Sarah. 2002. The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries. American Journal of Sociology 107(9): 533–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, Jr., Robert J. and Jude C. Hays. 2004. Modeling International Diffusion: Inferential and Methodological Challenges (with an Application to International Tax Competition). University of Michigan manuscript.
Gwynne, Robert N. and Kay, Cristobal, eds. 1999. Latin America Transformed: Globalization and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Gary and Richard N. Dean. 1994. Doing Business in Russia: Risk and Reward. Legal Times, September 5.
Henisz, Witold, Bennet Zelner, and Mauro F. Guillen. 2004. International Coercion, Emulation and Policy Diffusion: Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reforms, 1977–1999. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University, Washington, DC and Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Heston, Alan, Robert Summers, and Bettina Aten. 2001. The Penn World Table, Version 6.0. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP).
Hilferding, Rudolf. 1910[1981]. Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. Edited by Bottomore, Tom; translated by Morris Watnick and Sam Gordon. Boston: Routledge, Kegan, Paul.Google Scholar
Huber, John and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies. Party Politics 1 (1):71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. Annual Report on Exchange Restrictions. Washington: IMF. Various years, 1950 on. Continued by Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions after 1979 and Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions after 1989.
International Monetary Fund. 2001. International Financial Integration and Developing Countries. World Economic Outlook October: 145–73.
Jonung, Lars. 2005. How Do Policy-makers Learn? The Case of Swedish Stabilisation Policy, 1970–2000. Paper presented at Midwest Political Science Association's 63rd Annual National Conference, Chicago, IL.
Keesings' Contemporary Archive. Harlow: Longman, various years.
Kennedy, Peter. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1933. National Self-Sufficiency. The Yale Review 22: 755–69.Google Scholar
Kim, Heemin and Fording, Richard C.. 2003. Voter Ideology in Western Democracies: An Update. European Journal of Political Research 42 (1): 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krayem, Hassan. n.d. Political Parties and Electoral Systems in Lebanon and Israel: Interactive Reinforcement. Available at http://ddc.aub.edu.lb/projects/pspa/krayem/krayem.html [accessed August 2003].
LaVigne, Marie. 1991. International Political Economy and Socialism. Trans. David Lambert. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1916[1971]. Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism. In Selected Works: One Volume Edition. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Li, Quan and Smith, Dale. 2002. The Dilemma of Financial Liberalization: State Autonomy and Societal Demands. Journal of Politics 64 (3):764–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T. and Rose, Richard. 1991. The International Almanac of Electoral History. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T. and Rose, Richard. 1997. A Decade of Election Results: Updating the International Almanac. Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Helen Milner. 1997. The Political Economy of Regionalism: An Overview. In The Political Economy of Regionalism, edited by Mansfield, Edward D. and Milner, Helen, 1–19. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Meseguer, Covandonga Y. 2003. Rational and Bounded Learning in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations. Paper presented at the 99th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Meseguer, Covandonga Y. and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2005. What is New in the Study of Policy Diffusion: A Critical Review. Paper presented at the 2005 ISA Meetings, Hawaii.
Meyer, John W. 2004. Sociological Perspectives on Diffusion. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2003. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polisci.com. n.d. Available at www.polisci.com/almanac/nations/nation/FI.htm [accessed December 2002].
Prebisch, Raul. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin American and its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis. 1997. The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review 91 (3):531–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Dennis P. 2003. Capital Account Liberalization and Financial Globalization, 1890–1999: A Synoptic View. International Journal of Finance and Economics 8: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Dennis P. and Inclán, Carla. 1997. The Origins of Financial Openness: A Study of Current and Capital Account Liberalization. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3):771–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, John James. 2002. The Road Oft Traveled: Development Policies and Majority State Ownership of Industry in Africa. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rector, Chad and Scott Kasner. 2002. Partisan Cycles and the Timing of Capital Controls Regulatory Changes. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1995. The Political Economy of Trade Policy. In Handbook of International Economics. Volume 3, edited by Grossman, G. and Rogoff, K., 1457–94. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Bryce and Gross, Neal C.. 1943. The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities. Rural Sociology 8: 15–24.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?Journal of International Economics 54: 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2000. International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review 94: 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2005. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60: 781–810.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, Barbara K. 1992. International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization, and Structural Reform. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Politics, and the State, edited by Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert, 41–88. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., Mackuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89: 819–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkens, Andrea. 1995. Comparative Manifestos Project. Dataset CMPr3. Programmatic Profiles of Political Parties in 20 Countries, 1945–1988 (ESRC Data Archive study number F139–94). Science Center Berlin, Research Unit Institutions and Social Change (Director Hans-Dieter Klingemann) in cooperation with the Manifesto Research Group (Chairman Ian Budge).
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1976. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wapner, Paul. 1995. Politics Beyond the State: Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. World Politics 47 (3):311–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wapner, Paul. 1996. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2005. Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. World Politics 57 (2):262–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions are Efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. Various years. World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zhang, Hui. 2002. The Causes and Impacts of International Financial Liberalization. Unpublished manuscript, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×