Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T11:03:54.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - A corporate social responsibility–corporate financial performance behavioural model for employees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

N. Craig Smith
Affiliation:
INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France
C. B. Bhattacharya
Affiliation:
European School of Management, Berlin
David Vogel
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David I. Levine
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Today's CEOs are under pressure to address pervasive environmental, social and ethical issues. Companies are held accountable for the direct and indirect consequences of their actions and face a plethora of issues such as ensuring environmental sustainability and sound labour practices, sourcing skilled employees in areas with limited educational systems, ensuring the respect of workers' rights and meeting the needs of the world's poor. A vast range of activities now comes under the corporate social responsibility umbrella: ‘from volunteering in the local community to looking after employees properly, from helping the poor to saving the planet’. According to a 2007 McKinsey global survey, managers consider that society has greater expectations for business to take on public responsibilities than it had five years ago.

The existence of a positive relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance (CFP), however, remains considered by many as a necessary condition to justify the managerial relevance of the CSR concept. As Michael Porter observed:

Although there is a lot of feeling that ‘we ought to do it’ amongst analyst executives and a lot of corporate statements about companies' social ambition and efforts, there are also a lot of uncomfortable sentiments about why companies should be doing it. Corporate leaders are now giving lip service to this area [corporate social responsibility], but they do not ultimately understand it. No matter what they say in public, when you get behind the scenes with executives and directors, they will ask you ‘why should we invest in social initiatives?’ […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashforth, Blake and Mael, Fred, ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, Academy of Management Review, 14/1 (1989): 20–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.-C., ‘The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour’, in Worchel, S. and Austin, W.G. (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1985)Google Scholar
Cropanzano, Russell and Mitchell, Marie S., ‘Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review’, Journal of Management, 31/6 (2005): 874–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, Daniel B. and Greening, Daniel W., ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’, Academy of Management Journal, 40/3 (January 1997): 658–73Google Scholar
Maignan, Isabelle, Ferrell, O.C. and Hult, G.T.M., ‘Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (1999): 455–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, Daniel W. and Turban, Daniel B., ‘Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce’, Business and Society, 39/3 (September 2000): 254–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albinger, Heather S. and Freeman, Sarah J., ‘Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 28/3 (December 2000): 243–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maignan, Isabelle and Ferrell, O.C., ‘Antecedents and Benefits of Corporate Citizenship: An Investigation of French Businesses’, Journal of Business Research, 51 (2001): 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Dane K., ‘The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment’, Business and Society, 43/3 (September 2004): 269–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Wanda J., Wokutch, Richard B., Harrington, Vernard K. and Dennis, Bryan S., ‘Organizational Attractiveness and Corporate Social Orientation: Do Our Values Influence Our Preference for Affirmative Action or Managing Diversity?’, Business and Society, 43/1 (March 2004): 69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddy, S.W. Ng and Burke, Ronald J., ‘Person-organization Fit and the War for Talent: Does Diversity Management make a Difference?’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16/7 (July 2005): 1195–210Google Scholar
Carmeli, Abraham, Gillat, Gershon and Waldman, David A., ‘The Role of Perceived Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance’, Journal of Management Studies, 44/6 (September 2007): 972–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brammer, Stephen, Millington, Andrew and Rayton, Bruce, ‘The Contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility to Organizational Commitment’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18/10 (2007): 1701–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J.M. and Bettenhausen, Kenneth, ‘Understanding Prosocial Behavior, Sales Performance, and Turnover: A Group-Level Analysis in a Service Context’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75/6 (1990): 698–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P.M., Ahearne, M. and MacKenzie, S.B., ‘Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82/2 (1997): 262–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B., ‘Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Sales Unit Effectiveness’, Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (1994): 351–63Google Scholar
Walz, Sarah M. and Niehoff, Brian P., ‘Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Their Effects on Organizational Effectiveness in Limited-Menu Restaurants’, in J.B. Keys and L.N. Dosier (eds.), Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings (Statesboro, GA: George Southern University 1996), pp. 307–11Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×