Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:56:41.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Mapping common disease genes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Alan Wright
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh
Nicholas Hastie
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

What is “gene mapping” and why is it useful?

One of the goals of human genetics research is to understand genetic variation between people in their susceptibility to disease. From twin and family studies, and the study of Mendelian disease, it is clear that some traits and diseases “run in families” and that the reason for the increased disease risk of relatives of affected individuals is, at least in part, because of their genetic predisposition. Genetic variation in populations is caused by mutations that cause differences in DNA sequence and by other genome events in the germline, for example insertions, deletions, duplications and translocations of stretches of DNA. If these mutation events have an effect on a phenotype of the carrier, for example an increased risk of disease or an effect on a continuously varying phenotype (such as blood pressure or body mass index), then there will be an association between the genotype and the phenotype. Gene mapping aims to identify locations on the genome that are responsible for genetic variation and, ultimately, to identify which specific variants cause the observed effect. Gene mapping is useful because it leads to an understanding of the nature of genetic variation and the identification of variants and biological pathways that cause or predispose to disease. This knowledge can be used to develop drug targets or other treatments and in the future may be used for disease diagnosis or the assessment of susceptibility to disease.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genes and Common Diseases
Genetics in Modern Medicine
, pp. 59 - 79
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altshuler, D., Brooks, L. D., Chakravarti, A.et al. (2005). A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature, 437, 1299–320.Google Scholar
Antonarakis, S. E. and Beckmann, J. S. (2006). Mendelian disorders deserve more attention. Nat Rev Genet, 7, 277–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, T. and Knapp, M. (2004). A powerful strategy to account for multiple testing in the context of haplotype analysis. Am J Hum Genet, 75, 561–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakravarti, A. (1999). Population genetics – making sense out of sequence. Nat Genet, 21, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E. and Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422, 835–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, P. I., Yelensky, R., Pe'er, I.et al. (2005). Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet, 37, 1217–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Rienzo, A. and Hudson, R. R. (2005). An evolutionary framework for common diseases: the ancestral-susceptibility model. Trends Genet, 21, 596–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudbridge, F. (2003). Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypes. Genet Epidemiol, 25, 115–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A. O., Ritter, R., Abel, K. J.et al. (2005). Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science, 308, 421–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fullerton, J., Cubin, M., Tiwari, H.et al. (2003). Linkage analysis of extremely discordant and concordant sibling pairs identifies quantitative-trait loci that influence variation in the human personality trait neuroticism. Am J Hum Genet, 72, 879–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriel, S. B., Schaffner, S. F., Nguyen, H.et al. (2002). The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science, 296, 2225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldgar, D. E., Cannon-Albright, L. A., Oliphant, A.et al. (1993). Chromosome 17q linkage studies of 18 Utah breast cancer kindreds. Am J Hum Genet, 52, 743–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Grant, S. F., Thorleifsson, G., Reynisdottir, I.et al. (2006). Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet, 38, 320–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines, J. L., Hauser, M. A., Schmidt, S.et al. (2005). Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science, 308, 419–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampe, J., Cuthbert, A., Croucher, P. J.et al. (2001). Association between insertion mutation in NOD2 gene and Crohn's disease in German and British populations. Lancet, 357, 1925–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HapMapConsortium. (2003). The International HapMap Project. Nature, 426, 789–96.CrossRef
Hartl, D. L. and Clark, A. G. (1997). Principles of population genetics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. and Robertson, A. (1968). Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet, 38, 226–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houwen, R. H., Baharloo, S., Blankenship, K.et al. (1994). Genome screening by searching for shared segments: mapping a gene for benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis. Nat Genet, 8, 380–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugot, J. P., Chamaillard, M., Zouali, H.et al. (2001). Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature, 411, 599–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E. and Kruglyak, L. (1995). Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet, 11, 241–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E. S. and Schork, N. J. (1994). Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science, 265, 2037–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mah, S., Nelson, M. R., Delisi, L. E. et al. (2006). Identification of the semaphorin receptor PLXNA2 as a candidate for susceptibility to schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry, 11, 471–8.CrossRef
Maraganore, D. M., Andrade, M., Lesnick, T. G.et al. (2005). High-resolution whole-genome association study of Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet, 77, 685–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGinnis, R., Shifman, S. and Darvasi, A. (2002). Power and efficiency of the TDT and case-control design for association scans. Behav Genet, 32, 135–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeigue, P. M. (2005). Prospects for admixture mapping of complex traits. Am J Hum Genet, 76, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, N. E. (1955). Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet, 7, 277–318.Google ScholarPubMed
Nyholt, D. R. (2004). A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet, 74, 765–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogura, Y., Bonen, D. K., Inohara, N.et al. (2001). A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature, 411, 603–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, J. K. and Przeworski, M. (2001). Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet, 69, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, J. K. and Rosenberg, N. A. (1999). Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. Am J Hum Genet, 65, 220–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, S., Cherny, S. S. and Sham, P. C. (2003). Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics, 19, 149–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risch, N. J. (2000). Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature, 405, 847–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segurado, R., Detera-Wadleigh, S. D., Levinson, D. F.et al. (2003). Genome scan meta-analysis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, part III: Bipolar disorder. Am J Hum Genet, 73, 49–62. Epub 2003 Jun 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sham, P. (1998). Statistics in human genetics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skol, A. D., Scott, L. J., Abecasis, G. R. and Boehnke, M. (2006). Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet, 38, 209–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielman, R. S., McGinnis, R. E. and Ewens, W. J. (1993). Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet, 52, 506–16.Google Scholar
Stone, E. M., Braun, T. A., Russell, S. R.et al. (2004). Missense variations in the fibulin 5 gene and age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med, 351, 346–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storey, J. D. and Tibshirani, R. (2003). Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100, 9440–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeire, S. and Rutgeerts, P. (2005). Current status of genetics research in inflammatory bowel disease. Genes Immun, 6, 637–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, P. M., Haley, C. S., Ewald, H.et al. (2005). Joint multi-population analysis for genetic linkage of bipolar disorder or “wellness” to chromosome 4p. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 133, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, N. R. (2005). Allele frequencies and the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium: impact on design and interpretation of association studies. Twin Res Hum Genet, 8, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zondervan, K. T. and Cardon, L. R. (2004). The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat Rev Genet, 5, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×