Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:14:58.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Environment and disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Alan Wright
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh
Nicholas Hastie
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Defining “environment”

The “environment”, considered in relation to health, typically refers to air pollutants, chemical residues in food, contaminated drinking water, radioactive wastes and so on. Conventionally, therefore, “environmental health” refers to research and policy in relation to the health risks posed by ambient environmental exposures. These exposures usually impinge on whole neighbourhoods, communities or populations and are therefore usually not under the control of individuals. This has important implications for prevention strategies.

Environmental risks to health from ambient physical, chemical and microbiological factors induce harm via direct physical, toxicological or microbial action. In addition to these various well-recognized human-made environmental exposures there are many important naturally occurring environmental health hazards. These include exposure to solar radiation, extreme weather conditions, and chemicals naturally present in drinking water (e.g. fluoride).

A more inclusive definition of “environment” includes the built environment and the social environment. Indeed, the influences of urban design, housing quality, material circumstances, social diets, socioeconomic conditions and social relations upon disease patterns have claimed increasing attention from researchers. Similarly, some commentators include variations in self-determined exposures (as through tobacco smoking, dietary choices and contraceptive hormone use) as part of the suite of environmental influences on health. This wider perspective becomes important, for example, in considering environmental influences on the rise of obesity in modern urban populations. This incoming tide of obesity is essentially an “environmental system” problem, reflecting fundamental, community-wide, changes in the ways of living of contemporary urban dwellers, resulting in disequilibrium between energy intake and energy output.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genes and Common Diseases
Genetics in Modern Medicine
, pp. 164 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. S. and Cheer, S. M. (1995). “Civilisation” and the thrifty genotype. Asia-Pacific J Clin Nutr, 4, 341–2.Google Scholar
Brand-Miller, J. and Colagiuri, S. (1994). The carnivore connection: dietary carbohydrate in the evolution of NIDDM. Diabetologia, 37, 1280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, D. and McKeigue, P. (2001). Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases. Lancet, 358, 1356–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dessa Sadovnick, A. (2002). The genetics of multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 140, 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. (1992). Human evolution; diabetes running wild. Nature, 357, 362–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, D. M., Dosemeci, M. and Alavanja, M. C. R. (2000). Mortality from multiple sclerosis and exposure to residential and occupational solar radiation: a case-control study based on death certificates. Occup Environ Med, 57, 418–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, J. (2003). A war on obesity, not the obese. Science, 299, 856–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, A., Ott, A., Breteler, M. M. B.et al. (1997). Athersclerosis, apolipoprotein E and the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in the Rotterdam Study. Lancet, 349, 151–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogencamp, W. E., Rodriguez, M., Weinshenker, B. G. (1997). The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc, 72, 871–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holick, M. F. (1994). Vitamin D: New horizons for the 21st Century. McCollum Award Lecture, 60, 619–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Koeppen-Schomerus, G., Stevenson, J. and Plomin, R. (2000). Genes and environment in asthma: a study of 4 year old twins. Arch Dis Child, 85, 398–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, L. I., Mungar, K. J., Rubertone, M. V.et al. (2003). Multiple sclerosis and Epstein-Barr virus. JAMA, 289, 1533–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martyn, C., Cruddas, M., Compston, D. A. (1993). Symptomatic Epstein-Barr virus infection and multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 56, 167–8.CrossRef
Masterman, T. and Hillert, J. (2002). HLA-DR 15 and age of onset in multiple sclerosis. European J Neurol, 9, 177–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. (2001). Does ‘imprinting’ with low prenatal Vitamin D contribute to the risk of various disorders?Med Hypoth, 56, 367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeigue, P. (1997). Diabetes and insulin action. In Kuh, D. and Ben-shlomo, Y. eds., A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 78–100.Google Scholar
McMichael, A. J. and Hall, A. J. (1997). Does immunosuppressive ultraviolet radiation explain the latitude gradient for multiple sclerosis?Epidemiology, 8, 642–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMichael, A. J. (2002) Population, environment, disease and survival: past patterns, uncertain futures. Lancet, 359, 1145–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMichael, A. J. (2001). Diabetes, ancestral diets and dairy foods: An evolutionary perspective on population differences in susceptibility to diabetes. In Macbeth, H. and Shetty, P., eds., Ethnicity and health. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 133–46.Google Scholar
Neel, J. V., Weder, A. B. and Julius, S. (1998). Type II diabetes, essential hypertension, and obesity as “syndromes of impaired genetic homeostasis”: the “thrifty genotype” hypothesis enters the 21st century. Perspect Biol Med, 42, 44–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neel, J. V. (1962). Diabetes mellitus: a “thrifty”genotype rendered detrimental by “progress”. American Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 353–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Neel, J. V. (1982). The thrifty genotype revisited. In Kobberling, J. and Tattersall, R., eds., The Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus, London: Academic Press, pp. 283–93.Google Scholar
Norat, T., Lukanova, A., Ferrari, P. and Riboli, E. (2002). Meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an estimate of attributable and preventable fractions. In Riboli, E. and Lambert, R., eds., Nutrition and Lifestyle: Opportunities for Cancer Prevention. Lyon: IARC (WHO), pp. 223–6.Google Scholar
O'Dea, K. (1992). Obesity and diabetes in “The Land of Milk and Honey”. Diabetes Metab Rev, 8, 373–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dea, K. (1991). Westernisation, insulin resistance and diabetes in Australian Aborigines. Med J Aust, 155, 258–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Ponsonby, A.-L., McMichael, A. J. and Mei, I. (2002). Ultraviolet radiation and autoimmune disease: insights from epidemiological research. Toxicol, 181–182, 71–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reaven, G. M. (1998). Hypothesis: muscle insulin resistance is the (“not so”) thrifty genotype. Diabetologia, 41, 482–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts-Thomson, I. C., Ryan, P., Khoo, K. K. et al. (1996). Diet, acetylator phenotype, and risk of colorectal neoplasia. Lancet, 347, 1372–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosati, G. (2001). The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol Sci, 22, 117–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, G. (1985). Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol, 14, 32–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. R., Corvalan, C. and Kjellstrom, K. (1999). How much global ill-health is attributable to environmental factors?Epidemiology, 10, 573–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, M. P. (1991). Kelly West lecture: primary prevention of type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 14, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, I., Ponsonby, A.-L., Dwyer, T. et al. (2003). Past sun exposure, skin phenotype and risk of multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. BMJ, 327, 316.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1997). Health and environment in sustainable development. WHO Report No. Document WHO/EHG/97.8. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (1988). 1988 World health report. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2003). World health report 2000. Geneva: WHO.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×