Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:00:09.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Comment: Quis custodiet necessitatem? Adjudicating necessity in multilevel systems and the importance of judicial dialogue

from PART 5 - Market access, national treatment and domestic regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Marion Panizzon
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Nicole Pohl
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Pierre Sauvé
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Necessity as a (contentious) element of world trade law

The requirement that a measure should not be more trade-restrictive or burdensome than necessary to achieve a specific goal is a central, but contentious element of the multilateral trading system. Two functionally different contexts of a necessity test need to be distinguished: necessity can be part of the requirements of an exception clause, such as Article XX GATT. In this case, necessity only becomes relevant for the justification of a measure, which would otherwise be GATT-inconsistent. This context is the traditional sedes materiae of necessity and has been part of the world trading system since 1948. More recently, and especially with the entry into force of the WTO Agreement, necessity tests have also been integrated in positive obligations, in particular in the TBT and SPS Agreements. Necessity tests are not restricted to the multilateral trading system. In various degrees, they can also be found in exception clauses and positive obligations of regional integration and bilateral trade agreements.

The GATS contains references to both types of necessity tests: the general exception clause of Article XIV GATS includes necessity tests which are similar to the ones in Article XX GATT. The necessity test in the negotiating mandate of Article VI:4 GATS envisages a positive requirement. As Panos Delimatsis rightly recalls, this necessity test is a controversial subject of the negotiations on disciplines on domestic regulation in the WTO.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×