Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:02:16.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Professionalism – including academic activities: clinical research, audit, consent and ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Evangelos Mazaris
Affiliation:
Hammersmith Hospital, London
Paris Tekkis
Affiliation:
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London
Vassilios Papalois
Affiliation:
Hammersmith Hospital, London
Andrew Kingsnorth
Affiliation:
Derriford Hospital, Plymouth
Douglas Bowley
Affiliation:
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Surgical practice of the highest standards has always been based on sound knowledge of applied anatomy, sharp clinical judgment and excellent operative skills. In modern times, surgical practice is also integrated with basic and translational research in which the surgeon has to be actively and creatively involved.

Tight monitoring of the outcomes of surgical practice and the development of evidence-based surgery is a central theme in modern surgery. Clinical audit is an important process for the continuous evaluation of care provided to patients, leading to the acknowledgement of drawbacks, and has become a driving force for future improvement. Thus, it is necessary for surgeons to familiarize themselves, as early as possible during their careers, with the basic principles.

Acquiring informed consent is a crucial part of the daily practice of a surgeon. In modern healthcare, the patients rightly have a very strong say regarding their care and medical-legal problems arise more frequently. Therefore, surgeons have to be trained properly regarding the width and depth of the information they need to provide to the patients and their families prior to surgery regarding the type of operation, the potential problems and alternative treatments and allow them sufficient time and space to ‘digest the information’, ask questions and finally consent without coercion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fundamentals of Surgical Practice
A Preparation Guide for the Intercollegiate MRCS Examination
, pp. 94 - 102
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Choudhry, Set al. Unrelated living organ donation: ULTRA needs to go. J Med Ethics 2003;29(3):169–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delmonico, FLet al. Ethical incentives–not payment–for organ donation. N Engl J Med 2002;346(25):2002–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wert, G, Mummery, C. Human embryonic stem cells: research, ethics and policy. Hum Reprod 2003;18(4):672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickstein, E, Erlen, J. Ethical principles contained in currently professed medical oaths. Acad Med 1991;66: 622–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. In praise of unprincipled ethics. J Med Ethics 2003;29(5):303–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hou, S. Expanding the kidney donor pool: ethical and medical considerations. Kidney Int 2000;58(4):1820–1836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, DZ. Kidney vending: ‘Yes!’ or ‘No!Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35(5):1002–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, B, Zettler, P, Cedars, MI, Gates, E, Kriegstein, AR, Oberman, Met al. A new era in the ethics of human embryonic stem cell research. Stem Cells 2005;23(10):1454–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansell, MA. The ethics of rewarded kidney donation. BJU Int 2004;93(9):1171–1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radcliffe-Richards, J, Daar, AS, Guttmann, RD, Hoffenberg, R, Kennedy, I, Lock, Met al. The case for allowing kidney sales. International Forum for Transplant Ethics. Lancet 1998;351(9120):1950–1952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheper-Hughes, N. The global traffic in human organs 1. Curr Anthropol 2000;41(2):191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlitt, HJ. Paid non-related living organ donation: Horn of Plenty or Pandora's box?Lancet 2002;359(9310):906–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towns, CR, Jones, DG. Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics. J Med Ethics 2004;30(4):410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tung, T, Organ, CH. Ethics in surgery. Historical perspective. Arch Surg 2000;135:10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×