Adegbesan, J. A. 2009. On the origins of competitive advantage: Strategic factor markets and heterogeneous resource complementarity. Academy of Management Review, 34(3): 463–475.Google Scholar

Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. A. 2004. What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Academy of Management Review, 29(1): 74–85.Google Scholar

Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. H. J. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 33–46.Google Scholar

Asanuma, B. 1989. Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 3(1): 1–30.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231–1241.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage: Reply. Management Science, 35(12): 1511–1513.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barney, J. B. 1996. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 41–56.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., & Harrison, J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 124–188. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. 2014. Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (5th edition). London: Pearson.Google Scholar

Blossfeld, H.-P., Hamerle, A., & Mayer, K. U. 1989. Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. 2004. Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. H. 1988. Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1): 3–40.Google Scholar

Broschak, J. P. 2004. Manager mobility and market interface: The effects of manager mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4): 608–640.Google Scholar

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. 1997. The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. 2012. Build, borrow or by: Solving the growth dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar

Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Collis, D. 1991. A resource-based analysis of global competition: The case of the bearings industry. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer Special Issue): 49–68.Google Scholar

Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. 1997. Corporate strategy: A resource-based approach. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5): 477–501.Google Scholar

Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (Eds.). 1988. Cooperative strategies in international business: Joint ventures and technology partnerships between firms. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (Eds.). 2002. Cooperative strategies and alliances. Amsterdam and New York: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Cuypers, I. R. P., Cuypers, Y., & Martin, X. 2017. When the may know better: Effects of experience and information asymmetries on value from mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3): 609–625.Google Scholar

Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2006a. Strategic alliance governance: An extended real options perspective. In Ariño, A., & Reuer, J. J. (Eds.), Strategic alliances: Governance and contracts: 111–121. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2006b. What makes and what does not make a real option? A study of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Business Policy and Strategy Division: BPS: QQ1-QQ6. New York: Academy of Management.Google Scholar

Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2007. Joint ventures and real options: An integrated perspective. In Reuer, J. J., & Tong, T. W. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, Vol. 24: 107–148. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Cuypers, I. R. P., & Martin, X. 2010. What makes and what does not make a real option? A study of equity shares in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1): 47–69.Google Scholar

Deephouse, D. 2000. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6): 1091–1112.Google Scholar

Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504–1511.Google Scholar

Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 461–491.Google Scholar

Fichman, M. 1988. Motivational consequences of absence and attendance: Proportional hazard estimation of a dynamic motivation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1): 119–134.Google Scholar

Ghemawat, P., Porter, M. E., & Rawlinson, R. A. 1986. Patterns of international coalition activity. In Porter, M. E. (Ed.), Competition in global industries: 345–365. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Ghosh, A., Martin, X., Pennings, J. M., & Wezel, F. C. 2014. Ambition is nothing without focus: Compensating for negative transfer of experience in R&D. Organization Science, 25(2): 572–590.Google Scholar

Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(2): 114–135.Google Scholar

Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317.Google Scholar

Heimeriks, K. H., & Duysters, G. 2007. Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1): 25–49.Google Scholar

Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Special Winter Issue): 63–84.Google Scholar

Hennart, J.-F. 1988. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 361–374.Google Scholar

Hennart, J.-F. 1993. Explaining the “swollen middle”: Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy. Organization Science, 4(4): 529–547.Google Scholar

Hennart, J.-F., & Reddy, S. 1997. The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: The case of Japanese investors in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1): 1–12.Google Scholar

Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. 2006. The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1137–1157.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, W. H. 2007. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8): 827–856.Google Scholar

Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. 2003. Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 889–902.Google Scholar

Kogut, B. 1991. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37(1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotabe, M., Martin, X., & Domoto, H. 2003a. Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4): 293–316.Google Scholar

Kotabe, M., Martin, X., & Domoto, H. 2003b. Supply chains. Stern Business Journal, 8(1): 16–21.Google Scholar

Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. 2006. When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5): 894–917.Google Scholar

Kumar, M. V. S. 2010. Differential gains between partners in joint ventures: Role of resource appropriation and private benefits. Organization Science, 21(1): 232–248.Google Scholar

Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 638–658.Google Scholar

Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 1187–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Learned, E. P., Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., & Guth, W. D. 1965. Business policy: Text and cases. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar

Levinthal, D. A., & Fichman, M. 1988. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 345–369.Google Scholar

Makadok, R. 1999. Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market shares. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 935–952.Google Scholar

Malatesta, P. H. 1983. The wealth effect of merger activity and the objective functions of merging firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1–4): 155–181.Google Scholar

Maritan, C. A., & Brush, T. H. 2003. Heterogeneity and transferring practices: Implementing flow manufacturing in multiple plants. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 945–959.Google Scholar

Martin, X. 2002. Towards a research agenda on hybrid organizations: Research and development, production and marketing interfaces. In Kotabe, M., & Aulakh, P. S. (Eds.), Emerging issues in international business research: 241–259. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Martin, X. 2013a. Pre-emption and entry timing. In Teece, D. J., & Augier, M. (Eds.), Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Martin, X. 2013b. Solving theoretical and empirical conundrums in international strategy research: Linking foreign entry mode choices and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1): 28–41.Google Scholar

Martin, X. 2014. Institutional advantage. Global Strategy Journal, 4(1): 55–69.Google Scholar

Martin, X., & Li, C. 2015. What do we know about state-owned emerging-economy firms, and how? Evaluating literature about inward and outward multinational activities. In Tihanyi, L., Banalieva, E. R., Devinney, T. M., & Pedersen, T. (Eds.), Advances in international management, Vol. 28: 403–439. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

Martin, X., & Mitchell, W. 1998. The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Research Policy, 26(8): 753–771.Google Scholar

Martin, X., Mitchell, W., & Swaminathan, A. 1994. Recreating and extending buyer-supplier links following international expansion. In Shrivastava, P., Huff, A., & Dutton, J. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, Vol. 10B: 47–72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Martin, X., Mitchell, W., & Swaminathan, A. 1995. Recreating and extending Japanese automobile buyer-supplier links in North America. Strategic Management Journal, 16(8): 589–620.Google Scholar

Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2002. Knowledge transfer capacity and cooperative strategies: When should firms leverage tacit knowledge through licensing and alliances? In Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (Eds.), Cooperative strategies and alliances: 729–748. Amsterdam and New York: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2003. Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4): 356–373.Google Scholar

Martin, X., Salomon, R. M., & Wu, Z. 2010. The institutional determinants of agglomeration: A study in the global semiconductor industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6): 1769–1800.Google Scholar

Martin, X., Swaminathan, A., & Mitchell, W. 1998. Organizational evolution in an interorganizational environment: Incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3): 566–601.Google Scholar

Martin, X., Swaminathan, A., & Tihanyi, L. 2007. Modeling international expansion. In Ketchen, D. J., & Bergh, D. D. (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management, Vol. 4: 101–117. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Martin, X., & van den Oever, K. 2013. Progress, maturity or exhaustion? Sources and modes of theorizing on the international strategy – performance relationship (1990–2011). In Devinney, T. M., Pedersen, T., & Tihanyi, L. (Eds.), Advances in international management, Vol. 26: 331–361. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. 1996. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 519–543.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. 1992. Are more good things better, or will technical and market capabilities conflict when a firm expands? Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(2): 327–346.Google Scholar

Montgomery, C. A. 1992. Resources: The essence of corporate advantage. Harvard Business School Background Note 792-064, February.Google Scholar

Nanda, A. 1996. Resources, capabilities, and competencies. In Moingeon, B., & Edmondson, A. (Eds.), Organizational learning and competitive advantage: 93–120. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newbert, S. L. 2007. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2): 121–146.Google Scholar

Ouchi, W. G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 129–141.Google Scholar

Park, J. H., Park, N. K., & Zhang, A. M. 2003. The impact of international alliances on rival firm value: A study of the British Airways/USAir Alliance. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(1): 1–18.Google Scholar

Park, N. K. 2004. A guide to using event study methods in multi-country settings. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7): 655–668.Google Scholar

Park, N. K., & Martin, X. 2001. When do resources enhance firm value? Testing alliance and resource effects on firm value. Stern School of Business, New York University.Google Scholar

Park, N. K., Martin, X., Lee, J., & Mezias, J. M. 2018. Effects of functional focus on bounded momentum: Examining firm- and industry-level alliances. Strategic Organization, 16(2): 167–191.Google Scholar

Park, N. K., & Mezias, J. M. 2005. Before and after the technology sector crash: The effect of environmental munificence on stock market response to alliances of e-commerce firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11): 987–1007.Google Scholar

Park, N. K., Mezias, J. M., & Song, J. 2004. A resource-based view of strategic alliances and firm value in the electronic marketplace. Journal of Management, 30(1): 7–27.Google Scholar

Peeters, T., & Martin, X. 2017. Strategies for knowledge use in R&D and their implications for innovative performance. R&D Management, 47(1): 47–60.Google Scholar

Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179–191.Google Scholar

Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. 2003. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4): 309–323.Google Scholar

Peters, F. 2017. The business of video games is a multi-player game: Essays on governance choices and performance in a two-sided market. Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar

Peterson, M. F., Arregle, J.-L., & Martin, X. 2012. Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(5): 451–457.Google Scholar

Pisano, G. P. 1990. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 153–176.Google Scholar

Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336.Google Scholar

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review (May–June): 79–91.Google Scholar

Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001a. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22–40.Google Scholar

Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001b. Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 57–66.Google Scholar

Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 88–102.Google Scholar

Reuer, J. J., & Tong, T. W. 2005. Real options in international joint ventures. Journal of Management, 31(3): 403–423.Google Scholar

Robinson, P., & Martin, X. 1997. The Japanese economy: Unpacking the Japanese economic system. Sloan Management Review, 38(3): 6–7.Google Scholar

Rumelt, R. P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Lamb, B. (Ed.), Competitive strategic management: 556–570. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Sako, M., & Helper, S. 1998. Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34: 387–417.Google Scholar

Salomon, R., & Martin, X. 2008. Learning, knowledge transfer, and technology implementation performance: A study of time-to-build in the global semiconductor industry. Management Science, 54(7): 1266–1280.Google Scholar

Schreiner, M., Kale, P., & Corsten, D. 2009. What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1395–1419.Google Scholar

Seth, A., Song, K. P., & Pettit, R. R. 2002. Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: An empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10): 921–940.Google Scholar

Shamsie, J., Martin, X., & Miller, D. 2009. In with the old, in with the new: Capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1440–1452.Google Scholar

Stienstra, M., & Martin, X. 2017. When collaborative strategy turns into acquisition: Distinguishing and explaining partner acquisition versus joint venture buyout. In Mesquita, L. F., Ragozzino, R., & Reuer, J. J. (Eds.), Collaborative strategy: A guide to strategic alliances: 79–87. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. 1981. The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science (458): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teece, D. J. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1): 39–63.Google Scholar

Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171–180.Google Scholar

Wernerfelt, B. 1989. From critical resources to corporate strategy. Journal of General Management, 14(3): 4–12.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269–296.Google Scholar