Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T04:48:06.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Matthew A. Patterson
Affiliation:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Conservation Training Center, West Virginia
Rachel A. Mair
Affiliation:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Nathan L. Eckert
Affiliation:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Catherine M. Gatenby
Affiliation:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Tony Brady
Affiliation:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Jess W. Jones
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech University
Bryan R. Simmons
Affiliation:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Julie L. Devers
Affiliation:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aji, L.P. 2011. The use of algae concentrates, dried algae and algal substitutes to feed bivalves. Makara of Science Series 15:18.Google Scholar
Akiyama, Y. and Iwakuma, T.. 2007. Survival of glochidial larvae of the freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera laevis (Bivalvia: Unionoida), at different temperatures: a comparison between two populations with and without recruitment. Zoological Science 24(9):890893.Google Scholar
Aldridge, D.C. and McIvor, A.L.. 2003. Gill evacuation and release of glochidia by Unio pictorum and Unio tumidus under thermal and hypoxic stress. Journal of Molluscan Studies 69:5559.Google Scholar
Allen, D.C. and Vaughn, C.C.. 2011. Density-dependent biodiversity effects on physical habitat modification by freshwater bivalves. Ecology 92:10131019.Google Scholar
Allen, D.C., Hove, M.C., Sietman, B.E., et al. 2007. Early life-history and conservation status of Venustaconcha ellipsiformis (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 157:7491.Google Scholar
Allen, D.C., Vaughn, C.C., Kelly, J.F., Cooper, J.T., and Engel, M.H.. 2012. Bottom-up biodiversity effects increase resource subsidy flux between ecosystems. Ecology 93:21652174.Google Scholar
Allen, D.C., Galbraith, H.S., Vaughn, C.C., and Spooner, D.E.. 2013. A tale of two rivers: implications of water management practices for mussel biodiversity outcomes during droughts. Ambio 42:881891.Google Scholar
Anfinson, J.O. 2003. The River We Have Wrought: A History of the Upper Mississippi. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.Google Scholar
Aprahamian, M.W., Martin Smith, K., McGinnity, P., McKelvey, S., and Taylor, J.. 2003. Restocking of salmonids: opportunities and limitations. Fisheries Research 62:211227.Google Scholar
Araujo, R. and Ramos, M.A.. 2001. Life history data on the virtually unknown Margaritifera auricularia. Pages 143152 in Bauer, G. and Wachtler, K. (editors), Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies 145. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Araujo, R., Camara, N., and Ramos, M.A.. 2002. Glochidium metamorphosis in the endangered freshwater mussel Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1973): a histological and scanning electron miscroscopy study. Journal of Morphology 254:259265.Google Scholar
Arey, L.B. 1921. An experimental study on glochidia and the factors underlying encystment. Journal of Experimental Zoology 38:463499.Google Scholar
Arey, L.B. 1932. A microscopical study of glochidia immunity. Journal of Morphology 53:367379.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.J., Trenham, P.C., Fisher, R.N., et al. 2004. Designing Monitoring Programs in an Adaptive Management Context for Regional Multiple Species Conservation Plans. 74pp.Google Scholar
Atkinson, C.L. and Vaughn, C.C.. 2015. Biogeochemical hotspots: temporal and spatial scaling of the impact of freshwater mussels on ecosystem function. Freshwater Biology 60:563574.Google Scholar
Atkinson, C.L., Vaughn, C.C., Forshay, K.J., and Cooper, J.T.. 2013. Aggregated filter-feeding consumers alter nutrient limitation: consequences for ecosystem and community dynamics. Ecology 94:13591369.Google Scholar
Atkinson, C.L., Julian, J.P., and Vaughn, C.C.. 2014a. Species and function lost: role of drought in structuring stream communities. Biological Conservation 176:3038.Google Scholar
Atkinson, C.L., Kelly, J.F., and Vaughn, C.C.. 2014b. Tracing consumer derived nitrogen in riverine food webs. Ecosystems 17:485496.Google Scholar
Augspurger, T., Keller, A.E., Black, M.C., Cope, G., and Dwyer, F.J.. 2003. Derivation of water quality guidance for protection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) from ammonia exposure. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 22:25692575.Google Scholar
Baggett, L.P., Powers, S.P., Brumbaugh, R., et al. 2014. Oyster Habitat Restoration Monitoring and Assessment Handbook. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA. 96pp.Google Scholar
Barfield, M. and Watters, G.T.. 1998. Non-parasitic life cycle in the green floater, Lasmigona subviridis (Conrad, 1835). Triannual Unionid Report 16:22.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C. 1997. Fertilization Success in Freshwater Mussels. Report to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C. 2001. Fish Hosts and Culture of Mussel Species of Special Concern. Report to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C. 2003. Culture and Restoration of Mussel Species of Concern. Final Report. Missouri Department of Conservation and US Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C. 2004. Propagation and restoration of mussel species of concern. Endangered Species Grant Interim Report (E-142).Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C. 2006. Buckets of muckets: a compact system for rearing juvenile freshwater mussels. Aquaculture 254:227233.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C. and Roberts, A.D.. 1997. Reproduction and fish hosts of unionids from the Ozark Uplifts. Pages 1520 in Cummings, K.S., Buchanan, A.C., Naimo, T.J., and Mayer, C.A. (editors), Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels II: Initiatives for the Future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 16–18 October 1995, St. Louis, MO. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C., Haag, W.R., and Roston, W.N.. 2008. Adaptations to host infection and larval parasitism in Unionoida. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27(2):370394.Google Scholar
Barnhart, M.C., Glidewell, B., Maynard, A., et al. 2015. Pulsed flow-through systems for the laboratory culture of early life stages of freshwater mussels. Presented at “Rearing of Unionid Mussels,” Clervaux, Luxembourg. www.heppi.com/seminar/Uc_Lux_2015_Barnhart1.pdf (accessed September 2017).Google Scholar
Bauer, G. 1986. The status of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in the south of its European Range. Biological Conservation 38:19.Google Scholar
Bauer, G. 1987. Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Journal of Animal Ecology 56:691704.Google Scholar
Bauer, G. 1988. Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera L. in central Europe. Biological Conservation 45:239253.Google Scholar
Bauer, G. 1992. Variation in the life span and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:425436.Google Scholar
Bayne, B.L., Holland, D.L., Moore, M.N., Lowe, D.M., and Widdows, J.. 1978. Further studies on the effects of stress in the adult on the eggs of Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association, UK 58:824841.Google Scholar
Beck, K.M. and Neves, R.J.. 2003. An evaluation of selective feeding by three age-groups of the rainbow mussel Villosa iris. North American Journal of Aquaculture. 65:203209.Google Scholar
Benke, A. 1990. A perspective on America's vanishing streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9(1):7788.Google Scholar
Berenberg, C.J. and Patterson, G.W.. 1981. The relationship between dietary phytosterols and the sterols of wild and cultivated oysters. Lipids 16:276278.Google Scholar
Berka, R. 1986. The Transport of Live Fish: A Review. EIFAC Technical Paper (48):52pp.Google Scholar
Blystad, C.N. 1923. Significance of larval mantle of fresh-water mussels during parasitism, with notes on a new mantle condition exhibited by Lampsilis luteola. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 39:203219.Google Scholar
Bogan, A.E. 2008. Global diversity of freshwater mussels (Mollusca, Bivalvia) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:139147.Google Scholar
Bouchet, P., Rocroi, J.-P., Bieler, R., Carter, J.G., and Coan, E.V.. 2010. Nomenclator of bivalve families: classification of bivalve families. Malacologia 52(2):1184.Google Scholar
Boyer, S.L., Howe, A.A., Juergens, N.W., and Hove, M.C.. 2011. A DNA-barcoding approach to identifying juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia:Unionidae) recovered from naturally infested fishes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:182194.Google Scholar
Brady, T.R., Aloisi, D., Gordon, R., and Wege, G.. 2012. A method for culturing mussels using in-river cages. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 2(1):8589.Google Scholar
Brown, M.R., Jeffrey, S.W., Volkman, J.K., and Dunstan, G.A.. 1997. Nutritional properties of microalgae for mariculture. Aquaculture 151:315331.Google Scholar
Burkhead, N.M. 2012. Extinction rates in North American freshwater fishes, 1900–2010. Bioscience 62(9):798808.Google Scholar
Busack, C.A. and Currens, K. P.. 1995. Genetic risks and hazards in hatchery operations: fundamental concepts and issues. Pages 7180 in Schramm, H. L., Jr. and Piper, R. G. (editors), American Fisheries Society Symposium 15. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Bush, A.L. 2008. An Assessment of Suitable Feed Quantity and Quality for Riffleshell Mussels (Epioblasma spp.) Held in Captivity. Master's thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Byrne, R.A. and McMahon, B.R.. 1991. Acid–base and ionic regulation, during and following emersion, in the freshwater bivalve, Anodonta grandis simpsoniana (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biological Bulletin of the Marine Biology Laboratory, Woods Hole 181:289297.Google Scholar
Canessa, S., Hunter, D., McFadden, M., Marantelli, G. and McCarthy, M.A.. 2014. Optimal release strategies for cost-effective reintroductions. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:11071115.Google Scholar
Carrizo, S. F., Smith, K. G., and Darwall, W. R. T.. 2013. Progress towards a global assessment of the status of freshwater fishes (Pisces) for the IUCN Red List: application to conservation programmes in zoos and aquariums. International Zoo Yearbook 47(1):4664.Google Scholar
Carus, C.G. 1832. Neue Untersuchungen uber die Entwicklungsgeschichte unserer Flubmuschel. Verh K Leopoldinisch-Carolinischen Akad Naturforsch 16:181.Google Scholar
Chen, L.Y., Heath, A.G., and Neves, R.J.. 2001. An evaluation of air and water transport of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin 16:147154.Google Scholar
Clavijo, C., Carranza, A., Scarabino, F., and Southullo, A.. 2010. Conservation priorities for Uruguayan land and freshwater molluscs. Tentacle 18:1416.Google Scholar
Coker, R.E. and Surber, T.. 1911. A note on the metamorphosis of the mussel Lampsilis laevissimus. Biological Bulletin 20:179182.Google Scholar
Coker, R.E., Shira, A.F., Clark, H.W., and Howard, A.D.. 1921. Natural history and propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 37:75181.Google Scholar
Conner, C.H. 1909. Supplementary notes on the breeding seasons of the Unionidae. Nautilus 22:111112.Google Scholar
Converse, S. J., Moore, C. T., and Armstrong, D.P.. 2013. Demographics of reintroduced populations: Estimation, modeling and decision analysis. The Journal of Wildlife Management 77(6):10811093.Google Scholar
Cope, W.G., Newton, T.J., and Gatenby, C.M.. 2003. Review of techniques to prevent introduction of zebra mussels (Driessena polymorpha) during native mussel (Unionidea) conservation activities. Journal of Shellfish Research 22(1):177184.Google Scholar
Cox, I.G. (1994) Stocking strategies. Fisheries Management and Ecology 1:1530.Google Scholar
Cummings, K.S. and Graf, D.L.. 2010. Mollusca: Bivalvia. Pages 309384 in Thorp, J.H. and Covich, A.P. (editors), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Cummings, K.S. and Mayer, C.A.. 1993. Distribution and Host Species of the Federally Endangered Freshwater Mussel, Potamilus capax (Green, 1832) in the Lower Wabash River, Illinois and Indiana. Technical Report 1993:129.Google Scholar
Cummings, K.S., Suloway, L., and Page, L.M.. 1988. The Freshwater Mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Embarras River in Illinois: Thirty Years of Stream Change. Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 1988.Google Scholar
Davis, G.M. and Fuller, S.L.H.. 1981. Genetic relationships among Recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America. Malacologia 20:217253.Google Scholar
Dickinson, B.D. and Sietman, B.E.. 2008. Recent observations of metamorphosis without parasitism in Utterbackia imbecillis. Ellipsaria 10(1):78.Google Scholar
Dietz, T.H. 1979. Uptake of sodium and chloride by freshwater mussels. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57:156160.Google Scholar
Distler, D.A. and Bleam, D.E.. 1995. Decline in the diversity of Bivalvia, Ninnescah River, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 98:156159.Google Scholar
Downing, J. A., Van Meter, P., and Woolnough, D. A.. 2010. Suspects in evidence: a review of the causes of extirpation and decline in freshwater mussels. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 33(2):151185.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, D. 1999. Tropical Asian Streams: Zoobenthos, Ecology and Conservation. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.Google Scholar
Edgar, A.L. 1965. Observations of the sperm of the pelecypod Anodontoides ferussacianus (Lea). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 84:228230.Google Scholar
Engel, H. 1990. Untersuchungen zur Autökologie von Unio crassus (PHILIPSSON) in Norddeutschland. Dissertation, Universität Hanover, Hanover, Germany.Google Scholar
Enright, C. T., Newkirk, G. F., Craigie, J. S., and Castell, J. D.. 1986. Evaluation of phytoplankton diets for juvenile Ostrea edulis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 96:113.Google Scholar
Etnier, D.A. and Starnes, W.C.. 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN, USA.Google Scholar
Evans, R.R. 2001. Historical and Contemporary Distributions of Aquatic Mollusks in the Upper Canasauga River System of Georgia and Tennessee. Thesis, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN, USA.Google Scholar
Eybe, T., Thielen, F., Bohn, T., and Sures, B.. 2013. The first millimetre: rearing juvenile freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) in plastic boxes. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 23:964975.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.F., Blum, M.J., Raymer, M., Eakles, M.S., and Krane, D.E.. 2013. Population structure, multiple paternity and long-distance transport of spermatozoa in the Near Threatened freshwater mussel Lampsilis cardium (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Freshwater Science 32(1):267282.Google Scholar
Fisher, G.R. and Dimock, R.V. Jr. 2000. Viability of glochidia of Utterbackia imbecillis following their removal from the parental mussel. Pages 185188 in Freshwater Mollusk Symposium Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
Fleischauer-Rossing, S. 1990. Untersuchungen zur Autokologie von Unio tumidus Philipsson und Unio pictorum L. (Bivalvia) unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der fruhen postparasitaren Phase. Thesis, Universität Hanover, Hanover, Germany.Google Scholar
Francis-Floyd, R. 1995. The Use of Salt in Aquaculture. Cooperative Extension Service Fact Sheet VM 86. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.Google Scholar
Fritts, A.K., Barnhart, M.C., Bradley, M., et al. 2014. Assessment of toxicity test endpoints for freshwater mussel larvae (glochidia). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 33(1):199207.Google Scholar
Fritts, M.W., Fritts, A.K., Carleton, S.A., and Bringolf, R.B.. 2013. Shifts in stable-isotope signatures confirm parasitic relationship of freshwater mussel glochidia attached to host fish. Journal of Molluscan Studies 79(2):163167.Google Scholar
Fryer, G. 1961. The developmental history of Mutela bourguignati (Ancey) Bourguignat (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 244:259298.Google Scholar
Fuller, S.L.H. 1974. Clams and mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Pages 215273 in Hart, C. W. and Fuller, S. L. H. (editors), Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Fustish, C.A. and Millemann, R.E.. 1978. Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes. II. Comparison of tissue response of Coho and Chinook salmon to experimental infection with Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) (Pelecypoda: Margaritanidae). Journal of Parasitology 64(1):155157.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M. 1994. Development of a Diet for Rearing Juvenile Freshwater Mussels. Master's Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M. 2000. A Study of Holding Conditions, Feed Ration, and Algal Foods for the Captive Care of Freshwater Mussels. PhD. Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M., Neves, R.J., and Parker, B.C.. 1996. Influence of sediment and algal food on cultured juvenile freshwater mussels. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:597609.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M., Parker, B.C., and Neves, R.J.. 1997. Growth and survival of juvenile rainbow mussels, Villosa iris (Lea, 1829) (Bivalvia: Unionidae), reared on algal diets and sediment. American Malacological Bulletin 14:5766.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M., Morrison, P.A., Neves, R.J., and Parker, B.C.. 2000. A protocol for the salvage and quarantine of unionid mussels from zebra mussel-infested waters. Pages 918 in Tankersley, R.A., Warmolts, D.I., Watters, G.T., Armitage, B. J., Johnson, P.D., and Butler, R.S. (editors), Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M., Orcutt, D.M., Kreeger, D.A., et al. 2003. Biochemical composition of three algal species proposed as food for captive freshwater mussels. Journal of Applied Phycology 15:111.Google Scholar
Gatenby, C.M., Kreeger, D.A., Patterson, M.A., Marinni, M., and Neves, R.J.. 2013. Clearance rates of Villosa iris (Bivalvia:Unionidae) fed different rations of the alga Neochloris oleoabundans. Walkerana, 16(1):920.Google Scholar
Geist, J. 2010. Strategies for the conservation of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera L.): a synthesis of conservation genetics and ecology. Hydrobiologia 644:6988.Google Scholar
George, A.L., Kuhajda, B.R., Williams, J.D., et al. 2009. Guidelines for propagation and translocation for freshwater fish conservation. Fisheries 31(11):529545.Google Scholar
Gordon, M.E. and Smith, D.G.. 1990. Autumnal reproduction in Cumberlandia monodonta (Unionoidea: Margaritiferidae). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 109(4):407411.Google Scholar
Graf, D.L. 2013. Patterns of freshwater bivalve global diversity and the state of phylogenetic studies on the Unionoida, Sphaeriidae, and Cyrenidae. American Malacological Bulletin 31(1):135153.Google Scholar
Graf, D.L. and Cummings, K.S.. 2006. Palaeoheterodont diversity (Mollusca: Trigonioida + Unionoida): what we know and what we wish we knew about freshwater mussel evolution. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 148:343394.Google Scholar
Graf, D.L. and Cummings, K.S.. 2013. The Freshwater Mussels (Unionoida) of the World (and other less consequential bivalves), updated 5 August 2015. MUSSEL project web site, www.mussel-project.net (accessed September 2017).Google Scholar
Graf, D.L. and Foighil, D.Ó.. 2000. The evolution of brooding characters among the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of North America. Journal of Molluscan Studies 66:157170.Google Scholar
Grobler, P.J., Jones, J.W., Johnson, N.A., et al. 2006. Patterns of genetic differentiation and conservation of the slabside pearlymussel, Lexingtonia dolabelloides (Lea, 1840) in the Tennessee River drainage. Journal of Molluscan Studies 72:6575.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. 2002. Spatial, Temporal, and Taxonomic Variation in Population Dynamics and Community Structure of Freshwater Mussels. Dissertation, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. 2012. North American Freshwater Mussels: Natural History, Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge Univerity Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. and Rypel, A.L.. 2011. Growth and longevity in freshwater mussels: evolutionary and conservation implications. Biological Reviews 86:225247.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. and Staton, J.L.. 2003. Variation in fecundity and other reproductive traits in freshwater mussels. Freshwater Biology 48:21182130.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. and Warren, M.L.. 1997. Host fishes and reproductive biology of 6 freshwater mussel species from the Mobile Basin, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 16(3):576585.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. and Warren, M.L.. 2003. Host fishes and infection strategies of freshwater mussels in large Mobile Basin streams, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22(1):7891.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. and Warren, M.L.. 2004. Species Richness and Total Population Size of Freshwater Mussels in Horse Lick Creek, Kentucky in 2003. Unpublished report, USDA Forest Service, Oxford, MS, USA.Google Scholar
Haag, W.R. and Williams, J.D.. 2014. Biodiversity on the brink: an assessment of conservation strategies for North American freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 735:4560.Google Scholar
Hadfield, C.A. and Clayton, L.A.. 2011. Fish quarantine: current practices in public zoos and aquaria. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 42(4):641650.Google Scholar
Haggerty, T.M., Garner, J.T., and Rogers, R.L.. 2005. Reproductive phenology in Megalonaias nervosa (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Wheeler Reservoir, Tennessee River, Alabama, USA. Hydrobiologia 539:131136.Google Scholar
Haggerty, T.M., Garner, J.T., Crews, A.E., and Kawamura, R.. 2011. Reproductive seasonality and annual fecundity in Arcidens confragosus (Unionidae: Unioninae: Anodontini) from Tennessee River, Alabama, USA. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 55(4):230235.Google Scholar
Halverson, A. 2010. An Entirely Synthetic Fish: How Rainbow Trout Beguiled America and Overran the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, KT, USA.Google Scholar
Hanlon, S.D., Petty, M.A., and Neves, R.J.. 2009. Status of native freshwater mussels in Copper Creek, Virginia. Southeastern Naturalist 8:118.Google Scholar
Hartfield, P.D. and Hartfield, E.. 1996. Observations on the conglutinates of Pychobranchus greenii (Conrad 1834) (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoidea). American Midland Naturalist 135:370375.Google Scholar
Hastie, L.C. and Young, M. R.. 2003a. Conservation of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel: Captive Breeding Techniques. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series No.2, English Nature, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
Hastie, L.C. and Young, M.R.. 2003b. Timing of spawning and glochidial release in Scottish freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) populations. Freshwater Biology 48:21072117.Google Scholar
Heard, W.H. 1998. Brooding patterns in freshwater mussels. Malacological Review, Supplement 7, Bivalvia. 1:105121.Google Scholar
Heard, W.H. and Guckert, R.H.. 1970. A re-evaluation of the Recent Unionacea (Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacologia 10:333355.Google Scholar
Heasman, M.P., Sushames, T.M., Diemar, J.A., O'Connor, W.A., and Foulkes, L.A.. 2001. Production of Micro-algal Concentrates for Aquaculture. Part 2: Development and Evaluation of Harvesting, Preservation, Storage and Feeding Technology. NSW Fisheries Final Report Series No. 34, ISSN 1440-3544.Google Scholar
Heath, A.G. and Chen, L.Y.. 1996. Using Physiological Measurements to Establish Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Mussels. Final Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Helm, M.M. and Bourne, N.. 2004. Hatchery Culture of Bivalves: A Practical Manual. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Helm, M.M., Holland, D.L. and Stephenson, R.R. 1973. The effect of supplementary algal feeding of a hatchery breeding stock of Ostrea edulis L. on larval vigour. Journal of the Marine Biological Association U.K. 53:673684.Google Scholar
Henley, W.F., Zimmerman, L.L., Neves, R.J., and Kidd, M.. 2001. Design and evaluation of recirculating water systems for maintenance and propagation of freshwater mussels. North American Journal of Aquaculture 63:144155.Google Scholar
Henley, W.F., Grobler, P.J., and Neves, R.J.. 2006. Non-invasive method to obtain DNA from freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of Shellfish Research 25:975977.Google Scholar
Hochwald, S. 1997. Das Beziehungsgefüge innerhalb der Größenwachstums- und Fortpflanzungsparameter bayrischer Bachmuschelpopulationen (Unio crassus Phil. 1788) und dessen Abhängigkeit von Umweltparametern. Dissertation, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.Google Scholar
Hoeh, W.R., Frazer, K.S., Naranjo-García, E., and Trdan, R.J.. 1995. A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of simultaneous hermaphrodism in a freshwater mussel clade (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Utterbackia). Malacolgical Review 28:2542.Google Scholar
Hoggarth, M. A. 1992. An examination of the glochidia-host relationship reported in the literature for North American species of Unionacea (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Malacology Data Net 3:130.Google Scholar
Hoggarth, M. A. and Gaunt, A.S.. 1988. Mechanics of glochidial attachment (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of Morphology 198:7181.Google Scholar
Hornbach, D.J., Way, C.M., Wissing, T.E., and Burky, A.J.. 1984. Effects of particle concentration and season on the filtration rates of the freshwater clam, Sphaerium striatinum Lamarck (Bivalvia: Pisidiidae). Hydrobiologia 108:8396.Google Scholar
Hornbach, D.J., Kurth, V.J., and Hove, M.C.. 2010. Variation in freshwater mussel shell sculpture and shape along a river gradient. American Midland Naturalist 164:2236.Google Scholar
Hove, M.C., Sietman, B.E., Bakelaar, J.E., et al. 2011. Early life history and distribution of Pistolgrip (Tritogonia verrucosa (Rafinesque, 1820)) in Minnesota and Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist 165:338354.Google Scholar
Howard, A.D. 1914. Experiments in the Propagation of Freshwater Mussels of the Quadrula Group. Report of the US Commissioner of Fisheries 1913 Appendix 4:1–52. Issued separately as US Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 801. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Howard, A.D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. Nautilus 29(1):411.Google Scholar
Howard, A.D. 1922. Experiments in the culture of freshwater mussels. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries 38:6389.Google Scholar
Howard, A.D. and Anson, B.J.. 1922. Phases in the parasitism of the Unionidae. Journal of Parasitology 9:6882.Google Scholar
Howells, R.G., Mather, C.M., and Bergmann, J.A.M.. 1997. Conservation status of selected freshwater mussels in Texas. In Cummings, K.S., Buchanan, A.C., Mayer, C.A., and Naimo, T.J. (editors), Conservation and Management of Freshwater Mussels II: Initiatives for the Future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, Rock Island, Illinois. UMRCC, Onalaska, WI, USA.Google Scholar
Hruska, J. 1992. The freshwater pearl mussel in South Bohemia: Evaluation of the effect of temperature on reproduction, growth and age structure of the population. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 126:181191.Google Scholar
Imlay, M.J. 1973. Effects of potassium on survival and distribution of freshwater mussels. Malacologia 12:97113.Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2016. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. www.iucnredlist.org (accessed April 2017).Google Scholar
Ishibashi, R., Komaru, A. and Kondo, T.. 2000. Sperm sphere in unionid mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Zoological Science 17:947950.Google Scholar
Isom, B.G. 1971. A biologist's look at the history of Muscle Shoals (Mussel Shoals). Malacological Review 4:203206.Google Scholar
Isom, B.G. and Hudson, R.G.. 1982. In vitro culture of parasitic freshwater mussel glochidia. Nautilus 96:147151.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. B., Carpenter, S. R., Dahm, C. N., et al. 2001. Water in a changing world. Ecological Applications 11(4):10271045.Google Scholar
Jansen, W., Bauer, G., and Zahner-Meike, E. 2001. Glochidial mortality in freshwater mussels. Pages 185211 in Bauer, G. and Wachtler, K. (editors), Ecological Studies, Vol. 145, Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Jelks, H. L., Walsh, S. J., Burkhead, N. M., et al. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372407.Google Scholar
Jeong, K.H. 1989. An ultrastructural study on the glochidium and glochidial encystment on the host fish. Korean Journal of Malacology 5:19.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. D., Bogan, A. E., Brown, K. M., et al. 2013. Conservation status of freshwater gastropods of Canada and the United States. Fisheries 38(6):247282.Google Scholar
Jones, H.A., Simpson, R.D., and Humphrey, C.L.. 1986. The reproductive cycles and glochidia of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Hyriidae) of the Macleay River, northern New South Wales, Australia. Malacalogia 27(1):185202.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W. and Neves, R.J.. 2010. Descriptions of a new species and a new subspecies of freshwater mussels, Epioblasma ahlstedti and Epioblasma florentina aureola (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in the Tennessee River drainage, USA. Nautilus 124(2):7792.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Neves, R.J., Ahlstedt, S.A., and Mair, R.A.. 2004. Life history and propagation of the endangered dromedary pearlymussel (Dromus dromas) (Bivalvia:Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23(3):515525.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Mair, R.A., and Neves, R.J.. 2005. Factors affecting survival and growth of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) cultured in recirculating aquaculture systems. Journal of North American Aquaculture 67:210220.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Hallerman, E.M., and Neves, R.J.. 2006a. Genetic management guidelines for captive propagation of freshwater mussels (Unionoidea). Journal of Shellfish Research 25(2):527535.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Neves, R.J., Ahlstedt, S.A. and Hallerman, E.A.. 2006b. A holistic approach to taxonomic evaluation of two closely related endangered freshwater mussel species, the oyster mussel Epioblasma capsaeformis and tan riffleshell Epioblasma florentina walkeri (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of Molluscan Studies 72:267283.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Neves, R.J. and Hallerman, E.M.. 2012. Population performance criteria to evaluate reintroduction and recovery of two endangered mussel species, Epioblasma brevidens and Epioblasma capsaeformis (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Walkerana: Journal of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society 15(1):2744.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Ahlstedt, S.A., Ostby, B.J.K., et al. 2014. Clinch River freshwater mussels upstream of Norris Reservoir, Tennessee and Virginia: a quantitative assessment from 2004–2014. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50:820836.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, C.B. 1990. Bivalve Filter Feeding: Hydrodynamics, Bioenergetics, Physiology and Ecology. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Karna, D.W. and Millemann, R.E.. 1978. Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes. III. Comparative susceptibility to natural infection with Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) (Pelecypoda: Margaritanidae) and associated histopathology. Journal of Parasitology 64:528537.Google Scholar
Kat, P.W. 1984. Parasitism and the Unionacea (Bivalvia). Biological Reviews 59:189207.Google Scholar
Keller, A.E. and Zam, S.G.. 1990. Simplification of in vitro culture techniques for freshwater mussels. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 9:12911296.Google Scholar
Khym, J.R. and Layzer, J.B.. 2000. Host suitability for glochidia of Ligumia recta. American Midland Naturalist 143:178184.Google Scholar
Knauer, J. and Southgate, P.C.. 1999. A review of the nutritional requirements of bivalves and the development of alternative and artificial diets for bivalve aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science 7:241280.Google Scholar
Kondo, T. 1990. Reproductive biology of a small bivalve Grandiera burtoni in Lake Tanganyika. Venus 49:120125.Google Scholar
Kreeger, D.A. and Langdon, C.J.. 1993. Effect of dietary protein content on growth of juvenile mussels, Mytilus trossulus (Gould 1850). Biological Bulletin 185:123139.Google Scholar
Lane, T., Dan, H., and Jones, J. W.. 2014. Reintroduction of Endangered Freshwater Mussel Populations to High Priority Geographic Areas in the Upper Tennessee River System. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Lasee, B.A. 1991. Histological and Ultrastructural Studies of Larval and Juvenile Lampsilis (Bivalvia) from the Upper Mississippi River. Doctoral Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
Layzer, J.B., Gordon, M.E., and Anderson, R. M.. 1993. Mussels: the forgotten fauna of regulated rivers. A case study of the Caney Fork River. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 8:6371.Google Scholar
Lefevre, G. and Curtis, W.C.. 1910. Reproduction and parasitism in the Unionidae. Journal of Experimental Zoology 9:79115.Google Scholar
Lefevre, G. and Curtis, W.C.. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of freshwater mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:105201.Google Scholar
Lellis, W.A. and King, T.L.. 1998. Release of metamorphosed juveniles by the green floater, Lasmigona subviridis. Triannual Unionid Report 16:23.Google Scholar
Leydig, F. 1866. Mittheilung uder den Parisitismus junger Unioniden an Fischen in Noll. Inaugural-Dissertation, Tübingen, Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany.Google Scholar
Lima, P., Lima, M.L., Kovitvadhi, U., et al. 2012. A review on the “in vitro” culture of freshwater mussels (Unionoida). Hydrobiologia 691(1):2133.Google Scholar
Lopes-Lima, M., Sousa, R., Geist, J., et al. 2017. Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Biological Reviews 92:572607.Google Scholar
Lydeard, C., Mulvey, M., and Davis, G.M.. 1996. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits in North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351:15931603.Google Scholar
Lydeard, C., Crowie, R.H., Bogan, A.E., et al. 2004. The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. BioScience 54:321330.Google Scholar
Lynn, J. W. 1994. The ultrastructure of the sperm and motile spermatozeugmata released from the freshwater mussel Anodonta grandis (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Unionidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 72:14521461.Google Scholar
Mackie, G.L. 1984. Bivalves. Pages 351418 in Wilbur, K.M., Tompa, A.S., Verdonk, N.H., and van den Biggelaar, J.A.M. (editors), The Mollusca, Vol. 7: Reproduction. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
Mair, R.A. 2013. A Suitable Diet and Culture System for Rearing Freshwater Mussels at White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery, West Virginia. Master's Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Mansur, M.C.D. and Campos-Velho, N.M.R.. 1990. Técnicas para o estudo dos gloquídios de Hyriidae (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Unionoida). Acta Biolica Leopoldensia 12(1):518.Google Scholar
Matisoff, G., Fisher, J.G., and Matis, S.. 1985. Effect of macroinvertebrates on the exchange of solutes between sediments and freshwater. Hydrobiologia 122:1933.Google Scholar
McCall, P.L., Tevesz, M.J.S., Wang, X., and Jackson, J.R.. 1995. Particle mixing rates of freshwater bivalves: Anodonta grandis (Unionidae) and Sphaerium striatinium (Pisidiidae). Journal of Great Lakes Research 21:333339.Google Scholar
McMahon, R.F. 1991. Mollusca: Bivalvia. Pages 315390 in Thorp, J.H. and Covich, A.P. (editors), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
McMichael, G.A. and Pearsons, T.N.. 2001. Upstream movement of residual hatchery steelhead into areas containing bull trout and cutthroat trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:943946.Google Scholar
McMichael, G. A., Pearsons, T. N., and Leider, S. A.. 1999. Behavioral interactions among hatcheryreared steelhead smolts and wild Oncorhynchus mykiss in natural streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:948956.Google Scholar
Milam, C.D., Farris, J.L., Dwyer, F.J., and Hardesty, D.K.. 2005. Acute toxicity of six freshwater mussel species (glochidia) to six chemicals: implications for daphnids and Utterbackia imbecillis as surrogates for protection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 48:166173.Google Scholar
Molony, B.W., Lenanton, R., Jackson, G., and Norriss, J.. 2003. Stock enhancement as a fisheries management tool. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13:409432.Google Scholar
Morowski, D.E., James, L.J., and Hunter, R.D.. 2009. Freshwater mussels in the Clinton River, southeastern Michigan: an assessment of community status. Michigan Academician 39:131138.Google Scholar
Morrison, P.A., Gatenby, C.M., Devers, J., Patterson, M.A., and Mair, R.M.. 2013. Salvage and Refuge of Target Mussel Species (2004–2012): Mitigation of Bridge Replacement at East Brady, PA. Final report from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to PENN DOT: Memorandum of Agreement no. 430658 work order no. 1a and 1b.Google Scholar
Mulcrone, R.S. 2004. Incorporating Habitat Characterstics and Fish Hosts to Predict Freshwater Mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) Distributions in the Lake Erie Drainage, Southeastern Michigan. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. 1942. Relationship of the freshwater mussel to trout in the Truckee River. California Fish and Game 28:89102.Google Scholar
Naimo, T.J. 1995. A review of the effects of heavy metals on freshwater mussels. Ecotoxicology 4:341362.Google Scholar
NatureServe. 2015. Natural Heritage Central Databases. NatureServe, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Navarro, J.M., and Winter, J.E.. 1982. Ingestion rate, assimilation efficiency and energy balance in Mytilus chilensis in relation to body size and different algal concentrations. Marine Biology 67:255266.Google Scholar
Negus, C.L. 1966. A quantitative study of growth and production of unionid mussels in the River Thames at Reading. Journal of Animal Ecology 35:513532.Google Scholar
Neves, R. J. 2004. Propagation of endangered freshwater mussels in North America. Journal of Conchology, Special Publication 3:6980.Google Scholar
Neves, R.J., Bogan, A.E., Williams, J.D., Ahlstedt, S.A., and Harfield, P.W.. 1997. Status of mollusks in the southeast. Pages 4385 in Benz, G.W. and Collings, D. E. (editors), Aquatic Fauna in Peril: The Southeastern Perspective. Southeast Aquatic Research Institute Special Publication I. Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur, GA, USA.Google Scholar
Newton, T.J. and Bartsch, M.R.. 2007. Lethal and sublethal effects of ammonia to juvenile Lampsilis mussels (Unionidae) in sediment and water-only exposures. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26(10):20572065.Google Scholar
Nezlin, L.P., Cunjak, R.A., Zotin, A.A., and Ziuganov, V.V.. 1994. Glochidium morphology of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) and glochidiosis of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): A study by scanning electron microscopy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72(1):1521.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. and Garling, D.. 2000. Food-web dynamics and trophic-level interactions in a multispecies community of freshwater unionids. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:871882.Google Scholar
Nickum, M.J., Mazik, P.M., Nickum, J.G., and MacKinlay, D.D. (eds.) 2004. Propagated Fish in Resource Management. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Nobles, T. and Zhang, Y.. 2011. Biodiversity loss in freshwater mussels: importance, threats, and solutions. Pages 137162 in Grillo, O. (editor), Biodiversity Loss in a Changing Planet. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.Google Scholar
Noga, E.J. 1996. Fish Disease Diagnosis and Treatment. Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
O'Brien, C.A. and Williams, J.D.. 2002. Reproductive biology of four freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) endemic to eastern Gulf Coastal Plain drainages of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. American Malacological Bulletin 17(1):147158.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1911. A monograph of the najades of Pennsylvania. Parts I and II. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum. 4:279247.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1912. Notes upon the families and genera of the Najades. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 8:22365.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1918. The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the upper Tennessee river drainage. With notes on synonymy and distribution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 57:521626.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. 1920. Correlation of shape and station in fresh-water mussels (Naiades). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 59:269312.Google Scholar
Owen, C. T. 2009. Investigations for the Conservation and Propagation of Freshwater Mussels. Dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KT, USA.Google Scholar
Owen, C.T., Alexander, J.E., and McGregor, M.. 2010. Control of microbial contamination during in vitro culture of larval unionid mussels. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 54:187193.Google Scholar
Parodiz, J.J. and Bonetto, A.A.. 1963. Taxonomy and zoogeographic relationships of the South American naiades (Pelecypoda: Unionacea and Mutelacea). Malacologia 1(2):179213.Google Scholar
Pereira, D., Mansur, M.C.D., and Pimpoa, D.M.. 2012. Identificação e diferenciação dos bivalves límnicos invasores dos demais bivalves nativos do Brasil. Pages 7594 in Mansur, M.C.D., Santos, C.P., Pereira, D., et al. (editors), Moluscos Límnicos Invasores no Brasil: Biologia, Prevenção e Controle. Redes Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brasil.Google Scholar
Pereira, D., Mansur, M. C. D., Duarte, L. D. S., et al. 2014. Bivalve distribution in hydrographic regions in South America: historical overview and conservation. Hydrobiologia 735(1):1544.Google Scholar
Perrier, C., Guyomard, R., Bagliniere, J.-L., Nikolic, N., and Evanno, G.. 2013. Changes in the genetic structure of Atlantic salmon populations over four decades reveal substantial impacts of stocking and potential resiliency. Ecology and Evolution 3(7):23342349.Google Scholar
Piper, R.G., McElwain, I.B., Orme, L.E., et al. 1982. Fish Hatchery Management. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
Ponis, E., Robert, R., and Parisi, G.. 2003. Nutritional value of fresh and concentrated algal diets for larval and juvenile Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Aquaculture 221:491505.Google Scholar
Poole, K.E. and Downing, J.A.. 2004. Relationship of declining mussel biodiversity to stream-reach and watershed characteristics in an agricultural landscape. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:114125.Google Scholar
Popov, I.Y. and Ostrovsky, A. N.. 2014. Survival and extinction of the southern populations of freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in Russia (Leningradskaya and Novgorodskaya oblast). Hydrobiologia 735:161177.Google Scholar
Pritchard, J. A. 2001. An Historical Analysis of Mussel Propagation and Culture: Research Performed at the Fairport Biological Station. Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications. 58. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/nrem_pubs/58 (accessed September 2017).Google Scholar
Quilhac, A. and Sire, J.Y.. 1999. Spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of the epidermis after wounding a cichlid fish, Hemichromis bimaculatus. The Anatomical Record 254(3):435451.Google Scholar
Rach, J.J., Brady, T., Schreier, T.M., and Aloisi, D.. 2006. Safety of fish therapeutants to glochidia of the plain pocketbook mussel during encystment on largemouth bass. North American Journal of Aquaculture 68:348354.Google Scholar
Rathke, J. 1797. Om Dam-Muslingen. Naturhist Selskabets Skr Kjobenhavn 4:139179.Google Scholar
Reuling, F. H. 1919. Acquired immunity to an animal parasite. Journal of Infectious Disease 24:337346.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, A. and Rasmussen, J.B.. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13(5):12201222.Google Scholar
Richard, P.E., Dietz, T. H., and Silverman, H.. 1991. Structure of the gill during reproduction in the unionids Anodonta grandis, Ligumia subrostrata, and Carunculina parva texasensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69(7):17441754.Google Scholar
Richman, N. I., Böhm, M., Adams, S. B., et al. 2015. Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea). Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 370:111.Google Scholar
Riusech, F.A. and Barnhart, M.C.. 2000. Host suitability and utilization in Venustaconcha ellipsiformis and Venustaconcha pleasii. Pages 8391 in Tankersley, R.A., Watters, T., Armitage, B., and Warmolts, D. (editors), Proceedings of the Captive Care, Propagation, and Conservation of Freshwater Mussels Symposium, March 6–8, 1998, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio University Press, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
Roberts, A.D. and Barnhart, M.C.. 1999. Effects of temperature, pH, and CO2 on transformation of glochidia of the flat floater mussel, Anodonta suborbiculata. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):477487.Google Scholar
Rodgers, S.O. 1999. Population Biology Of The Tan Riffleshell (Epioblasma florentina walkeri) and the Effects of Substratum and Light on Juvenile Mussel Propagation. Master's Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Roe, K.J., Simons, A.M., and Hartfield, P.D.. 1997. Identification of a fish host of the inflated heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus (Bivalvia:Unionidae) with a description of its glochidium. American Midland Naturalist 138:4854.Google Scholar
Rogers-Lowery, C.L. and Dimock, R.V.. 2006. Encapsulation of attached ectoparasitic glochidia larvae of freshwater mussels by epithelial tissue on fins of naive and resistant host fish. Biological Bulletin 210:5163.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M.L. and Dimock, R.V. Jr. 2001. Ultrastructural evidence for nutritional exchange between brooding unionid mussels and their glochidia larvae. lnvertebrate Biology 20(3):227236.Google Scholar
Seddon, M., Appleton, C., Van Damme, D., and Graf, D.. 2011. Freshwater molluscs of Africa: diversity, distribution, and conservation. Pages 92119 in Darwall, W., Smith, K., Allen, D., et al. (editors), The Diversity of Life in African Freshwaters: Under Water, Under Threat. An Analysis of the Status and Distribution of Freshwater Species Throughout Mainland Africa. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Shadoan, M.K. and Dimock, R.V.. 2000. Differential sensitivity of hooked (Utterbackia imbecillis) and hookless (Megalonaias nervosa) glochidia to chemical and mechanical stimuli (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Pages 93102 in Tankersley, R.A., Warmolts, D.I., Watters, G.T., et al. (editors), Freshwater Mollusk Symposium Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
Sietman, B.E., Davis, J.M., and Hove, M.C.. 2012. Mantle display and glochidia release behaviors of five Quadruline freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin 30(1):3946.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. 2001. Systematics and distribution of the recent Margaritiferidae. Pages 3349 in Bauer, G. and Wächtler, K. (editors), Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Southgate, P.C., Lee, P.S., and Nell, J.A.. 1992. Preliminary assessment of a microencapsulated diet for the larval culture of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea commercialis (Iredale and Roughley). Aquaculture 105:345352.Google Scholar
Spooner, D.E. and Vaughn, C.C.. 2006. Context-dependent effects of freshwater mussels on stream benthic communities. Freshwater Biology 51:10161024.Google Scholar
Spooner, D. E. and Vaughn, C. C.. 2009. Species richness and temperature influence mussel biomass: a partitioning approach applied to natural communities. Ecology 90:781790.Google Scholar
Steingraber, M.T., Bartsch, M.R., Kalas, J.E., and Newton, T.J.. 2007. Thermal criteria for early life stage development of the winged mapleleaf mussel (Quadrula fragosa). American Midland Naturalist 157:297311.Google Scholar
Sterki, V. 1903. Notes on the Unionidae and their classification. Nautilus 12:1821, 2832.Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L. 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 25:271287.Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L. 2014. Understanding how nutrient cycles and freshwater mussels (Unionoida) affect one another. Hydrobiologia 735:277292.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L. and Malcom, H.M.. 2012. Causes of recruitment failure in freshwater mussel populations in southeastern New York. Ecological Applications 22:17801790.Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L. and Smith, D. R.. 2003. A Guide to Sampling Freshwater Mussel Populations. Monograph 8, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., Caraco, N.F., Cole, J.J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M.L.. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves: a case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. Bioscience 49(1):1927.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., Downing, J.A., Haag, W.R., et al. 2004. Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America's most imperiled animals. Bioscience 54:429439.Google Scholar
Surber, T. 1912. Identification of the Glochidia of Freshwater Mussels. Report and Special Papers of the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries.Google Scholar
Tankersley, R.A. 1996. Multipurpose gills: effect of larval brooding on the feeding physiology of freshwater unionid mussels. Invertebrate Biology 115:243255.Google Scholar
Tankersley, R.A. and Dimock, R.V. Jr. 1993. Endoscopic visualization of the functional morphology of the ctenidia of the unionid mussel Pyganodon cataracta. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71(4):811819.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. A., Schuster, G. A., Cooper, J. E., et al. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):372389.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. R., Taylor, J., and Garcia de Leaniz, C.. 2010. Captive breeding of the endangered freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Endangered Species Research 12:19.Google Scholar
Timmons, M.B. and Ebeling, J.M.. 2010. Recirculating Aquaculture, 2nd edn. Cayuga Aqua Ventures, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. 2000. Policy regarding controlled propagation of species listed under the Endangered Species Act. Federal Register 65:5691656922.Google Scholar
Uthaiwan, K., Noparatnarapom, N., and Machado, J.. 2001. Culture of glochidia of the freshwater pearl mussel Hyriopsis myersiana (Lea, 1856) in artificial media. Aquaculture 195:6169.Google Scholar
Uthaiwan, K., Pakkong, P., Noparatnarapom, N., Vilarinho, L., and Machado, J.. 2002. Study of a suitable fish plasma for in vitro culture of glochidia Hyriopsis myersiana. Aquaculture 209:197208.Google Scholar
Uthaiwan, K., Pakkong, P., Noparatnarapom, N., Vilarinho, L., and Machado, J.. 2003. Studies on the plasma composition of fish host of the freshwater mussel, Hyriopsis myersiana, with implications for improvement of the medium for culture of glochidia. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 44(1):5361.Google Scholar
Utterback, W.I. 1931. Sex behavior among naiades. Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science 5:4345.Google Scholar
van der Schalie, H. 1970. Hermaphrodism among North American freshwater mussels. Malacologia 10:93112.Google Scholar
Vaughn, C. C. 2010. Biodiversity losses and ecosystem function in freshwaters: emerging conclusions and research directions. Bioscience 60:2535.Google Scholar
Vaughn, C.C. and Spooner, D.E.. 2006. Unionid mussels influence macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25:691700.Google Scholar
Vaughn, C.C., Gido, K.B., and Spooner, D.E.. 2004. Ecosystem processes performed by unionid mussels in stream mesocosms: species roles and effects on abundance. Hydrobiologia 527:3547.Google Scholar
Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555561.Google Scholar
Wächtler, K., Dreher-Mansur, M.C., and Richter, T.. 2001. Larval types and early postlarval biology in naiads (Unionoida). Pages 93125 in Bauer, G. and Wachtler, K. (editors), Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida. Ecological Studies 145. Springer, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Walker, K. F., Jones, H. A., and Klunzinger, M. W.. 2014. Bivalves in a bottleneck: taxonomy and conservation of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) in Australasia. Hydrobiologia 735:6179.Google Scholar
Waller, D. L. and Mitchell, L. G.. 1989. Gill tissue reactions in walleye Stizostedion vitreum vitreum and common carp Cyprinus carpio to glochidia of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis radiata siliquoidea. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 6:8187.Google Scholar
Waller, D.L., Rach, J.J., Cope, W.G., and Miller, G.A.. 1995. Effects of handling and aerial exposure on the survival of unionid mussels. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10:199208.Google Scholar
Walne, P.R. 1964. The culture of marine bivalve larvae. Pages 197210 in Wilbur, K. and Yonge, C.M. (editors), Physiology of the Mollusca, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Wang, N., Ingersoll, C. G., Greer, I.E., et al. 2007a. Chronic toxicity of copper and ammonia to juvenile freshwater mussels (Unionidae). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26(10):20482056.Google Scholar
Wang, N., Ingersoll, C.G., Hardesty, D.K., et al. 2007b. Acute toxicity of copper, ammonia, and chlorine to glochidia and juveniles of freshwater mussels (Unionidae). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26(10):20362047.Google Scholar
Wang, N., Ingersoll, C.G., Ivey, C.D., et al. 2010. Sensitivity of early life stages of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) to acute and chronic toxicity of lead, cadmium, and zinc in water. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29(9):20532063.Google Scholar
Wang, N., Consbrock, R.A., Ingersoll, C.G., and Barnhart, M. C.. 2011. Evaluation of influence of sediment on the sensitivity of a Unionid mussel (Lampsilis siliquoidea) to ammonia in 28-day water exposures. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30:22702276.Google Scholar
Wang, N., Ivey, C. D., Ingersoll, C. G., et al. 2016. Acute sensitivity of a broad range of freshwater mussels to chemicals with different modes of toxic action. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 36:786796.Google Scholar
Watters, G.T. 1999. Morphology of the conglutinate of the kidneyshell freshwater mussel, Ptychobranchus fasciolaris. Invertebrate Biology 118(3):289295.Google Scholar
Watters, G.T. and O'Dee, S.H.. 1999. Glochidia of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis overwintering on fish hosts. Journal of Molluscan Studies 65:453459.Google Scholar
Watters, G.T., Hoggarth, M.A., and Stansbery, D.H.. 2009. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, USA.Google Scholar
Welker, M. and Walz, N.. 1998. Can mussels control the plankton in rivers?: a planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy. Limnology and Oceanography 43(5):753762.Google Scholar
Whelan, N.V., Geneva, A.J., and Graf, D.L.. 2011. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of tropical freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida) resolves the position of Coelatura and supports a monophyletic Unionidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61:504514.Google Scholar
Whyte, J. N. C., Bourne, N., and Hodgson, C. A.. 1989. Influence of algal diets on biochemical composition and energy reserves in Patinopecten yessoensis (Jay) larvae. Aquaculture 78:333347.Google Scholar
Wiley, R.W. 2008. The 1962 rotenone treatment of the Green River, Wyoming and Utah, revisited: lessons learned. Fisheries 33:611617.Google Scholar
Williams, J.D., Warren, M.L. Jr., Cummings, K.S., Harris, J.L., and Neves, R.J.. 1993. Conservation status of the freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18:622.Google Scholar
Williams, J.D., Bogan, A.E., and Garner, J.T.. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama and the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi, and Tennessee. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.Google Scholar
Winter, J. E. 1978. A review on the knowledge of suspension-feeding lamellibranchiate bivalves, with special reference to artificial aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 13:133.Google Scholar
Wood, E.M. 1974. Some mechanisms involved in host recognition and attachment of the glochidium larva of Anodonta cygnea (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Journal of the Zoological Society of London 173:1530.Google Scholar
Wurts, W.A. and Durborow, R.M.. 1992. Interactions of pH, Carbon Dioxide, Alkalinity and Hardness in Fish Ponds. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication No. 464. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, Stoneville, MS, USA.Google Scholar
Yeager, M.M., Cherry, D.S., and Neves, R.J.. 1994. Feeding and burrowing behavior of juvenile rainbow mussels, Villosa iris (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13:217222.Google Scholar
Young, M. and Williams, J.. 1984a. The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (LINN.) in Scotland I. Field studies. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 99:405422.Google Scholar
Young, M. and Williams, J.. 1984b. The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (LINN.) in Scotland II. Laboratory studies. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 100:2943.Google Scholar
Zale, A.V. and Neves, R.J.. 1982. Fish hosts of four species of lampsiline mussels (Mollusca: Unionidae) in Big Moccasin Creek, Virginia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60(11):25352542.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, G. F. and de Szalay, F. A.. 2007. Influence of unionid mussels (Mollusca: Unionidae) on sediment stability: an artificial stream study. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 168:299306.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L.L. and Neves, R.J.. 2002. Effects of temperature on duration of viability for glochidia of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin 17(1/2):3135.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×