Book contents
- The Forgotten Front
- The Forgotten Front
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Archival and Primary Sources
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- 1 A Recurring Obstacle
- 2 The Trouble with Allies in Counterinsurgency
- 3 Influencing Clients
- 4 America’s Boy? The Philippines, 1947–1953
- 5 The Puppet That Pulled Its Own Strings? Vietnam, 1957–1963
- 6 The Lesser of Two Evils? El Salvador, 1979–1992
- 7 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Book contents
- The Forgotten Front
- The Forgotten Front
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Archival and Primary Sources
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- 1 A Recurring Obstacle
- 2 The Trouble with Allies in Counterinsurgency
- 3 Influencing Clients
- 4 America’s Boy? The Philippines, 1947–1953
- 5 The Puppet That Pulled Its Own Strings? Vietnam, 1957–1963
- 6 The Lesser of Two Evils? El Salvador, 1979–1992
- 7 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Forgotten FrontPatron-Client Relationships in Counterinsurgency, pp. 314 - 340Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Ahern, Thomas L. Jr., CIA and the House of NGO: Covert Action in South Vietnam, 1954–1963 (Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 2000).Google Scholar
Bureau for Legislative and Public Affairs, “U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants: Obligations and Loan Authorizations, July 1, 1945–September 30, 2008,” U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, 2008.Google Scholar
Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Condemns Salvadoran Death Squads (Washington, DC: Department of State, December 11, 1983).Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service, “El Salvador, 1979–1989,” Library of Congress, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
El Salvador: Military Assistance Has Helped Counter but Not Overcome the Insurgency (Washington, DC: General Accounting Office, April 23, 1991).Google Scholar
Enders, Thomas, “El Salvador: The Search for Peace,” U.S. Department of State Bulletin (September 1981).Google Scholar
Field Manual 3–24, Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies (Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 2014).Google Scholar
“Foreign Assistance Program: FY1986 and 1985 Supplemental Request,” U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC, May 1985.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1948, vol. I, part 2: General.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1950, vol. VI: East Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1951, vol. VI: East Asia and the Pacific.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1952–1954, vol. XIII: Indochina, part 2.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1955–1957, vol. I: Vietnam.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1958–1960, vol. I: Vietnam.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, vol. I: Vietnam, 1961.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, vol. II: Vietnam, 1962.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, vol. III: Vietnam, January–August 1963.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, vol. IV: Vietnam, August–December 1963.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1964–1968, vol. I: Vietnam, 1964.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Mark, Leach, Jim, and Miller, George, Bankrolling Failure: United States Policy in El Salvador and the Urgent Need for Reform (Washington, DC: Arms Control and Foreign Policy Caucus, November 1987).Google Scholar
Kronstadt, K. Alan, Pakistan-U.S. Relations: Issues for the 114th Congress (Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, May 14, 2015).Google Scholar
Report of the Bipartisan Commission on Central America (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984).Google Scholar
Report to the President of the United States by the U.S. Economic Survey Mission to the Philippines (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1950).Google Scholar
Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2012).Google Scholar
UN Security Council, From Madness to Hope: The 12-year War in El Salvador. Report of the Commission on the Truth for El Salvador, S/25500 (New York: UN, 1993).Google Scholar
U.S. Army/Marine Corps, Counterinsurgency Field Manual (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide (Washington, DC: Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, January 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, American Foreign Policy: Current Documents, 1981 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, American Foreign Policy: Current Documents, 1983 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984).Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Foreign Assistance Legislation for Fiscal Years 1986–1987, Part 6.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Presidential Certification on El Salvador (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982).Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, The Situation in El Salvador: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Human Rights (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984).Google Scholar
United States–Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971).Google Scholar
Vest, George S., Murphy, Richard, and Destler, I. M., Report on the Secretary of State’s Panel on El Salvador (Washington, DC: Department of State, July 1993).Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, The Appeals of Communism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Armstrong, Adrienne, “The Political Consequences of Economic Dependence,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, no. 3 (1981), pp. 401–28.Google Scholar
Arnson, Cynthia, Crossroads: Congress, the President, and Central America, 1976–1992 (State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Arreguin-Toft, Ivan, “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict,” International Security, 26, no. 1 (Summer 2001), pp. 93–128.Google Scholar
Bacevich, Andrew J., Hallums, James, White, Richard, and Young, Thomas, American Military Policy in Small Wars: The Case of El Salvador (Boston: Potomac Books, 1988).Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A., Economic Statecraft (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A., “The Power of Positive Sanctions,” World Politics, 24, no. 1 (1971), pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
Baloyra, Enrique, “The Salvadoran Elections of 1982–1991,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 28, no. 3 (Fall 1993), pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Levy, Jack S., “Domestic Sources of Alliances and Alignments: The Case of Egypt, 1962–73,” International Organization, 45, no. 3 (Summer 1991), pp. 369–95.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. T., Equality, the Third World, and Economic Delusion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Beckett, Ian, The Roots of Counter-Insurgency: Armies and Guerrilla Warfare 1900–1945 (London: Blandford, 1988).Google Scholar
Beckett, Ian, and Pimlott, John, Armed Forces and Modern Counter-Insurgency (London: Croom Helm, 1985).Google Scholar
Ben-Zvi, Abraham, The United States and Israel: The Limits of the Special Relationship (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob, “Superpowers and Client States: Analyzing Relations and Patterns of Influence,” in Efrat, Moshe and Bercovitch, Jacob, eds., Superpowers and Client States in the Middle East: The Imbalance of Influence (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Bergerud, Eric, Dynamics of Defeat: The Vietnam War in Hau Nghia Province (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Berlin, Donald, “Prelude to Martial Law: An Examination of Pre-1972 Philippine Civil-Military Relations,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Carolina, 1974.Google Scholar
Betts, Richard, “The Tragicomedy of Arms Trade Control,” International Security, 5, no. 1 (Summer 1980), pp. 80–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, Stephen, “The New U.S. Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual as Political Science and Political Praxis,” Perspectives on Politics, 6, no. 2 (June 2008), pp. 347–50.Google Scholar
Biddle, Stephen, Friedman, Jeffrey, and Shapiro, Jacob, “Testing the Surge, Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007?” International Security, 37, no. 1 (Summer 2012), pp. 7–40.Google Scholar
Bird, Shawn, and Williams, Philip, “El Salvador: Revolt and Negotiated Transition,” in Walker, Thomas W. and Armony, Ariel C., eds., Repression, Resistance, and Democratic Transition in Central America (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 2000).Google Scholar
Birtle, Andrew, U.S. Army Counterinsurgency and Contingency Operations Doctrine, 1942–1976 (Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 2007).Google Scholar
Blaufarb, Douglas S., The Counterinsurgency Era: U.S. Doctrine and Performance, 1950 to the Present (New York: Free Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Blechman, Barry M., Nolan, Janne E., and Platt, Alan, “Negotiated Limitations on Arms Transfers: First Steps towards Crisis Prevention?” in George, Alexander L., ed., Managing U.S.-Soviet Rivalry: Problems of Crisis Prevention (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Blessing, James A., “The Suspension of Foreign Aid: A Macro-Analysis,” Polity, 13, no. 3 (Spring 1981), pp. 524–35.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Charles T., “Antiguerrilla Operations,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 341 (May 1962), pp. 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, Brian, The Salvadoran Officer Corps and the Final Offensive (London: McFarland, 1999).Google Scholar
Brady, Henry, and Collier, David, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).Google Scholar
Brands, Hal, Latin America’s Cold War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen, “Donors’ Dilemmas in Democratization: Foreign Aid and Political Reform in Africa,” Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, 2000.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., “The Samaritan’s Dilemma,” in Phelps, Edmund S., ed., Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory (New York: Sage, 1975).Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Principles of International Politics (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph, and Morrow, James, The Logic of Political Survival (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James, and Smith, Alastair, “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, no. 2 (2007), pp. 251–84.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James, Siverson, Randolph, and Smith, Alastair, “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace,” American Political Science Review, 93, no. 4 (December 1999), pp. 791–807.Google Scholar
Bull, Bartle Breese, “The Wrong Force for the ‘Right War,’” New York Times, August 14, 2008.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L., “Friends Like These: Counterinsurgency and the War on Terrorism,” International Security, 31, no. 2 (Fall 2006), pp. 79–115.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L., “Going to War with the Allies You Have: Allies, Counterinsurgency and the War on Terrorism,” Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, PA, 2006.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L., “The Intelligence War on Terrorism,” Intelligence and National Security, 29, no. 6 (2014), pp. 850, 859–60.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L., and Waxman, Matthew, The Dynamics of Coercion: American Foreign Policy and the Limits of Military Might (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Byrne, Hugh, El Salvador’s Civil War: A Study of Revolution (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, Larry E., Conflict of Myths: The Development of American Counterinsurgency Doctrine during the Vietnam War (New York: New York University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Carney, Christopher, “International Patron-Client Relationships: A Conceptual Framework,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 24, no. 2 (1989), pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Robert M., “Back to the Street without Joy: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Vietnam and Other Small Wars,” Parameters, XXXIV, no. 2 (Summer 2004), pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
Castellanos, Miguel, The Comandante Speaks: Memoirs of an El Salvadoran Guerrilla Leader (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Catton, Philip, Diem’s Final Failure: Prelude to America’s War in Vietnam (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003).Google Scholar
Chau, Tran Ngoc, “From Ho Chi Minh to Ngo Dinh Diem,” in Neese, Harvey C. and O’Donnell, John, eds., Prelude to Tragedy: Vietnam, 1960–1965 (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Childress, Michael, The Effectiveness of U.S. Training Efforts in Internal Defense and Development (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1995).Google Scholar
Ciorciari, John D., “A Chinese Model for Patron-Client Relations? The Sino-Cambodian Partnership,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 15, no. 2 (May 2015), pp. 245–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, James, and Crossett, Chuck, “Measuring Effectiveness in Irregular Warfare,” Parameters, 37, no. 2 (Summer 2007), pp. 88–100.Google Scholar
Cohen, Craig, and Chollet, Derek, “When $10 Billion Is Not Enough: Rethinking U.S. Strategy towards Pakistan,” Washington Quarterly, 30, no. 2 (Spring 2007), pp. 7–19.Google Scholar
Colby, William, Lost Victory: A Firsthand Account of America’s Sixteen-Year Involvement in Vietnam (Chicago: Contemporary Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahoney, James, “Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research,” World Politics, 49, no. 1 (1996), pp. 56–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, Guillaumont, Patrick, Guillaumont, Sylviane, and Gunning, Jan Willem, “Redesigning Conditionality,” World Development, 25, no. 9 (1997), pp. 1399–407.Google Scholar
Collins, James L., The Development and Training of the South Vietnamese Army, 1950–1972 (Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 1975).Google Scholar
Cortright, David, The Price of Peace: Incentives and International Conflict Prevention (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar
Corum, James S., and Johnson, Wray R., Airpower in Small Wars: Fighting Insurgents and Terrorists (Manhattan: University Press of Kansas, 2003).Google Scholar
Cosmas, Graham, MACV: The Joint Command in the Years of Escalation, 1962–1967 (Washington, DC: Center for Military History, 2005).Google Scholar
Cottam, Richard W., Competitive Interference and Twentieth Century Diplomacy (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Crandall, Russell, The Salvador Option: The United States in El Salvador, 1977–1992 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Crawford, Gordon, Foreign Aid and Political Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Democracy Assistance and Political Conditionality (New York: Palgrave, 2001).Google Scholar
Cross, James E., Conflict in the Shadows: The Nature and Politics of Guerrilla War (New York: Doubleday, 1963).Google Scholar
Currey, Cecil, Edward Lansdale, the Unquiet American (Washington, DC: Brassey’s, 1998).Google Scholar
Dacy, Douglas C., Foreign Aid, War and Economic Development: South Vietnam, 1955–1975 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Danner, Mark, The Massacre at El Mozote: A Parable of the Cold War (New York: Vintage, 1994).Google Scholar
David, Steven R., Choosing Sides: Alignment and Realignment in the Third World (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Davidson, Janine, Lifting the Fog of Peace (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Djankov, Simeon, Montalvo, José Garcia, and Reynal-Querol, Marta, “The Curse of Aid,” Economics Working Papers 870 (Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2005).Google Scholar
Dockery, Martin, Lost in Translation: A Combat Advisor’s Story (New York: Ballantine, 2003).Google Scholar
Dollar, Dave, and Pritchett, Lant, Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn’t and Why (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Doohovskoy, Andrei, “Soviet Counterinsurgency in the Soviet Afghan War Revisited,” Master’s thesis, Harvard University, September, 2009.Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander, “Draining the Sea by Filling the Graves: Investigating the Effectiveness of Indiscriminate Violence as a Counterinsurgency Strategy,” Civil Wars, 9, no. 4 (December 2007), pp. 420–44.Google Scholar
Drazen, Allan, Political Economy in Macroeconomics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Drazen, Allan, “What Is Gained by Selectively Withholding Foreign Aid?” working paper, University of Maryland and NBER, April 1999.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel, “Are Carrots and Sticks Good for You? The Utility of Economic Statecraft,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1996.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel, The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Duiker, William, The Communist Road to Power in Vietnam (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Duncanson, Dennis, Government and Revolution in Vietnam (London: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Dwyer, F. Robert, and Walker, Orville C., “Bargaining in an Asymmetric Power Structure,” Journal of Marketing, 55, no. 1 (Winter 1981), pp. 104–15.Google Scholar
Fair, C. Christine, “Time for Sober Realism: Renegotiating U.S. Relations with Pakistan,” Washington Quarterly, 32, no. 2 (April 2009), pp. 149–72.Google Scholar
Fair, C. Christine, and Ganguly, Sumit, “An Unworthy Ally,” Foreign Affairs, 94, no. 5 (September–October 2015), pp. 160–70.Google Scholar
Fall, Bernard, The Two Viet-Nams: A Political and Military Analysis (London: Praeger, 1963).Google Scholar
Fearon, James, “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes,” American Political Science Review, 88, no. 3 (September 1994), pp. 577–92.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization, 49, no. 3 (1995), pp. 379–414.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Laitin, David, “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War,” American Political Science Review, 97, no. 1 (February 2003), pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Felter, Joseph H., “Taking Guns to a Knife Fight: A Case for Empirical Study of Counterinsurgency,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 2005.Google Scholar
Feng, Yi, “Political Freedom, Political Instability and Policy Uncertainty: A Study of Political Institutions and Private Investments in Developing Countries,” International Studies Quarterly, 45, no. 2 (June 2001), pp. 271–94.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Arias, Eduardo, “Crisis, Foreign Aid, and Macroeconomic Reform,” paper presented at the Fifteenth Meeting of the Latin American Econometric Society, Santiago, Chile, March 1997.Google Scholar
Finel, Bernard, “A Substitute for Victory,” Foreign Affairs, April 8, 2010, available at www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66189/bernard-finel/a-substitute-for-victory.Google Scholar
Fishel, John T., and Manwaring, Max G., Uncomfortable Wars Revisited (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fisher, Ross A., “The Kennedy Administration and the Overthrow of Ngo Dinh Diem,” in Fisher, Ross A., Moore, John Norton, and Turner, Robert F., eds., To Oppose Any Foe: The Legacy of U.S. Intervention in Vietnam (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Forbes, Elise, “Our Man in Kinshasa: U.S. Relations with Mobutu 1970–1983,” Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1987.Google Scholar
Fox, Annette Baker, “The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War II,” in Ingebritsen, Christine, Neumann, Iver, Gstohl, Sieglinde, and Beyer, Jessica, eds., Small States in International Relations (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, Kennedy’s Wars: Berlin, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, “On Starting All over Again: A Naive Approach to the Study of the Cold War,” in Westad, O. A., ed., Reviewing the Cold War: Approaches, Interpretations, Theory (London: Frank Cass, 2000).Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan, “A Structural Theory of Imperialism,” Journal of Peace Research, 8, no. 2 (1971), pp. 81–117.Google Scholar
Galula, David, Counter-Insurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice (London: Pall Mall Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Gandara, Arturo, and Sereseres, Caesar, U.S.-Latin American Relations under the Carter Administration (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1980).Google Scholar
Garcia, José, “El Salvador: Legitimizing the Government,” Current History, 84, no. 500 (March 1985), pp. 101–36.Google Scholar
Gelb, Leslie, “Vietnam: The System Worked,” Foreign Policy, no. 3 (Summer 1971), pp. 141–4.Google Scholar
Gentile, Gian, “A Requiem for American Counterinsurgency,” Orbis, 57, no. 4 (Autumn 2013), pp. 549–58.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., Presidential Decision Making in Foreign Policy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., Bridging the Gap (Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1993).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., “Knowledge for Statecraft: The Challenge for Political Science and History,” International Security, 22, no. 1 (Summer 1997), pp. 44–52.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (London: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Smoke, Richard, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Gerring, John, “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?” American Political Science Review, 98, no. 2 (May 2004), pp. 341–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, William, The U.S. Government and the Vietnam War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Girod, Desha, “Foreign Aid and Post-Conflict Reconstruction,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 2008.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian, “Expanded Trade and GDP Data,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46 (2002), pp. 712–24.Google Scholar
Golay, Frank, The Philippines: Public Policy and National Economic Development (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jeffrey, and Ambinder, Marc, “The Ally from Hell,” The Atlantic, December 2011.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A., “An Analytical Framework,” in Goldstone, Jack A., ed., Revolutions of the Late Twentieth Century (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Gordon, D. F., “Conditionality in Policy-Based Lending in Africa: USAID Experience,” in Mosley, Paul, ed., Development Finance and Policy Reform (London: Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar
Grant, Thomas, “Government, Politics, and Low-Intensity Conflict,” in Corr, Edwin and Sloan, Stephen, eds., Low-Intensity Conflict: Old Threats in a New World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Greenberg, Lawrence, The Hukbalahap Insurrection (Washington, DC: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1987).Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas, Comparative Revolutionary Movements: Search for Theory and Justice (London: Prentice-Hall International, 1990).Google Scholar
Greentree, Todd, Crossroads of Intervention: Insurgency and Counterinsurgency Lessons from Central America (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Donald R., “Strategic Communications in El Salvador 1982–1986: A Personal Perspective,” Center for Hemispheric Defense, Santiago, Chile, 2003.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Donald R., “Strategic Communications in El Salvador 1982–1986: A Personal Perspective,” Washington, DC, September 13, 2010.Google Scholar
Handel, Michael, “Does the Dog Wag the Tail or Vice Versa? Patron-Client Relations,” Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 6, no. 2 (1982), pp. 24–35.Google Scholar
Harford, Tim, and Klein, Michael, “Aid and the Resource Curse,” View Points 291 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005).Google Scholar
Harkavy, Robert, Arms Trade and International Systems (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1975).Google Scholar
Harnecker, Marta, Pueblos En Armas (Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, 1983).Google Scholar
Hart, Donn, “Magsaysay: Philippine Candidate,” Far Eastern Survey, 22, no. 6 (May 1953), pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
Hartendorp, A. V. H., History of Industry and Trade of the Philippines (Manila: ACCP, 1958).Google Scholar
Hellmann, John, American Myth and the Legacy of Vietnam (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Helman, Joseph, “The Politics of Patron-Client State Relationships: The United States and Israel, 1948–1992,” Ph.D. dissertation, George Washington University, 2002.Google Scholar
Henderson, William, “South Viet Nam Finds Itself,” Foreign Affairs, 35, no. 2 (January 1957), pp. 283–94.Google Scholar
Herring, George C., America’s Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A., Mass Political Violence: A Cross-National Causal Analysis (New York: Wiley, 1973).Google Scholar
Hilsman, Roger, “Internal War: The New Communist Tactic,” in Greene, Thomas, ed., The Guerrilla and How to Fight Him (New York: Praeger: 1962).Google Scholar
Hilsman, Roger, To Move a Nation: The Politics of Foreign Policy in the Administration of John F. Kennedy (Garden City, NJ: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley, “Restraints and Choices in American Foreign Policy,” Daedelus, 91 (Fall 1962), pp. 668–704.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley, Gulliver’s Troubles: The Setting of American Foreign Policy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968).Google Scholar
Holsti, K. J., International Politics: A Framework for Analysis (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole, Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Hoyt, Timothy D., “Pakistan, an Ally by Any Other Name,” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 137/7/1,301 (July 2011).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P., and Nelson, Joan M., No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Huth, Paul, “Deterrence and International Conflict,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1999), pp. 25–48.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul, and Russett, Bruce, “Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation,” International Studies Quarterly, 32, no. 1 (1988), pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
Isham, Jonathan, Kaufmann, Daniel, and Pritchett, Lant, “Civil Liberties, Democracy and the Performance of Government Projects,” World Bank Economic Review, 11, no. 2 (1997), pp. 219–42.Google Scholar
Jensen, Lloyd, “Negotiating Strategic Arms Control, 1969–1979,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28, no. 3 (September 1984), pp. 535–59.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael, and Meckling, William, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, no. 4 (October 1976), pp. 305–60.Google Scholar
Jentleson, Bruce, “American Commitments in the Third World: Theory vs. Practice,” International Organization, 41, no. 4 (Autumn 1987), pp. 667–704.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, The Logic of Images in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, “Deterrence Theory Revisited,” World Politics, 31, no. 2 (January 1979), pp. 289–324.Google Scholar
Joes, Anthony James, America and Guerrilla Warfare (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2000).Google Scholar
Joes, Anthony James, Resisting Rebellion: The History and Politics of Counterinsurgency (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2004).Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A., “Civilian Loyalties and Guerrilla Conflict,” World Politics, 14, no. 4 (July 1962), pp. 646–61.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Ian, “Rights and Reconciliation in El Salvador,” in Doyle, Michael, Jonstone, Ian, and Orr, Robert, eds., Keeping the Peace: Multidimensional UN Operations in Cambodia and El Salvador (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, A Twilight Struggle: American Power and Nicaragua, 1977–1990 (New York: Free Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kahin, George McTurnan, Intervention: How America Became Involved in Vietnam (New York: Knopf, 1986).Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis, “New and Old Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?” World Politics, 54, no. 1 (October 2001), pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis, The Logic of Violence in Civil War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis, and Balcells, Laia, “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict,” American Political Science Review, 104, no. 3 (2010), pp. 415–29.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry, “After La Palma: Christian Democracy, U.S. Policy, and the Prospects for Democratization in El Salvador,” World Policy Journal (Winter 1985), pp. 305–30.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry, “The Perils of the Petro-State: Reflections on the Paradox of Plenty,” Journal of International Affairs, 53, no. 1 (Fall 1999), pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
Kennedy, John F., “America’s Stake in Vietnam,” in Fishel, Wesley, ed., Vietnam: Anatomy of a Conflict (Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock, 1968).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “Political Influence in the General Assembly,” International Conciliation, no. 557 (1966), pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “The Big Influence of Small Allies,” Foreign Policy, no. 2 (Spring 1971), pp. 161–82.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond,” in Keohane, Robert O., ed., Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp. 158–203.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict, The Huk Rebellion: A Study of Peasant Revolt in the Philippines (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Kiewiet, Roderick, and McCubbins, Matthew, The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriation Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Kilcullen, David, The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kilcullen, David, “Two Schools of Classical Counterinsurgency,” Small Wars Journal, January 27, 2007, available at http://smallwarsjournal.com/printpdf/6415.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeane, “Dictatorships and Double Standards,” Commentary, 68, no. 5 (November 1979), pp. 34–45.Google Scholar
Kitson, Frank, Low Intensity Operations: Subversion, Insurgency, Peacekeeping (London: Faber & Faber, 1971).Google Scholar
Klare, Michael, “The Deadly Connection: Paramilitary Bands, Small Arms Diffusion and State Failure,” in Rotberg, Robert, ed., When States Fail: Causes and Consequences (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Klare, Michael, and Kornbluh, Peter, Low Intensity Warfare: Counterinsurgency, Proinsurgency, and Antiterrorism in the Eighties (New York: Pantheon Books, 1988).Google Scholar
Knorr, Klaus, On the Uses of Military Power in the Nuclear Age (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Knorr, Klaus, The Power of Nations: The Political Economy of International Relations (New York: Basic Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Knorr, Klaus, “International Economic Leverage and Its Uses,” in Knorr, Klaus and Trager, Frank, eds., Economic Issues and National Security (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Kotowitz, Yehuda, “Moral Hazard,” in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (New York: W.W. Norton, 1987).Google Scholar
Krause, Keith, “Military Statecraft: Power and Influence in Soviet and American Arms Transfer Relationships,” International Studies Quarterly, 35, no. 3 (1991), pp. 313–36.Google Scholar
Krepinevich, Andrew F., The Army and Vietnam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Lachica, Eduardo, The Huks: Philippine Agrarian Society in Revolt (London: Praeger, 1971).Google Scholar
Ladwig, Walter C. III, “Managing Counterinsurgency: Lessons from Malaya,” Military Review, 87, no. 3 (May–June 2007), pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
Ladwig, Walter C. III, “When the Police Are the Problem: The Philippine Constabulary and the Hukbalahap Rebellion,” in Fair, C. Christine and Ganguly, Sumit, eds., Policing Insurgencies: Cops as Counterinsurgents (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladwig, Walter C. III, “Influencing Clients in Counterinsurgency: U.S. Involvement in El Salvador’s Civil War, 1979–92,” International Security, 41, no. 1 (Summer 2016), pp. 99–146.Google Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Martimort, David, The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lall, Arthur, Modern International Negotiation: Principles and Practice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Landau, Saul, The Guerrilla Wars of Central America (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Lande, Carl, “The Dyadic Basis of Clientelism,” in Schmidt, Steffen W., Guasti, Laura, Lande, Carl, and Scott, James, eds. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Lansdale, Edward G., In the Midst of Wars: An American’s Mission to Southeast Asia (New York: Harper & Row, 1972).Google Scholar
Laqueur, Walter, Guerrilla: A Historical and Critical Study (Boston: Little Brown, 1976).Google Scholar
Laqueur, Walter, Guerrilla Warfare: A Historical and Critical Study (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1998).Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, “Crisis Prevention and the Austrian State Treaty,” International Organization, 41, no. 1 (Winter 1987), pp. 27–60.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, The Art of Bargaining (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Ledeen, Michael, and Lewis, Michael, Debacle: The American Failure in Iran (New York: Knopf, 1981).Google Scholar
Leites, Nathan, and Wolf, Charles, Rebellion and Authority: An Analytic Essay on Insurgent Conflicts (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1970).Google Scholar
LeMoyne, James, “El Salvador’s Forgotten War,” Foreign Affairs, 68, no. 3 (Summer 1989), pp. 105–25.Google Scholar
LeoGrande, William, “A Splendid Little War: Drawing the Line in El Salvador,” International Security, 6, no. 1 (Summer 1981), pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
LeoGrande, William, Our Own Backyard: The United States in Central America, 1977–1993 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Lewis, William, “Political Influence: The Diminished Capacity,” in Neuman, Stephanie and Harkavy, Robert, eds., Arms Transfers in the Modern World (New York: Praeger, 1979).Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark I., The Rebel’s Dilemma (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Licklider, Roy E., “How Civil Wars End: Questions and Methods,” in Licklider, Roy E., ed., Stopping the Killing: How Civil Wars End (London: New York University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Licklider, Roy E., “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993,” American Political Science Review, 89, no. 3 (1995), pp. 681–90.Google Scholar
Lindell, Ulf, and Persson, Stefan, “The Paradox of Weak State Power,” in International Relations: Contemporary Theory and Practice (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Long, William, Economic Incentives and Bilateral Cooperation (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore, “Making Democracy Safe for the World: On Fighting the Next War,” in Ikenberry, John, ed., American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays (New York: HarperCollins, 1989).Google Scholar
Luckham, Robin, “Security and Disarmament in Africa,” Alternatives, 9, no. 2 (Fall 1983), pp. 203–28.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N., “Dead End: Counterinsurgency Warfare as Military Malpractice,” Harper’s, February 2007.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason, “Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, no. 3 (June 2009), pp. 331–62.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Douglas J., Adventures in Chaos: American Intervention for Reform in the Third World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Manwaring, Max G., and Prisk, Court, El Salvador at War: An Oral History (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Martin-Baro, Ignacio, “La Guerra Civil En El Salvador,” Estudios Centroamericanos, nos. 387–388 (January–February 1981).Google Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia, Revolutionary Movements in Latin America: El Salvador’s FMLN and Peru’s Shining Path (Washington, DC: USIP Press, 1998).Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry, “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3, no. 2 (Autumn 1987), pp. 243–77.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, and Schwartz, Thomas, “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science, 28, no. 1 (February 1984), pp. 165–79.Google Scholar
Meara, William, Contra Cross: Insurgency and Tyranny in Central America, 1979–1989 (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Metz, Steven, “Rethinking Insurgency,” Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, PA, 2007.Google Scholar
Miller, Edward, Misalliance: Ngo Dinh Diem, the United States, and the Fate of South Vietnam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Millman, Joel, “El Salvador’s Army: A Force unto Itself,” New York Times Magazine, December 10, 1989.Google Scholar
Moaz, Zeev, “Power Capabilities and Paradoxical Conflict Outcomes,” World Politics, 46, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 239–66.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry, “The New Economics of Organization,” American Journal of Political Science, 28, no. 4 (November 1984), pp. 739–77.Google Scholar
Montes, Segundo, “Hambre a Causa Del Armamentismo,” Estudios Centroamericanos, nos. 429–430 (July–August 1984).Google Scholar
Montgomery, Tommie Sue, Revolution in El Salvador: From Civil Strife to Civil Peace (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, “Alliances in Theory and Practice,” in Wolfers, Arnold, ed., Alliance Policy in the Cold War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, “A Political Theory of Foreign Aid,” American Political Science Review, 56 (June 1962), pp. 287–305.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf, 1967).Google Scholar
Mott, William, United States Military Assistance: An Empirical Perspective (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Mouritsen, David Jeffrey, “The United States in El Salvador, 1979–1992: Success through the Eyes of the Diplomats,” Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University, June 2003.Google Scholar
Moyar, Mark, Triumph Forsaken: The Vietnam War, 1954–1965 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Moyar, Mark, A Question of Command: Counterinsurgency from the Civil War to Iraq (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Muller, Edward, and Seligson, Mitchell, “Inequality and Insurgency,” American Political Science Review, 81, no. 2 (June 1987), pp. 435–52.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin, Schleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert, “Why Is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth,” American Economic Review, 83, no. 2 (May 1993), pp. 409–14.Google Scholar
Nachimas, Nitza, Transfer of Arms, Leverage and Peace in the Middle East (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Nagl, John A., Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam (London: Praeger, 2002).Google Scholar
Nelson, Joan, and Eglinton, Stephanie, Global Goals, Contentious Means (Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council, 1993).Google Scholar
Nincic, Miroslav, “The Logic of Positive Engagement: Dealing with Renegade Regimes,” International Studies Perspectives, 7, no. 4 (November 2006), pp. 321–41.Google Scholar
Nincic, Miroslav, “Getting What You Want: Positive Inducements in International Relations,” International Security, 35, no. 1 (Summer 2010), pp. 138–83.Google Scholar
North, Douglas, Wallis, John, and Weingast, Barry, Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Bard E., Insurgency and Terrorism: Inside Modern Revolutionary Warfare (Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2005).Google Scholar
Odom, William E., On Internal War: American and Soviet Approaches to Third World Clients and Insurgents (London: Duke University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur, “Dictatorship, Democracy and Development,” American Political Science Review, 87 (September 1993), pp. 567–76.Google Scholar
Olson, William J., “The New World Disorder,” in Manwaring, Max G., ed., Gray Area Phenomena: Confronting the New World Disorder (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Olson, William J., “U.S. Objectives and Constraints,” in Shultz, Richard, Pfaltzgraff, Robert, Ra’anan, Uri, Olson, William, and Lukes, Igor, eds., Guerrilla Warfare and Counterinsurgency (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1993).Google Scholar
Operations Evaluation Department, “Higher Impact Adjustment Lending: Initial Evaluation,” World Bank, Washington, DC, June 1999.Google Scholar
Owens, William, Eye-Deep in Hell: A Memoir of the Liberation of the Philippines (Dallas: SMU Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Park, Chang Jin, “The Influence of Small States upon the Superpowers: The United States-South Korean Relations as a Case Study, 1950–1953,” World Politics, 28 (1975), pp. 97–117.Google Scholar
Patchen, Martin, Resolving Disputes Between Nations: Coercion or Conciliation? (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Pauker, Guy J., Notes on Non-Military Measures in Control of Insurgency (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1962).Google Scholar
Paul, Roland A., American Military Commitments Abroad (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., “Influence through Arms Transfers: Lessons from the U.S.-Pakistani Relationship,” Asian Survey, 32, no. 12 (December 1992), pp. 1078–92.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Richard M., ed., No More Vietnams? The War and the Future of American Foreign Policy (New York: Harper & Row, 1968).Google Scholar
Phillips, Rufus, “Before We Lost in Vietnam,” in Neese, Harvey C. and O’Donnell, John, eds., Prelude to Tragedy: Vietnam, 1960–1965 (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Plascov, Avi, Modernization, Political Development and Stability (London: Gower, 1982).Google Scholar
“Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2008,” Center for Systemic Peace, George Mason University, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, William, “The Philippine Peasantry and the Huk Revolt,” Journal of Peasant Studies, 5, no. 4 (1978), pp. 497–517.Google Scholar
Porter, Gareth, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Pratt, John, and Zeckhauser, Richard, “Principals and Agents: An Overview,” in Pratt, John and Zeckhauser, Richard, eds., Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Pribbenow, Merle L., Victory in Vietnam: The Official History of the People’s Army of Vietnam, 1954–1975 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002).Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian, “Roots of Insurgency,” in Eckstein, Harry, ed., Internal War (New York: Free Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian, Aspects of Political Development: An Analytic Study (Boston: Little Brown, 1966).Google Scholar
Quinlivan, James T., “Coup-Proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East,” International Security, 24, no. 2 (Fall 1999), pp. 131–65.Google Scholar
Quirino, Elpidio, “Initial Views on the Huk Problem,” in The New Philippine Ideology (Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1949).Google Scholar
Ramazani, Rouhollah, The United States and Iran: The Patterns of Influence (New York: Praeger, 1982).Google Scholar
Ramsey, Robert, Advising Indigenous Forces: American Advisors in Korea, Vietnam and El Salvador (Ft Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute, 2006).Google Scholar
“Recrudecimiento De La Violencia En El Salvador,” Estudios Centroamericanos, no. 480 (October 1988).Google Scholar
Rees, Ray, “The Theory of Principal and Agent: Part 1,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 37, no. 1 (1985), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Reeves, Richard, President Kennedy: Profile in Power (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993).Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen, “Does Foreign Aid Promote the Expansion of Government?” American Journal of Political Science, 48, no. 1 (2004), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Resenick, Evan N. “Strange Bedfellows: U.S. Bargaining Behavior with Allies of Convenience,” International Security, 35, no. 3 (Winter 2010–2011), pp. 144–84.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Celia L., and Wan, Wilfred T., “Empirical Trends in Sanctions and Positive Inducements in Nonproliferation,” in Solingen, Etel, ed., Sanctions, Statecraft, and Nuclear Proliferation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, “Public Opinion, Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies,” World Politics, 43, no. 4 (July 1991), pp. 479–512.Google Scholar
Root, Hilton L., Alliance Curse: How America Lost the Third World (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard, “Reward, Punishment and Interdependence,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, no. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
Rosello, Victor, “Lessons from El Salvador,” Parameters, 23, no. 4 (Winter 1993–1994), pp. 100–8.Google Scholar
Ross, Stephen, “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem,” American Economic Review, 63, no. 2 (May 1973), pp. 134–9.Google Scholar
Rosson, William, “Four Periods of American Involvement in Vietnam,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford, 1978.Google Scholar
Rostow, Walt, The Diffusion of Power: An Essay in Recent History (New York: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar
Rothschild, Michael, and Stiglitz, Joseph, “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, no. 4 (November 1976), pp. 629–49.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Robert, Alliances and Small Powers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey, and Brown, Bert, The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation (New York: Academic Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Satoshi, Nakano, “Gabriel L. Kaplan and U.S. Involvement in Philippine Electoral Democracy: A Tale of Two Democracies,” Philippine Studies, 52, no. 2 (2004), pp. 149–78.Google Scholar
Scaff, Alvin, The Philippine Answer to Communism (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C., Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Schwarz, Benjamin C., American Counterinsurgency Doctrine and El Salvador: The Frustrations of Reform and the Illusions of Nation Building (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1991).Google Scholar
Sciolino, Elaine, “Panama’s Chief Defies U.S. Powers of Persuasion,” New York Times, January 17, 1988.Google Scholar
Sepp, Kalev, “The Evolution of United States Military Strategy in Central America, 1979–1991,” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 2002.Google Scholar
Shafer, D. Michael, Deadly Paradigms: The Failure of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Shalom, Stephen, “Counter-Insurgency in the Philippines,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 7, no. 2 (1977), pp. 153–77.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael, “Comparative Counterinsurgency Strategies: Guatemala and El Salvador,” Conflict, 9, no. 2 (1989), pp. 127–54.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Neil, A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam (New York: Random House, 1988).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Christopher, and Spanier, John, Patron-Client State Relationships: Multilateral Crises in the Nuclear Age (New York: Praeger, 1984).Google Scholar
Shultz, Richard, “Strategy Lessons from an Unconventional War: The U.S. Experience in Vietnam,” in Sarkesian, Sam, ed., Nonnuclear Conflicts in the Nuclear Age (New York: Praeger, 1980).Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, “Inter-Nation Influence: A Formal Model,” American Political Science Review, 57, no. 2 (June 1963), pp. 420–30.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985,” International Interactions, 14, no. 2 (April 1987), pp. 115–32.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair, “International Crises and Domestic Politics,” American Political Science Review, 92, no. 3 (September 1998), pp. 623–38.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, Philippine Freedom, 1946–1958 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Smith, Robert, The Hukbalahap Insurgency: Economic, Political and Military Factors (Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, 1963).Google Scholar
Smith, Tony, “New Bottles for New Wine: A Pericentric Framework for the Study of the Cold War,” Diplomatic History, 24, no. 4 (Fall 2000), pp. 567–91.Google Scholar
Snyder, David, and Tilly, Charles, “Hardship and Collective Violence in France, 1830 to 1960,” American Sociological Review, 37, no. 5 (October 1972).Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn, and Diesing, Paul, Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Spector, Ronald H., Advice and Support: The Early Years, 1941–1960 (Washington, DC: Center of Military History, 1985).Google Scholar
Spencer, John H., Ethiopia at Bay: A Personal Account of the Selassie Years (Algonac, MI: Reference Publications, 1984).Google Scholar
Stanley, William, The Protection Racket State: Elite Politics, Military Extortion, and Civil War in El Salvador (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Stanley, William, “El Salvador: State-Building before and after Democratization, 1980–95,” Third World Quarterly, 27, no. 1 (2006), pp. 101–14.Google Scholar
Starner, Frances, Magsaysay and the Philippine Peasantry (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Statler, Kathryn, Replacing France: The Origins of American Intervention in Vietnam (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2007).Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph, “Principal and Agent (II),” in A Dictionary of Economics (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002) pp. 185–90.Google Scholar
Strachan, Hew, “British Counter-Insurgency from Malaya to Iraq,” The RUSI Journal, 152, no. 6 (2007), pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Summers, Harry, “A War Is a War Is a War Is a War,” in Thompson, Loren B., ed., Low-Intensity Conflict (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Svensson, Jakob, and Dollar, David, “What Explains the Success or Failure of Structural Adjustment Programmes?” Economic Journal, 110, no. 466 (October 2000).Google Scholar
Talmadge, Caitlin, “Different Threats, Different Militaries: Explaining Organizational Practices in Authoritarian Armies,” Security Studies, 25, no. 1 (February 2016), pp. 111–141.Google Scholar
Tanham, George, Communist Revolutionary Warfare: From the Vietminh to the Viet Cong (New York: Praeger, 1967).Google Scholar
Tanham, George, and Duncanson, Dennis, “Some Dilemmas of Counterinsurgency,” Foreign Affairs, 48, no. 1 (October 1969), pp. 113–22.Google Scholar
Taruc, Luis, He Who Rides the Tiger: The Story of an Asian Guerrilla Leader (New York: Praeger, 1967).Google Scholar
Thayer, Carlyle, “Southern Vietnamese Revolutionary Organizations,” in Zasloff, Joseph and Brown, MacAlister, eds., Communism in Indochina (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Thomas, , Comparative Revolutionary Movements: Search for Theory and Justice (London: Prentice-Hall International, 1990).Google Scholar
Thompson, Leroy, Ragged War: The Story of Unconventional and Counterrevolutionary Warfare (London: Arms & Armor, 1994).Google Scholar
Thompson, Robert, Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam (London: Praeger, 1966).Google Scholar
Thompson, Robert, “Civic Action in Low-Intensity Warfare,” Proceedings of the Low Intensity Warfare Conference (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 1986).Google Scholar
Thorpe, William, “Huk Hunting in the Philippines, 1946–1953,” The Airpower Historian (April 1962), pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
Tirona, Tomas, “The Philippine Anti-Communist Campaign,” Air University Quarterly Review (Summer 1954), pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc, “Audience Costs: An Historical Analysis,” Security Studies, 21, no. 1 (March 2012), pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Trinquier, Robert, Modern Warfare: A French View of Counterinsurgency (New York: Praeger, 1964).Google Scholar
Uclés, Mario Lungo, El Salvador in the Eighties: Counterinsurgency and Revolution (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Valeriano, Napoleon D., and Bohannan, Charles T., Counter-Guerrilla Operations: The Philippine Experience (London: Pall Mall Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Valeriano, Napoleon D., and Bohannan, Charles T., Counter-Guerrilla Operations: The Philippine Experience (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006).Google Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas, African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Vien, Cao, The U.S. Advisor (Washington, DC: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1980).Google Scholar
Villalobos, Joaquin, The War in El Salvador (San Francisco: Solidarity Publications, 1986).Google Scholar
Waldner, David, State Building and Late Development (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, “Politics as a Vocation,” in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, eds., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Weder, Alberto, and Alesina, Beatrice, “Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?” American Economic Review, 92, no. 4 (September 2002), pp. 1126–37.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Franklin, “The Concept of a Commitment in International Relations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13, no. 1 (March 1969), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy, “Resources and the Information Problem in Rebel Recruitment,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, no. 4 (2005), pp. 598–624.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46, no. 2 (Spring 1992), 391–425.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, Darrel, “Farm Gate,” Air Force Magazine, 88, no. 12 (December 2005), pp. 82–7.Google Scholar
Wickham-Crowley, Timothy, “Understanding Failed Revolution in El Salvador,” Politics and Society, 17, no. 4 (1989), pp. 511–30.Google Scholar
Wickham-Crowley, Timothy, Guerrillas and Revolution in Latin America: A Comparative Study of Insurgents and Regimes since 1956 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Williams, Fredrick, “Guerrilla Warfare,” in Osanka, Franklin, ed., Modern Guerrilla Warfare: Fighting Communist Guerrilla Movements, 1941–1961 (New York: Free Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold, Discord and Collaboration: Essays in International Politics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth, Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob, Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA 1981–1987 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987).Google Scholar
Wriggins, W. Howard, and Adler-Karlsson, Gunnar, Reducing Global Inequities (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978).Google Scholar
Wurfel, David, “Philippine Agrarian Reform under Magsaysay, Part I,” Far Eastern Survey, 27, no. 1 (January 1958), pp. 13, 23–30.Google Scholar
Wurfel, David, “Foreign Aid and Social Reform in Political Development: A Philippine Case Study,” American Political Science Review, 53, no. 2 (June 1959), pp. 456–82.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003).Google Scholar
Yoon, Mi Yung, “Explaining U.S. Intervention in Third World Internal Wars, 1945–1989,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, no. 4 (1997), pp. 580–602.Google Scholar
Young, Marilyn, Fitzgerald, John, and Grunfeld, Tom, The Vietnam War: A History in Documents (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Zasloff, Joseph, Origins of the Insurgency in South Vietnam, 1954–1960: The Role of the Southern Vietminh Cadres (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1968).Google Scholar