Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: March 2013

Section 1 - Anatomy and physiology

References

1. de Kretser DM, Meinhardt A, Meehan T, et al. The roles of inhibin and related peptides in gonadal function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161: 43–6.
2. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell–Walsh Urology, 9th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2007.
3. Clarke IJ, Rao A, Fallest PC, Shupnik MA. Transcription rate of the follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) beta subunit gene is reduced by inhibin in sheep but this does not fully explain the decrease in mRNA. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1993; 91: 211–16.
4. Harrison RG, Barclay AE. The distribution of the testicular artery (internal spermatic artery) to the human testis. Br J Urol 1948; 20: 57–66.
5. Skandhan KP, Rajahariprasad A. The process of spermatogenesis liberates significant heat and the scrotum has a role in body thermoregulation. Med Hypotheses 2007; 68: 303–7.
6. Muller I. [Architectonic of the canals and capillaries of rat testes]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1957; 45: 522–37.
7. Wishahi MM. Detailed anatomy of the internal spermatic vein and the ovarian vein. Human cadaver study and operative spermatic venography: clinical aspects. J Urol 1991; 145: 780–4.
8. Sofikitis N, Dritsas K, Miyagawa I, Koutselinis A. Anatomical characteristics of the left testicular venous system in man. Arch Androl 1993; 30: 79–85.
9. Lennox B, Ahmad KN. The total length of tubules in the human testis. J Anat 1970; 107: 191.
10. Lennox B, Ahmad KN, Mack WS. The total length of tubules in normal and atrophic testes. J Pathol 1970; 100: P3–4.
11. Baumgarten HG, Holstein AF. [Direct adrenergic innervation of Leydig cells in the vertebrate testis]. J Neurovisc Relat 1971; 0 (Suppl 10): 563–72.
12. Mitchell GA. The innervation of the kidney, ureter, testicle and epididymis. J Anat 1935; 70: 10–32.
13. Baumgarten HG, Holstein AF. [Catecholamine-containing nerve fivers in the testis of man]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1967; 79: 389–95.
14. Baumgarten HG, Falck B, Holstein AF, Owman C, Owman T. [Adrenergic innervation of the human testis, epididymis, ductus deferens and prostate: a fluorescence microscopic and fluorimetric study]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1968; 90: 81–95.
15. Van De Velde RL, Risley PL. The origin and development of smooth muscle and contractility in the ductus epididymidis of the rat. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1963; 11: 369–82.
16. Macmillan EW. The blood supply of the epididymis in man. Br J Urol 1954; 26: 60–71.
17. Johnson L, Varner DD. Effect of daily spermatozoan production but not age on transit time of spermatozoa through the human epididymis. Biol Reprod 1988; 39: 812–17.
18. Amann RP, Howards SS. Daily spermatozoal production and epididymal spermatozoal reserves of the human male. J Urol 1980; 124: 211–15.
19. Moore HD, Hartman TD, Pryor JP. Development of the oocyte-penetrating capacity of spermatozoa in the human epididymis. Int J Androl 1983; 6: 310–18.
20. Schoysman RJ, Bedford JM. The role of the human epididymis in sperm maturation and sperm storage as reflected in the consequences of epididymovasostomy. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 293–9.
21. Jardin A, Izard V, Benoit G, et al. [In vivo and in vitro fertilizing ability of immature human epididymal spermatozoa]. Reprod Nutr Dev 1988; 28: 1375–85.
22. Matthews GJ, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations. J Urol 1995; 154: 2070–3.
23. Silber SJ. Results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: role of epididymis in sperm maturation. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 298–303.
24. Rowley MJ, Teshima F, Heller CG. Duration of transit of spermatozoa through the human male ductular system. Fertil Steril 1970; 21: 390–6.
25. Silber SJ. Role of epididymis in sperm maturation. Urology 1989; 33: 47–51.
26. Harrison RG. The distribution of the vasal and cremasteric arteries to the testis and their functional importance. J Anat 1949; 83: 267–82.
27. Paniagua R, Regadera J, Nistal M, Abaurrea MA. Histological, histochemical and ultrastructural variations along the length of the human vas deferens before and after puberty. Acta Anat (Basel) 1982; 111: 190–203.
28. White IG, Goh P, Voglmayr JK. Effect of male reproductive tract fluids and proteins on the metabolism and motility of ram spermatozoa. Arch Androl 1987; 19: 115–25.
29. Steers WD. Neural pathways and central sites involved in penile erection: neuroanatomy and clinical implications. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000; 24: 507–16.
30. Everaert K, de Waard WI, Van Hoof T, et al. Neuroanatomy and neurophysiology related to sexual dysfunction in male neurogenic patients with lesions to the spinal cord or peripheral nerves. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 182–91.
31. Akman Y, Liu W, Li Yw, Baskin LS. Penile anatomy under the pubic arch: reconstructive implications. J Urol 2001; 166: 225–30.
32. Lue TF, Zeineh SJ, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Neuroanatomy of penile erection: its relevance to iatrogenic impotence. J Urol 1984; 131: 273–80.
33. Lue TF, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA. Electrostimulation and penile erection. Urol Int 1985; 40: 60–4.
34. Lepor H, Gregerman M, Crosby R, Mostofi FK, Walsh PC. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J Urol 1985; 133: 207–12.
35. Giuliano F, Rampin O. Neural control of erection. Physiol Behav 2004; 83: 189–201.
36. Yang CC, Jiang X. Clinical autonomic neurophysiology and the male sexual response: an overview. J Sex Med 2009; 6 (Suppl 3): 221–8.
37. Goldstein AM, Padma-Nathan H. The microarchitecture of the intracavernosal smooth muscle and the cavernosal fibrous skeleton. J Urol 1990; 144: 1144–6.
38. Jiang J, He Y, Jiang R. Ultrastructural changes of penile cavernous tissue in multiple sclerotic rats. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2206–14.
39. Murat N, Soner BC, Demir O, Esen A, Gidener S. Contractility of diabetic human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle in response to serotonin mediated via Rho-kinase. Pharmacology 2009; 84: 24–8.
40. Gratzke C, Angulo J, Chitaley K, et al. Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 445–75.
41. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Signal transduction and regulation in smooth muscle. Nature 1994; 372: 231–6.
42. Walsh MP. Regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72: 919–36.
43. Lue TF. Erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1802–13.

References

1. Winter JS, Faiman C. Pituitary–gonadal relations in male children and adolescents. Pediatr Res 1972; 6: 126–35.
2. Cohen J, Ooms MP, Vreeburg JT. Reduction of fertilizing capacity of epididymal spermatozoa by 5 alpha-steroid reductase inhibitors. Experientia 1981; 37: 1031–2.
3. Turner TT, D’Addario D, Howards SS. Further observations on the initiation of sperm motility. Biol Reprod 1978; 19: 1095–101.
4. Macmillan EW. The blood supply of the epididymis in man. Br J Urol 1954; 26: 60–71.
5. Bedford JM, Calvin H, Cooper GW. The maturation of spermatozoa in the human epididymis. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1973; 18: 199–213.
6. Johnson L, Varner DD. Effect of daily spermatozoan production but not age on transit time of spermatozoa through the human epididymis. Biol Reprod 1988; 39: 812–17.
7. Rowley MJ, Teshima F, Heller CG. Duration of transit of spermatozoa through the human male ductular system. Fertil Steril 1970; 21: 390–6.
8. Curtis SK, Amann RP. Testicular development and establishment of spermatogenesis in Holstein bulls. J Anim Sci 1981; 53: 1645–57.
9. Amann RP, Howards SS. Daily spermatozoal production and epididymal spermatozoal reserves of the human male. J Urol 1980; 124: 211–15.
10. Bedford JM. The status and the state of the human epididymis. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 2187–99.
11. Kaler LW, Neaves WB. Attrition of the human Leydig cell population with advancing age. Anat Rec 1978; 192: 513–18.
12. Nagano T. [Some observations on the fine structure of the Sertoli cell in the human testis]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1966; 73: 89–106.
13. von Eckardstein S, Simoni M, Bergmann M, et al. Serum inhibin B in combination with serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a more sensitive marker than serum FSH alone for impaired spermatogenesis in men, but cannot predict the presence of sperm in testicular tissue samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 2496–501.
14. Fawcett DW. Observations on the organization of the interstitial tissue of the testis and on the occluding cell junctions in the seminiferous epithelium. Adv Biosci 1973; 10: 83–99.
15. Dym M, Fawcett DW. The blood-testis barrier in the rat and the physiological compartmentation of the seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod 1970; 3: 308–26.
16. Clermont Y. Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals: seminiferous epithelium cycle and spermatogonial renewal. Physiol Rev 1972; 52: 198–236.
17. Roosen-Runge EC. Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1952; 55: 574–84.
18. Brinster RL, Avarbock MR. Germline transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 11303–7.
19. Ehmcke J, Schlatt S. A revised model for spermatogonial expansion in man: lessons from non-human primates. Reproduction 2006; 132: 673–80.
20. Clermont Y. Spermatogenesis in man: a study of the spermatogonial population. Fertil Steril 1966; 17: 705–21.
21. Rowley MJ, Heller CG. [Quantitation of the cells of the seminiferous epithelium of the human testis employing the sertoli cell as a constant]. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 1971; 115: 461–72.
22. Geijsen N, Horoschak M, Kim K, et al. Derivation of embryonic germ cells and male gametes from embryonic stem cells. Nature 2004; 427: 148–54.
23. Koepp DM, Harper JW, Elledge SJ. How the cyclin became a cyclin: regulated proteolysis in the cell cycle. Cell 1999; 97: 431–4.
24. Collins I, Newlon CS. Chromosomal DNA replication initiates at the same origins in meiosis and mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14: 3524–34.
25. Cha RS, Weiner BM, Keeney S, Dekker J, Kleckner N. Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p. Genes Dev 2000; 14: 493–503.
26. Parisi S, McKay MJ, Molnar M, et al. Rec8p, a meiotic recombination and sister chromatid cohesion phosphoprotein of the Rad21p family conserved from fission yeast to humans. Mol Cell Biol May 1999; 19: 3515–28.
27. Lynn A, Koehler KE, Judis L, et al. Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science 2002; 296: 2222–5.
28. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 1997; 88: 375–84.
29. Holliday R, Whitehouse HL. The wrong way to think about gene conversion? Mol Gen Genet 1970; 107: 85–93.
30. Roeder GS, Bailis JM. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet 2000; 16: 395–403.
31. Gruber S, Haering CH, Nasmyth K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 2003; 112: 765–77.
32. Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 1996; 10: 3081–93.
33. Ciosk R, Zachariae W, Michaelis C, et al. An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 1998; 93: 1067–76.
34. Lee J, Iwai T, Yokota T, Yamashita M. Temporally and spatially selective loss of Rec8 protein from meiotic chromosomes during mammalian meiosis. J Cell Sci 2003; 116: 2781–90.
35. Lee BH, Amon A. Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation. Science 2003; 300: 482–6.
36. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 2004; 427: 510–17.
37. Nasmyth K. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Genet 2001; 35: 673–745.
38. Suja JA, de la Torre J, Gimenez-Abian JF, Garcia de la Vega C, Rufas JS. Meiotic chromosome structure: kinetochores and chromatid cores in standard and B chromosomes of Arcyptera fusca (Orthoptera) revealed by silver staining. Genome 1991; 34: 19–27.
39. Dewar H, Tanaka K, Nasmyth K, Tanaka TU. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 2004; 428: 93–7.
40. Shonn MA, Murray Al, Murray AW. Spindle checkpoint component Mad2 contributes to biorientation of homologous chromosomes. Curr Biol 2003; 13: 1979–84.
41. Furuno N, Nishizawa M, Okazaki K, et al. Suppression of DNA replication via Mos function during meiotic divisions in Xenopus oocytes. Embo J 1994; 13: 2399–410.
42. Marston AL, Lee BH, Amon A. The Cdc14 phosphatase and the FEAR network control meiotic spindle disassembly and chromosome segregation. Dev Cell 2003; 4: 711–26.
43. Clermont Y, Leblond CP. Spermiogenesis of man, monkey, ram and other mammals as shown by the periodic acid-Schiff technique. Am J Anat 1955; 96: 229–53.
44. Holstein AF. Ultrastructural observations on the differentiation of spermatids in man. Andrologia 1976; 8: 157–65.
45. Heller CG, Clermont Y. Spermatogenesis in man: an estimate of its duration. Science 1963; 140: 184–6.
46. Hermo L, Pelletier RM, Cyr DG, Smith CE. Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 2: changes in spermatid organelles associated with development of spermatozoa. Microsc Res Tech 2010; 73: 279–319.
47. Hermo L, Pelletier RM, Cyr DG, Smith CE. Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 1: background to spermatogenesis, spermatogonia, and spermatocytes. Microsc Res Tech 2010; 73: 241–278.
48. de Kretser DM, Loveland KL, Meinhardt A, Simorangkir D, Wreford N. Spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (Suppl 1): 1–8.
49. Tulsiani DR, Orgebin-Crist MC, Skudlarek MD. Role of luminal fluid glycosyltransferases and glycosidases in the modification of rat sperm plasma membrane glycoproteins during epididymal maturation. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1998; 53: 85–97.
50. Allison AC, Hartree EF. Lysosomal enzymes in the acrosome and their possible role in fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1970; 21: 501–15.
51. Beyler SA, Zaneveld LJ. Inhibition of in-vitro fertilization of mouse gametes by proteinase inhibitors. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 66: 425–31.
52. Klemm U, Maier WM, Tsaousidou S, et al. Mouse preproacrosin: cDNA sequence, primary structure and postmeiotic expression in spermatogenesis. Differentiation 1990; 42: 160–6.
53. Escalier D, Gallo JM, Albert M, et al. Human acrosome biogenesis: immunodetection of proacrosin in primary spermatocytes and of its partitioning pattern during meiosis. Development 1991; 113: 779–88.
54. Bellve AR, Anderson E, Hanley Bowdoin L. Synthesis and amino acid composition of basic proteins in mammalian sperm nuclei. Dev Biol 1975; 47: 349–65.
55. Steger K, Klonisch T, Gavenis K, et al. Expression of mRNA and protein of nucleoproteins during human spermiogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4: 939–45.
56. Balhorn R. A model for the structure of chromatin in mammalian sperm. J Cell Biol 1982; 93: 298–305.
57. Fawcett DW. The mammalian spermatozoon. Dev Biol 1975; 44: 394–436.
58. Breitbart H, Cohen G, Rubinstein S. Role of actin cytoskeleton in mammalian sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction. Reproduction 2005; 129: 263–8.
59. Baccetti B. Evolutionary trends in sperm structure. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol 1986; 85: 29–36.
60. Toshimori K. Maturation of mammalian spermatozoa: modifications of the acrosome and plasma membrane leading to fertilization. Cell Tissue Res 1998; 293: 177–87.
61. Stackpole CW, Devorkin D. Membrane organization in mouse spermatozoa revealed by freeze-etching. J Ultrastruct Res 1974; 49: 167–87.
62. Fawcett DW, Phillips DM. The fine structure and development of the neck region of the mammalian spermatozoon. Anat Rec 1969; 165: 153–64.
63. Shupnik MA, Schreihofer DA. Molecular aspects of steroid hormone action in the male reproductive axis. J Androl 1997; 18: 341–4.
64. O’Donnell L, Meachem S, Stanton P. Endocrine regulation of spermatogenesis. In Knobil E, Neill JD, eds., The Physiology of Reproduction. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1994; pp. 1017–69.
65. Hayes FJ, Pitteloud N, DeCruz S, Crowley WF, Boepple PA. Importance of inhibin B in the regulation of FSH secretion in the human male. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 5541–6.
66. Kumar TR. What have we learned about gonadotropin function from gonadotropin subunit and receptor knockout mice? Reproduction 2005; 130: 293–302.
67. Cheng CY, Wong EW, Yan HH, Mruk DD. Regulation of spermatogenesis in the microenvironment of the seminiferous epithelium: new insights and advances. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; 315: 49–56.
68. Witte ON. Steel locus defines new multipotent growth factor. Cell 1990; 63: 5–6.

References

1. Colpi Gm, Colpi Em, Castiglioni F, Grugnetti C. Semen cryopreservation from oncological patients: the Italian experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113 (Suppl 1): S12–13.
2. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1388–93.
3. Bostofte E, Bagger P, Michael A, Stakemann G. Fertility prognosis for infertile men: results of follow-up study of semen analysis in infertile men from two different populations evaluated by the Cox regression model. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 1100–6.
4. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 629–34.
5. Bonde JP, Ernst E, Jensen TK, et al. Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet 1998; 352: 1172–7.
6. Fisch H, Ikeguchi EF, Goluboff ET. Worldwide variations in sperm counts. Urology 1996; 48: 909–11.
7. Robbins WA, Elashoff DA, Xun L, et al. Effect of lifestyle exposures on sperm aneuploidy. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005; 111: 371–7.
8. Alvarez C, Castilla JA, Martinez L, et al. Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2082–8.
9. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 231–45.
10. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th edn. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
11. Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Andersson AM, Skakkebaek NE. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 358–66.
12. Comhaire F, Vermeulen L. Human semen analysis. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1: 343–62.
13. Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B. Effect of long abstinence periods on human sperm quality. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1994; 39: 278–82.
14. McLachlan RI, Baker HW, Clarke GN, et al. Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice. Pathology 2003; 35: 25–33.
15. Elia J, Delfino M, Imbrogno N, et al. Human semen hyperviscosity: prevalence, pathogenesis and therapeutic aspects. Asian J Androl 2009; 11: 609–15.
16. Overstreet JW. Clinical approach to male reproductive problems. Occup Med 1994; 9: 387–404.
17. Andrade-Rocha FT. Semen analysis in laboratory practice: an overview of routine tests. J Clin Lab Anal 2003; 17: 247–58.
18. Mortimer ST. CASA: practical aspects. J Androl 2000; 21: 515–24.
19. Macleod IC, Irvine DS. The predictive value of computer-assisted semen analysis in the context of a donor insemination programme. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 580–6.
20. Oehninger S, Franken D, Alexander N, Hodgen GD. Hemizona assay and its impact on the identification and treatment of human sperm dysfunctions. Andrologia 1992; 24: 307–21.
21. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112–17.
22. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 586–92.
23. Van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W. Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 495–500.
24. Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. J Androl 2000; 21: 145–53.
25. Grow DR, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, et al. Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 559–67.
26. Liu DY, Baker HW. Tests of human sperm function and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 465–83.
27. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1517–21.
28. Chiu WW, Chamley LW. Clinical associations and mechanisms of action of antisperm antibodies. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 529–35.
29. Bohring C, Krause W. Immune infertility: towards a better understanding of sperm (auto)-immunity. The value of proteomic analysis. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 915–24.
30. Fedder J. Nonsperm cells in human semen: with special reference to seminal leukocytes and their possible influence on fertility. Arch Androl 1996; 36: 41–65.
31. Aziz N, Agarwal A, Lewis-Jones I, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ. Novel associations between specific sperm morphological defects and leukocytospermia. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 621–7.
32. Shekarriz M, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Positive myeloperoxidase staining (Endtz test) as an indicator of excessive reactive oxygen species formation in semen. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12: 70–4.
33. Wolff H. The biologic significance of white blood cells in semen. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1143–57.
34. Keck C, Gerber-Schafer C, Clad A, Wilhelm C, Breckwoldt M. Seminal tract infections: impact on male fertility and treatment options. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 891–903.
35. de Lamirande E. Semenogelin, the main protein of the human semen coagulum, regulates sperm function. Semin Thromb Hemost 2007; 33: 60–8.
36. Sabanegh ES, Jr., Ragheb AM. Male fertility after cancer. Urology 2009; 73: 225–31.
37. Chung K, Irani J, Knee G, et al. Sperm cryopreservation for male patients with cancer: an epidemiological analysis at the University of Pennsylvania. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113 (Suppl 1): S7–11.
38. Ragni G, Somigliana E, Restelli L, et al. Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients. Cancer 2003; 97: 1624–9.
39. Agarwal A, Said TM. Implications of systemic malignancies on human fertility. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9: 673–9.
40. Ho Gt, Gardner H, DeWolf WC, Loughlin KR, Morgentaler A. Influence of testicular carcinoma on ipsilateral spermatogenesis. J Urol 1992; 148: 821–5.
41. Barr RD, Clark DA, Booth JD. Dyspermia in men with localized Hodgkin's disease: a potentially reversible, immune-mediated disorder. Med Hypotheses 1993; 40: 165–8.
42. Hallak J, Kolettis PN, Sekhon VS, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Cryopreservation of sperm from patients with leukemia: is it worth the effort? Cancer 1999; 85: 1973–8.
43. David G, Jouannet P, Martin-Boyce A, Spira A, Schwartz D. Sperm counts in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 453–5.
44. Lewis SE. Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility? Reproduction 2007; 134: 31–40.
45. Biljan MM, Taylor CT, Manasse PR, et al. Evaluation of different sperm function tests as screening methods for male fertilization potential: the value of the sperm migration test. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 591–8.
46. Robinson JN, Lockwood GM, Dokras A, et al. Does isolated teratozoospermia affect performance in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer? Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 870–4.
47. Chia SE, Tay Sk, Lim ST. What constitutes a normal seminal analysis? Semen parameters of 243 fertile men. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3394–8.
48. Branigan EF, Estes MA, Muller CH. Advanced semen analysis: a simple screening test to predict intrauterine insemination success. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 547–51.
49. Krause W. The significance of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) for diagnosis in andrology and fertility prognosis. Int J Androl 1995; 18 (Suppl 2): 32–5.
50. Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nelson DR. New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. J Androl 2003; 24: 343–52.

References

1. McMahon CG, Abdo C, Incrocci L, et al. Disorders of orgasm and ejaculation in men. J Sex Med 2004; 1: 58–65.
2. Halata Z, Munger BL. The neuroanatomical basis for the protopathic sensibility of the human glans penis. Brain Res 1986; 371: 205–30.
3. Baron R, Janig W. Afferent and sympathetic neurons projecting into lumbar visceral nerves of the male rat. J Comp Neurol 1991; 314: 429–36.
4. Ueyama T, Arakawa H, Mizuno N. Central distribution of efferent and afferent components of the pudendal nerve in rat. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1987; 177: 37–49.
5. Nadelhaft I. Cholinergic axons in the rat prostate and neurons in the pelvic ganglion. Brain Res 2003; 989: 52–7.
6. Sato K., Kihara K. Spinal cord segments controlling the canine vas deferens and differentiation of the primate sympathetic pathways to the vas deferens. Microsc Res Tech 1998; 42: 390–7.
7. Truitt WA, Coolen LM. Identification of a potential ejaculation generator in the spinal cord. Science 2002; 297: 1566–9.
8. Coolen LM, Veening JG, Wells AB, Shipley MT. Afferent connections of the parvocellular subparafascicular thalamic nucleus in the rat: evidence for functional subdivisions. J Comp Neurol 2003; 463: 132–56.
9. Hamson DK, Watson NV. Regional brainstem expression of Fos associated with sexual behavior in male rats. Brain Res 2004; 1006: 233–40.
10. Heeb MM, Yahr P. Anatomical and functional connections among cell groups in the gerbil brain that are activated with ejaculation. J Comp Neurol 2001; 439: 248–58.
11. Opsomer RJ, Caramia MD, Zarola F, Pesce F, Rossini PM. Neurophysiological evaluation of central-peripheral sensory and motor pudendal fibres. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 74: 260–70.
12. Shafik A, El Sibai O. Mechanism of ejection during ejaculation: identification of a urethrocavernosus reflex. Arch Androl 2000; 44: 77–83.
13. Giuliano F, Clément P. Neuroanatomy and physiology of ejaculation. Annu Rev Sex Res 2005; 16: 190–216.
14. Ohl DA, Sønksen J, Menge AC, McCabe M, Keller LM. Electroejaculation versus vibratory stimulation in spinal cord injured men: sperm quality and patient preference. J Urol 1997; 157: 2147–9.
15. Gerstenberg TC, Levin RJ, Wagner G. Erection and ejaculation in man: assessment of the electromyographic activity of the bulbocavernosus and ischiocavernosus muscles. Br J Urol 1990; 65: 395–402.
16. Vinik AI, Freeman R, Erbas T. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Semin Neurol 2003; 23: 365–72.