Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2010

19 - Vitrification of human oocytes for a donor program

from Section 4 - Cryopreservation of oocytes

References

1. VegettiW, MarozziA, ManfrediniE, et al. Premature ovarían failure. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161: 53–57.
2. PortnoiMF, AbouraA, TachdjianG, et al. Molecular cytogenetic studies of Xq critical regions in premature ovarian failure patients. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2329–2334.
3. LiXH, ChenSU, ZhangX, et al. Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important sourse of oocyte donation: a clinical report of successful pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3390–3394.
4. ShulmanA, FrenkelY, Dor Jehoshua, et al. The best donor. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2493–2499.
5. CheckJH, ChoeJK, Nazari, A, et al. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donor. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1403–1408.
6. FabbriR, PorcuE, MarsellaT, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 411–416.
7. GhetlerY, SkutelskyE, BenNun I, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation and the fate of cortical granules. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 210–215.
8. ChenC. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; i: 884–886.
9. OkayK, PelinC, BangH. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 70–79.
10. ChenSU, LienYR, ChenHF, et al. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1975–1980.
11. KatayamaKP, StehlikJ, KuwayamaM, et al. High survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 223–224.
12. KuleshovaL, GianaroliL, MagliC, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3077–3079.
13. LindheimSR, FrumovitzMV, SauerM. Recruitment and screening policies and procedures used to establish a paid donor oocyte registry. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2020–2024.
14. BirminghanA. Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:S39-S50.
15. MarinaS, ExpósitoR, MarinaF, et al. Oocyte donor selection from 554 candidates. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2770–2776.
16. HøjgaardA, IngerslevHJ, DinesenJ. Friendly IVF: patient opinions. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1391–1396.
17. IngeGB, BrinsdenPR, ElderKT. Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 588–592.
18. KadochIJ. Spontaneous ovulation rate before oocyte retrieval in modified natural cycle IVF with and without indomethacin. Reprod Bio Med Online 2008; 16: 245–249.
19. TuckerMJ, MortonPC, WrightG, et al. Clinical application of human egg cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3156–3159.
20. PorcuE, FabbriR, SeracchioliR, et al. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 724–726.
21. MullenSF, AgcaY, BroermannDC, et al. The effects of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2004; 5: 1148–1154.
22. PickeringSJ, BraudePR, JohnsonMH, et al. Transient cooling to room temperature can use irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 102–108.
23. KuleshovaLL, LopataA. Vitrification can be more favourable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449–454.
24. ChianR-C, KuwayamaM, Tan L, et al. High survival rate of bovine oocyte matured in vitro following vitrification. J Reprod Develop 2004; 50: 685–696.
25. KuwayamaM. High efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 300–308.
26. LucenaE, BernalD, LucenaC, et al. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 108–111.
27. HongSW, ChungHM, LimJM, et al. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 142–146.
28. MichalasS, LoutradisD, DrakakisP, et al. A flexible protocol for the induction of recipient endometrial cycle in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1063–1066.
29. ApplebaumM. The uterine biophysical profile. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 67–68.
30. NottolaSA, Macchiarelli, CoticchioG, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocyte after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1123–1132.
31. LarmanMG, Katz-JaffeMG, SheehanCB, GardnerDK. 1,2-Propanediol and the type of cryopreservation procedure adversely affect mouse oocyte physiology. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 250–259.
32. LudwingM, Al-HasaniS, FelberbaumR, et al. New aspects of cryopreservation of oocyte and embryos in assisted reproduction and future perspectives. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 162–168.
33. American Fertility Society. Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 1993; 58: 55–75.
34. ResnikDB. The commodification of human reproductive materials. J Med Ethics 1998; 24: 338–339.