Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2010

Section 4 - Cryopreservation of oocytes

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

1. HeffnerLJ. Advanced maternal age: how old is too old?N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1927–1929.
2. HookEB, CrossPK, SchreinemachersDM. Chromosomal abnormality rates at amniocentesis and in live-born infants. JAMA 1983; 249: 2034–2038.
3. ShermanJK, LinTP. Survival of unfertilized mouse eggs during freezing and thawing. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1958; 98: 902–905.
4. ParkeningTA, TsunodaY, ChangMC. Effects of various low temperatures, cryoprotective agents and cooling rates on the survival, fertilizability and development of frozen–thawed mouse eggs. J Exp Zool 1976; 197: 369–374.
5. WhittinghamDG. Fertilization in vitro and development to term of unfertilized mouse oocytes previously stored at −196°C. J Reprod Fertil 1977; 49: 89–94.
6. ChenC. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; 327: 884–886.
7. van UemJF, SiebzehnrüblER, SchuhB, et al. Birth after cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes. Lancet 1987; 329: 752–753.
8. ChenC. Pregnancies after human oocyte cryopreservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 541: 541–519.
9. Al-HasaniS, DiedrichK, van der VenH, et al. Cryopreservation of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 695–700.
10. TuckerM, WrightG, MortonP, et al. Preliminary experience with human oocyte cryopreservation using 1,2-propanediol and sucrose. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1513–1515.
11. PorcuE, FabbriR, SeracchioliR, et al. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 724–726.
12. NoyesN, PorcuE, BoriniA. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18: 769–777.
13. ChianR-C, HuangJYJ, TanSL, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 608–610.
14. PorcuE, FabbriR, CiottiPM, et al. Cycles of human oocyte cryopreservation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: results of 112 cycles. Fertil Steril 1999; 72(Suppl 1): S2.
15. BoriniA, BonuMA, CoticchioG, et al. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 601–605.
16. TuckerMJ, MortonPC, WrightG, et al. Clinical application of human egg cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3156–3159.
17. MandelbaumJ, Belaїsch-AllartJ, JuncaAM, et al. Cryopreservation in human assisted reproduction is now routine for embryos but remains a research procedure for oocytes. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(Suppl 3): 161–177.
18. KuleshovaLL, LopataA. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449–454.
19. WiningerJD, KortHI. Cryopreservation of immature and mature human oocytes. Sem Reprod Med 2002; 20: 45–49.
20. YangDS, BlohmPL, WinslowKL, et al. A twin pregnancy after microinjection of human cryopreserved oocyte with a specially developed oocyte cryopreservation regime. Fertil Steril 1998; 70(Suppl 3): S86.
21. FabbriR, Porcu E, MarsellaT, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 411–416.
22. YangDS, BlohmPL, WinslowKL, et al. Oocyte donation using cryopreserved donor oocytes. Fertil Steril 2002; 78(Suppl 3): S14.
23. WinslowKL, YangDS, BlohmPL, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation: a three year follow up of sixteen births. Fertil Steril 2001; 76(Suppl 3): S120.
24. ChenSU, LienYR, TsaiYY, et al. Successful pregnancy occurred from slowly freezing human oocytes using the regime of 1.5 mol/l 1,2-propanediol with 0.3 mol/l sucrose. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1412.
25. FosasN, MarinaF, TorresPJ, et al. The births of five Spanish babies from cryopreserved donated oocytes. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1417–1421.
26. ChenSU, LienYR, ChenHF, et al. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1975–1980.
27. LiXH, ChenSU, ZhangX, et al. Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important source of oocyte donation: a clinical report of successful pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3390–3394.
28. BoriniA, SciajnoR, BianchiV, et al. Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 512–517.
29. Levi SettiPE, AlbaniE, NovaraPV, et al. Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 370–375.
30. TjerGC, ChiuTT, CheungLP, et al. Birth of a healthy baby after transfer of blastocysts derived from cryopreserved human oocytes fertilized with frozen spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 1547–1549.
31. BoriniA, CattoliM, BullettiC, CoticchioG. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1127: 49–58.
32. BoriniA, BianchiV, BonuMA, et al. Evidence-based clinical outcome of oocyte slow cooling. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15: 175–181.
33. StacheckiJJ, CohenJ, WilladsenSM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology 1998; 37: 346–355.
34. DonaldsonMJ, QuintansCJ, RochaM, et al. Pregnancies achieved after transfer of embryos obtained by IVF of human oocytes cryopreserved in low sodium: report of two cases. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 152.
35. QuintansCJ, DonaldsonMJ, BertolinoMV, et al. Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3149–3152.
36. BoldtJ, ClineD, McLaughlinD. Human oocyte cryopreservation as an adjunct to IVF-embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1250–1255.
37. AzambujaR, BadalottiM, TelokenC, et al. Successful birth after injection of frozen human oocytes with frozen epididymal spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 449–451.
38. MukaidaT, WadaS, TakahashiK, et al. Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 1998; 13; 2874–2879.
39. MukaidaT, NakamuraS, TomiyamaT, et al. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 618–620.
40. HongSW, ChungHM, LimJM, et al. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 142–146.
41. KuleshovaL, GianaroliL, MagliC, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3077–3079.
42. KuleshovaLL, ShawJM. A strategy for rapid cooling of embryos within a double straw to eliminate the risk of contamination during cryopreservation and storage. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2604–2609.
43. YokotaY, YokotaH, YokotaMet al. Birth of healthy twins from in vitro development of human refrozen embryos. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 1063–1065.
44. ChungHM, HongSW, LimJM, et al. In vitro blastocyst formation of human oocytes obtained from unstimulated and stimulated cycles after vitrification at various maturational stages. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 545–551.
45. ChiHJ, KooJJ, KimMY, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled slow freezing. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2146–2151.
46. ChoHJ, SonWY, YoonSH, et al. An improved protocol for dilution of cryoprotectants from vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2419–2422.
47. VanderzwalmenP, BertinG, DebaucheCH, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the Hemi-Straw carrier: application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1504–1511.
48. SonWY, YoonSH, YoonHJ, et al. Pregnancy outcome following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified on electron microscopy grids after induced collapse of the blastocoele. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 137–139.
49. YoonTK, KimTJ, ParkSE, et al. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1323–1326.
50. KatayamaKP, StehlikJ, KuwayamaMet al. High survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 223–224.
51. KyonoK, FuchinoueK, YagiA, et al. Successful pregnancy and delivery after transfer of a single blastocyst derived from a vitrified mature human oocyte. Fertil Steril 2004; 84: 1017.
52. ChianR-C, SonWY, Huang JW, et al. High survival rates and pregnancies of human oocytes following vitrification: preliminary report. Fertil Steril 2005; 84(Suppl 1): S36.
53. KimTJ, HongSW, ChungHMet al. Pregnancy and delivery after vitrification of human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2004; 83(Suppl 1): S13.
54. KimT, HongS, ChaK. Pregnancies from cryopreserved oocytes using vitrification protocol. Fertil Steril 2005; 84(Suppl 1): S179.
55. KuwayamaM, VajtaG, IedaS, et al. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 608–614.
56. OkimuraT, KatoK, ZhanQ, et al. Update on clinical efficiency of the vitrification method for human oocytes in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 2005; 84(Suppl 1): S174.
57. LucenaE, BernalDP, LucenaC, et al. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 108–111.
58. CoboA, KuwayamaM, PérezS, RuizA, PellicerA, RemohíJ. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1657–1664.
59. SherG, KeskintepeL, MukaidaT, et al. Selective vitrification of euploid oocytes markedly improves survival, fertilization and pregnancy-generating potential. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 524–529.
60. ChianR-C, HuangJYJ, GilbertL, et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2391–2398.
61. CooperA, PaynterSJ, FullerBJ, et al. Differential effects of cryopreservation on nuclear or cytoplasmic maturation in vitro in immature mouse oocytes from stimulated ovaries. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 971–978.
62. IsachenkoEF, NayuduPL. Vitrification of mouse germinal vesicle oocytes: effect of treatment temperature and egg yolk on chromosomal normality and cumulus integrity. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 400–408.
63. MandelbaumJ, JuncaAM, PlachotM, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos and oocytes. Hum Reprod 1988; 3: 117–119.
64. TothTL, BakaSG, VeeckLL, et al. Fertilization and in vitro development of cryopreserved human prophase I oocytes. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 891–894.
65. TothTL, LanzendorfSE, SandowBA, et al. Cryopreservation of human prophase I oocytes collected from unstimulated follicles. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 1077–1082.
66. SonWY, ParkSE, LeeKA, et al. Effects of 1,2-propanediol and freezing on the in vitro developmental capacity of human immature oocytes. Fertil Steril 1996; 66: 996–999.
67. ChaKY, ChianR-C. Maturation in vitro of immature human oocytes for clinical use. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 103–120.
68. TuckerMJ, WrightG, MortonPC, et al. Birth after cryopreservation of immature oocytes with subsequent in vitro maturation. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 578–579.
69. ShawJM, OranratnachaiA, TrounsonAO. Fundamental cryobiology of mammalian oocytes and ovarian tissue. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 59–72.
70. CaoYX, XingQ, ZhangZG, WeiZL, ZhouP, CongL. Cryopreservation of immature and in-vitro matured human oocytes by vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19: 369–373.
71. ChianR-C, GilbertL, HuangJY, et al. Live birth after vitrification of in vitro matured human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 372–376.

References

1. ChenC. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; i: 884–886.
2. Al-HasaniS, DiedrichK, van der VenH, KrebsD. [Initial results of the cryopreservation of human oocytes]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1986; 46: 643–644.
3. WhittinghamDG. Fertilization in vitro and development to term of unfertilized mouse oocytes previously stored at −196 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil 1977; 49: 89–94.
4. PorcuE, FabbriR, SeracchioliR, et al. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 724–726.
5. BoriniA, BonuMA, CoticchioG, et al. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 601–605.
6. PaynterSJ, O ’ NeilL, FullerBJ, ShawRW. Membrane permeability of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant propane-1,2-diol. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 532–538.
7. FabbriR, PorcuE, MarsellaT, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 411–416.
8. BianchiV, CoticchioG, DistratisV, et al. Differential sucrose concentration during dehydration (0.2 mol/l) and rehydration (0.3 mol/l) increases the implantation rate of frozen human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 64–71.
9. BoriniA, SciajnoR, BianchiV, et al. Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 512–517.
10. De SantisL, CinoI, RabellottiE, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome of slow-cooling protocols differing in sucrose concentration. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 57–63.
11. Levi SettiPE, AlbaniE, NovaraPV, CesanaA, MorrealeG. Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 370–375.
12. PaynterSJ, BoriniA, BianchiV, et al. Volume changes of mature human oocytes on exposure to cryoprotectant solutions used in slow cooling procedures. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1194–1199.
13. BoriniA, BianchiV, BonuMA, et al. Evidence-based clinical outcome of oocyte slow cooling. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15: 175–181.
14. CoboA, KuwayamaM, PerezS, et al. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1657–1664.
15. CoboA, BellverJ, DomingoJ, et al. New options in assisted reproduction technology: the Cryotop method of oocyte vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 68–72.
16. De SantisL, CoticchioG, PaynterS, et al. Permeability of human oocytes to ethylene glycol and their survival and spindle configurations after slow cooling cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 2776–2783.
17. KasaiM, MukaidaT. Cryopreservation of animal and human embryos by vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9: 164–170.
18. NottolaSA, CoticchioG, de SantisL, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation with ethylene glycol. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 368–377.
19. StacheckiJJ, CohenJ, WilladsenS. Detrimental effects of sodium during mouse oocyte cryopreservation. Biol Reprod 1998; 59: 395–400.
20. StacheckiJJ, CohenJ, WilladsenSM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized mouse oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology 1998; 37: 346–354.
21. StacheckiJJ, WilladsenSM. Cryopreservation of mouse oocytes using a medium with low sodium content: effect of plunge temperature. Cryobiology 2000; 40: 4–12.
22. StacheckiJJ, CohenJ, GarrisiJ, et al. Cryopreservation of unfertilized human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13: 222–227.
23. BoldtJ, TidswellN, SayersA, KilaniR, ClineD. Human oocyte cryopreservation: 5-year experience with a sodium-depleted slow freezing method. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13: 96–100.
24. QuintansCJ, DonaldsonMJ, BertolinoMV, PasqualiniRS. Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3149–3152.
25. PetraccoA, AzambujaR, OkadaL, et al. Comparison of embryo quality between sibling embryos originating from frozen or fresh oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13: 497–503.
26. ZiebeS, PetersenK, LindenbergS, et al. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1545–1549.
27. EdgarDH, ArcherJ, McBainJ, BourneH. Embryonic factors affecting outcome from single cryopreserved embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 718–723.
28. CoticchioG, SereniE, SerraoL, et al. What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality?Ann New York Acad Sci 2004; 1034: 132–144.
29. NagyZP, ChangCC, ShapiroDB, et al. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 520–526.
30. NottolaSA, MacchiarelliG, CoticchioG, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1123–1133.
31. GookDA, OsbornSM, JohnstonWI. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1101–1109.
32. GhetlerY, SkutelskyE, Ben NunI, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation and the fate of cortical granules. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 210–216.
33. GualtieriR, IaccarinoM, MolloV, et al. Slow cooling of human oocytes: ultrastructural injuries and apoptotic status. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1023–1034.
34. FukuE, XiaL, DowneyBR. Ultrastructural changes in bovine oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology 1995; 32: 139–156.
35. HochiS, KozawaM, FujimotoT, et al. In vitro maturation and transmission electron microscopic observation of horse oocytes after vitrification. Cryobiology 1996; 33: 300–310.
36. CoticchioG, DistratisV, BoriniA, et al. Reduced ultrastructural damage in human oocytes cryopreserved after dehydration involving single-step propanediol exposure. Hum Reprod 2008; 23(Suppl 1): i150.
37. NottolaSA, CoticchioG, SciajnoR, et al. Ultrastructural changes in human metaphase II oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification. Hum Reprod 2008; 23(Suppl 1): i34.
38. PickeringSJ, BraudePR, JohnsonMH, CantA, CurrieJ. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 102–108.
39. CoticchioG, de SantisL, RossiG, et al. Sucrose concentration influences the rate of human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1771–1776.
40. CoboA, PerezS, de los SantosMJ, ZulateguiJ, DomingoJ, RemohiJ. Effect of different cryopreservation protocols on the metaphase II spindle in human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 350–359.
41. WangWH, MengL, HackettRJ, KeefeDL. Developmental ability of human oocytes with or without birefringent spindles imaged by Polscope before insemination. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1464–1468.
42. WangWH, MengL, HackettRJ, OdenbourgR, KeefeDL. The spindle observation and its relationship with fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in living human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 348–353.
43. CookeS, TylerJP, DriscollGL. Meiotic spindle location and identification and its effect on embryonic cleavage plane and early development. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2397–2405.
44. MoonJH, HyunCS, LeeSW, et al. Visualization of the metaphase II meiotic spindle in living human oocytes using the Polscope enables the prediction of embryonic developmental competence after ICSI. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 817–820.
45. RienziL, UbaldiF, MartinezF, et al. Relationship between meiotic spindle location with regard to the polar body position and oocyte developmental potential after ICSI. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1289–1293.
46. de SantisL, CinoI, RabellottiE, et al. Polar body morphology and spindle imaging as predictors of oocyte quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 36–42.
47. Rama RajuGA, PrakashGJ, KrishnaKM, MadanK. Meiotic spindle and zona pellucida characteristics as predictors of embryonic development: a preliminary study using Polscope imaging. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 166–174.
48. ShenY, StalfT, MehnertC, et al. Light retardance by human oocyte spindle is positively related to pronuclear score after ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 737–751.
49. MadaschiC, de SouzaBonetti TC, de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, et al. Spindle imaging: a marker for embryo development and implantation. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 194–198.
50. BianchiV, CoticchioG, FavaL, FlamigniC, BoriniA. Meiotic spindle imaging in human oocytes frozen with a slow freezing procedure involving high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1078–1083.
51. RienziL, MartinezF, UbaldiF, et al. Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 655–659.
52. CoticchioG, SciajnoR, HuttKJ, et al. Comparative analysis of the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes through polarized light and high performance confocal microscopy. Fertil Steril 2009; epub ahead pf print.
53. BarrittJ, LunaM, DukeM, et al. Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: e13–17.
54. La SalaGB, NicoliA, VillaniMT, et al. Outcome of 518 salvage oocyte-cryopreservation cycles performed as a routine procedure in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 1423–1427.
55. ChenSU, LienYR, ChenHF, et al. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1975–1980.
56. LucenaE, BernalDP, LucenaC, et al. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 108–111.
57. GookDA, EdgarDH. Cryopreservation of the human female gamete: current and future issues. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2938–2940.
58. LassalleB, TestartJ, RenardJP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2-propanediol. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 645–651.
59. ParmegianiL, CognigniGE, BernardiS, et al. Freezing within 2 h from oocyte retrieval increases the efficiency of human oocyte cryopreservation when using a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol with high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1771–1778.
60. DucibellaT. Biochemical and cellular insights into the temporal window of normal fertilization. Theriogenology 1998; 49: 53–65.
61. BoriniA, CattoliM, BullettiC, CoticchioG. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Ann New York Acad Sci 2008; 1127: 49–58.
62. PorcuE, FabbriR, DamianoG, et al. Clinical experience and applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 169: 33–37.
63. BoriniA, CattoliM, MazzoneS, et al. Survey of 105 babies born after slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: S13–S14.
64. Tur-KaspaI, GalM, HorwitzA. Genetics and health of children born from cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: S14.
65. MaherB. Little consensus on egg freezing. Nature 2007; 449: 958.

References

1. FahyGM, RallWF. Vitrification: an overview. In TuckerMJ, LiebermannJ, eds. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User’s Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London:Informa Healthcare, 2007, pp. 1–20.
2. KuwayamaM. The human oocyte: vitrification. In GardnerDK, WeissmanA, HowlesCM, ShohamZ, eds. Textbook of Asssisted Reproductive Technologies. Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd edn. London:Informa Healthcare, 2009, pp. 267–273.
3. TuckerMJ, LiebermannJ (eds.). Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User’s Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London:Informa Healthcare, 2007.
4. FahyGM, MacFarlaneDR, AngellCA, et al. Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology 1984; 21: 407–426.
5. VajtaG, NagyZP, CoboA, et al. Vitrification in ART: myths, mistakes, disbeliefs and confusion. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; in press.
6. YavinS, AravA.Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology 2007; 67: 81–89.
7. HomburgR, van der VeenF, SilberSJ.Oocyte vitrification: women’s emancipation set in stone. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1319–1320.
8. DiazDG, LaA-TH, RodriguezK, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: outcome from 70 frozen oocyte cycles using a new modified slow-freeze protocol. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: S287.
9. QuinnP. Cryopreservation. In MarrsRP, ed. Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Oxford:Blackwell Scientific, 1993, pp. 89–107.
10. The World Egg Bank. 2009. http://www.theworldeggbank.com/tweb2/Home/Default.aspx (accessed July 23, 2009).
11. ChenC.Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; 19: 884–886.
12. ChenC.Pregnancies after human oocyte cryopreservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 541: 541–549.
13. KuleshovaLL, LopataA.Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449–454.
14. QuinnP. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes. In KeyeWR, ChangRJ, RebarRW, SoulesMR, eds. Infertility. Evaluation and Treatment. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1995, pp. 821–840.
15. KuleshovaL, GianaroliL, MagliC, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3077–3079.
16. YonTK, ChungHM, LimJM, et al. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 180–181.
17. KatayamaKP, StehlikJ, KuwayamaM, et al. High survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 223–224.
18. KuwayamaM, VajtaG, KatoO, et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 300–308.
19. KuwayamaM, VajtaG, IedaS, et al. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 608–614.
20. LucenaE, BernalDP, LucenaC, et al. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 108–111.
21. AntinoriM, LicataE, DaniG, et al. Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 72–79.
22. CoboA, KuwayamaM, PerezS, et al. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1657–1664.
23. ChianR-C, HuangJHJ, GilbertL, et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2391–2398.
24. ChianR-C, HuangJYJ, TanSL, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 608–610.
25. VajtaG, NagyZP.Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 779–796.
26. BielanskiA, VajtaG.Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and cryobanking in IVF units. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2457–2467.
27. MartinoA, SongsasenN, LeiboSP.Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod 1996; 54: 1059–1069.
28. MukaidaT, WadaS, TakahashiK, et al. Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2874–2879.
29. VajtaG, LewisIM, KuwayamaM, et al. Sterile application of the open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification method. Cryo Letters 1998; 19: 389–392.
30. KuwayamaM, KatoO.All-round vitrification method for human oocytes and embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000; 17: 477.
31. VanderzwalmenP, BertinG, DebaucheCH, et al. ‘In vitro’ survival of metaphase II oocytes (MII) and blastocysts after vitrification in an Hemi Straw (HS) system. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: S215–S216.
32. LaneM, SchoolcraftWB, GardnerDK.Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 1073–1078.
33. BoldtJ. CryoTip discussion. EmbryoMail List. 2009. http://embryomail.net/mhonarchive/em/msg00341.html (accessed 21 May, 2009).
34. AthaydeK. CryoTip breakage. EmbryoMail List. 2009. http://embryomail.net/mhonarchive/em/msg00329.html (accessed July 23, 2009).
35. BielanskiA, HannimanA.Non-cross-contamination of bovine embryos with microbes using the OPS vitrification system. Reprod Fertil Dev 2007; 19: 232.
36. LarmanMG, SheehanCB, GardnerDK.Vitrification of mouse pronuclear oocytes with no direct liquid nitrogen contact. Reprod BioMed Online 2006; 12: 66–69.
37. AravA, ZeronY, OcheretnyA.A new device and method for vitrification increases the cooling rate and allows successful cryopreservation of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 248.
38. YavinS, AroyoA, RothZ, et al. Embryo cryopreservation in the presence of low concentration of vitrification solution with sealed pulled straws in liquid nitrogen slush. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 797–804.
39. YoonTK, KimTJ, ParkSE, et al. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1323–1326.
40. KimT, HongS, ChaK.Pregnancies from cryopreserved oocytes using vitrification protocol. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: S179.
41. OktayK, CilAP, BangH.Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 70–80.
42. SelmanH, AngeliniA, BarnocchiN, et al. Ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of human oocytes using a combined solution of ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 997–1000.
43. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART Clinical Summary Report 2007. Birmingham, AL: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0 (accessed August 2, 2009).
44. StacheckiJJ, CohenJ.S3 vitrification system: a novel approach to blastocyst freezing. J Clin Embryol 2008; 11: 5–14.
45. CamusA, ClairazP, ErshamA, et al. Comparison of the process of five different vitrification devices. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2006; 34: 737–745.
46. IsachenkoV, KatkovII, YakavenkoS, et al. Vitrification of human laser treated blastocysts within cut standard straws (CSS): novel aseptic packaging and reduced concentrations of cryoprotectants. Cryobiology 2007; 54: 305–309.
47. ShawJM, JonesGM.Terminology associated with vitrification and other cryopreservation procedures for oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9: 583–605.
48. VanderzwalmenP, EctorsF, GrobetL, et al. Aseptic vitrification of blastocysts originating from infertile patients, egg donors and after IVM. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19: 700–707.
49. IsachenkoV, IsachenkoE, ReinsbergJ, et al. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue: effect of spontaneous and initiated ice formation. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 336–345.
50. TedderRS, ZuckermanMA, GoldstoneAH, et al. Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet 1995; 346: 137–140.
51. BielanskiA.Non-transmission of bacterial and viral microbes to embryos and semen stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen in dry shippers. Cryobiology 2005; 50: 206–210.
52. QuinnP.Cryopreservation of mouse oocytes using sodium-depleted media: comparison of HEPES-HTF and PBS-based formulations. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: S24–S25.
53. El-DanasouriI, SelmanH, StrehlerE, et al. Comparison of MOPS and HEPES buffers during vitrification. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: i136.
54. SwainJE, PoolTB.New pH-buffering system for media utilized during gamete and embryo manipulations for assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18: 799–810.
55. McWilliamsRB, GibbonsWE, LeiboSP.Osmotic and physiological responses of mouse zygotes and human oocytes to mono- and disaccharides. Hum Reprod 2005; 10: 1163–1171.
56. Kitazato. Kitazato Cryotop Safety Kit Protocol 2009; http://www.kitazato-biopharma.com/images/cryotop/Cryotop_En.pdf (accessed July 21, 2009).
57. Irvine. Scientific Vit Kit Thaw package insert. 2009. http://www.irvinesci.com/techinfo/docs/40793-Booklet-Rev5.pdf (accessed July 21, 2009).
58. SageIVF.Directions for Use for Vitrification Warming Kit. 2009. http://www.coopersurgical.com/Documents/ART-8030%20DFU.pdf (accessed July 22, 2009).
59. QuinnP. The impact of culture media on success rate in ART: where have we gone in the last decade? In GurganT, DemirolA, eds. Proceedings of the 13th World Congress: In Vitro Fertilization, Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Istanbul, Turkey, 2005, pp. 221–225.
60. StacheckiJ.Response to Letter to the JCE editor. J Clin Embryol 2009; 12: 5.
61. Wikipedia. Concentration. 2009. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration (accessed July 22, 2009).
62. Wikipedia. International System of Units. 2009. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_units (accessed July 22, 2009).

References

1. LeeSJ, SchoverLR, PartridgeAH, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 2917–2931.
2. Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 1622–1628.
3. WangX, ChenH, YinH, et al. Fertility after intact ovary transplantation. Nature 2002; 415: 385.
4. OktayK, BuyukE, VeeckLL, et al. Embryo development after heterotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet 2004; 363: 837–840.
5. DonnezJ, DolmansMM, DemylleD, et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet 2004; 364: 1405–1410.
6. MeirowD, LevronJ, Eldar-GevaT, et al. Pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a patient with ovarian failure after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 318–321.
7. DemeestereI, SimonP, EmilianiS, DelbaereA, EnglertY.Fertility preservation: successful transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a young patient previously treated for Hodgkin’s disease. Oncologist 2007; 12: 1437–1442.
8. MeirowD, HardanI, DorJ, et al. Searching for evidence of disease and malignant cell contamination in ovarian tissue stored from hematologic cancer patients. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1007–1013.
9. Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 993–998.
10. KuleshovaLL, LopataA.Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449–454.
11. OktayK, CilAP, BangH.Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 70–80.
12. HuangJY, TanSL, ChianR-C.Fertility preservation for female. J Reprod Contracept 2006; 17: 109–128.
13. ChianR-C, HuangJYJ, GilbertL, et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in-vitro and in-vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2391–2398.
14. KatayamaKP, StehlikJ, KuwayamaM, KatoO, StehlikE.High survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 223–224.
15. KuwayamaM, VajtaG, KatoO, LeiboSP.Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 300–308.
16. KuwayamaM.Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology 2007; 67: 73–80.
17. LucenaE, BernalDP, LucenaC, et al. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 108–111.
18. CoboA, KuwayamaM, PerezS, et al. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 1657–1664.
19. CooperA, PaynterSJ, FullerBJ.Differential effects of cryopreservation on nuclear or cytoplasmic maturation in vitro in immature mouse oocytes from stimulated ovaries. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 971–978.
20. IsachenkoEF, NayuduPL.Vitrification of mouse germinal vesicle oocytes: effect of treatment temperature and egg yolk on chromosomal normality and cumulus integrity. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 400–408.
21. TothTL, BakaSG, VeeckLL, et al. Fertilization and in vitro development of cryopreserved human prophase I oocytes. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 891–894.
22. TothTL, LanzendorfSE, SandowBA, et al. Cryopreservation of human prophase I oocytes collected from unstimulated follicles. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 1077–1082.
23. SonWY, ParkSE, LeeKA, et al. Effects of 1,2-propanediol and freezing–thawing on the in vitro developmental capacity of human immature oocytes. Fertil Steril 1996; 66: 995–999.
24. TuckerMJ, WrightG, MortonPC, MasseyJB.Birth after cryopreservation of immature oocytes with subsequent in vitro maturation. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 578–579.
25. RaoGD, ChianR-C, SonWS, GilbertL, TanSL.Fertility preservation in women undergoing cancer treatment. Lancet 2004; 363: 1829–1830.
26. HuangJY, TulandiT, HolzerH, TanSL, ChianR-C.Combining ovarian tissue cryobanking with retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: an additional strategy of fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 567–572.
27. ChianR-C, GilbertL, HuangJYJ, et al. Live birth after vitrification of in vitro matured human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 372–376.
28. ChianR-C, BuckettWM, TanSL.In-vitro maturation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8: 148–166.
29. ChianR-C, LimJH, TanSL.State of the art in in-vitro oocyte maturation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 16: 211–219.
30. JuremaMW, NogueiraD.In vitro maturation of human oocytes for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 1277–1291.
31. Al-SunaidiM, TulandiT, HolzerH, et al. Repeated pregnancies and live births after in vitro maturation treatment. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1212.e9–e12.
32. SonW-Y, ChungJ-T, ChianR-C, et al. A 38 h interval between hCG priming and oocyte retrieval increases in vivo and in vitro oocyte maturation rate in programmed IVM cycles. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2010–2016.
33. EdwardsRG. Foreword. In TanSL, ChianR-C, BuckettWM, eds. In Vitro Maturation of Human Oocytes Basic Science to Clinical Application. London: Informa Healthcare, 2006, pp. xv–xx.
34. BuckettWM, ChianR-C, HolzerH, et al. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 885–891.
35. DemirtasE, ElizurS, HolzerH, et al. Immature oocyte retrieval in the luteal phase to preserve fertility in women with cancer facing imminent gonadotoxic therapy: it is worth a try. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 520–523.
36. LuyetB.The vitrification of organic colloids and protoplasm. Biodynamica 1937; 1: 1–14.
37. FahyG.Prospect for vitrification of whole organs. Cryobiology 1981; 18: 617–625.
38. MacFarlaneD, ForsythM.Recent insights on the role of the cryoprotection against vitrification. Cryobiology 1990; 27: 345–358.
39. SommerfeldV, NiemannH.Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled freezing or vitrification. Cryobiology 1999; 38: 95–105.
40. EmilianiS, BerghM, VanninA, BiramaneJ, EnglertY.Comparison of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and glycerol for cryopreservation of slow-cooled mouse zygotes, 4-cell embryos and blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 905–910.
41. ShawJ, OranratnachaiA, TrounsonA.Fundamental cryobiology of mammalian oocytes and ovarian tissue. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 59–72.
42. MazurP.Cryobiology: the freezing of biological systems. Science 1970; 168: 939–949.
43. KasaiM.Advances in the cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes and embryos: development of ultrarapid vitrification. Reprod Med Biol 2002; 1: 1–9.
44. BoutronP, KaufmannA.Stability of the amorphous state in the system water–1,2-propanediol. Crybiology 1979; 16: 557–568.
45. RenardJ, BabinetC.High survival of mouse embryos after rapid freezing and thawing inside plastic straws with 1,2-propanediol as cryoprotectant. J Exp Zool 1984; 230: 443–448.
46. GlenisterP, WoodM, KirbyC, WhittinghamD.Incidence of chromosome anomalies in first-cleavage mouse embryos obtained from frozen–thawed oocytes fertilized in vitro. Gamete Res 1987; 16: 205–216.
47. KolaI, KirbyC, ShawJ, DaveyA, TrounsonA.Vitrification of mouse oocytes results in aneuploidy zygotes and malformed fetuses. Teratology 1988; 38: 467–474.
48. VincentC, PreliereG, Pajot-AugyE, et al. Effects of cryoprotectants on actin filaments during the cryopreservation of one-cell rabbit embryos. Cryobiology 1990; 27: 9–23.
49. GookD, OsbornS, BourneH, JohnstonW.Fertilization of human oocytes following cryopreservation; normal karyotypes and absence of stray chromosome. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 684–691.
50. van BlerkomJ, DavisP.Cytogenic, cellular, and developmental consequences of cryopreservation of immature and mature mouse and human oocytes. Micro Res Tech 1994; 27: 165–193.
51. VincentC, JohnsonMH.Cooling, cryoprotectants, and the cytoskeleton of the mammalian oocyte. Oxford Rev Reprod Biol 1992; 14: 73–100.
52. GookD, OsbornS, JohnsonW.Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindleHum Reprod 1993; 8: 1101–1109.
53. SathananthanAH, TrounsonA, FreemanL.Morphology and fertilization of frozen human oocytes. Gamete Res 1987; 16: 343–354.
54. ErogluA, TonerM, LeykinL, TothTL.Cytoskeleton and polyploidy after maturation and fertilization of cryopreserved germinal vesicle-stage mouse oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15: 447–454.
55. ErogluA, TothTL, TonerM.Alterations of the cytoskeleton and polyploidy induced by cryopreservation of metaphase II mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 944–957.
56. HuangJY, ChenHY, TanSL, ChianR-C.Effects of osmotic stress and cryoprotectant toxicity on mouse oocyte fertilization and subsequent embryonic development in vitro. Cell Preserv Tech 2006; 4: 149–160.
57. AliJ, SheltonJ.Vitrification of preimplantation stages of mouse embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 98: 459–465.
58. MukaidaT, WadaS, TakahashiK, et al. Vitrification of human embryos based on the assessment of suitable conditions for 8-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2874–2879.
59. KasaiM, KomiJ, TakakamoA, et al. A simple method for mouse embryo cryopreservation in a low toxicity vitrification solution, without appreciable loss of viability. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 89: 91–97.
60. VajtaG, NagyZP.Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 779–796.
61. KuwayamaM, VajtaG, IedaS, KatoO.Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 608–614.
62. LaneM, BavisterB, LyonsE, ForestK.Container-less vitrification of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17: 1234–1236.
63. LaneM, SchoolcraftW, GardnerD.Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 1073–1078.
64. VajtaG, HolmP, KuwayamaM, et al. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 51: 53–58.
65. VanderzwalmenP, BertinG, DebaucheC, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the Hemi-Straw carrier: application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1504–1511.
66. MartinoA, SongsasenN, LeiboS.Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod 1996; 54: 1059–1069.
67. HuangJYJ, ChenHY, TanSL, ChianR-C.Effect of choline-supplemented sodium-depleted slow freezing versus vitrification on mouse oocyte meiotic spindles and chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1093–1100.
68. HuangJYJ, ChenHY, ParkJYS, TanSL, ChianR-C.Comparison of spindle and chromosome configuration in in vitro- and in vivo-matured mouse oocytes after vitrification. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1424–1432.
69. SteerCV, MillsCL, TanSL, CampbellS, EdwardsRG.The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 117–119.
70. ChildTJ, Abdul-JalilAK, TanSL.Embryo morphology, cumulative embryo score, and outcome in an oocyte in vitro maturation program. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 424–425.
71. ChianR-C, KuwayamaM, TanL, TanJ, KatoO, NagaiT.High survival rate of bovine oocytes matured in vitro following vitrification. J Reprod Dev 2004; 50: 685–696.
72. DonnezJ, DolmansMM, DemylleD, et al. Restoration of ovarian function after orthotopic (intraovarian and periovarian) transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a woman treated by bone marrow transplantation for sickle cell anaemia: case report.Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 183–188.
73. GunbyJ, DayaS.Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 550–559.
74. AndersenAN, GianaroliL, FelberbaumR, de MouzonJ, NygrenKG.Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1680–1697.
75. ChianR-C, HuangJYJ, TanSL, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 608–610.
76. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2006.
77. RiesL, PercyC, BuninG. Introduction. In GurneyJ, LinetM, TamraT, YoungJ, BuninG, eds. Cancer Incidence and Survival among Children and Adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975–1995. [NIH Pub No 99–4649.] Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1999, pp. 1–15.
78. LoboRA. Potential options for preservation of fertility in women. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 64–73.
79. BleyerW.The impact of childhood cancer on the United States and the world. Cancer 1990; 40: 355–367.
80. TulandiT, Al-TookS.Laparoscopic ovarian suspension before irradiation. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 381–183.
81. OktayK, DemirtasE, SonWY, et al. In vitro maturation of germinal vesicle oocytes recovered after premature luteinizing hormone surge: description of a novel approach to fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2008; 89: 228.e19–e22.
82. HuangJY, BuckettWM, GilbertL, TanSL, ChianR-C.Retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: a case report on a new strategy of fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 542–544.
83. GidoniY, HolzerH, TanSL, TulandiT.Fertility preservation in non-oncologic patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16: 792–800.
84. ElizurSE, ChianR, PineauCA, et al. Fertility preservation treatment for young women with autoimmune disease facing treatment with gonadotoxic agents. Rheumatology 2008; 47: 1506–1509.
85. ElizurSE, ChianR-C, HolzerHEG, et al. Cryopreservation of oocytes in a young woman with severe and symptomatic endometriosis: a new indication for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 293. e1–e3.
86. LauNM, HuangJYJ, MacDonaldS, et al. Feasibility of fertility preservation in young females with Turner syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 520–523.
87. HuangJY, TulandiT, HolzerH, et al. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and in-vitro matured oocytes in a female with mosaic Turner syndromeHum Reprod 2008; 23: 336–339.
88. HuangJY, TulandiT, HolzerH, et al. Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: S127–S128.
89. GidoniYS, TakefmanJ, HolzerHEG, et al. Cryopreservation of a mother’s oocytes for possible future use by her daughter with Turner syndrome: case report. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: e9–e12.
90. HeffnerLJ.Advanced maternal age: how old is too old? N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1927–1929.

References

1. LeiboSP. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes. In TulandiT, GosdenR, eds. Preservation of Fertility. London: Taylor & Francis, 2004; pp. 141–154.
2. CattJ, WoodT, HenmanM, et al. Single embryo transfer in IVF to prevent multiple pregnancies. Twin Res 2003; 6: 536–539.
3. HenmanM, CattJW, WoodT, et al. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1620–1627.
4. de BoerKA, CattJW, JansenRP, et al. Moving to blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and single embryo transfer at Sydney IVF. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 295–298.
5. Jansen RP, Burton GJ.Mitochondrial dysfunction in reproduction. Mitochondrion 2004; 4: 577–600.
6. TaylorDM, HandysideAH, RayPF, et al. Quantitative measurement of transcript levels throughout human preimplantation development: analysis of hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase. Mol Hum Reprod 2001; 7: 147–154.
7. TelfordNA, WatsonAJ, SchultzGA.Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: a comparison of several species. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 26: 90–100.
8. CloustonHJ, HerbertM, FenwickJ, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 1143–1152.
9. ChenC.Pregnancy after human oocytes cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; 11: 884–886.
10. van UemJFHM, SiebzehnrüblER, SchuhB, et al. Birth after cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes. Lancet 1987; 8535: 752–753.
11. Al-HasaniS, DiedrichK, van der Ven, et al. Cryopreservation of human oocytesHum Reprod 1987; 2: 695–700.
12. TuckerM, WrightG, MortonF, et al. Preliminary experience with human oocytes cryopreservation using 1,2-propanediol and sucrose. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1513–1515.
13. PorcuE, FabbriR, Seracchioli, et al. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 724–726.
14. YoungE, KennyA, PuigdomenechE, et al. Triplet pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved oocytes: case report. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 360–361.
15. BoldtJ, ClineD, McLaughlinD.Human oocytes cryopreservation as an adjunct to IVF-embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2003;18: 1250–1255.
16. Kuleshova LL, Lopata A.Vitrification can be more favourable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449–454.
17. MohrLR, Trounson AO, Freeman L.Deep freezing and transfer of human embryos. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1985; 2: 1–10.
18. SiebzehnrüblER.Cryopreservation of gametes and cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 1989; 4(Suppl): 105–110.
19. TestartJ, LassaleB, FormanR, et al. Factors influencing the success of human embryo freezing in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 107.
20. VeeckLL, AmudsonCH, BrothmanLJ, et al. Significantly enhanced pregnancy rates per cycle through cryopreservation and thaw of pronuclear stage oocytes. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 1202–1207.
21. Van den AbbeelE, CampusM, van WaesbergheL, et al. A randomised comparison of the cryopreservation of one cell human embryos with a slow controlled cooling procedure or a rapid cooling procedure by direct plunging into liquid nitrogen. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1554–1560.
22. Al-HasaniS, DemirelLC, SchöpperB, et al. Pregnancies achieved after frozen-thawed pronuclear oocytes obtained by intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa extracted from frozen–thawed testicular tissues from non-obstructive azoospermic men. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2031–2035.
23. DamarioMA, HammittDG, GalantisTM, et al. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implication for timing of the freeze. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 1049–1054.
24. BoriniA, CattoliM, BullettiC, CoticchioG.Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1127: 49–58.
25. KuleshovaLL, GianaroliL, MagliC, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3077–3039.
26. YoonTK, ChungHM, LimJM, et al. Pregnancy and delivery of healthy infants developed from vitrified oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 180–181.
27. YoonTK, KimTJ, ParkSE, et al. Live birth after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programm. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1323–1326.
28. KatayamaKP, StehlikJ, KuwayamaM, et al. Huge survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 223–224.
29. ParkSP, KimEY, OhJH, et al. Ultra-rapid freezing of human multipronuclear oocytes using electron microscope grids. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1787–1790.
30. Selman HA, El-Danasouri I.Pregnancies derived from vitrified human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2002; 77, 422–423.
31. LiebermannJ, TuckerMJ, GrahamJR, et al. Blastocyst development after vitrification of multipronuclear oocytes using the Flexipet denuding pipette. RBM Online 2002; 4: 148–152.
32. LiebermannJ, NawrothF, IsachenkoV, et al. Potential importance of vitrification in reproductive medicine. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 1671–1680.
33. JelinkovaL, SelmanHA, AravA, et al. Twin pregnancy after vitrification of 2-pronuclei human embryos. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 412–414.
34. CiottiPM, PorcuE, NotarangeloL, et al. Meiotic spindle recovery is faster in vitrification of human oocytes compared to slow freezing. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2399–2407.
35. BagchiA, WoodsEJ, CritserJK. Cryopreservation and vitrification: recent advances in fertility preservation technologies. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5: 359–370.
36. Al-HasaniS, OzmenB, KoutlakiN, et al. Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing? RBM Online 2007; 14: 288–293.
37. ReedML, LaneM, GardnerDK, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts using the cryoloop method: successful clinical application and birth of offspring. J Assist Reprod Genet 2002; 19: 304–306.
38. VanderzwalmenP, BertinG, DebaucheCH, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the Hemi-Straw carrier: application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1504–1511.
39. MukaidaT, NakamuraS, TomiyamaT, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts using cryoloops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 384–391.
40. SonWY, YoonSH, ParkSJ, et al. Ongoing twin pregnancy after vitrification of blastocysts produced by in-vitro matured oocytes retrieved from a woman with polycystic ovary syndrome: case report. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2963–2966.
41. SonWY, LeeSY, ChangMJ, et al. Pregnancy resulting from transfer of repeat vitrified blastocysts produced by in-vitro matured oocytes in patient with polycystic ovary syndrome. RBM Online 2005; 10: 398–401.
42. TakahashiK, MukaidaT, GotoT, et al. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 88–92.
43. ZechNH, LejeuneB, ZechH, et al. Vitrification of hatching and hatched human blastocysts: effect of an opening in the zona pellucida before vitrification. RBM Online 2005; 11: 355–361.
44. LiebermannJ, TuckerMJ.Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 20–26.
45. HiraokaK, HiraokaK, KinutaniM, et al. Vitrification of human hatched blastocysts: a report of 4 cases. J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 413–415.
46. LeeSY, SonWY, YoonSH, et al. Clinical-pregnancy outcome after vitrification of blastocysts produced from in vitro maturation cycles. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 1449–1451.
47. BaudotA, AlgerL, BoutronP.Glass-forming tendency in the system water–dimethyl sulfoxide. Cryobiology 2000; 40: 151–158.
48. Kuleshova LL, Shaw JM.A strategy for rapid cooling of mouse embryos within a double straw to eliminate the risk of contamination during storage in liquid nitrogen. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2604–2609.
49. Palasz AT, Mapletoft RJ.Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos and oocytes: recent advances. Biotechnol Adv 1996; 14: 127–149.
50. MartinoA, Songansen N, Leibo SP.Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod 1996; 54: 1059–1069.
51. VajtaG, KuwayamaM, HolmP, et al. Open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 51: 53–58.
52. LaneM, BavisterBD, LyonsEA, et al. Containerless vitrification of mammalian oocytes. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17: 1234–1236.
53. Lane M, Gardner DK.Vitrification of mouse oocytes using a nylon loop. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 58: 342–347.
54. DinnyesA, DaiY, JiangS, et al. High developmental rates of vitrified bovine oocytes following parthenogenetic activation, in vitro fertilization, and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 2000; 63: 513–518.
55. Kuwayama M, Kato O.Successful vitrification of human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 549.
56. BerryED, DorsaWJ, SiragusaGR, et al. Bacterial cross-contamination of meat during liquid nitrogen immersion freezing. J Food Prot 1998; 61: 1103–1108.
57. KhuuHM, CowleyH, David-OcampoV, et al. Catastrophic failures of freezing bags for cellular therapy products: description, cause, and consequences. Cytotherapy 2002; 4: 539–549.
58. BielanskiA, Nadin-DavisS, SappT, et al. Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 2000; 40: 110–116.
59. BielanskiA, BergeronH, LauPC, et al. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 2003; 46: 146–152.
60. BielanskiA.Experimental microbial contamination and disinfection of dry (vapour) shipper dewars designed for short-term storage and transportation of cryopreserved germplasm and other biological specimens. Theriogenology 2005; 63: 1946–1957.
61. MorrisGJ.The origin, ultrastructure, and microbiology of the sediment accumulating in liquid nitrogen storage vessels. Cryobiology 2005; 50: 231–238.
62. FountainD, RalstonM, HigginsN, et al. Liquid nitrogen freezers: a potential source of microbial contamination of hematopoietic stem cell components. Transfusion 1997; 37: 585–591.
63. IsachenkoV, KatkovII, YakovenkoS, et al. Vitrification of human laser treated blastocysts within cut standard straws (CSS): novel aseptic packaging and reduced concentrations of cryoprotectants. Cryobiology 2007; 54: 305–309.
64. Veeck, LL.An Atlas of Human Gametes and Concepts. London:Parthenon, 1998; p. 215.
65. Veeck, LL, Zaninovic N.An Atlas of Human Blastocysts. London:Parthenon, 2003; p. 286.
66. IsachenkoV, MontagM, IsachenkoE, et al. Aseptic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open-pulled straws. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 492–496.
67. IsachenkoV, MontagM, IsachenkoE, et al. Aseptic vitrification of human germinal vesicle oocytes using dimethyl sulfoxide as a cryoprotectant. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 741–747.
68. Aramanovich IG, Levin VI.Equations of thermal conductivity. In Equations of Mathematical Physics. Moscow: Nauka, 1969, pp. 145–216.
69. KatkovII, IsachenkoV, IsachenkoE. Vitrification in small quenched volumes with a minimal amount of or without vitrificants: biophysics and thermodynamics in vitrification in assisted reproduction. In TuckerMJ, LiebermannJ, eds. A User’s Manual and Troubleshooting Guide. Oxford: Informa Healthcare, 2007, pp. 21–32.
70. NaveCR.HyperPhysics. 2005:// hyperphysics. phy-astrastr.gsu.edu/hbase/hph.html (accessed October 5, 2009).
71. IsachenkoV, MontagM, IsachenkoE, et al. Aseptic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open-pulled straws. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 492–496.
72. Rall WF, Fahy GM.Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196°C by vitrification. Nature 1985; 313: 573–575.
73. VincentC, PickeringSJ, JohnsonMH, et al. Dimethyl sulphoxide affects the organization of microfilaments in the mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 26: 227–235.
74. BouquetM, SelvaJ, AurouxM.Effect of cooling and equilibration in DMSO, and cryopreservation of mouse oocytes, on the rates of in vitro fertilization, development and chromosomal abnormalities. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 40: 110–115.
75. HuangCC, LeeTH, ChenSU, et al. Successful pregnancy following blastocyst cryopreservation using super-cooling ultra-rapid vitrification. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 122–128.
76. IsachenkoV, IsachenkoE, KatkovII, et al. Cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification and freezing in vapor: effect on motility, DNA integrity, and fertilization ability. Biol Reprod 2004; 71: 1167–1173.
77. IsachenkoV, MontagM, IsachenkoE, et al. Vitrification of mouse pronuclear embryos after polar body biopsy without direct contact with liquid nitrogen. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1011–1016.
78. RallWF.Factor affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology 1987; 24: 387–402.
79. Rall WF, Wood MJ.High in vitro and in vivo survival of day 3 mouse embryos vitrified in a non-toxic solution of glycerol and albumin. J Reprod Fertil 1994; 101: 681–688.
80. IsachenkoV, Perez-SanchezF, IsachenkoE, et al. Vitrification of GV-porcine oocytes with intact intracellular lipids: effect of the cryoprotectant saturation/dilution stepping, elevated temperature and cytoskeletal inhibitor. Cryobiology 1998; 36: 250–253.
81. IsachenkoV, GorbunovL, IsachenkoE, et al. Some physical and technological aspects of GV porcine oocyte vitrification. Cryobiology 1999; 39: 35.
82. IsachenkoV, IsachenkoE, MontagM, et al. Clean technique of cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa. RBM Online 2005; 10: 350–354.
83. ScottL, AlveroR, LeondiresM, et al. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2394–2403.
84. IsachenkoV, TodorovP, DimitrovY, et al. Integrity rate of pronuclei after cryopreservation of pronuclear-zygotes as a criteria for subsequent embryo development and pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 819–826.
85. SennA, UrnerF, ChansonA, et al. Morphological scoring of human pronuclear zygotes for prediction of pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 234–239.
86. IsachenkoV, MontagM, IsachenkoE, et al. Developmental rate and ultrastructure of vitrified human pronuclear oocytes after stepwise versus direct rehydration. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 660–665.
87. IsachenkoV, SelmanH, IsachenkoE, et al. Effect of cryoprotectants on the ultrastructure of cooled human pronuclear oocytes. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 720–722.
88. IsachenkoV, SelmanH, IsachenkoE, et al. Modified vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes: efficacy and effect on ultrastructure. RBM Online 2003; 7: 211–216.
89. YokotaY, SatoS, YokotaM, ArakiY.Birth of a healthy baby following vitrification of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 1027–1029.
90. YokotaY, YokotaH, YokotaM, et al. Birth of healthy twins from in vitro development of human refrozen embryos. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 1063–1065.
91. ChoHJ, SonWY, YoonSH, et al. An improved protocol for dilution of cryoprotectants from vitrified human blastocysts, Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2419–2422.

References

1. VegettiW, MarozziA, ManfrediniE, et al. Premature ovarían failure. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161: 53–57.
2. PortnoiMF, AbouraA, TachdjianG, et al. Molecular cytogenetic studies of Xq critical regions in premature ovarian failure patients. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2329–2334.
3. LiXH, ChenSU, ZhangX, et al. Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important sourse of oocyte donation: a clinical report of successful pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3390–3394.
4. ShulmanA, FrenkelY, Dor Jehoshua, et al. The best donor. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2493–2499.
5. CheckJH, ChoeJK, Nazari, A, et al. Fresh embryo transfer is more effective than frozen for donor oocyte recipients but not for donor. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1403–1408.
6. FabbriR, PorcuE, MarsellaT, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 411–416.
7. GhetlerY, SkutelskyE, BenNun I, et al. Human oocyte cryopreservation and the fate of cortical granules. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 210–215.
8. ChenC. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet 1986; i: 884–886.
9. OkayK, PelinC, BangH. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 70–79.
10. ChenSU, LienYR, ChenHF, et al. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1975–1980.
11. KatayamaKP, StehlikJ, KuwayamaM, et al. High survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 223–224.
12. KuleshovaL, GianaroliL, MagliC, et al. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3077–3079.
13. LindheimSR, FrumovitzMV, SauerM. Recruitment and screening policies and procedures used to establish a paid donor oocyte registry. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2020–2024.
14. BirminghanA. Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:S39-S50.
15. MarinaS, ExpósitoR, MarinaF, et al. Oocyte donor selection from 554 candidates. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2770–2776.
16. HøjgaardA, IngerslevHJ, DinesenJ. Friendly IVF: patient opinions. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1391–1396.
17. IngeGB, BrinsdenPR, ElderKT. Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 588–592.
18. KadochIJ. Spontaneous ovulation rate before oocyte retrieval in modified natural cycle IVF with and without indomethacin. Reprod Bio Med Online 2008; 16: 245–249.
19. TuckerMJ, MortonPC, WrightG, et al. Clinical application of human egg cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3156–3159.
20. PorcuE, FabbriR, SeracchioliR, et al. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 724–726.
21. MullenSF, AgcaY, BroermannDC, et al. The effects of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2004; 5: 1148–1154.
22. PickeringSJ, BraudePR, JohnsonMH, et al. Transient cooling to room temperature can use irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 102–108.
23. KuleshovaLL, LopataA. Vitrification can be more favourable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 449–454.
24. ChianR-C, KuwayamaM, Tan L, et al. High survival rate of bovine oocyte matured in vitro following vitrification. J Reprod Develop 2004; 50: 685–696.
25. KuwayamaM. High efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11: 300–308.
26. LucenaE, BernalD, LucenaC, et al. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 108–111.
27. HongSW, ChungHM, LimJM, et al. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 142–146.
28. MichalasS, LoutradisD, DrakakisP, et al. A flexible protocol for the induction of recipient endometrial cycle in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1063–1066.
29. ApplebaumM. The uterine biophysical profile. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 67–68.
30. NottolaSA, Macchiarelli, CoticchioG, et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocyte after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1123–1132.
31. LarmanMG, Katz-JaffeMG, SheehanCB, GardnerDK. 1,2-Propanediol and the type of cryopreservation procedure adversely affect mouse oocyte physiology. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 250–259.
32. LudwingM, Al-HasaniS, FelberbaumR, et al. New aspects of cryopreservation of oocyte and embryos in assisted reproduction and future perspectives. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 162–168.
33. American Fertility Society. Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 1993; 58: 55–75.
34. ResnikDB. The commodification of human reproductive materials. J Med Ethics 1998; 24: 338–339.

References

1. AndersenAN, GoosensV, GianaroliL, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1513–1525.
2. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1253–1256.
3. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART Clinical Summary Report 2005. Birmingham, AL: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, www.sartcorsonline.com/rpt.
4. AdamsonGD, de MouzonJ, LancasterP, for the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology, . World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1586–1622.
5. AuerbachS.Fears aired in test tube baby debate. Washington Post 1974; Jul 21: A1.
6. WrightP.Less risk of test-tube baby being born with brain damage, doctor says. The Times 1974; Sept 7: 4.
7. FitzgeraldJ.Veto in vitro, or turn off the tube. Can Fam Physician 1978; 24: 816.
8. HarwoodK.Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics 2009; 23: 39–46.
9. GooldI, SavalescuJ.In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics 2009; 23: 47–58.
10. CaoYX, XingQ, LiL, et al. Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1306–1311
11. TedderRS, ZukermanMA, GoldstoneAH, et al. Hepatitis transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet 1995; 346: 137–140.
12. ChanBC, LaoTT.Effect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 102: 237–241.
13. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. ASRM Urges Caution, Strong Counseling for Women Seeking Egg Freezing. Washington, DC: American Society for Reproductivve Medicine, October 16, 2007, http://www.asrm.org/Media/Press/AM07urgecautioneggfreezing.html.
14. Jones HW, Jr., AcostaAA, AndrewsMC, et al. What is a pregnancy? A question for programs of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 728–733.
15. WinterE, WangJ, DaviesMJ, NormanR.Early pregnancy loss following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3220–3223.
16. BuckettWM, ChianR-C, DeanNL, et al. Pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived following in vitro oocyte maturation (IVM), conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 546–550.
17. BellverJ, AlbertC, LabartaE, PellicerA.Early pregnancy loss in women stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols according to oral contraceptive pill pretreatment. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1089–1101.
18. European Recombinant LH Study Group. Human recombinant luteinizing hormone is as effective as, but safer than, urinary human chorionic gonadotropin in inducing final follicular maturation and ovulation in in vitro fertilization procedures: results of a multicenter double-blind study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 2607–2618.
19. BarlowP, LejeuneB, PuissantF, et al. Early pregnancy loss and obstetrical risk after in-vitro fertilization and embryo replacement. Hum Reprod 1988; 3: 671–675.
20. MillerJF, WilliamsonE, GlueJ, et al. Fetal loss after implantation: a prospective study. Lancet 1980; ii: 554–556.
21. ReganL, BraudeP, TrembathPL.Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. Br Med J 1989; 299: 541–545.
22. Nybo AndersenAM, WohlfahrtJ, ChristensP, et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage. Br Med J 2000; 320: 1708–1712.
23. BuckettW, ReganL. Sporadic and recurrent miscarriage. In ShawRA, SoutterWP, StantonSL, eds. Gynaecology, 3rd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2003, pp. 343–360.
24. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 19–25.
25. HomburgR.Pregnancy complications in PCOS. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 20: 281–292.
26. MacGregorAH, JohnsonJE, BundeCA.Further clinical experience with clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril 1968; 19: 616–622.
27. FarrSL, SchieveLA, JamiesonDJ.Pregnancy loss among pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1999–2002. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165: 1380–1386.
28. WangJX, DaviesMJ, NormanRJ.Polycystic ovarian syndrome and the risk of spontaneous abortion following assisted reproductive technology treatment. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2606–2609.
29. MaheshwariA, StofbergL, BhattacharyaS.Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13: 433–444.
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current trends in ectopic pregnancy-United States, 1990–1992. MMWR Surveill Summ 1995; 44: 46–48.
31. FosasN, MarinaF, TorresPJ, et al. The births of five Spanish babies from cryopreserved donated oocytes. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1417–1421
31. FosasN, MarinaF, TorresPJ, et al. The births of five Spanish babies from cryopreserved donated oocytes. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1417–1421.
32. Ribic-PuceljM, TomazevicT, VoglerA, Meden-VrtovecH.Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12: 594–598.
33. DubuissonJB, AubriotFX, MathieuL, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in 556 pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: implications for preventive management. Fertil Steril 1991; 56: 686–690.
34. VerhulstG, CamusM, BollenN, Van SteirteghemA, DevroeyP.Analysis of the risk factors with regard to the occurrence of ectopic pregnancy after medically assisted procreation. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1284–1287.
35. ClaytonHB, SchieveLA, PetersonHB, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 595–604.
36. BuckettWM, ChianR-C, DeanNL, et al. Pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived after in vitro oocyte maturation, conventional in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 546–550.
37. BrighamSA, ConlonC, FarquharsonRG.A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2868–2871.
38. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Stillbirth, Neonatal and Post-neonatal Mortality 2000–2003, England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. London: RCOG Press, 2005.
39. MorinNC, WirthFH, JohnsonDH, et al. Congenital malformations and psychosocial development in children conceived by in vitro fertilization. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 222–227.
40. SutcliffeAG, D’SouzaSW, CadmanJ, et al. Minor congenital anomalies, major congenital malformations and development in children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 3332–3337.
41. IsakssonR, GisslerM, TiitinenA.Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1755–1761.
42. KlemettiR, GissierM, SevonT, et al. Children born after assisted fertilization have an increased rate of major congenital anomalies. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1300–1307.
43. OlsonCK, Keppler-NoreuilKM, RomittiPA, et al. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1308–1315.
44. HansenM, BowerC, MilneE, de KlerkN, KurinczukJJ.Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects: a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 328–338.
45. Dhont M, de Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A.Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 688–695.
46. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 725–730.
47. EricsonA, KallenB.Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 504–509.
48. Westergaard HB, Johansen AM, Erb K, Andersen AN.Danish national in-vitro fertilization registry 1994 and 1995: a controlled study of births, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1896–1902.
49. KoivurovaS, KartikainenAL, GisslerM, et al. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1391–1398.
50. BonduelleM, LiebaersI, DeketelaereV, et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991–1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983–1999). Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 671–694.
51. PlaceI, EnglertY.A prospective longitudinal study of the physical, psychomotor, and intellectual development of singleton children up to 5 years who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with children conceived spontaneously and by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1388–1397.
52. BuckettW, AirdL, LuckasM, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Karyotyping should be done before treatment. Br Med J 1996; 313: 1334.
53. GekasJ, ThepotF, TurleauC. For the Association des Cytogeneticiens de Langue Francaise. Chromosomal factors of infertility in candidate couples for ICSI: an equal risk of constitutional aberrations in women and men. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 82–90.
54. GosdenR, TraslerJ, LuciferoD, FaddyM.Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003; 361: 1974–1977.
55. ChangAS, MoleyKH, WanglerM, FeinbergAP, DebaunMR.Association between Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproductive technology: a case series of 19 patients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 349–354.
56. LudwigM, KatalinicA, GrossS, et al. Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 2890–2891.
57. WoodC, TrounsonA, LeetonJF, et al. Clinical features of eight pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 22–29.
58. MushinD, SpensleyJ, Barreda-HansonM.Children of IVF. Clin Obstet Gynacol 1985; 12: 865–876.
59. BissonnetteF, CohenJ, CollinsJ, et al. Incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 773–790.
60. HelmerhorstFM, PerquinDAM, DonkerD, KeirseMJNC.Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. Br Med J 2004; 328: 261.
61. JacksonRA, GibsonKA, WuYW, CroughanMS.Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 551–563.
62. RimmAA, KatayamaAC, DiazM, KatayamaKP.A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004; 21: 437–443.
63. LinderN, HaskinO, LevitO, et al. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight premature infants: a retrospective case–control study. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 590–595.
64. OlivennesF, FanchinR, LedeeN, et al. Perinatal outcome and developmental studies on children born after IVF. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 117–128.
65. StrombergB, DahlquistG, EricsonA, et al. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet 2002; 359: 461–465.
66. De GeyterM, SteimannS, HolzgreveW, De GeyterC. First delivery of healthy offspring after freezing and thawing of oocytes in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2007; 137: 443–447.
67. ChianR-C, GilbertL, HuangJY, et al. Live birth after vitrification of in vitro matured human oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 372–376.
68. KyonoK, NakajoY, NishinakaC, et al. A birth from the transfer of a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst using intracytoplasmic sperm injection with calcium ionophore oocyte activation in a globozoospermic patient. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 931.e7–e11.
69. BoriniA, BianchiV, Bonu MA, et al. Evidence based clinical outcome of oocyte slow cooling. Reprod BioMed Online 2007; 15: 175–181.
70. AlbaniE, BarbieriJ, NovaraPV, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation. Placenta 2008; 29(Suppl B): 143–146.
71. ChianR-C, HuangJY, TanSL, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 608–610.
72. QuintansCJ, DonaldsonMJ, BertolinoMV, PasqualiniRS.Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3149–3152.
73. KoncJ, KanyoK, VargaE, KristonR, CsehS.Births resulting from oocyte cryopreservation using a slow freezing protocol with propanediol and sucrose. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2008; 54: 205–210.
74. BoriniA, SciajnoR, BianchiV, et al. Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 512–517.
75. SherG, KeskintepeL, MukaidaT, et al. Selective vitrification of euploid oocytes markedly improves survival, fertilization and pregnancy-generating potential. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 524–529.
76. KimTJ, LauferLR, HongSW.Vitrification of oocytes produces high pregnancy rates when carried out in fertile women. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 467–474.
77. ChangCC, ShapiroDB, BernalDP, et al. Human oocyte vitrification: in-vivo and in-vitro maturation outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 684–688.
78. ChianR-C, HuangJY, GilbertL, et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 2391–2398.
79. YoonTK, LeeDR, ChaSK, et al. Rate of human oocytes and pregnancy outcome after vitrification using slush nitrogen in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 952–956.
80. AntinoriM, LicataE, DaniG, et al. Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 72–79.
81. LiY, ChenZJ, YangHJ, et al. Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2007; 42: 753–755.
82. EzcurraD, RangnowJ, CraigM, SchertzJ.The HOPE Registry: first US registry for oocyte cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 743–744.
83. ChenSU, LienYR, TsaiYY, et al. Successful pregnancy occurred from slowly freezing human oocytes using the regime of 1.5 mol/l 1,2- propanediol with 0.3 mol/l sucrose. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1412.
84. DingJ, RanaN, DmowskiWP.Successful pregnancies after oocyte cryopreservation with slow-freezing method: a report of 3 cases. J Reprod Med 2008; 53: 813–820.
85. YangD, BrownSE, NguyenK, et al. Live birth after the transfer of human embryos developed from cryopreserved oocytes harvested before cancer treatment. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 1469.
86. ParmegianiL, FabbriR, CognigniGE, et al. Blastocyst formation, pregnancy, and birth derived from human oocytes cryopreserved for 5 years. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 2014.